[Bug 1718227] Re: replacement of ifupdown with netplan needs integration for /etc/network/if{up, down}.d scripts
For ethtool the if-up.d script is actual integration of hardware
settings from ifupdown, i.e. it is parsing ifupdown settings in order to
get them applied to the device via ethtool.
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-
team/ethtool/-/blob/master/debian/ethtool.if-up?ref_type=heads
This is not relevant for Netplan/systemd-networkd as it can control such
ethtool settings itself (e.g. via .link files).
** Changed in: ethtool (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718227
Title:
replacement of ifupdown with netplan needs integration for
/etc/network/if{up,down}.d scripts
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aiccu/+bug/1718227/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1718227] Re: replacement of ifupdown with netplan needs integration for /etc/network/if{up, down}.d scripts
For ethtool the if-up.d script is actual integration of hardware
settings from ifupdown, i.e. it is parsing ifupdown settings in order to
get them applied to the device via ethtool.
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-
team/ethtool/-/blob/master/debian/ethtool.if-up?ref_type=heads
This is not relevant for Netplan/systemd-networkd as it can control such
ethtool settings itself (e.g. via .link files).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718227
Title:
replacement of ifupdown with netplan needs integration for
/etc/network/if{up,down}.d scripts
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aiccu/+bug/1718227/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1980663] Re: [MIR] false-positives, do not promote
dpkg-dev (in main) Recommends "fakeroot". But fakeroot FTBFS on armhf/oracular, therefore component-mismatches tries to pull in "pseudo", which Provides: fakeroot. ** Also affects: pseudo (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: pseudo (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980663 Title: [MIR] false-positives, do not promote To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/esmtp/+bug/1980663/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071396] Re: [MIR] libdisplay-info
an/rules is rather clean - It is not on the lto-disabled list Problems: - Ubuntu does carry a delta => try upstreaming the tests and debhelper changes - the current release is not packaged: We have v0.2.0 as of mid-June - Upstream update history is sporadic (only 3 releases so far, new project) - Debian/Ubuntu update history is sporadic [Upstream red flags] OK: - no Errors during the build - no incautious use of malloc/sprintf (as far as we can check it) - no use of sudo, gksu, pkexec, or LD_LIBRARY_PATH - no use of user nobody - no use of setuid / setgid - no important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu - no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit or libseed - not part of the UI for extra checks - no translation present, but none needed for this case (user visible)? Problems: - Warnings during build: ../gtf.c:116:12: warning: ‘pixel_freq’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] ../gtf.c:114:40: warning: ‘h_blank_pixels’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] ../gtf.c:113:44: warning: ‘total_pixels’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] ../gtf.c:112:22: warning: ‘v_sync_bp’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] ../di-edid-decode/edid.c:500:51: warning: ‘hratio’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] ../di-edid-decode/edid.c:500:61: warning: ‘vratio’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] ** Changed in: libdisplay-info (Ubuntu) Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) => Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) ** Changed in: libdisplay-info (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071396 Title: [MIR] libdisplay-info To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdisplay-info/+bug/2071396/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1664818] Re: Not possible to render pre-up, pre-down, post-up, or post-down snippets
The website/FAQ was updated according to comment #11 https://netplan.io/faq#use-pre-up%2C-post-up%2C-etc.-hook-scripts ** Changed in: netplan Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1664818 Title: Not possible to render pre-up, pre-down, post-up, or post-down snippets To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1664818/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2070434] Re: Configurate a IPv6 only and IPv4 disabled networking by netplan
I'm closing this ticket in favour of the support request (question) linked from the comment above. ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070434 Title: Configurate a IPv6 only and IPv4 disabled networking by netplan To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2070434/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2041727] Re: "netplan apply" produces ovsdb-server.service WARNING even when openvswitch-switch not installed
Released as of Netplan v1.0 ** Changed in: netplan Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Low Status: Triaged ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2041727 Title: "netplan apply" produces ovsdb-server.service WARNING even when openvswitch-switch not installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2041727/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072486] Re: netplan-ovs-cleanup.service is marked world-inaccessible
This warning doesn't seem to cause any harm. But it should probably be document that nobody should put secret data into .service units (e.g. through Netplan's OVS integration), because that would still be world readable by calling "systemctl cat UNIT_NAME.service". We should update Netplan's threat model about that https://netplan.readthedocs.io/en/stable/security/ ** Tags added: docs documentation ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072486 Title: netplan-ovs-cleanup.service is marked world-inaccessible To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2072486/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071747] Re: netplan causes unresponsive system with certain nsswitch config
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1999178 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999178 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1999178 netplan generator causes deadlock during systemd daemon-reload -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071747 Title: netplan causes unresponsive system with certain nsswitch config To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2071747/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2070434] Re: Configurate a IPv6 only and IPv4 disabled networking by netplan
Related to https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+question/816875 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070434 Title: Configurate a IPv6 only and IPv4 disabled networking by netplan To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2070434/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1999178] Re: netplan generator causes deadlock during systemd daemon-reload
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999178 Title: netplan generator causes deadlock during systemd daemon-reload To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1999178/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1987842] Re: wireguard: netdev file can leak private key
fixed in 1.0.1 upstream ** Changed in: netplan Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987842 Title: wireguard: netdev file can leak private key To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1987842/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2020409] Re: can't move mellanox interface to switchdev when SR-IOV disable
released as 1.0.1 ** Changed in: netplan Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020409 Title: can't move mellanox interface to switchdev when SR-IOV disable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2020409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055148] Re: NetworkManager connections with an explicit DoT (DNS over TLS) are not supported with Netplan
fixed in https://github.com/canonical/netplan/releases/tag/1.0.1 ** Changed in: netplan Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055148 Title: NetworkManager connections with an explicit DoT (DNS over TLS) are not supported with Netplan To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2055148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066344] Re: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256
upstream bug filed: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/33619 ** Bug watch added: github.com/systemd/systemd/issues #33619 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/33619 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344 Title: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071363] Re: netplan apply triggers udev add events for every network interface
systemd-udevd does not apply ethtool changes, that are defined in a .link file, on a CHANGE uevent anymore, as of systemd v265. It still seems to apply those changes for ADD, BIND & MOVE udev actions, though. Going with a MOVE action seems more senstible here, as that should cover all the cases Netplan needs and avoid triggering the above mentioned cloud-init rule, running on ADD uevents. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071363 Title: netplan apply triggers udev add events for every network interface To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2071363/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071722] Re: Maintenance seems to have stalled
I noticed that the build-system is pretty outdated while working on this: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tftp- hpa/5.2+20150808-1.4ubuntu3 Also, test coverage is bad. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071722 Title: Maintenance seems to have stalled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tftp-hpa/+bug/2071722/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071722] [NEW] Maintenance seems to have stalled
Public bug reported: The last non-NMU for tftp-hpa in Debian was in 2015. There seems to be some recent upstream activity, though (and a pending 5.3) release: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/tftp/tftp- hpa.git/log/ As the owning team in Ubuntu "main", please consider helping to better maintain this package or replacing it in main my something else. Note This bug was raised to the MIR discussions around: https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues/55 ** Affects: tftp-hpa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071722 Title: Maintenance seems to have stalled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tftp-hpa/+bug/2071722/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071363] Re: netplan apply triggers udev add events for every network interface
** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071363 Title: netplan apply triggers udev add events for every network interface To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2071363/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071363] Re: netplan apply triggers udev add events for every network interface
Might be related to https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/479 (parts of it landed in the oracular package already) ** Tags added: fr-8086 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071363 Title: netplan apply triggers udev add events for every network interface To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2071363/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2038648] Re: package sosreport 4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed sosreport package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
After working my way through bug #2054395, I'm also sponsoring this, even tough Bionic is end-of-standard-support already. I'll leave it to the SRU team to accept or reject it. The change generally LGTM. I forward-ported the debdiff from comment #27 on top of the most recent 4.5.3ubuntu0.18.04.1 version in Bionic, resolving conflicts in d/changelog. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038648 Title: package sosreport 4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed sosreport package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2038648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054395] Re: [sru] sos upstream 4.7.2
After some brief discussion on IRC today, we agreed to move python3-boto3 from Suggests to Recommends (instead of Depends), as it's considered to be an optional dependency. Remarks from comments #43 and #50 seem to be addressed (for oracular), I can confirm that the changes match the upstream 4.7.2 sources. Uploading to oracular. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054395 Title: [sru] sos upstream 4.7.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-pro/+bug/2054395/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069308] Re: MIR xdg-terminal-exec
tion present, but none needed for this case (user visible)? Problems: None ** Changed in: xdg-terminal-exec (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: xdg-terminal-exec (Ubuntu) Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069308 Title: MIR xdg-terminal-exec To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-terminal-exec/+bug/2069308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066700] Re: systemd-networkd is inactive by default since ubuntu 23.10?
To differentiate an Ubuntu server system from an Ubuntu desktop system you should check with seeds/meta-package you have installed. e.g.: $ dpkg -l | grep "ubuntu-desktop-minimal" # or "ubuntu-server-minimal" This is generated through the Ubuntu seeds and could be the authoritative way to check the type of system you're using. PS: I'm closing this bug as "Invalid", as stated in comment #2 networkd is only enabled on Ubuntu server systems, NetworkManager only on Ubuntu desktop systems (by default), so I guess we're seeing the expeted behavior here. Please comment & re-open if you feel otherwise. ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066700 Title: systemd-networkd is inactive by default since ubuntu 23.10? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066700/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066700] Re: systemd-networkd is inactive by default since ubuntu 23.10?
More recently the Desktop enablement configuration moved to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066700 Title: systemd-networkd is inactive by default since ubuntu 23.10? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066700/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069495] Re: Netplan generator causes systemd, apt and unlock hangs on 24.04
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1999178 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999178 Thanks for reporting this issue! I'm marking this as a duplicate of bug #1999178 Let's try to keep the discussion in one place. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1999178 netplan generator causes deadlock during systemd daemon-reload -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069495 Title: Netplan generator causes systemd, apt and unlock hangs on 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2069495/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069308] Re: MIR xdg-terminal-exec
** Changed in: xdg-terminal-exec (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069308 Title: MIR xdg-terminal-exec To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-terminal-exec/+bug/2069308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066344] Re: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344 Title: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066272] Re: [MIR] libpanel
- no important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu - no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit or libseed - part of the UI, no .desktop file needed (it's an UI library) - translation present Problems: None ** Changed in: libpanel (Ubuntu) Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) => Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) ** Changed in: libpanel (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066272 Title: [MIR] libpanel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpanel/+bug/2066272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066344] Re: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344 Title: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066344] Re: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256
See: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/netplan.io/-/merge_requests/15 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344 Title: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066344] Re: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256
It's a change in behaviour in systemd-udevd AFAIU (at this point), which Netplan probably should adapt to. But I'm not yet sure _how_ it needs to adapt. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344 Title: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1987842] Re: wireguard: netdev file can leak private key
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987842 Title: wireguard: netdev file can leak private key To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1987842/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066272] Re: [MIR] libpanel
At first glance, this looks like it does not need security-review. I'll do a full MIR review later. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066272 Title: [MIR] libpanel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpanel/+bug/2066272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063260] Re: ovn-ic: systemd service does not use ovn_ctl_opts
Sponsored a "maysync1" upload that will be replaced by the next Debian upload: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/24.03.2-2maysync1 ** Changed in: ovn (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063260 Title: ovn-ic: systemd service does not use ovn_ctl_opts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/+bug/2063260/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063260] Re: ovn-ic: systemd service does not use ovn_ctl_opts
Will be landing in Debian via https://salsa.debian.org/openstack- team/third-party/ovn/-/commit/d082e0ee08e0672d544b57110846b92f413f77c9 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063260 Title: ovn-ic: systemd service does not use ovn_ctl_opts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/+bug/2063260/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061637] Re: [SRU] xx-svn-review crashed with ModuleNotFoundError
I can see all debdiffs landed in the unapproved queues. Marking the bug status accordingly and unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors. ** Changed in: xxdiff (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: xxdiff (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: xxdiff (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061637 Title: [SRU] xx-svn-review crashed with ModuleNotFoundError To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xxdiff/+bug/2061637/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061668] Re: [SRU] evtx_filter_records.py crashed with ModuleNotFoundError in Noble
This doesn't seem to introduce a component-mismatch, so adding the new runtime dependeny should be fine IMO. LGTM. Sponsored the SRU for Noble, Mantic, Jammy, Focal ** Changed in: python-evtx (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: python-evtx (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: python-evtx (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: python-evtx (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061668 Title: [SRU] evtx_filter_records.py crashed with ModuleNotFoundError in Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-evtx/+bug/2061668/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1957168] Re: [SRU] fwbuilder crashes in Noble when trying to create almost any type of new object
I'll unsubscribe ~ubuntu-sponsors for now. Feel free to re-subscribe once a debdiff for Focal is prepared ad well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957168 Title: [SRU] fwbuilder crashes in Noble when trying to create almost any type of new object To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwbuilder/+bug/1957168/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1957168] Re: [SRU] fwbuilder crashes in Noble when trying to create almost any type of new object
Sponsored Mantic, too: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/mantic/+queue?queue_state=1_text=fwbuilder And Jammy, as well https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1_text=fwbuilder ** Changed in: fwbuilder (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: fwbuilder (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957168 Title: [SRU] fwbuilder crashes in Noble when trying to create almost any type of new object To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwbuilder/+bug/1957168/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1957168] Re: [SRU] fwbuilder crashes in Noble when trying to create almost any type of new object
Thanks, the Noble patch matches upstream and looks good to me. Sponsored, with a modified version string, initially. But you were actually right, as we have the same revision in multiple Ubuntu series, so I re-uploaded with your proposed version string. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+queue?queue_state=1_text=fwbuilder ** Changed in: fwbuilder (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957168 Title: [SRU] fwbuilder crashes in Noble when trying to create almost any type of new object To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwbuilder/+bug/1957168/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058914] Re: [FFe] python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7
The work landed in Oracular. I unsubscribed ~ubuntu-sponsors, as the SRU work got orphaned according to comment #11. Please re-subscribe ~ubuntu-sponsors should you need SRU-sponsorship in the future. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058914 Title: [FFe] python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/2058914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067544] Re: [BPO] package-notes/13 from oracular
** Changed in: package-notes (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067544 Title: [BPO] package-notes/13 from oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/package-notes/+bug/2067544/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067544] Re: [BPO] package-notes/13 from oracular
Thanks, lgtm. Sponsored. I guess we now need somebody from the [backporters] team to review & approve the upload. [backporters] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-backporters/+members -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067544 Title: [BPO] package-notes/13 from oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/package-notes/+bug/2067544/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067373] Re: [MIR] provd
entralized online accounts (Ubuntu Pro)
- does deal with system authentication (gdm setup, active directory)
- does deal with cryptography (password hashes)
- this high risk application could make more use of mitigation features
(dropping permissions, using temporary environments, restricted users/groups,
seccomp, systemd isolation features, apparmor, ...)
[Common blockers]
OK:
- does not FTBFS currently
- does have a test suite that runs at build time
- test suite fails will fail the build upon error.
- does have a non-trivial test suite that runs as autopkgtest
- This does not need special HW for build or test
- no new python2 dependency
- Go package, but using dh-golang
Problems:
- running "go test" unit tests as autopkgtest. Maybe some integration tests
using the "ubuntu-desktop-init" snap would be helpful, too.
[Packaging red flags]
OK:
- Ubuntu does not carry a delta (Ubuntu native package)
- symbols tracking not applicable for this kind of code.
- debian/watch is not present but also not needed (e.g. native)
- Upstream update history is sporadic – its a native package after all
- promoting this does not seem to cause issues for MOTUs that so far
maintained the package
- no massive Lintian warnings
- debian/rules is rather clean
- It is not on the lto-disabled list
Problems:
- Debian/Ubuntu update history is sporadic (not a lot of history, being a new
package)
- the current release is not packaged, upstream (GitHub) contains 0.1.4, should
be an easy upgrade from 0.1.2
- lintian warnings:
I: provd source: missing-built-using-field-for-golang-package (in section for
provd) [debian/control:18]
I: provd source: unused-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-3
[debian/copyright:353]
Nitpicks:
I: provd: spelling-error-in-binary acccessed accessed [usr/libexec/provd]
I: provd: spelling-error-in-binary compatibile compatible [usr/libexec/provd]
I: provd: spelling-error-in-binary divison division [usr/libexec/provd]
I: provd: spelling-error-in-binary standar standard [usr/libexec/provd]
I: provd: spelling-error-in-binary standart standard [usr/libexec/provd]
[Upstream red flags]
OK:
- no Errors during the build
- no incautious use of malloc/sprintf (the language has no direct MM)
=> some "unsafe" code in internal/services/user/password_hash.go
- no use of user nobody
- no important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu
- no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit or libseed
- not part of the UI for extra checks
- no translation present, but none needed for this case
Problems:
- use of sudo, gksu, pkexec, or LD_LIBRARY_PATH
=> sprovd/sprovd.go wraps "sudo pro attach"
- use of setuid / setgid in /usr/libexec/sprovd
=> prefer systemd to set those flags, or give rationale why it's done another
way
- Warnings during the build:
go: warning: "./..." matched no packages
? github.com/canonical/ubuntu-desktop-provision/provd [no test files]
# github.com/linuxdeepin/go-gir/gobject-2.0
fix_gobject.c: In function ‘_g_type_param_value_array’:
fix_gobject.c:74:13: warning: Deprecated pre-processor symbol
74 | GType _g_type_param_value_array() { return
G_TYPE_PARAM_VALUE_ARRAY; }
| ^~~
** Changed in: provd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067373
Title:
[MIR] provd
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/provd/+bug/2067373/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067373] Re: [MIR] provd
There are several MIR TODOs for the desktop team in comment #1, but I'm already assigning it to the security team, as I think both topics can be worked on in parallel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067373 Title: [MIR] provd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/provd/+bug/2067373/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066344] Re: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256
See: https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/479 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344 Title: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066344] Re: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256
Having a closer look, this sounds like a real regression in systemd-udev. Please double-check that "ReceiveChecksumOffload=" (inside a .link) file is working properly with systemd v256 Netplan's tests seem to work otherwise, except when the new systemd is pulled in. It fails for Netplan's sd-networkd & NetworkManager backends, because both make use of systemd-udev .link files. There's no special handling for NetworkManager here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344 Title: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066344] [NEW] netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256
Public bug reported: Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1071220: [, ] ** Affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: netplan.io (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1071220 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071220 ** Changed in: netplan.io (Debian) Remote watch: None => Debian Bug tracker #1071220 ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344 Title: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059287] Re: Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed)
** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059287 Title: Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/request-tracker4/+bug/2059287/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059287] Re: Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed)
Actually, there is a proper upstream fix here: https://github.com/bestpractical/rt/commit/8b574915649a424370aff12282360bed08623c47 (part of v5.0.6) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059287 Title: Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/request-tracker4/+bug/2059287/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059287] Re: Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed)
The same issue happens with gnupg2 2.4 from Debian experimental, see https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/request-tracker5/unstable/amd64/ I think the tests need to be adoped to account for the additional "Failure during GnuPG gpg-exit: Failed to gpg-exit" output from GPG 2.4. ** Changed in: request-tracker5 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: request-tracker5 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059287 Title: Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/request-tracker4/+bug/2059287/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058743] Re: systemd local DNS tests failing with timeout
** Tags removed: rls-jj-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058743 Title: systemd local DNS tests failing with timeout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/2058743/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2039083] Re: "optional: true" flag introduces problem it's meant to fix in certain circumstances
Yes, it's supposed to be fixed via bug #2060311 Netplan now generates a systemd-networkd-wait- online.service.d/10-netplan.conf override config to explicitly list any configured Network interface, thus making the system wait on all of them. If an interface is marked "optional: true" it will not be listed and the system will not block on it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039083 Title: "optional: true" flag introduces problem it's meant to fix in certain circumstances To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2039083/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1862481] Re: Cannot set accept-ra to 2, it keeps reseting it to 0
** Tags added: docs documentation -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862481 Title: Cannot set accept-ra to 2, it keeps reseting it to 0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1862481/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064877] Re: Resume from Standby vmnet1/8 connected instead of Wired LAN
Would you mind sharing your Netplan configuration from /etc/netplan/*.yaml ? Feel free to redact sensitive information that could be contained. This sounds like it could be related to the NetworkManager-Netplan integration getting confused about the ordering of the connection profiles. ** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064877 Title: Resume from Standby vmnet1/8 connected instead of Wired LAN To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2064877/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064093] Re: if-up.d files do not have effect on ubuntu 24.04 LTS
You filed the bug report against NetworkManager. But the "up.d" hook is called differently in NM, see https://netplan.io/faq#use-pre-up-post-up- etc-hook-scripts If this is about /etc/network/if-up.d then it should be targeted towards the "ifupdown" package. I'm adding a corresponding bug task. ** Also affects: ifupdown (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064093 Title: if-up.d files do not have effect on ubuntu 24.04 LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/2064093/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063331] Re: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service runs into a timeout during boot
This is to be fixed in the installer, not Netplan. ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063331 Title: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service runs into a timeout during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2063331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063973] Re: network-online.target is reached before netplan-configured interfaces are online
** Tags added: foundations-todo network-online-ordering ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063973 Title: network-online.target is reached before netplan-configured interfaces are online To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2063973/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063443] Re: krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false
Let me mark it as invalid as I also already opened a bug ticket at the debian bug tracker as we have the same results there as well. Probably doesn't make sense to double track bugtickets then in this case, thanks! ** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063443 Title: krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/2063443/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063443] Re: krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false
** Description changed: We have a scenario where we need to disable reverse lookups for canonicalization in Kerberos as the customer's PTR records are not consistent and lead to wrongly requested SPNs otherwise (see https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-latest/doc/admin/princ_dns.html#reverse- dns-mismatches) - Therfore we have set "rdns = false" in /etc/krb5.conf as follows: + Therefore we have set "rdns = false" in /etc/krb5.conf as follows: # cat /etc/krb5.conf [libdefaults] udp_preference_limit = 0 default_realm = EMEA.EXAMPLE.COM rdns = false However this setting seems to get ignored for some reason. I tried to do - some debugging and comparison as we don't have the same issue for + some debugging and comparisons as we don't have the same issue for example on a RHEL8 (using krb5-libs-1.18.2-26.el8_9.x86_64) machine. On those RHEL machines the setting seems to do exactly what it's supposed to, in fact I can reproduce the issue we have on Ubuntu on RHEL as well if I remove the "rdns = false" line from the configuration. Kerberos authentication (in our test we use a simple ldapsearch with GSSAPI auth) fails then randomly as it sometimes gets a wrong SPN due to using a wrong PTR for canonicalization. On our Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (with libkrb5-3:amd64 1.19.2-2ubuntu0.3) however - the setting does not seem to have any effect. + the setting does not seem to have any effect. I then re-did the same + test with Debian oldstable, stable and sid as well, all with the exact + same result. - I actually run a tcpdump while trying to do a Kerberos auth with the + I actually ran a tcpdump while trying to do a Kerberos auth with the "rdns = false" setting in place and I can still see the reverse lookup - being performed in the tcpdump (anonymized some things so don't get + being performed in the tcpdump (I anonymized some things so don't get confused about the IPs): 10:47:58.382684 IP 1.2.3.4.55001 > 123.123.123.123.53: 12962+ [1au] A? domaincontroller01.emea.example.com. (55) 10:47:58.382809 IP 1.2.3.4.37669 > 123.123.123.123.53: 38376+ [1au] ? domaincontroller01.emea.example.com. (55) 10:47:58.412041 IP 123.123.123.123.53 > 1.2.3.4.37669: 38376* 0/1/1 (143) - 10:47:58.412564 IP 123.123.123.123.53 > 1.2.3.4.55001: 12962* 1/9/10 A 10.145.214.16 (602) - 10:47:58.442326 IP 1.2.3.4.51232 > 123.123.123.123.53: 16995+ [1au] PTR? 16.214.145.10.in-addr.arpa. (55) + 10:47:58.412564 IP 123.123.123.123.53 > 1.2.3.4.55001: 12962* 1/9/10 A 5.6.7.8 (602) + 10:47:58.442326 IP 1.2.3.4.51232 > 123.123.123.123.53: 16995+ [1au] PTR? 8.7.6.5.in-addr.arpa. (55) 10:47:58.471669 IP 123.123.123.123.53 > 1.2.3.4.51232: 16995 2/2/3 PTR emea.example.com., PTR DOMAINCONTROLLER.emea.example.com. (238) As you see there it does the PTR lookup and retrieves two entries (emea.example.com and DOMAINCONTROLLER.emea.example.com) If I do the same test on the RHEL8 machine I can actually see in tcpdump that with the "rdns = false" setting the reverse lookup is correctly NOT performed. I am a bit puzzled why this is the case as I have not seen other people - reporting it even though in a quick test I was also able to get the same - wrong result with Debian stable. + reporting it (maybe everyone else has their reverse DNS under control + ;)) even though as said in a quick test I was also able to get the same + wrong result with multiple Debian releases and the mentioned Ubuntu + release. The only thing I've found in the past where this exact issue was - mentioned as many years ago: + mentioned was many years ago: https://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/krb5-bugs/2011-June/008684.html However this has been fixed ever since. I have not done yet any actual code comparison with the version that RHEL uses, also I'm not sure if - the issue is even there or (as in that recent bug linked above) might - come from some glibc issue? + the issue actually really exists in libkrb5 itself or if it might be a + sideeffect from some other lib. How to reproduce on your own: Even if you don't have erroneous reverse DNS entries you could still try to reproduce it by just looking at tcpdump and checking if you see reverse lookups performed with and without the option. - - I attached the apport for libkrb5 but let me know if something else is - needed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063443 Title: krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/2063443/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063443] Re: krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false
** No longer affects: kerberos -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063443 Title: krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/2063443/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063443] Re: krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false
** Description changed: We have a scenario where we need to disable reverse lookups for canonicalization in Kerberos as the customer's PTR records are not - consistent and lead to wrongly requested SPNs otherwise. + consistent and lead to wrongly requested SPNs otherwise (see + https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-latest/doc/admin/princ_dns.html#reverse- + dns-mismatches) Therfore we have set "rdns = false" in /etc/krb5.conf as follows: # cat /etc/krb5.conf [libdefaults] udp_preference_limit = 0 default_realm = EMEA.EXAMPLE.COM rdns = false However this setting seems to get ignored for some reason. I tried to do some debugging and comparison as we don't have the same issue for example on a RHEL8 (using krb5-libs-1.18.2-26.el8_9.x86_64) machine. On those RHEL machines the setting seems to do exactly what it's supposed to, in fact I can reproduce the issue we have on Ubuntu on RHEL as well if I remove the "rdns = false" line from the configuration. Kerberos authentication (in our test we use a simple ldapsearch with GSSAPI auth) fails then randomly as it sometimes gets a wrong SPN due to using a wrong PTR for canonicalization. On our Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (with libkrb5-3:amd64 1.19.2-2ubuntu0.3) however the setting does not seem to have any effect. I actually run a tcpdump while trying to do a Kerberos auth with the "rdns = false" setting in place and I can still see the reverse lookup being performed in the tcpdump (anonymized some things so don't get confused about the IPs): 10:47:58.382684 IP 1.2.3.4.55001 > 123.123.123.123.53: 12962+ [1au] A? domaincontroller01.emea.example.com. (55) 10:47:58.382809 IP 1.2.3.4.37669 > 123.123.123.123.53: 38376+ [1au] ? domaincontroller01.emea.example.com. (55) 10:47:58.412041 IP 123.123.123.123.53 > 1.2.3.4.37669: 38376* 0/1/1 (143) 10:47:58.412564 IP 123.123.123.123.53 > 1.2.3.4.55001: 12962* 1/9/10 A 10.145.214.16 (602) 10:47:58.442326 IP 1.2.3.4.51232 > 123.123.123.123.53: 16995+ [1au] PTR? 16.214.145.10.in-addr.arpa. (55) 10:47:58.471669 IP 123.123.123.123.53 > 1.2.3.4.51232: 16995 2/2/3 PTR emea.example.com., PTR DOMAINCONTROLLER.emea.example.com. (238) - - As you see there it does the PTR lookup and retrieves two entries (emea.example.com and DOMAINCONTROLLER.emea.example.com) + As you see there it does the PTR lookup and retrieves two entries + (emea.example.com and DOMAINCONTROLLER.emea.example.com) If I do the same test on the RHEL8 machine I can actually see in tcpdump that with the "rdns = false" setting the reverse lookup is correctly NOT performed. I am a bit puzzled why this is the case as I have not seen other people reporting it even though in a quick test I was also able to get the same wrong result with Debian stable. The only thing I've found in the past where this exact issue was mentioned as many years ago: https://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/krb5-bugs/2011-June/008684.html However this has been fixed ever since. I have not done yet any actual code comparison with the version that RHEL uses, also I'm not sure if the issue is even there or (as in that recent bug linked above) might come from some glibc issue? How to reproduce on your own: Even if you don't have erroneous reverse DNS entries you could still try to reproduce it by just looking at tcpdump and checking if you see reverse lookups performed with and without the option. I attached the apport for libkrb5 but let me know if something else is needed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063443 Title: krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kerberos/+bug/2063443/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063443] Re: krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false
** Project changed: launchpad => kerberos ** Also affects: krb5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063443 Title: krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kerberos/+bug/2063443/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060311] Re: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image
** Changed in: netplan Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311 Title: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd- wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2060311/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063204] Re: Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml
Arguably, the "/usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml" should be shipped by the network-manager package, instead of ubuntu-settings... The community flavors using Calamares, might be covered by this PR: https://github.com/calamares/calamares/pull/2284 ** Also affects: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063204 Title: Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2063204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056331] Re: [SRU] fix suspend/resume when there are no input devices
Thanks! The rebased patches do still apply cleanly and build fine. - I fixed the Mantic debdiff SRU version "2:21.1.7-3ubuntu3" -> "2:21.1.7-3ubuntu2.10" - I fixed the Jammy debdiff d/changelog to reference this bug report Re-sponsoring for Mantic & Jammy and unsubcribing ~ubuntu-sponsors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056331 Title: [SRU] fix suspend/resume when there are no input devices To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/2056331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2036467] Re: Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock checksum mismatch in resize2fs
** Also affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Critical Assignee: Matthew Ruffell (mruffell) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036467 Title: Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock checksum mismatch in resize2fs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2036467/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063204] Re: Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml
** Description changed: The /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml, generated by livecd-rootfs, shouldn't exist any more IIUC. That functionality was moved into src:ubuntu-settings and shipped as /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml This is according to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu- settings/23.10.1 The duplicated "renderer: NetworkManager" doesn't cause any harm in the live-session, AFAICT. + + The /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml file is carried over into + the installed system (target). + + After "apt install --reinstall ubuntu-settings" the file gets deleted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063204 Title: Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2063204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063204] Re: Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml
** Tags added: iso-testing ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063204 Title: Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2063204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063204] [NEW] Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml
Public bug reported: The /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml, generated by livecd-rootfs, shouldn't exist any more IIUC. That functionality was moved into src:ubuntu-settings and shipped as /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml This is according to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu- settings/23.10.1 The duplicated "renderer: NetworkManager" doesn't cause any harm in the live-session, AFAICT. ** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063204 Title: Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2063204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1970773] Re: Verify YAML configuration after package upgrades
** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970773 Title: Verify YAML configuration after package upgrades To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/1970773/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055012] Re: When I upgraded from 22.04 to 24.04, DNS resolution went wrong.
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055012 Title: When I upgraded from 22.04 to 24.04, DNS resolution went wrong. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/2055012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2045096] Re: Error in network definition: Invalid MAC address 'random'
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045096 Title: Error in network definition: Invalid MAC address 'random' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2045096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060778] Re: netplan, multiple dhcp route with metric failure
Thanks for the additional details! In this case the output of "resolvectl" after "netplan apply" and after resume (no "netplan apply") might be useful. In addition to debug-logs of your systemd-resolved $ sudo systemctl edit systemd-resolved Adding: ``` [Service] Environment=SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug ``` $ sudo systemctl daemon-reload $ sudo systemctl restart systemd-resolved # (or reboot) Afterwards: $ journalctl -u systemd-resolved # (for a full "netplan apply", suspend, resume cycle) ** Changed in: netplan Status: Incomplete => Invalid ** Summary changed: - netplan, multiple dhcp route with metric failure + systemd-resolved switches primary interface for name resolution after suspend/resume cycle -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060778 Title: systemd-resolved switches primary interface for name resolution after suspend/resume cycle To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2060778/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2020409] Re: can't move mellanox interface to switchdev when SR-IOV disable
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: sru-next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020409 Title: can't move mellanox interface to switchdev when SR-IOV disable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2020409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2004516] Re: [MIR] libyuv (transitive dependency of libheif)
Thanks for the investigation of the new dependency tracking! I missed that previously. Sorry for all the extra work involved for getting this landed in time! I'll unsubscribe ~foundations-bugs and move it to "In Progress", as the MIR still passed. So it has the correct state, should it be needed by any team in the future. ** Changed in: libyuv (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004516 Title: [MIR] libyuv (transitive dependency of libheif) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libyuv/+bug/2004516/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2004523] Re: [MIR] libwebm (transitive dependency of libheif)[libheif -> aom -> libwebm]
Thanks for the investigation of the new dependency tracking! I'll unsubscribe ~foundations-bugs and move it to "In Progress", as the MIR still passed. So it has the correct state, should it be needed by any team in the future. ** Changed in: libwebm (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004523 Title: [MIR] libwebm (transitive dependency of libheif)[libheif -> aom -> libwebm] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwebm/+bug/2004523/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060311] Re: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image
I didn't hear about any blocker and in the "Foundation Leadership Sync" meeting people were overall positive about the change. I'm dropping the "block-proposed" tag. ** Tags removed: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311 Title: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd- wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2060311/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060035] Re: [MIR] msgraph
MIR is ready. ** Changed in: msgraph (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060035 Title: [MIR] msgraph To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msgraph/+bug/2060035/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2004442] Re: [MIR] aom (dependency of libheif)
** Changed in: aom (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004442 Title: [MIR] aom (dependency of libheif) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aom/+bug/2004442/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2004449] Re: [MIR] libde265 (dependency of libheif)
** Changed in: libde265 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004449 Title: [MIR] libde265 (dependency of libheif) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libde265/+bug/2004449/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2004516] Re: [MIR] libyuv (transitive dependency of libheif)
** Changed in: libyuv (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004516 Title: [MIR] libyuv (transitive dependency of libheif) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libyuv/+bug/2004516/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2004523] Re: [MIR] libwebm (transitive dependency of libheif)[libheif -> aom -> libwebm]
** Changed in: libwebm (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004523 Title: [MIR] libwebm (transitive dependency of libheif)[libheif -> aom -> libwebm] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwebm/+bug/2004523/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1827442] Re: [MIR] libheif
** Changed in: libheif (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827442 Title: [MIR] libheif To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aom/+bug/1827442/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060311] Re: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311 Title: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd- wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2060311/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060311] Re: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image
Extensive testing, from different teams and individuals, has happened in this bug report and especially in the upstream PR https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/456. This is in addition to the newly added build-time tests and autopkgtests. This change affects the "systemd-networkd-wait-online" behavior via "/run/systemd/system/systemd-networkd-wait-online.service.d/10-netplan.conf" and should not affect core-networking. If anything goes wrong the change can easily be disabled (at runtime): $ mkdir -p /etc/systemd/system/systemd-networkd-wait-online.service.d $ ln -s /dev/null /etc/systemd/system/systemd-networkd-wait-online.service.d/10-netplan.conf I went ahead and uploaded this as https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/1.0-2ubuntu1 This bug is still "block-proposed", to give a last chance to anybody who feels like there is still a blocker in this upload. ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311 Title: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd- wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2060311/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060311] Re: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Tags removed: foundations-todo ** Tags added: block-proposed update-excuse ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311 Title: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd- wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2060311/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1827442] Re: [MIR] libheif
Everything seems to be ready now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827442 Title: [MIR] libheif To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aom/+bug/1827442/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061089] Re: [FFe] update libheif dependencies
Security ACK for libyuv granted -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061089 Title: [FFe] update libheif dependencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2004516] Re: [MIR] libyuv (transitive dependency of libheif)
This is now ready and can be promoted with the rest of the libgd2 -> libheif -> PLUGINS -> CODECS chain ** Changed in: libyuv (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004516 Title: [MIR] libyuv (transitive dependency of libheif) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libyuv/+bug/2004516/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061090] Re: [FFe] add libheif as a dependency
Security ACK for libyuv granted -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061090 Title: [FFe] add libheif as a dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgd2/+bug/2061090/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2051925] Re: [MIR] promote libtracefs as a trace-cmd dependency
autopkgtests landed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtracefs/1.8.0-1ubuntu1 This should now be ready for promotion! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051925 Title: [MIR] promote libtracefs as a trace-cmd dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtracefs/+bug/2051925/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2028054] Re: [MIR] python-rlpycairo
** Tags removed: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028054 Title: [MIR] python-rlpycairo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hplip/+bug/2028054/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055309] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest
This is a MIR requirement, see bug #2051925 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055309 Title: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtracefs/+bug/2055309/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060311] Re: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image
> In the past it was okay to NOT have "optional: true" set for both: encc000 > and encc000.2653 (and I found that logical, since both interfaces are needed > in a VLAN context). > > Knowing now what's missing, I could live with that (even if it's a change in > behavior). Interesting.. I suspect some infrastructure changes here. The default for systemd-networkd-wait-online is to wait on the "degraded" operational state, i.e. having a link-local address assigned to the interface. If there is SLAAC or IPv6 RA enabled on the other side of "encc000", the interface might come online without "optional: true". But lacking such setup, it would be stuck in the "configuring" state, as it waits for an (IPv6) link-locaL address, putting it as "optional: true" helps in that case with our recent changes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311 Title: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd- wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2060311/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060311] Re: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image
With version ~ppa5 we're now skipping the activation of systemd- networkd-wait-online.service in case all Netplan interfaces are defined to be "optional: true", using "ConditionPathIsSymbolicLink=" on Netplan's s-n-wait-online.service enablement link, that's only set when we have non-optional interfaces. All the magic happens in /run/systemd/system/systemd-networkd-wait- online.service.d/10-netplan.conf override under the generic "systemd- networkd-wait-online.service" umbrella. Code is up-to-date in https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/456 Test buidls in PPA: https://launchpad.net/~slyon/+archive/ubuntu/lp2060311/+packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311 Title: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd- wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2060311/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2051925] Re: [MIR] promote libtracefs as a trace-cmd dependency
slyon> IMO we should still build it, but just accept ppc64el and s390x autopkgtest failing (for now) – to be fixed later slyon> at least now we know that it's broken on ppc64el and s390x, whereas before (without tests) it was just broken cpaelzer> I think under those conditions, and given the time let us promote it but please commit to continue working with upstream and IBM to fix it slyon> we're on it already and it will show up in our usual proposed-migration report OK, so let's consider this to be a MIR ACK! Adrien, please get the current tests uploaded, it can be promoted afterwards. ** Changed in: libtracefs (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051925 Title: [MIR] promote libtracefs as a trace-cmd dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtracefs/+bug/2051925/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060311] Re: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image
Thanks for testing! There is a failure in your systemd-networkd-wait-online.service logs: > systemd-networkd-wait-online.service: Main process exited, code=exited, > status=1/FAILURE I fixed this failure in the ~ppa4 version. Could you confirm the failure is gone with that newer version and still no delay? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311 Title: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd- wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2060311/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061745] Re: Please demote golang-1.21 to universe
> $ reverse-depends -r noble -b src:golang-1.21 Those are reverse build-depends, which do not necessarily need to be in "main". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061745 Title: Please demote golang-1.21 to universe To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-1.21/+bug/2061745/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
