[Bug 1573448] [NEW] package systemd-sysv 225-1ubuntu9.1 failed to install/upgrade: pre-dependency problem - not installing systemd-sysv
Public bug reported: Error happened during the upgrade from 15.10 to 16.04. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: systemd-sysv 225-1ubuntu9.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-21.37-generic 4.4.6 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Apr 22 09:19:59 2016 ErrorMessage: pre-dependency problem - not installing systemd-sysv InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-01-16 (96 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 15.10 "Wily Werewolf" - Release amd64 (20151021) RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1 apt 1.2.10ubuntu1 SourcePackage: systemd Title: package systemd-sysv 225-1ubuntu9.1 failed to install/upgrade: pre-dependency problem - not installing systemd-sysv UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2016-04-22 (0 days ago) ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573448 Title: package systemd-sysv 225-1ubuntu9.1 failed to install/upgrade: pre- dependency problem - not installing systemd-sysv To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1573448/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070150] Re: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics
The solution from #20 works for me as well! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070150 Title: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1070150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070150] Re: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics
Also, do not forget to exit the tty1 session, since you can go there even though your screen may be locked. I personally use this line: sudo killall -9 lightdm; sudo service lightdm start exit -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070150 Title: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1070150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070150] Re: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070150 Title: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1070150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070150] Re: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics
And finally the x-0-greeter.log from /var/log/lightdm Sorry for the spam, but either LP doesn't allow me to upload more than one attachment at a time or I don't know how to. ** Attachment added: And finally the x-0-greeter.log from /var/log/lightdm https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1070150/+attachment/3414081/+files/x-0-greeter.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070150 Title: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1070150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070150] Re: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics
The x-o.log from /var/log/lightdm ** Attachment added: The x-o.log from /var/log/lightdm https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1070150/+attachment/3414080/+files/x-0.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070150 Title: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1070150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070150] Re: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics
The sleep 1 service lightdm start in /etc/rc.local didn't work. I'm attaching some logs. ** Attachment added: LightDM Log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1070150/+attachment/3414079/+files/lightdm.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070150 Title: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1070150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070150] Re: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics
The workaround to restart lightdm makes me think this *may* be lightdm- related. I'll try and gather some logs next time I get a low graphics mode message and post them here. ** Also affects: lightdm Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070150 Title: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1070150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070150] Re: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics
Also, this may be related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/873495 When I just booted, lightdm wasn't running at all. So it either crashed or didn't start. Maybe this will help us narrow down the problem. I'll be testing now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070150 Title: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1070150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1063680] Re: php5-fpm crashed with SIGSEGV
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063680 Title: php5-fpm crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1063680/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1063680] Re: php5-fpm crashed with SIGSEGV
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063680 Title: php5-fpm crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1063680/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1010289] Re: KeePass2: copy username or copy password does not work as expected in applications
I can confirm the behavious as described in the original bug report on Ubuntu 12.04.1 (clean install). Also, thanks for the suggestion on CTRL+SHIFT+INS :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010289 Title: KeePass2: copy username or copy password does not work as expected in applications To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepass2/+bug/1010289/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 965371] Re: HTTPS requests fail on some sites on Ubuntu 12.04
Works for php fsockopen :) Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965371 Title: HTTPS requests fail on some sites on Ubuntu 12.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssl/+bug/965371/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
@Renato Silva: what you describe has nothing to do with the movement of the Unity launcher. What you describe has got to do with launcher sensitivity, something you will be able to control via System Settings in 12.04 LTS. Moving the launcher would solve the problem, naturally, but isn't the cause of it. On 04/02/2012 09:15 PM, Renato Silva wrote: Won't Fix a simple positioning setting to fix ridiculous wrong clicks when you try to access application items on the left? There are usually more clickable items on the left (back button in Firefox, window buttons, first application menu etc) than on the right or bottom. It's just sane to allow the users to have the launcher on a different position, current design is ridiculous. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 818830] Re: [Sandy Bridge] serious power regression from kernel 3.0.0-6 to 3.0.0-7 (rc6 disabled)
@Claus Strasburger See comment #64 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/818830/comments/64) for information on how to patch an Oneiric kernel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818830 Title: [Sandy Bridge] serious power regression from kernel 3.0.0-6 to 3.0.0-7 (rc6 disabled) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/818830/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 973184] Re: lightdm crashed with SIGSEGV in g_value_set_boxed()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973184 Title: lightdm crashed with SIGSEGV in g_value_set_boxed() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/973184/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 973185] Re: plymouthd crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973185 Title: plymouthd crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/973185/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 973183] Re: lightdm crashed with SIGSEGV in g_value_set_boxed()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973183 Title: lightdm crashed with SIGSEGV in g_value_set_boxed() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/973183/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 968003] Re: lightdm crashed with SIGSEGV in g_signal_emit_valist()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968003 Title: lightdm crashed with SIGSEGV in check_stopped() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/968003/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 962411] [NEW] package nautilus-dropbox 0.7.1-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2
Public bug reported: Happened just after logging in. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: nautilus-dropbox 0.7.1-2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-20.32-generic 3.2.12 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2 AptOrdering: nautilus-dropbox: Purge Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Mar 22 12:36:00 2012 DpkgTerminalLog: Removing nautilus-dropbox ... Purging configuration files for nautilus-dropbox ... dpkg: error processing nautilus-dropbox (--purge): subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120301) SourcePackage: nautilus-dropbox Title: package nautilus-dropbox 0.7.1-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nautilus-dropbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962411 Title: package nautilus-dropbox 0.7.1-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-dropbox/+bug/962411/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 962411] Re: package nautilus-dropbox 0.7.1-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962411 Title: package nautilus-dropbox 0.7.1-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-dropbox/+bug/962411/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 733349] Re: Minimize Application's Windows upon clicking its Launcher Icon
I'd love to see this behaviour as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733349 Title: Minimize Application's Windows upon clicking its Launcher Icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/733349/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955751] Re: brcupsconfpt1 assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/Brother/Printer/dcp560cn/cupswrapper/brcupsconfpt1 terminated
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955751 Title: brcupsconfpt1 assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/Brother/Printer/dcp560cn/cupswrapper/brcupsconfpt1 terminated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brother-cups-wrapper-common/+bug/955751/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776435] Re: Window maximizes on the wrong workspace
I can't reproduce this any longer on the latest precise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776435 Title: Window maximizes on the wrong workspace To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-core/+bug/776435/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776435] Re: Window maximizes on the wrong workspace
Sorry, that last comment was a bit meaningless, without the following: Compiz 0.9.7.0 (1:0.9.7.0+bzr3035-0ubuntu1) unity 5.6.0 (5.6.0-0ubuntu3) Linux 3.2.0-18-generic #29-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 9 21:36:08 UTC 2012 x86_64 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776435 Title: Window maximizes on the wrong workspace To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-core/+bug/776435/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 944626] Re: Xorg segfault - xdiagnose output
I'm getting this more often as well and it's about one of the most annoying bugs I have *ever* experienced. Here's my backtrace: Backtrace: [ 12549.977] 0: /usr/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x26) [0x7f18af4362f6] [ 12549.977] 1: /usr/bin/X (0x7f18af2ae000+0x18c19a) [0x7f18af43a19a] [ 12549.977] 2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f18ae5d4000+0xfcb0) [0x7f18ae5e3cb0] [ 12549.977] 3: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7f18ad44a000+0x14c321) [0x7f18ad596321] [ 12549.977] 4: /usr/bin/X (WriteToClient+0x202) [0x7f18af4398e2] [ 12549.977] 5: /usr/bin/X (WriteEventsToClient+0x24a) [0x7f18af30638a] [ 12549.977] 6: /usr/bin/X (TryClientEvents+0x106) [0x7f18af3064f6] [ 12549.977] 7: /usr/bin/X (0x7f18af2ae000+0x5bd12) [0x7f18af309d12] [ 12549.977] 8: /usr/bin/X (DeliverEventsToWindow+0x1cb) [0x7f18af309f4b] [ 12549.977] 9: /usr/bin/X (DeliverEvents+0x133) [0x7f18af30ae93] [ 12549.977] 10: /usr/bin/X (DeleteWindow+0x20b) [0x7f18af32884b] [ 12549.977] 11: /usr/bin/X (0x7f18af2ae000+0x6f302) [0x7f18af31d302] [ 12549.978] 12: /usr/bin/X (FreeClientResources+0x6a) [0x7f18af31e03a] [ 12549.978] 13: /usr/bin/X (CloseDownClient+0x5a) [0x7f18af2fbbaa] [ 12549.978] 14: /usr/bin/X (0x7f18af2ae000+0x4e736) [0x7f18af2fc736] [ 12549.978] 15: /usr/bin/X (0x7f18af2ae000+0x3d64a) [0x7f18af2eb64a] [ 12549.978] 16: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xed) [0x7f18ad46b76d] [ 12549.978] 17: /usr/bin/X (0x7f18af2ae000+0x3d93d) [0x7f18af2eb93d] [ 12549.978] Segmentation fault at address 0xb09485b0 [ 12549.978] Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/944626 Title: Xorg segfault - xdiagnose output To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/944626/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 818830] Re: [Sandy Bridge] serious power regression from kernel 3.0.0-6 to 3.0.0-7 (rc6 disabled)
@Andy: yes, it is always the left edge. Do you have a bug number for me so I can follow that as well, please? On 03/05/2012 02:02 PM, Andy Whitcroft wrote: @Maarten -- if you could describe when the complete visual freezes occur, that might help. For example there is a separate known issue where the X server locks hard due to an internal deadlock; this most commonly occurs when touching the left edge to get the unity launcher. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818830 Title: [Sandy Bridge] serious power regression from kernel 3.0.0-6 to 3.0.0-7 (rc6 disabled) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/818830/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 818830] Re: [Sandy Bridge] serious power regression from kernel 3.0.0-6 to 3.0.0-7 (rc6 disabled)
3.2.0-17-generic is not completely stable for me. I get a complete visual freeze (sound keeps working) with this kernel about twice a day. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818830 Title: [Sandy Bridge] serious power regression from kernel 3.0.0-6 to 3.0.0-7 (rc6 disabled) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/818830/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 940085] Re: 12.04, Compiz Wall plugin default shortcut keys are incorrect
I agree that super shift does not at all feel ergonomic. I'd really like to know the design reason for this as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940085 Title: 12.04, Compiz Wall plugin default shortcut keys are incorrect To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/940085/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 940085] Re: 12.04, Compiz Wall plugin default shortcut keys are incorrect
Oh man, this is *crazy*. I get the keyboard shortcut overlay all the time, the launcher sometimes stays open (I have autohide on) with the numbers on the icons and the search window pops up every now and then when switching workspaces. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940085 Title: 12.04, Compiz Wall plugin default shortcut keys are incorrect To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/940085/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 940085] Re: 12.04, Compiz Wall plugin default shortcut keys are incorrect
I'm not getting the old keybindings back after having installed the fixed package. Should I manually fix the key bindings? Is anybody else having this problem? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940085 Title: 12.04, Compiz Wall plugin default shortcut keys are incorrect To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/940085/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 932654] Re: soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in X11SalGraphics::GetResolution()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932654 Title: soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in X11SalGraphics::GetResolution() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/932654/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
@Magnes: your arguments are quite invalid when it's a hiding launcher. On 12/22/2011 08:55 AM, Magnes wrote: Tablets, phones and some LCDs with pivot have portrait mode in which launcher on the left takes too much space and is ridiculously high. Tablets especially are often used in this mode. So if you want to make Unity for tablets you need to make it movable anyway. (and on phones it would have to be on the bottom anyway - most new phones are 16:9 and used in portrait with little space for launcher on the left) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
@Magnes: not if it's on the left of the screen and you swipe right-to-left to reveal it (just like moving your mouse to the right). At least, that's what I remember having seen in some plan. On 12/22/2011 10:22 AM, Magnes wrote: Hiding launcher on a touchscreen? That would be pretty hard to use. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
@SRoesgen: I think the left border will be the most unlikely place for a false positive, even when flipping the pages of a book. If it were up to me, I would require the finger to almost hit the left-most line of pixels. That would work well, I think. On 12/22/2011 02:00 PM, SRoesgen wrote: @Maarten Kossen Swiping into any direction would be a nice and handy metaphor for turning the pages of a book. But instead of this the swiping will reveal the launcher which people might not even know exists because it is auto-hidden on a touch screen? Well, nicely done. For me this sound not very logical or intuitive. Especially since many people use tablets as some form of high powered e-reader, e-book, webbrowser and not much more (besides reading e-mails). @all The fact that so many people have problems with only one feature and debate it for over one year now, would make me think about the decisions. I think that all of us really like Ubuntu, the idea behind Ubuntu and even Unity. If we didn't care for Unity, we would not start debating a single feature but instead we would criticize the whole Unity Shell (which is exactly what we are not doing at the moment, which is very good.) The point is, one can see the arguments against a moveable launcher. But many of them are not really valid anymore. And I am sorry, I cannot see any really conclusive and convincing argument against a movable launcher in the far future. @John Lea (and I am afraid I have to get a little bit academic now) You didn't get my car metaphor right. I was not talking about blocking future developments and innovation. Innovation is a good thing. I was talking about something that in psychological theories is called the horizon of expectation. If you see a product you expect things. If these expectations are not met they break that horizon of expectations and usually are met with criticism and debate. My analogy was about the doors in a car. Not the number of doors, but the doors itself. If you have a car with two, four or eight doors. You will expect all of them to work as doors and not as windows. You create your own horizon of expectation derived by your life experiences, they define your habits and pattern of thinking. The criticism that emerges when breaking this horizon will inevitably create debate, which in itself is not bad. Breaking the horizon of expectation very often resulted in new innovations. But breaking the horizon several times, on multiple points will automatically result in defamiliarization (or alienation) of those who see their horizon of expectations broken too often by the same event/thing. Basically the premise under which you developed Unity was good, and well thought. The design is creating familiarities on different points by creating elements you can relate to because they are known, working features in smart phones, desktops of operating systems, netbook interfaces etc... The problem arises when those points which apparently create familiarities are broken when the recipient (user) experiences moments when those familiar paradigms, which create stability, are not working as expected. The people here want exactly one feature added. And indeed you can postulate that every single concession made here will result in debates on other places about different topics and different bugs. And thus you might complain that too many user features will result in an unmaintainable Unit. The difference is that there are very very few bugs on launchpad which are debated to extensively, so vigorously and so passionately. This should make you think about it. I once told here before. I think the idea of Mark Shuttleworth of a dictator, as somebody whose power lies in dictandi ingenio, in the power to command if requested and if necessary, is basically a good thing. Too much debate about everything will destroy a product and make it a formless mass which is unmaintainable code. But a Roman dictator had only a short period of this time of absolute power to command and make decisions. He was never held responsible for those thing he commanded during that period of reign. But after a few month this reign was over and there was again a debate culture in the Roman Senate and the Assemblies. What I want to say: if so many people, at least a significant and audible number of people, want something, then wouldn't it be right to raise against the topic. Bring it before the assemblies and the senate (so discuss in in some internet fora/forums, on mailing lists of the Dx or design or desktop teams). Make the members of those lists read this whole discussion that is raging for over one year now. And then decide again what is right and what is wrong. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
@realn: Well, every major OS out there (Windows, Mac OS X, Ubuntu) are moving to such a situation. See the new launchpad (or whatever it's called) on Mac OS X that is much like the springboard on iOS and the new Windows Phone OS (or whatever it's called) and Windows 8 with their similar setup. It's an inevitable change in a transition from the traditional desktop situation to one where evetually the browser becomes the center piece and is all you need. On 12/21/2011 11:11 PM, realn wrote: I think that trying to use the same UI on a smartphone/tablet/desktop/laptop is a mistake. Perhaps in 10 years from now it will be the case with all OSes and all devices and users might get used to it maybe. That would simply mean that I will use my phone in the same way as my future extra powerful desktop. That would be a terrible waste: it will kill diversity and everybody will shake their phones in the same way in order to skip to the next track. How will we be skipping to the next track on our future laptops? By shaking them, too ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
@Magnes: as I right handed user I can positively confirm that I can move my mouse in any direction. I have even asked some left-handed people, who also happen to be able to move their mouse in any direction. Equally well to the left as to the right. As you rightly say, it's a preference. Not an ability or capability. It may be easier, but it's possible the other way. The big difference is: if it wouldn't be usable at all it would be a blocking issue to have the launcher stuck to the left. If it's useable but not the prefered way, it's not a blocking issue. @SRoesgen: there is not just one argument left for not having a usable launcher. Errors/bugs can be fixed. There is at least one major argument for not moving it: cross-device functionality. It should be able to works well on a tablet or smartphone exactly as on the desktop. This means a swipe should trigger the launcher. Swiping up and down is used for scrolling, so the top and the bottom are out. Usually, you need to swipe using the right side of the screen, making that a lesser candidate. The only side that remains left is left. I see the logic in that. They were not necessarily bad decisions. Maybe for you but not in general. @John Lea: thanks for your continueuing responses here. Much appreciated :) On 12/20/2011 09:41 AM, Magnes wrote: @Maarten Kossen: that was really rude. :( What would you say as a right handed person if the Unity was on the right? For me it would be a complete disaster, so I understand left-handed people who complain about the placement. Putting on the bottom or on the top is OK for everyone but putting on left or right side causes a lot of problems to people who prefer it the other way. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
@UnityUser: if you cannot move your mouse cursor any other way than right, there's not much sense in you using a computer at all. @Lisa Schmidt: this is in no way discrimination, nor ignorance or arrogance. It's a design vision for a cross-device User Interface aimed at making Ubuntu available to a larger audience. I know that's hard to comprehend but that's the way it is. Now, it's quite clear that the Unity launcher is not going to be moveable by default (at least for the time being). There are plenty of solutions out there if you don't like Unity the way it is not (or if you want to move the launcher). You're not oblidged to use Unity. Nobody's forcing you. On 12/19/2011 05:30 PM, UnityUser wrote: @boxnotify; I agree! I am also a left handed person and like you I am unable to move my mouse pointer any direction other than right. This active discrimination has to end, first Microsoft placed the Start button in the bottom left corner of the screen and and Ubuntu moved their launcher to the left! I don't know who is worse, Bill Gates or Mark Shuttleworth. btw, as you seem to have a similar difficulty to me, I suggest you learn a right to left language, writing Urdu had made my life much easier. خدا حافظ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 438868] Re: Numerous applications have focus issues after emerging from a screensaver or suspend
Indeed, still happening. Could this be a compiz bug once more? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438868 Title: Numerous applications have focus issues after emerging from a screensaver or suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/438868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
To all the people saying goodbye: you are a bunch of drama queens. You say you are going to leave ubuntu because of Unity but take an effort in reporting it here, which means you obviously don't want to say goodbye or like to make a show of it. Besides that, if you don't like Unity and switch to Windows or Mac OS X because of it, there's more bothering you than just Unity. There are plenty of alternatives available that can be easily installed on Ubuntu, without having the need to switch to a completely different OS. I've been following this bug for a while and even though I would personally prefer a movable launcher, I really understand the reasoning for not giving that option [out of the box]. I've liked Unity from the beginning and I use it with pleasure every day. So, to the Ubuntu Team, the Ayatana Design Team and Mark Shuttleworth: thank you! Maarten On 11/02/2011 08:12 AM, realn wrote: Bye bye, Ubuntu. So long , and thanks for all the fish. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
@SRoesgen: You don't seem to be able to understand that a person can like something a lot, but still sees room for improvement. I like Unity a lot as it is, but I won't deny something can be improved. There's no hypocrisy in that. That's normal. I'm thankful for Unity, since it's a lot better than the classic Gnome interface (in my opinion) and made my day-to-day work easier. It never hurts to compliment people for work done, even though there is room for improvement. It gives people the feeling that they're doing something good, they're on the right road and maybe it motivates them to move further and improve the product. This bug is not a motivation, it just highlights that many people are not satisfied with Unity. There are two options from that point on: 1. Try and help to make things better 2. Do what you do and be frustrated I've seen a lot of 2 and a little of 1. Rome wasn't built in one day and Unity can't be perfect all at once. Incidentally, not everybody wants to live in Rome and it's the same thing that makes people dislike Unity: personal preference. If everybody hates Unity so much: don't use it! There are plenty of other options available. It's quite clear by now that Unity may not become what some expect of it. Stop doing 2 and move on. Maarten On 11/02/2011 11:49 AM, SRoesgen wrote: Now, I am the one, who does not understand the fuss. I actually thought we went one step further down the right direction. At least in the direction that most of the people here wanted this discussion heading. * we could have an option to reveal the launcher after a top left corner hit (so the movement returns to being the original slam-into-top-left-corner, then move to your app icon) * we could allow the launcher to move to the bottom of the screen. However, this would require a patch which took into account all the related issues, like animations and transitions, and the direction of various arrows. We would not accept a patch which reduced the quality of the existing experience for those who like it. Mark To me this reads like Canonical won't pay anybody to program a moveable launcher, but will accept a well written patch which allows the launcher to be placed at the bottom of the screen. So if all design requirements are met the new option for the launcher will be accepted. At least this is how I understood it. I do not know why anybody would now want to leave the Ubuntu train. Nobody could expect Canonical to invest money into a development when they see other, more pressing, features to be implemented. I was complaining here, because I thought that won't fix means that the also will not accept any patches. But with this new answer I am pretty pleased. I am no programmer, so I am afraid I cannot implement the code for a moveable launcher myself. But still this gives me hope that there is the possibility of a moveable launcher. That is all I wanted. To hear it could be feasible and we will accept a patch, if it is well written. @Maarten Kossen: Don't you think yourself that you sound somewhat exaggerated and hypocritical? Look at the comments of this article: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/11/ubuntu-desktop-designers-clarify-on-configurability/ there are tow main elements that permeat all comments a) more configurability is great (there are not very many comments stating that they want the number of options stay the way it is) b) many people state in the comments that Canonical/Ubuntu should learn to do PR work. And I have to agree with this. If this all was already on the agenda for a long time then why did not anybody say so month ago? Much of the fuss about many of the aspects in Unity would have been avoided. I, personally, am annoyed by the unmovable launcher, but I could have lived with it if I had thought that this would be one of the few things that would not be configurable. But instead it all appeared as if there would never be much space for configuration at all. So seemingly I was wrong and there will be a couple of options to configure the system. But many discussions and much of my frustration could have been avoided by some simple statements to the public (or to the community). You say yourself you would prefer the launcher to be movable. So you cannot be entirely content with the system. I look at my own work and see that there are many things that I can improve. I do not applause myself because I did not make much errors today or yesterday; I simply look for those things I can improve. Real approval or praise is never uttered loudly, it is the lack of complaints. In a music concert you do not applause after every performance you can do so after everything was finished and everything found your approval. If someone needs approval or applause for the things he does, he knows he does it wrong. It is hypocritical to thank somebody for his work, though, in the same comment you
[Bug 847024] Re: Launcher sometimes doesn't display when a maximised window is focused
I can confirm this happens on Oneiric x64: gir1.2-unity-4.0 4.0.2-0ubuntu1 libmeanwhile11.0.2-4 libunity-2d-private0 4.6.1-0ubuntu1 libunity-core-4.0-4 4.14.2-0ubuntu2 libunity-misc4 4.0.4-0ubuntu1 libunity43.8.4-0ubuntu2 libunity54.0.0-0ubuntu4 libunity64.0.2-0ubuntu1 unity4.14.2-0ubuntu2 unity-2d 4.6.1-0ubuntu1 unity-2d-launcher4.6.1-0ubuntu1 unity-2d-panel 4.6.1-0ubuntu1 unity-2d-places 4.6.1-0ubuntu1 unity-2d-spread 4.6.1-0ubuntu1 unity-asset-pool 0.8.20-0ubuntu2 unity-common 4.14.2-0ubuntu2 unity-greeter0.0.5-0ubuntu4 unity-lens-applications 0.4.4-0ubuntu1 unity-lens-files 0.6.4-0ubuntu1 unity-lens-music 0.1.4-0ubuntu1 unity-place-applications 0.4.4-0ubuntu1 unity-place-files0.6.4-0ubuntu1 unity-services 4.14.2-0ubuntu2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/847024 Title: Launcher sometimes doesn't display when a maximised window is focused To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/847024/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
First of all, let me correct my previous post: with 'sticking to the right' I naturally meant 'sticking to the left'. Fernando: you are right, most Ubuntu users are power users. However, what I think Canonical is trying to do is make Ubuntu more appealing to non-technical users. I really think for this purpose Unity is way better than the old Gnome2 desktop or the new Gnome shell. It's more appealing to the eye, if offers a more streamlined experience and it's easy to get started with. On 09/08/2011 04:39 PM, Fernando wrote: Maarten, I don't know you personally, that is what I was talking about. And another thing that wish to remember is that here, we are not ordinary users. Many people here are Computer Science students, application developers and all other sort of technical expertise. So don't think that there are only dumb people complaining. Even Linus Torvalds is unhappy with the current situation of Linux desktop. We are not here to TROLL Unity, but trying to make it better. The fact that the launcher is fixed in the left side of the screen is only a single complaint in middle of many that I hear. On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Maarten Kossenmaarten.kos...@quateria.com wrote: Well, Fernando, then let me be the first then. I heavily prefer Unity over the Mac OS X and Windows 7 UIs, despite both having a movable launcher. I agree that the Unity Launcher sticking to the right isn't always perfect (like with RTL languages or with a dual screen setup with the left screen being the primary), but that's really secondary. For most users, the current launcher covers it. It's fantastic! If everything would happen based on what users would expect, there would not be much innovation... On 09/08/2011 03:05 PM, Fernando wrote: I, personally, don't a single human being on the Earth that thinks that Unity is the best think they had found until now. If there is any research about user interfaces, please, share with us the results, papers and every other artifact of this research. Please Unity developers, don't be as ignorant as developers of Microsoft and Apple, please, hear us, it is for the sake of the Ubuntu Linux project that we are asking such a thing. I know that from time to time new user's interface must be developed, but sometimes their concepts don't match user's expectations. As I can see, Unity is not the right direction in it's current form. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 761500] Re: nagstamon don't work on ubuntu natty
That's an incomplete fix (since it doesn't say you need to whitelist the application first) and it makes nagstamon float around; it doesn't put it in the top panel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761500 Title: nagstamon don't work on ubuntu natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagstamon/+bug/761500/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
Well, Fernando, then let me be the first then. I heavily prefer Unity over the Mac OS X and Windows 7 UIs, despite both having a movable launcher. I agree that the Unity Launcher sticking to the right isn't always perfect (like with RTL languages or with a dual screen setup with the left screen being the primary), but that's really secondary. For most users, the current launcher covers it. It's fantastic! If everything would happen based on what users would expect, there would not be much innovation... On 09/08/2011 03:05 PM, Fernando wrote: I, personally, don't a single human being on the Earth that thinks that Unity is the best think they had found until now. If there is any research about user interfaces, please, share with us the results, papers and every other artifact of this research. Please Unity developers, don't be as ignorant as developers of Microsoft and Apple, please, hear us, it is for the sake of the Ubuntu Linux project that we are asking such a thing. I know that from time to time new user's interface must be developed, but sometimes their concepts don't match user's expectations. As I can see, Unity is not the right direction in it's current form. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 843602] Re: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_static_private_get()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/843602 Title: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_static_private_get() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/843602/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 838616] Re: jockey-text crashed with KeyError in __getitem__(): 'package'
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838616 Title: jockey-text crashed with KeyError in __getitem__(): 'package' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/838616/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 657829] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with DBusException in call_blocking()
This also happens when adding a printer (when pressing 'Forward' when having selected an automatically-detected network printer) and blocks that process. I would personally suggest bumping up the priority of this, since it tends to block a number of quite important tasks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657829 Title: jockey-gtk crashed with DBusException in call_blocking() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/657829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 836716] Re: jockey-text crashed with KeyError in __getitem__(): 'package'
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836716 Title: jockey-text crashed with KeyError in __getitem__(): 'package' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/836716/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 836714] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__(): 'package'
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836714 Title: jockey-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__(): 'package' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/836714/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 831754] Re: jockey-backend crashed with MemoryError in run_dbus_service()
The workaround from #28 doesn't work for me. I get a while list of other errors: WARNING:root:Could not open DriverDB cache /var/cache/jockey/driverdb-OpenPrintingDriverDB.cache: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/cache/jockey/driverdb-OpenPrintingDriverDB.cache' WARNING:root:modinfo for module nvidia_96 failed: ERROR: modinfo: could not find module nvidia_96 WARNING:root:modinfo for module nvidia_current failed: ERROR: modinfo: could not find module nvidia_current WARNING:root:modinfo for module nvidia_173 failed: ERROR: modinfo: could not find module nvidia_173 WARNING:root:modinfo for module nvidia_current failed: ERROR: modinfo: could not find module nvidia_current WARNING:root:modinfo for module nvidia_173 failed: ERROR: modinfo: could not find module nvidia_173 WARNING:root:modinfo for module nvidia_96 failed: ERROR: modinfo: could not find module nvidia_96 WARNING:root:modinfo for module vmxnet failed: ERROR: modinfo: could not find module vmxnet WARNING:root:modinfo for module fglrx failed: ERROR: modinfo: could not find module fglrx WARNING:root:modinfo for module fglrx failed: ERROR: modinfo: could not find module fglrx WARNING:root:modinfo for module wl failed: ERROR: modinfo: could not find module wl WARNING:root:modinfo for module ath_pci failed: ERROR: modinfo: could not find module ath_pci Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/jockey-text, line 128, in module sys.exit(u.run()) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/jockey/ui.py, line 467, in run self.backend().shutdown() File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/jockey/ui.py, line 113, in backend self._dbus_iface = Backend() File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/jockey/backend.py, line 146, in __init__ self.detect() File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/jockey/backend.py, line 175, in detect self._detect_handlers() File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/jockey/backend.py, line 773, in _detect_handlers hardware=self.hardware): File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/jockey/detection.py, line 1001, in get_handlers available_handlers.update(get_db_handlers(backend, db, hardware, mode)) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/jockey/detection.py, line 1029, in get_db_handlers h = _driverid_to_handler(did, backend, mode) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/jockey/detection.py, line 739, in _driverid_to_handler (not h.package or not did['package'] or h.package == did['package']): File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/jockey/detection.py, line 134, in __getitem__ return self.properties.__getitem__(key) KeyError: 'package' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831754 Title: jockey-backend crashed with MemoryError in run_dbus_service() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/jockey/+bug/831754/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 831754] Re: jockey-backend crashed with MemoryError in run_dbus_service()
Xavier: thanks for your suggestion. Running it directly after booting got rid of the initial message (about the DriverDB), but the rest is the same, unfortunately. Let's hope for a fix soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831754 Title: jockey-backend crashed with MemoryError in run_dbus_service() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/jockey/+bug/831754/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 762968] Re: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.159.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: nspluginwrapper: no appropriate viewer found for /usr/lib/flashplugin-installer/libflashplayer.so
I removed my sevenmachines flash (which I used in the mean time) with ppa-purge and then installed ubuntu-restricted-extras. Worked for me. Note: I do have multiarch enabled. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762968 Title: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.159.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: nspluginwrapper: no appropriate viewer found for /usr/lib/flashplugin-installer/libflashplayer.so To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/762968/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 833734] Re: jockey-text crashed with DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name :1.65 was not provided by any .service files
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 831873 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831873 ** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833734 Title: jockey-text crashed with DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name :1.65 was not provided by any .service files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/833734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 833734] Re: jockey-text crashed with DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name :1.65 was not provided by any .service files
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 831873 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831873 Could somebody make the original of this dupe public, please? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833734 Title: jockey-text crashed with DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name :1.65 was not provided by any .service files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/833734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 821829] Re: Unity 3D does not work in Oneiric on Dell Inspiron 1721
I've managed to solve this issue by installing the package 'compizconfig-backend-gconf' which provides the missing libgconf.so file. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821829 Title: Unity 3D does not work in Oneiric on Dell Inspiron 1721 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/821829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 831447] Re: jockey-backend crashed with MemoryError in run_dbus_service()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 831754 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831754 Could somebody make the original bug (#831754) this is a dupe of public, please? Right now it's private. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831447 Title: jockey-backend crashed with MemoryError in run_dbus_service() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/831447/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657829] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with DBusException in call_blocking()
Has anybody been able to solve this issue with some sort of workaround yet? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657829 Title: jockey-gtk crashed with DBusException in call_blocking() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/657829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 833529] Re: jockey-text crashed with DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name :1.80 was not provided by any .service files
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833529 Title: jockey-text crashed with DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name :1.80 was not provided by any .service files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/833529/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 833528] Re: jockey-text crashed with DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name :1.80 was not provided by any .service files
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833528 Title: jockey-text crashed with DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name :1.80 was not provided by any .service files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/833528/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 831754] Re: jockey-backend crashed with MemoryError in run_dbus_service()
This happens at more moments than when clicking 'Additional Drivers'. I just got it while unlocking my screen and I've seen it happen once what looked like a random moment. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831754 Title: jockey-backend crashed with MemoryError in run_dbus_service() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/jockey/+bug/831754/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 762968] Re: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.159.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Still happening... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762968 Title: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.159.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/762968/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
The new design, as it appears on OMG!Ubuntu, makes it even harder to place the launcher elsewhere. In the current situation, you can make the launcher appear via the top left corner of a screen. In the new situation, the trigger point must have been removed. Otherwise you would get the launcher when you try to close an application, which is probably undesirable behavior. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 761065] Re: [Sandybridge] Spurious *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... blt ring idle messages in dmesg when using compiz
#18 doesn't fix it on 2.6.38-10, #16 does. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761065 Title: [Sandybridge] Spurious *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... blt ring idle messages in dmesg when using compiz To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/761065/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 761065] Re: [Sandybridge] Spurious *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... blt ring idle messages in dmesg when using compiz
I've experienced this bug as well on a Clevo W150HRM with a Sandy Bridge Core I7 (2820QM). The solution in #16 fixes it for me. I have yet to try #18, but I'm sure it'll work as well. Running 2.6.38-10-generic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761065 Title: [Sandybridge] Spurious *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... blt ring idle messages in dmesg when using compiz To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/761065/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776587] Re: thunderbird-globalmenu still displays normal menu bar space
Bug still stands, so I've changed the title rather than file a new bug report. ** Summary changed: - thunderbird-globalmenu does not honor APPMENU_DISPLAY_BOTH=1 + thunderbird-globalmenu still displays normal menu bar space ** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776587 Title: thunderbird-globalmenu still displays normal menu bar space -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 734563] Re: [gnome3] Upgrading to Gnome3 PPA breaks Ubuntu theme defaults
I agree, the dependency should be fixed or the package manager should propose the given solution itself. Currently it remains broken. ** Changed in: gsettings-desktop-schemas (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734563 Title: [gnome3] Upgrading to Gnome3 PPA breaks Ubuntu theme defaults -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 550764] Re: Brother CUPS wrapper fails to change LPR driver settings
Still happens on the latest Natty, so I've set this to new as it seems to be the most appropriate status. ** Changed in: brother-cups-wrapper-extra (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550764 Title: Brother CUPS wrapper fails to change LPR driver settings -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748516] Re: Eclipse window not identified correctly in Unity Launcher-bar
It's been working perfectly for me since my last post on two separate systems. Can anybody actually confirm this is still a problem with an up-to-date installation of Natty? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748516 Title: Eclipse window not identified correctly in Unity Launcher-bar -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 748516] Re: Eclipse window not identified correctly in Unity Launcher-bar
OK, then there still is an issue. If there's any data I can contribute to help solve this problem, please let me know how. On 04/12/2011 11:27 AM, schaze wrote: Also just did a test with the latest updates. The behaviour is definitly changed now, but it really isn't working for me yet. bamfdaemon is crashing a lot when starting/restarting eclipse and the launcherbar displays sometimes several eclipse icons. (I've seen from 2 to 4 -- see attach image). Also sometimes after close the white indicator dots stay besides the eclipse icons and I can't start it again. ** Attachment added: Screenshot-1.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/748516/+attachment/2023200/+files/Screenshot-1.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748516 Title: Eclipse window not identified correctly in Unity Launcher-bar -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 734563] Re: [gnome3] Upgrading to Gnome3 PPA breaks Ubuntu theme defaults
Maybe the eventual solution could be posted under 'Answers' so there's a how-to for people who face this problem. I haven't had the time to experiment with this myself, unfortunately. I'll probably get to it tomorrow and I'll post any (new) findings here. On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:02 PM, MacRules 734...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: indeed. I seem to have fixed it (partially) by doing: sudo apt-get remove gnome-accessibility-themes and then sudo apt-get install gnome-themes-standard Then install gnome-tweak-tool and set the theme to Adwaita and reboot. I do feel things look a bit crummy, but maybe that is because of removing some ubuntu themes as well. If anyone knows how to fix this like it should, please let us know :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734563 Title: [gnome3] Upgrading to Gnome3 PPA breaks Ubuntu theme defaults Status in “gsettings-desktop-schemas” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: gsettings-desktop-schemas Installing the Gnome 3 Team PPA on Natty and upgrading breaks the default theming used by Ubuntu Classic the new Unity desktop environments by setting the icon-theme to gnome and the gtk-theme to Adwaita. And because gnome-control-center currently doesn't have an applet to change the theme, it is difficult for users to figure out how to get things back to normal. It looks like Gnome 3 ignores the previous gconf interface settings and only reads the dconf ones. For Ubuntu, the dconf default org.gnome.interface.icon-theme should be ubuntu-mono-dark and org.gnome.interface.gtk-theme should be Ambiance. I believe Ubuntu sets the default gconf themes in the ubuntu-artwork package so I don't know if this should be fixed there. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gsettings-desktop-schemas 0.1.7-2ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-6.34-generic 2.6.38-rc7 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-6-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Mar 13 19:23:40 2011 Dependencies: InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.utf8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gsettings-desktop-schemas UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-01-01 (71 days ago) To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gsettings-desktop-schemas/+bug/734563/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734563 Title: [gnome3] Upgrading to Gnome3 PPA breaks Ubuntu theme defaults -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748516] Re: Eclipse window not identified correctly in Unity Launcher-bar
Everything worked fine before Unity 3.8.2, so it's probably something in that version that causes this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748516 Title: Eclipse window not identified correctly in Unity Launcher-bar -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 438868] Re: Numerous applications have focus issues after emerging from a screensaver or suspend
Everything seems normal now on the lastest natty (as of March 29) with Compiz 0.9.4.0. On 03/29/2011 04:10 AM, Scott Norris wrote: Couple of comments: First, for me this always coincides with text in text-entry boxes auto- highlighting itself, so that subsequent keypresses erase what I have already typed. Second, when experiencing this bug, not only does the awesome bar fail to auto-complete; it also often drops letters if I type too fast. Third, I can always fix the problem by pressing 'alt-Tab' twice. Fourth, I frequently (but not always) find that when I alt-Tab, the Update Manager has popped under my firefox session. Fifth, this also happens with less frequency to LyX. Except in LyX, I can't enter any text anywhere until I alt-Tab twice. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438868 Title: Numerous applications have focus issues after emerging from a screensaver or suspend -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740391] Re: unable to move the Launcher to the right side of the screen
I know this has been discussed elsewhere already, but I cannot find that bug (and hence am unable to mark this as a duplicate). The other bug report discussion basically boiled down to 'not going to happen' any time soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740391 Title: unable to move the Launcher to the right side of the screen -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740780] Re: Unity crashes compiz when clicking any app under Applications
** Description changed: - Click on Applications in the unity bar and then click any application. - Unity and Compiz will crash. + Click on Applications in the unity bar, click 'See more results' under + Installed and then click any application. Unity and Compiz will crash. + + Mar 23 09:12:58 mpkossen-VPCF11C5E kernel: [ 2028.213530] compiz[4423]: + segfault at 20 ip 7fd511a7d173 sp 7fff4f244f18 error 6 in + libstdc++.so.6.0.14[7fd511a17000+e8000] + + I'm working on finding the core dump that was made. ** Also affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: compiz Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Unity crashes compiz when clicking any app under Applications + Unity appears to crash compiz when clicking any app under Applications, Installed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740780 Title: Unity appears to crash compiz when clicking any app under Applications, Installed -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740780] Re: Unity appears to crash compiz when clicking any app under Applications, Installed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 711916 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711916 Core dump file from /var/crash ** Attachment added: _usr_bin_compiz.1000.crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/740780/+attachment/1932556/+files/_usr_bin_compiz.1000.crash ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 711916 compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in std::_List_node_base::_M_hook() * You can subscribe to bug 711916 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/711916/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740780 Title: Unity appears to crash compiz when clicking any app under Applications, Installed -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740834] Re: system-config-printer.py crashed with AttributeError in rename_printer(): 'GUI' object has no attribute 'printer'
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740834 Title: system-config-printer.py crashed with AttributeError in rename_printer(): 'GUI' object has no attribute 'printer' -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740833] Re: unity-applications-daemon crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740833 Title: unity-applications-daemon crashed with SIGABRT in raise() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657634] Re: [GeForce GT 330M] nvidia 260.19.06-0ubuntu1 update triggers black screen on boot for sony vaio F-series
Have a look around and the answer is there: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics- drivers/+question/121996 -- [GeForce GT 330M] nvidia 260.19.06-0ubuntu1 update triggers black screen on boot for sony vaio F-series https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657634 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657634] Re: [GeForce GT 330M] nvidia 260.19.06-0ubuntu1 update triggers black screen on boot for sony vaio F-series
I can confirm this as well on a VPCF11C5E. 260.x drivers are completely unusable. Purple screen and a full system hang. 256.x drivers work like a charm. ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Confirmed -- [GeForce GT 330M] nvidia 260.19.06-0ubuntu1 update triggers black screen on boot for sony vaio F-series https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657634 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565382] Re: EDID configuration needed for NVIDIA driver
Works on Maverick for me. ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- EDID configuration needed for NVIDIA driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 643280] [NEW] Creating a new mail account is broken
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: thunderbird When creating a new mail account on a fresh Thunderbird on Maverick Beta, the new automated setting find screen doesn't complete, so you always have to click 'Manual setup...'. After having manually set up an account, the account is not added to the account tree, but is does show up there after a restart. This behaviour is not Mozilla's packages. ** Affects: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Creating a new mail account is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643280 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 643280] Re: Creating a new mail account is broken
Launchpad obviously lost track of the package I selected, so could somebody with proper permissions set this bug to thunderbird on Maverick, please? -- Creating a new mail account is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643280 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573358] Re: Back button disabled in configuration during 9.10-10.04 upgrade
I can second this (for 10.04 - 10.10, and a 10.10 upgrade). I just had to reinstall an Ubuntu VM because the 'Back' button was disabled and my boot loader got messed up. It's utterly annoying, especially for something so simple. -- Back button disabled in configuration during 9.10-10.04 upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 238208] Re: Need MemoryStick driver Ricoh R5C822 chipset
May I ask if there in an update on this? This problem also affects me. I'll definitely help testing! -- Need MemoryStick driver Ricoh R5C822 chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238208 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565382] Re: EDID configuration needed for NVIDIA driver
I can confirm this is still an issue in the 10.04 LTS release. I have a Sony Vaio VPCF11C5E with the same specs as the reporter. -- EDID configuration needed for NVIDIA driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 462349] Re: Mono WinForms apps don't show text on menus and button
Just wanted to let you know that I've just installed xserver-xorg-video- intel=2:2.9.0-1ubuntu2.1 and I see text in KeePass! -- Mono WinForms apps don't show text on menus and button https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462349 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57784] Re: after xrandr desktop icons can go missing
I can also confirm it still happens, somehow the dead space of the desktop is still accessible (also by mouse), and thus icons are placed there. It's been like this for years (see Jeremy Nickurak's links) and a fix would be highly appreciated! -- after xrandr desktop icons can go missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57784 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
