[Bug 1876282] Re: libc++1 is kept back after upgrade to focal
This issue also exists in 21.04 beta. Same solution works. It didn't show up until today. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876282 Title: libc++1 is kept back after upgrade to focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1876282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1062735] Re: ethercodes.dat in arpwatch is out of date
I ended up just adding this to my crontab to pull an updated copy once a month. # Update the pci id file 20 120 * * /usr/sbin/update-pciids The easy solution might be to add a cron file to do something similar. A cleaner solution would be to include it into it a dedicated package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062735 Title: ethercodes.dat in arpwatch is out of date To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/arpwatch/+bug/1062735/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1764896] Re: System will not display using displayport from AMD GPU
This is resolved now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764896 Title: System will not display using displayport from AMD GPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1764896/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1876282] Re: libc++1 is kept back after upgrade to focal
This issue also exists in 20.10. The fix works as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876282 Title: libc++1 is kept back after upgrade to focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1876282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1899272] Re: upgrade to 20.10 beta from 20.04 fails immediate configuration
HI Asavah, I took your suggestion and modified it slightly. sudo -s do-release-upgrade -d (expected to fail) cd /var/cache/apt/archives dpkg --force-depends --force-breaks -i libnss-nis_3.1-0ubuntu4_amd64.deb do-release-upgrade -d It did allow the libnss-nis package to install. Afterwards, running do- release-upgrade -d worked nicely. Thanks for you help! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899272 Title: upgrade to 20.10 beta from 20.04 fails immediate configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1899272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1899272] Re: upgrade to 20.10 beta from 20.04 fails immediate configuration
Tested after 20.10 release. No improvement. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899272 Title: upgrade to 20.10 beta from 20.04 fails immediate configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1899272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1899272] [NEW] upgrade to 20.10 beta from 20.04 fails immediate configuration
Public bug reported: This problem shows up when using any update method (update-manager -d, do-release-upgrade -d). The captured data shows an immediate-configure error. -- Fetched 0 B in 0s (0 B/s) Error in function: install apt_pkg.Error: E:Could not configure 'libc6:amd64'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libnss-nis:amd64'. Please see man 5 apt.conf under APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2) Error in sys.excepthook: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/problem_report.py", line 477, in add_to_existing self.write(f) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/problem_report.py", line 430, in write block = f.read(1048576) File "/usr/lib/python3.8/codecs.py", line 322, in decode (result, consumed) = self._buffer_decode(data, self.errors, final) UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x8b in position 1: invalid start byte Original exception was: apt_pkg.Error: E:Could not configure 'libc6:amd64'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libnss-nis:amd64'. Please see man 5 apt.conf under APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2) Error in function: install apt_pkg.Error: E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libffi8ubuntu1:amd64'. Please see man 5 apt.conf under APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2) Error in sys.excepthook: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/problem_report.py", line 477, in add_to_existing self.write(f) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/problem_report.py", line 430, in write block = f.read(1048576) File "/usr/lib/python3.8/codecs.py", line 322, in decode (result, consumed) = self._buffer_decode(data, self.errors, final) UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x8b in position 1: invalid start byte Original exception was: apt_pkg.Error: E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libffi8ubuntu1:amd64'. Please see man 5 apt.conf under APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2) Could not install the upgrades The upgrade has aborted. Your system could be in an unusable state. A recovery will run now (dpkg --configure -a). Upgrade infeasible The upgrade could not be completed, there were errors during the upgrade process. Restoring original system state Aborting Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done -- I've deleted the cache of new packages and rerun the download to confirm that I didn't have a bad package download. ubuntu-release-upgrader-core/focal-updates,focal-updates,now 1:20.04.25 all [installed] manage release upgrades ubuntu-release-upgrader-gtk/focal-updates,focal-updates,now 1:20.04.25 all [installed,automatic] manage release upgrades ubuntu-release-upgrader-qt/focal-updates,focal-updates,now 1:20.04.25 all [installed] manage release upgrades root@wizard:/var/lib# lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS Release:20.04 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:20.04.25 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-48-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CrashDB: ubuntu Date: Sat Oct 10 10:17:59 2020 InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-03-11 (1308 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Alpha amd64 (20170222) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-10-10 (0 days ago) VarLogDistupgradeTermlog: mtime.conffile..etc.update-manager.release-upgrades: 2020-04-02T08:44:51.029022 ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899272 Title: upgrade to 20.10 beta from 20.04 fails immediate configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1899272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1870562] Re: Open of CDR file fails
** Also affects: libcdr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870562 Title: Open of CDR file fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1870562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1870562] Re: Open of CDR file fails
I reinstalled v1.5 of lib cdr and inkscape works now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870562 Title: Open of CDR file fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1870562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1870562] Re: Open of CDR file fails
On further research... This appears to be a bug in libcdr... v1.6 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130914 ** Bug watch added: Document Foundation Bugzilla #130914 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130914 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870562 Title: Open of CDR file fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1870562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1870562] [NEW] Open of CDR file fails
Public bug reported: Opening of a .cdr file is supported in Inkscape and worked on my test files before the upgrade. Now it errors out with Failed to load the requested file ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: inkscape 0.92.4-5ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-21.25-generic 5.4.27 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu22 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Apr 3 09:03:29 2020 InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-03-11 (1118 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Alpha amd64 (20170222) SourcePackage: inkscape UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-04-02 (1 days ago) ** Affects: inkscape (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870562 Title: Open of CDR file fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1870562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1858015] [NEW] Option missing from color calibration instructions
Public bug reported: https://help.ubuntu.com/stable/ubuntu-help/color-calibrate- printer.html.en Lists 2 options for calibrating a printer. It should list a third. If the user has a scanner,the scanner can be used to calibrate the printer. Using an IT8 target provided at http://www.targets.coloraid.de/ or similar, the scanner can be calibrated. Then using the calibrated scanner and a target that is printed out by the printer, a calibration profile can be generated. I'm happy to help write this up if needed. ** Affects: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858015 Title: Option missing from color calibration instructions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1858015/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1764896] [NEW] System will not display using displayport from AMD GPU
Public bug reported: There are 2 monitors connected to 1 GPU. The monitor connected via a digital connection always comes up correctly. The monitor connected via DISPLAYPORT does not come up, even though the machine is booting correctly. It's almost like the DP path isn't recognized by xorg. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-15.16-generic 4.15.15 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-15-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' CompositorRunning: None Date: Tue Apr 17 18:02:09 2018 DistUpgraded: 2018-03-30 21:12:37,078 DEBUG Running PostInstallScript: './xorg_fix_proprietary.py' DistroCodename: bionic DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: nvidia, 390.48, 4.15.0-13-generic, x86_64: installed nvidia, 390.48, 4.15.0-15-generic, x86_64: installed ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes GraphicsCard: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Ellesmere [Radeon RX 470/480/570/580] [1002:67df] (rev e7) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. [MSI] Ellesmere [Radeon RX 470/480/570/580] [1462:3417] InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-03-11 (402 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Alpha amd64 (20170222) MachineType: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M. ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-4.15.0-15-generic root=UUID=68755ecb-0ee0-46a1-8a3e-c027d0cbac65 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1 SourcePackage: xorg Symptom: display UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-03-31 (17 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 12/13/2016 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: P7.20 dmi.board.name: Z170M Pro4S dmi.board.vendor: ASRock dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrP7.20:bd12/13/2016:svnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:rvnASRock:rnZ170MPro4S:rvr:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.: dmi.product.family: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.product.name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.product.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.sys.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M. version.compiz: compiz N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.91-2 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 18.0.0~rc5-1ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 18.0.0~rc5-1ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.19.6-1ubuntu3 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:18.0.1-1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.15-2 ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic third-party-packages ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764896 Title: System will not display using displayport from AMD GPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1764896/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1690953] [NEW] gdm package tries to restart service and fails
Public bug reported: on 5/15 I updated my system. During the update gdm 3.24.1.0ubuntu0.1 was updated via apt. The following packages will be upgraded: gdm3 gir1.2-gdm-1.0 git git-man libgdm1 libxen-4.8 libxenstore3.0 7 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 41 not upgraded. Need to get 684 kB/4,842 kB of archives. After this operation, 14.3 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y Get:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu zesty-updates/universe amd64 gdm3 amd64 3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1 [629 kB] Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu zesty-updates/universe amd64 libgdm1 amd64 3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1 [45.7 kB] Get:3 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu zesty-updates/universe amd64 gir1.2-gdm-1.0 amd64 3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1 [8,670 B] Fetched 684 kB in 0s (1,247 kB/s) Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... 528045 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../0-git-man_1%3a2.11.0-2ubuntu0.1_all.deb ... Unpacking git-man (1:2.11.0-2ubuntu0.1) over (1:2.11.0-2) ... Preparing to unpack .../1-git_1%3a2.11.0-2ubuntu0.1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking git (1:2.11.0-2ubuntu0.1) over (1:2.11.0-2) ... Preparing to unpack .../2-gdm3_3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking gdm3 (3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1) over (3.24.0-0ubuntu2) ... Preparing to unpack .../3-libgdm1_3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libgdm1 (3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1) over (3.24.0-0ubuntu2) ... Preparing to unpack .../4-gir1.2-gdm-1.0_3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking gir1.2-gdm-1.0 (3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1) over (3.24.0-0ubuntu2) ... Preparing to unpack .../5-libxenstore3.0_4.8.0-1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libxenstore3.0:amd64 (4.8.0-1ubuntu2.1) over (4.8.0-1ubuntu2) ... Preparing to unpack .../6-libxen-4.8_4.8.0-1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libxen-4.8:amd64 (4.8.0-1ubuntu2.1) over (4.8.0-1ubuntu2) ... Setting up git-man (1:2.11.0-2ubuntu0.1) ... Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-19) ... ureadahead will be reprofiled on next reboot Processing triggers for libglib2.0-0:amd64 (2.52.0-1) ... Setting up libxenstore3.0:amd64 (4.8.0-1ubuntu2.1) ... Setting up libgdm1 (3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1) ... Setting up libxen-4.8:amd64 (4.8.0-1ubuntu2.1) ... Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.24-9ubuntu2) ... Processing triggers for systemd (232-21ubuntu3) ... Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.6.1-2) ... Processing triggers for dbus (1.10.10-1ubuntu2) ... Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme (0.15-1) ... Setting up git (1:2.11.0-2ubuntu0.1) ... Setting up gir1.2-gdm-1.0 (3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1) ... Setting up gdm3 (3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1) ... gdm.service is not active, cannot reload. invoke-rc.d: initscript gdm3, action "reload" failed. The Reload failed because I use Kwin. The failure should have been more graceful. ** Affects: network-manager-pptp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690953 Title: gdm package tries to restart service and fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-pptp/+bug/1690953/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1313376] Re: Ricoh SG3110dn PPD missing paper sizes
Hi Till, The printer supports all of the following, plus some that would be real unusual like Marching Band, Compact, etc. It might just be simpler to find a way to support custom sizes. * denotes existing Std Paper Tray and Bypass *Letter 8.5" x 11.0" *Legal 8.5" x 14.0" *Half Letter5.5" x 8.5" Executive 7.25" x 10.5" F 8.0" x 13.0" Folio 8.5" x 13.0" *A4 *A5 *A6 Envelopes Com10 Monarch 7.25" x 10.5" C6 C5 DL Custom Size - Std Tray 2.1" x 5.0" - 8.5" x 14" Custom Size Multi bypass tray 2.1" x 5.0" - 8.5" x *51"* * Note that most of the cards below are index or Photo sizes, but can be* * printed on the card stock the printer supports.* US Business Card2.0" x 3.5" 3x5 3.0" x 5.0" 4x6 4.0" x 6.0" 5x8 5.0" x 8.0" 2R 2.5" x 3.5" 3R 3.5" x 5.0" 4R 4.0" x 6.0" 5R 5.0" x 7.0" 6R 6.0" x 8.0" 8R 8.0" x 10.0" *B5JIS Acceptable Paper Types *Plain Paper *Inkjet Plain Paper *Glossy Paper *Postcard *Inkjet Postcards *Envelopes* *Thick Paper Terry > Did you add all missing paper sizes in the attached PPD? If not, please > give us a complete list of missing paper sizes. Thanks. > > ** Package changed: rastertosag-gdi (Ubuntu) => foomatic-db (Ubuntu) > > ** Changed in: foomatic-db (Ubuntu) >Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313376 Title: Ricoh SG3110dn PPD missing paper sizes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/foomatic-db/+bug/1313376/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1313376] [NEW] Ricoh SG3110dn PPD missing paper sizes
Public bug reported: The RICOH_SG3110DN.ppd is missing a number of paper sizes including 4x6. I can't see where to file this. I have an adjusted PPD that contains the 4x6. How can I go about getting this in the fixed PPD. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: printer-driver-sag-gdi 0.1-3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: KDE Date: Sun Apr 27 09:21:36 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-25 (1 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140416.2) Lpstat: device for C543dn: dnssd://Lexmark%20C543._ipp._tcp.local/ device for CardPrinter: dnssd://RICOH%20AficioSG3110DN%20%5B7F8186%5D._pdl-datastream._tcp.local/ device for PDF: cups-pdf:/ device for SG3110DN: dnssd://RICOH%20AficioSG3110DN%20%5B7F8186%5D._pdl-datastream._tcp.local/ MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name PackageArchitecture: all Papersize: letter PpdFiles: C543dn: Lexmark C543 Foomatic/Postscript PDF: Generic CUPS-PDF Printer CardPrinter: RICOH AficioSG3110DN PXL SG3110DN: RICOH AficioSG3110DN PXL ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.13.0-24-generic root=UUID=7ace8435-91c4-4b61-a6b3-e0c17d287caa ro nomdmonddf nomdmonisw SourcePackage: rastertosag-gdi UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 12/16/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 2004 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: P7P55D EVO dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr2004:bd12/16/2010:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP7P55DEVO:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer ** Affects: rastertosag-gdi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty ** Attachment added: "RICOH_SG3110DN.ppd.working" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313376/+attachment/4098450/+files/RICOH_SG3110DN.ppd.working -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313376 Title: Ricoh SG3110dn PPD missing paper sizes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rastertosag-gdi/+bug/1313376/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1293704] Re: Kleopatra don't support s/mime
Hi Felix, It does allow the tests to pass at the Kleopatria startup. The cursory look that I took the the app, show that everything appears to be working. Thanks for jumping on the Felix! Regards, Terry > This is a regression introduced in gpgme1.0 1.4.3-0.1ubuntu2 which > completely disables the gpgsm (S/MIME) and gpgconf backends. > > Could you please test this package: > https://launchpad.net/~debfx/+archive/experimental/+packages?field.name_filt > er=gpgme1.0 > > It basically reverts the changes from 1.4.3-0.1ubuntu2 and fixes a build > failure, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1293704 Title: Kleopatra don't support s/mime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpgme1.0/+bug/1293704/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1290717]
Daniel - As you requested ATR:AddressAttribute ATR:DispatchModeAttribute ATR:MDNStateAttribute ATR:ScamAttribute ATR:SentActionAttribute ATR:SentBehaviourAttribute ATR:TransportAttribute ATR:contactmetadata ATR:pop3resourceattribute GID PLD:ENVELOPE PLD:HEAD PLD:RFC822 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290717 Title: akonadi 1.11.80 fails to start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/akonadi/+bug/1290717/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1290717]
That took care of the akonadi issue. Thanks Daniel !! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290717 Title: akonadi 1.11.80 fails to start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/akonadi/+bug/1290717/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1293032] [NEW] gpgme not complied with correct switches
Public bug reported: In trying to start up Kleopatra I discovered that the self test failed. It found 2 errors. First, the GpgSM test failed as the library was complied without support for gpgsm. Second, the GpgConf test failed as the library was complied without support for gpgconf. Description:Ubuntu Trusty Tahr (development branch) Release:14.04 libgpgme11: Installed: 1.4.3-0.1ubuntu3 Candidate: 1.4.3-0.1ubuntu3 Version table: *** 1.4.3-0.1ubuntu3 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: gpgme (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Package changed: ubuntustudio-default-settings (Ubuntu) => gpgme (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1293032 Title: gpgme not complied with correct switches To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpgme/+bug/1293032/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1290717]
The updated packages on 3/10 allowed Akonadi to start doing a data scan that never finished. The packages released on 3.11 are back to the original issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290717 Title: akonadi 1.11.80 fails to start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/akonadi/+bug/1290717/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168777] [NEW] Words Lynix expects to find in banners is too limited
Public bug reported: In the file tests_banners on line 27 is the following: LEGAL_BANNER_STRINGS=" access authorized Legal legal monitor owner policy policies private prohibited this unauthorized" There are a lot of ways to begin the wording of a sentence in a banner, but at a minimum having the option to have Access capitalized and also to have the word "restricted" available would make this package easier to use. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: lynis 1.3.0-1 [modified: usr/share/lynis/include/tests_authentication usr/share/lynis/include/tests_banners usr/share/lynis/include/tests_kernel usr/share/lynis/include/tests_storage] ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-17.27-generic 3.8.6 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-17-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Apr 13 17:16:54 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-09-04 (587 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Beta amd64+mac (20110901) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: lynis UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-03-23 (21 days ago) ** Affects: lynis (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168777 Title: Words Lynix expects to find in banners is too limited To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lynis/+bug/1168777/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168775] [NEW] lynis does not process security/limits.conf correctly
Public bug reported:
In script tests_kernel there is a test for core file status 5820. The
problem is that in lines 267 and 268 the output is an A else B type of
statement. The problem code and a proposed fixed are attached below:
267,268c267,268
< FIND1=`cat /etc/security/limits.conf | awk '{ if ($1=="*" &&
$2=="soft" && $3=="core" && $4=="0") { print "soft core disabled" } else {
print "soft core enabled" } }'`
< FIND2=`cat /etc/security/limits.conf | awk '{ if ($1=="*" &&
$2=="hard" && $3=="core" && $4=="0") { print "hard core disabled" } else {
print "hard core enabled" } }'`
---
> FIND1=`cat /etc/security/limits.conf | awk '{ if ($1=="*" &&
> $2=="soft" && $3=="core" && $4=="0") { print "soft core disabled" } }'`
> FIND2=`cat /etc/security/limits.conf | awk '{ if ($1=="*" &&
> $2=="hard" && $3=="core" && $4=="0") { print "hard core disabled" } }'`
Basically.. With the else {...} portion of the statement that causes
something to print out each time instead of just for the one line that
matches. The causes the output of the script to be incorrect and the
result printed in the analysis to be wrong.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: lynis 1.3.0-1 [modified: usr/share/lynis/include/tests_authentication
usr/share/lynis/include/tests_banners usr/share/lynis/include/tests_kernel
usr/share/lynis/include/tests_storage]
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-17.27-generic 3.8.6
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-17-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Apr 13 17:04:13 2013
InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-09-04 (587 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Beta amd64+mac (20110901)
MarkForUpload: True
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=en_US
TERM=xterm
PATH=(custom, no user)
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: lynis
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-03-23 (21 days ago)
** Affects: lynis (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168775
Title:
lynis does not process security/limits.conf correctly
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lynis/+bug/1168775/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1062735] [NEW] ethercodes.dat in arpwatch is out of date
Public bug reported: The file /usr/share/arpwatch/ethercodes.dat is out of date. Description:Ubuntu quantal (development branch) Release:12.10 arpwatch: Installed: 2.1a15-1.2 Candidate: 2.1a15-1.2 Version table: *** 2.1a15-1.2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status The software does not correctly report the manufacturer of the detected MAC. Updating the ** Affects: arpwatch (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062735 Title: ethercodes.dat in arpwatch is out of date To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/arpwatch/+bug/1062735/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 858370] [NEW] Packaging error -greens.png
Public bug reported: When trying to update digikam in the 11.10 beta I get the following error -- Package: /var/cache/apt/archives/digikam-data_2%3a2.1.1-0ubuntu1_all.deb Error: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/digikam/2Greens.png', which is also in package digikam-doc 1.2~svn1134171-1 ** Affects: digikam (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858370 Title: Packaging error -greens.png To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/digikam/+bug/858370/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 846451] Re: Packaging problem in Beta 1
Just as a test I pulled down the flash 11 RC1 (version 11.0.r1.129) from http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplatformruntimes/flashplayer11/ It also has a dependency on libkutils4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846451 Title: Packaging problem in Beta 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/846451/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 846451] Re: Packaging problem in Beta 1
# apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: flashplugin-nonfree : Depends: flashplugin-installer but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. # apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree flashplugin-installer Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: flashplugin-installer : Depends: flashplugin-downloader but it is not installable Depends: nspluginwrapper but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. # apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree flashplugin-installer Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: flashplugin-installer : Depends: flashplugin-downloader but it is not installable Depends: nspluginwrapper but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. The more that I look at this is appears that the flashplugin-downloader is missing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846451 Title: Packaging problem in Beta 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/846451/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 846451] [NEW] Packaging problem in Beta 1
Public bug reported: I did a fresh install of Kubuntu 11.10 Beta 1 from the Alternate installer CD using the AMD64 architecture.. When I tried to install flash it failed. Installing flashplugin-nonfree or flashplugin-installer gave the following errors: ** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846451 Title: Packaging problem in Beta 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/846451/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 700409] Re: Upstart does not pass cmd line args to cron
Steve, You're right. When I initially went thru the examples I didn't see anything except the exec command line. I've since found the script function and how to resolve the problem. I've modified the script as follows: # cron - regular background program processing daemon # # cron is a standard UNIX program that runs user-specified programs at # periodic scheduled times description "regular background program processing daemon" start on runlevel [2345] stop on runlevel [!2345] expect fork respawn script . /etc/default/cron exec cron $LSBNAMES $EXTRA_OPTS end script This seems to address the problem. ** Attachment added: "cron.conf" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cron/+bug/700409/+attachment/1858310/+files/cron.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700409 Title: Upstart does not pass cmd line args to cron -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 716311] Re: flash not installed
I see this as well. It appears that the tar.gz file gets downloaded, but the libflashplayer.so flie is never installed correctly. I'm running 64 bit as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/716311 Title: flash not installed -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 707770] Re: libpng.so.3 missing for 32 bit apps
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707770 Title: libpng.so.3 missing for 32 bit apps -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 707770] [NEW] libpng.so.3 missing for 32 bit apps
Public bug reported: I was installing an application that required the 32 bit compatibility libs on a 64 bit system. The library that was needed was /usr/lib32/libpng.so.3 It turns out that this should be a link to /usr/lib32/libpng12.so.0. Installing this link fixed the issue, but I would suggest that when the package libpng3 is installed then the link should be installed at the same time. lsb_release -rd = Description:Ubuntu 10.10 Release: 10.10 Package Version - 1.2.44-1 of libpng3 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: libpng3 1.2.44-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic 2.6.35.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-24-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Jan 25 19:43:41 2011 InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: libpng ** Affects: libpng (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707770 Title: libpng.so.3 missing for 32 bit apps -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 700409] [NEW] Upstart does not pass cmd line args to cron
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: upstart The defaults for cron are listed in /etc/default/cron. If I uncomment EXTRA_OPTS=" -L 2" in order to add additional logging to cron nothing happens when the process is restarted using service cron restart or service cron stop/start. This occurs because the upstart command for cron exec's cron with no input from the default file. Other services controlled by upstart may have the same issue. If the defaults need to occur elsewhere then could the documentation be updated or a README in /etc/default be created with the correct process? Description:Ubuntu 10.10 Release:10.10 Patched current as of 1/8/2010 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: upstart 0.6.6-3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic 2.6.35.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-24-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Jan 8 11:22:28 2011 InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE= PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: upstart ** Affects: upstart (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700409 Title: Upstart does not pass cmd line args to cron -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 700409] Re: Upstart does not pass cmd line args to cron
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700409 Title: Upstart does not pass cmd line args to cron -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 591980] Re: system-config-printer-kde missing error
fixed for me as well. Lucid w/ 4.5.1. The last update that I had indicated the 4.5.1 has not been released for Maverick yet. -- system-config-printer-kde missing error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591980 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdeadmin in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535538] [NEW] no feed back in jockey
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: jockey-kde After initialing starting up jockey-kde the I was presented with only one option - to install the Nvidia drivers. With only one presented choice the obvious thing to do was to press activate. This caused the selection window to gray out, but nothing else happened. There appears to be no default selection where there is only one choice. This is could be an issue. The bigger issue is that pressing activate with no selection provides no feed back that the application still needs information. Once I clicked on the needed driver and then pressed activate, everything worked as expected. Description:Ubuntu 9.10 Release:9.10 t...@gremlin:~$ apt-cache policy jockey-kde jockey-kde: Installed: 0.5.5-0ubuntu3 Candidate: 0.5.5-0ubuntu3 Version table: *** 0.5.5-0ubuntu3 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com karmic-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.5.5-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Mar 9 23:22:37 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Lsusb: Bus 002 Device 004: ID 046d:c517 Logitech, Inc. LX710 Cordless Desktop Laser Bus 002 Device 002: ID 8087:0020 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 002: ID 8087:0020 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: jockey-kde 0.5.5-0ubuntu3 PackageArchitecture: all ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.31-20-generic root=UUID=46e01e3e-ae29-44ae-9f32-50941493dd9c ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-20.57-generic SourcePackage: jockey Uname: Linux 2.6.31-20-generic x86_64 XsessionErrors: (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1895): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (npviewer.bin:2384): Gtk-WARNING **: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libqtcurve.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 dmi.bios.date: 07/28/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 0209 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: P7P55D EVO dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0209:bd07/28/2009:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP7P55DEVO:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer ** Affects: jockey (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- no feed back in jockey https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535538] Re: no feed back in jockey
** Attachment added: ".var.log.jockey.log.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670838/.var.log.jockey.log.txt ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670839/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670840/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670841/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Devices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670842/Devices.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670843/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670844/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670845/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670846/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670847/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670848/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: "XorgConf.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670849/XorgConf.txt -- no feed back in jockey https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
