[Bug 1925522] Re: Introduce the 465 driver series, fabric-manager, and libnvidia-nscq

2021-05-18 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Performed a review of the remaining 2 NEW packages. Non-blocking issues
for libnvidia-nscq-*

 - Build-Depends on a non-versioned debhelper?
 - Same as above, debian/rules BRANCH variable is set to 999
 - Same as above, weird `rm -f lib*.so` in override_dh_auto_build - cleanup 
needed

Besides that, I guess all the 4 new packages suffer from some lintian
warnings (forgot to mention those earlier). Possibly good to have some
overrides for those that make no sense, but I'm listing some that would
be good to fix:

W: libnvidia-nscq-460 source: ancient-standards-version 3.8.0 (released 
2008-06-04) (current is 4.5.0)
W: libnvidia-nscq-460 source: override_dh_fixperms-does-not-call-dh_fixperms 
(line 124)
W: libnvidia-nscq-460 source: package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version 9

Still, I think it's non-blocking for a package of this caliber.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925522

Title:
  Introduce the 465 driver series, fabric-manager, and libnvidia-nscq

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/1925522/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1877088] Please test proposed package

2021-05-18 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,

Accepted linux-base into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
base/4.5ubuntu1.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877088

Title:
  [UBUNTU 20.04] installkernel script does not symlink /boot/initrd.img
  which is required with the default zipl.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1877088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1877088] Please test proposed package

2021-05-18 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,

Accepted linux-base into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
base/4.5ubuntu3.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877088

Title:
  [UBUNTU 20.04] installkernel script does not symlink /boot/initrd.img
  which is required with the default zipl.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1877088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903054] Re: [SRU] Please merge u-boot 2020.10+dfsg-1 from Debian unstable

2021-05-18 Thread Dave Jones
** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903054

Title:
  [SRU] Please merge u-boot 2020.10+dfsg-1 from Debian unstable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/1903054/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928777] [NEW] Please merge u-boot 2021.01+dfsg-4 from Debian unstable

2021-05-18 Thread Dave Jones
Public bug reported:

Please merge u-boot 2021.01+dfsg-4 from Debian unstable.

Updated changelog and diff against Debian unstable to be attached below.

** Affects: u-boot (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928777

Title:
  Please merge u-boot 2021.01+dfsg-4 from Debian unstable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/1928777/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928001] Re: [SRU] New stable release 2.68.1

2021-05-18 Thread Iain Lane
automake-1.16> same started happening in impish too - you could cherry-
pick 2b8b44ffc37047231757780952f6290398fb73e2 to the hints maybe?

netplan.io> slyon told me this is known bad and is skipped in other
releases already (upstream) and will be included in the next SRU to
hirsute, if any. could be hinted too?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928001

Title:
  [SRU] New stable release 2.68.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1928001/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1877088] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] installkernel script does not symlink /boot/initrd.img which is required with the default zipl.conf

2021-05-18 Thread Frank Heimes
** Tags removed: verification-failed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877088

Title:
  [UBUNTU 20.04] installkernel script does not symlink /boot/initrd.img
  which is required with the default zipl.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1877088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-05-18 Thread fuomag
Still present on 5.12.4 as well

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926938

Title:
  Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal
  20.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1926938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 273507] Re: No sound effects play when "play sound effects when buttons are clicked" is enabled

2021-05-18 Thread amazing pharma chem
Hi its a good weather with a good smoke from
https://www.medicalmarijuanabudshop.com/ their service is amazing try
them out

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273507

Title:
  No sound effects play when "play sound effects when buttons are
  clicked" is enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcanberra/+bug/273507/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1274090] Re: apache2-bin declares httpd, but does not provide webserver

2021-05-18 Thread amazing pharma chem
Hi its a good weather with a good smoke from
https://www.medicalmarijuanabudshop.com/ their service is amazing try
them out

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1274090

Title:
  apache2-bin declares httpd, but does not provide webserver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1274090/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1274090] Re: apache2-bin declares httpd, but does not provide webserver

2021-05-18 Thread amazing pharma chem
hi is this doesn't goes through please kindly contact
https://globalhomemed.com/ to get your best pain relief and cancer
drugs, alot stress in recent time

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1274090

Title:
  apache2-bin declares httpd, but does not provide webserver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1274090/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1913421] Re: Load of pre-upgrade qemu modules needs to avoid noexec

2021-05-18 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Hi Markus,
yeah the intention is to pick one once we agree with Debian which one to not go 
back too often. That was discussion was stuck for a while but recently 
unblocked.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913421

Title:
  Load of pre-upgrade qemu modules needs to avoid noexec

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1913421/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927037] Re: ath9k driver: miniPCIe Atheros AR93xx not recognized

2021-05-18 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Sorry for the slow response, there was a long weekend in between. Can
you try the new kernel from
https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~juergh/lp1927037/?

You also need to:
echo 'dtoverlay=pcie-32bit-dma' >> /boot/firmware/config.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927037

Title:
  ath9k driver: miniPCIe Atheros AR93xx not recognized

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1927037/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928758] Re: All apt commands failed after upgrade to 27.0.2~20.04.1

2021-05-18 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Hi Ulrik, thanks for reporting this problem.

How are you creating the machines in the serves ? I just want to
understand the process you are using to reproduce the issue here and
find a fix for it.

Also, when can you also say the apt version that was being used when you
upgraded ubuntu-advantage-tools to 27.0.2 ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928758

Title:
  All apt commands failed after upgrade to 27.0.2~20.04.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1928758/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928710] Re: ubuntu server 20.04 LTS for ARM64 on Raspberry Pi4 could not handle more than 32 USB3 devices

2021-05-18 Thread Ye He
So it looks like other than the internal devices that count towards this
xHCI max limit of 32 (what are they? Audio? Bluetooth? Can they be
disabled to free up space), the 16 port USB3 hub itself is probably
daisy chained internally and takes up spots as well.  I've read that by
switching to the eHCI driver I would not be limited to this 32 but I
would downgrade to USB2 speed instead, which I could live with.   So if
this limit of 32 on xHCI just cannot be solved with the 1 USB controller
onboard and the xHCI driver, is there a workaround to load the eHCI
driver instead?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928710

Title:
  ubuntu server 20.04 LTS for ARM64 on Raspberry Pi4 could not handle
  more than 32 USB3 devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1928710/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1664844] Re: No distinction between link-up and link-down interfaces

2021-05-18 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
+ 
+ Since very long, we had a feature request in netplan to determine the
+ activation mode of a given network interface. We got requests to enable
+ marking some interfaces as 'manual', meaning that networkd (or any other
+ backend) would not control its state in any way, requiring the
+ administrator to bring the interface up or down manually. The other
+ request was to mark a interface as 'off', that is: forcing the network
+ interface to always be down until the configuration option isn't
+ changed.
+ 
+ This was mainly requested for the networkd backend and requires the new
+ feature of specifying ActivationPolicy= for interfaces, alongside the
+ required netplan changes.
+ 
+ This feature is present in systemd 248 - for netplan supported stable
+ series we have decided to cherry-pick and backport this feature on top
+ of current systemd. The networkd feature basically adds the following 5
+ ActivationPolicy modes: always-down, down, manual, up, always-up. For
+ netplan purposes we only use 'always-down' and 'manual'.
+ 
+ The netplan feature, hopefully landing as part of 0.103, is called
+ 'activation-mode' and supports two values: 'manual' and 'off'.
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ 
+ For the systemd part:
+ 
+  * Bring up a VM test environment with either a dummy interface or an 
interface that can be safely manipulated.
+  * Upgrade systemd to the -proposed version
+  * For the target interface, create/modify the networkd configuration (for 
instance by adding /etc/systemd/network/20-.network) to include the 
ActivationPolicy= setting in [Link], for instance:
+ 
+ [Match]
+ Name=dummy0
+ 
+ [Network]
+ Address=192.168.10.30/24
+ Gateway=192.168.10.1
+ 
+ [Link]
+ ActivationPolicy=manual
+ 
+  * Try all 5 combinations of ActivationPolicy values: always-down, down,
+ manual, up, always-up - doing `sudo networkctl reload` everytime and
+ checking if the interface behaves as expected.
+ 
+ [Where problems could occur]
+ 
+ The patchset modifies quite a lot of code in the networkd link handling
+ code paths, so regressions could appear in how networkd manages links -
+ maybe by suddenly certain interfaces not getting brought up as they were
+ before.
+ 
+ ---
+ 
+ 
+ [Original Description]
+ 
+ [Old Impact]
  Users need to write valid configuration, especially for new features that are 
approved by not yet implemented, such as marking a link "optional".
  
- [Test case]
+ [Old Test case]
  Write a netplan configuration:
  
  network:
-   version: 2
-   renderer: networkd
-   ethernets:
- eth0:
-   optional: yes
-   dhcp4: yes
+   version: 2
+   renderer: networkd
+   ethernets:
+ eth0:
+   optional: yes
+   dhcp4: yes
  
  And run 'netplan apply'. Netplan should write configuration for the link
  and not error out with a syntax error.
  
- [Regression potential]
+ [Old Regression potential]
  This has a minimal potential for regression: the new keyword was added to be 
supported already by consumers of netplan (users, cloud-init) so that they 
could start writing config with the new key and that configuration to be seen 
as valid by netplan before the backend is implemented. There is no functional 
change besides allowing for the value to exist in a netplan configuation.
  
  ---
  
  If I define an interface in netplan (even one which has no DHCP type and
  no addresses), it's not possible to determine if its adminStatus should
  be enabled (link up) or disabled (link down).
  
  I can completely exclude an interface from the netplan configuration,
  but I think that implies that not only its adminStatus is "disabled" by
  default, but also netplan will not be able to do anything "nice" for the
  interface, such as rename it to what the user specified in MAAS.
  
  If I include the interface but don't specify any addresses or DHCP, it
  isn't clear if it will be link up (my current assumption) or link down.
  
  There should be a way to allow an interface to be recognized by netplan
  (and even partially configured, waiting for the user to run something
  like 'ifup ' on a manual but not auto-started interface in
  ifupdown), but marked administratively disabled. (adminStatus down)

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1664844

Title:
  No distinction between link-up and link-down interfaces

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1664844/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928744] Re: Disk IO very slow on kernel 4.15.0-142-generic

2021-05-18 Thread Chris Guiver
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:

apport-collect 1928744

When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this
functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs.

Note: you may have issues with this, as you've changed the package to
the HWE kernel (kernel 5.4 for 18.04) but your details imply you're
using 18.04's GA kernel of 4.15 (Ubuntu 16.04 using HWE uses the 4.15
kernel)

If you have issues; please change the package to 'linux' then try
apport-collect again.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928744

Title:
  Disk IO very slow on kernel 4.15.0-142-generic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe/+bug/1928744/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1925452] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-05-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-18 04:19 EDT---
Verified also on groovy and hirsuite..

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925452

Title:
  [Ubuntu 21.04] net/mlx5: Fix HW spec violation configuring uplink

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1925452/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1912347] Re: freeipmi-ipmiseld: missing '/var/cache/ipmiseld/' directory in package freeipmi-ipmiseld

2021-05-18 Thread ashish kumar
thank you for sharing with us  https://get-vidmateapp.com  https://get-
mobdroapk.com

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912347

Title:
  freeipmi-ipmiseld: missing '/var/cache/ipmiseld/' directory in package
  freeipmi-ipmiseld

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeipmi/+bug/1912347/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891802] Re: Raspberry Pi: setting gpu_mem in usercfg.txt is ignored

2021-05-18 Thread Dave Jones
** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891802

Title:
  Raspberry Pi: setting gpu_mem in usercfg.txt is ignored

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/1891802/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928774] [NEW] RTL8188EE Wireless Network Adapter not supported

2021-05-18 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Public bug reported:

[Impact]

PCIe NIC is not recognized:

$ sudo lspci -nn -k -v
00:00.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Broadcom Inc. and subsidiaries Device [14e4:2711] 
(rev 20) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 41
Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0
I/O behind bridge: -0fff [size=4K]
Memory behind bridge: f800-f80f [size=1M]
Prefetchable memory behind bridge: [disabled]
Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 3
Capabilities: [ac] Express Root Port (Slot-), MSI 00
Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
Capabilities: [180] Vendor Specific Information: ID= Rev=0 Len=028 

Capabilities: [240] L1 PM Substates
Kernel driver in use: pcieport

01:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8188EE 
Wireless Network Adapter [10ec:8179] (rev 01)
Subsystem: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8188EE Wireless Network 
Adapter [10ec:8197]
Flags: fast devsel, IRQ 255
I/O ports at  [disabled]
Memory at 6 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=16K]
Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
Capabilities: [70] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
Capabilities: [140] Device Serial Number 00-e0-4c-ff-fe-81-91-01
Capabilities: [150] Latency Tolerance Reporting

[Test Case]

$ ls /sys/class/net/
eth0  lo

[Where Problems Could Occur]

The usual, when new modules are enabled. Crashes and/or splats due to
buggy modules.

** Affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu Focal)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu Groovy)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu Hirsute)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928774

Title:
  RTL8188EE Wireless Network Adapter not supported

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1928774/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928773] [NEW] New upstream microreleases 10.17 12.7 13.3

2021-05-18 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Public bug reported:

[Impact]

 * MRE for latest stable fixes of Postgres released on May 2021

[Test Case]

 * The Postgres MREs traditionally rely on the large set of autopkgtests
   to run for verification. In a PPA those are all already pre-checked to
   be good for this upload.

[Regression Potential]

 * Upstreams tests are usually great and in additon in the Archive there
   are plenty of autopkgtests that in the past catched issues before being
   released.
   But never the less there always is a risk for something to break. Since
   these are general stable releases I can't pinpoint them to a most-likely
   area.
   - usually this works smoothly except a few test hickups (flaky) that need to 
be
 clarified to be sure. Pre-checks will catch those to be discussed upfront 
(as last time)

[Other Info]

 * This is a reoccurring MRE, see below and all the references
 * This includes a fix for one CVE:
CVE-2021-3393 - only v12 for on Focal/Groovy

---

Current versions in supported releases that got updates:
 postgresql-13 | 13.2-1 | hirsute | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, 
riscv64, s390x
 postgresql-12 | 12.6-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 | groovy-security | source, amd64, 
arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
 postgresql-12 | 12.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 | focal-security | source, amd64, arm64, 
armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
 postgresql-10 | 10.16-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 | bionic-security | source, amd64, 
arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x

No new version for:
 postgresql-9.5 | 9.5.25-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 | xenial-security | source, amd64, 
arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x

Special cases:
- Impish is already synced from Debian.

Standing MRE - Consider last updates as template:
- pad.lv/1637236
- pad.lv/1664478
- pad.lv/1690730
- pad.lv/1713979
- pad.lv/1730661
- pad.lv/1747676
- pad.lv/1752271
- pad.lv/1786938
- pad.lv/1815665
- pad.lv/1828012
- pad.lv/1833211
- pad.lv/1839058
- pad.lv/1863108
- pad.lv/1892335
- pad.lv/1915254

As usual we test and prep from the PPA and then push through
SRU/Security as applicable.

** Affects: postgresql-12 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: postgresql-10 (Ubuntu Bionic)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: In Progress

** Affects: postgresql-12 (Ubuntu Focal)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: In Progress

** Affects: postgresql-12 (Ubuntu Groovy)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: In Progress

** Affects: postgresql-13 (Ubuntu Hirsute)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: In Progress

** Affects: postgresql-13 (Ubuntu Impish)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Fix Released

** Changed in: postgresql-12 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** No longer affects: postgresql-10 (Ubuntu Impish)

** Changed in: postgresql-13 (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: postgresql-13 (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: postgresql-12 (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: postgresql-12 (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: postgresql-10 (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928773

Title:
  New upstream microreleases 10.17 12.7 13.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-12/+bug/1928773/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928700] Re: new postinst hook requires initramfs-tools

2021-05-18 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted linux-base into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
base/4.5ubuntu3.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928700

Title:
  new postinst hook requires initramfs-tools

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-base/+bug/1928700/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928700] Please test proposed package

2021-05-18 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted linux-base into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
base/4.5ubuntu1.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928700

Title:
  new postinst hook requires initramfs-tools

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-base/+bug/1928700/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928656] Re: [i915] Horizontal lines of flickering random pixels on Comet Lake

2021-05-18 Thread Mahmoud Elbarbari
I do not know how to use the new kernel. If you can let me know how I
can do it, I would try them.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928656

Title:
  [i915] Horizontal lines of flickering random pixels on Comet Lake

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe-5.8/+bug/1928656/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1882143] Re: /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin:11:SvtBroadcaster::Add:SvtListener::StartListening:SwAccessibleNoTextFrame::SwAccessibleNoTextFrame:SwAccessibleGraphic::SwAccessibleGraphic:

2021-05-18 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: df-libreoffice
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882143

Title:
  
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin:11:SvtBroadcaster::Add:SvtListener::StartListening:SwAccessibleNoTextFrame::SwAccessibleNoTextFrame:SwAccessibleGraphic::SwAccessibleGraphic:SwAccessibleMap::GetContext

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1882143/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1921105] Re: SRU: backport cvise to 18.04 LTS, 20.04 LTS and 20.10

2021-05-18 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
How extensive is the build-time test suite? Does it check all the
possible usage scenarios? Since looking at tests/ I only saw two tests
in there - is there something more?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921105

Title:
  SRU: backport cvise to 18.04 LTS, 20.04 LTS and 20.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cvise/+bug/1921105/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928700] Re: new postinst hook requires initramfs-tools

2021-05-18 Thread Timo Aaltonen
it's actually enough to test that a kernel installs on a clean chroot,
and I've tested bionic/focal/hirsute that they're fine now with the new
version

** Tags added: verification-done-hirsute

** Tags added: verification-done-focal

** Tags added: verification-done-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928700

Title:
  new postinst hook requires initramfs-tools

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-base/+bug/1928700/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1926078] Re: Unable to detect touchpad

2021-05-18 Thread Daniel van Vugt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1881319 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881319

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1881319
   Touchpad not recognized Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ARE05 (probably falsely as touch 
panel)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926078

Title:
  Unable to detect touchpad

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1926078/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1881319] Re: Touchpad not recognized Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ARE05

2021-05-18 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Summary changed:

- Touchpad not recognized Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ARE05 (probably falsely as touch 
panel)
+ Touchpad not recognized Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ARE05

** Tags added: hirsute

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881319

Title:
  Touchpad not recognized Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ARE05

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1881319/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1919245] Re: [Lenovo Ideapad 5-15ARE05] Touchpad does not work at all

2021-05-18 Thread Daniel van Vugt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1881319 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881319

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1881319
   Touchpad not recognized Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ARE05 (probably falsely as touch 
panel)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919245

Title:
  [Lenovo Ideapad 5-15ARE05] Touchpad does not work at all

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1919245/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927827] Re: Error launching cheese: Native Windows taller than 65535 pixels are not supported

2021-05-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The GTK issue is known as
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/931

There is perhaps a cheese issue there as well though on what it's trying
to render

** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues #931
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/931

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927827

Title:
  Error launching cheese: Native Windows taller than 65535 pixels are
  not supported

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/1927827/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1925008] Re: no memory hot-plugging in cloud-images

2021-05-18 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
groovy' to 'verification-done-groovy'. If the problem still exists,
change the tag 'verification-needed-groovy' to 'verification-failed-
groovy'.

If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.

See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: verification-needed-groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925008

Title:
  no memory hot-plugging in cloud-images

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1925008/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891817] Re: Raspberry Pi: u-boot hangs when (non-boot-related) USB disks are attached during boot

2021-05-18 Thread Dave Jones
USB MSD support under u-boot on the Pi does seem to have several
problems (we'd attempted to get USB boot working with u-boot, but while
some devices would be recognized others wouldn't, or would only be
recognized intermittently). As of groovy (20.10) we've moved away from
using u-boot in the boot sequence so I'm afraid I'll have to mark this
as "won't fix".

However, it is now (since focal's .2 release) possible to migrate such
an install away from using u-boot as well, which may mitigate your
problems. I've written a quick tutorial about this at
https://waldorf.waveform.org.uk/2021/you-boot-no-u-boot-first.html in
case you want to give it a try.

** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891817

Title:
  Raspberry Pi: u-boot hangs when (non-boot-related) USB disks are
  attached during boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/1891817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891817] Re: Raspberry Pi: u-boot hangs when (non-boot-related) USB disks are attached during boot

2021-05-18 Thread Dave Jones
I should add that in that post, you'll only need the "Boot Surgery"
section if you're happy to remain booting from the SD card (the post is
primarily intended for those wishing to boot a focal install directly
from USB storage with no SD card at all, but the Boot Surgery section is
equally applicable to your case of wishing to boot from an SD card, but
without u-boot).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891817

Title:
  Raspberry Pi: u-boot hangs when (non-boot-related) USB disks are
  attached during boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/1891817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1925008] Re: no memory hot-plugging in cloud-images

2021-05-18 Thread Olaf Schmerse
updated kernel:
...
Setting up linux-image-5.4.0-1039-kvm (5.4.0-1039.40) ...
I: /boot/vmlinuz is now a symlink to vmlinuz-5.4.0-1039-kvm
I: /boot/initrd.img is now a symlink to initrd.img-5.4.0-1039-kvm
...

unfortunately the kernel config is still not set:
root@ubuntu:~# grep -i CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY /boot/config-5.4.0-1039-kvm 
# CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY is not set


** Tags removed: verification-done-focal
** Tags added: verification-failed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925008

Title:
  no memory hot-plugging in cloud-images

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1925008/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1843760] Re: Please add a PPA to track only the Still Branch across major versions of LibreOffice

2021-05-18 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Introduced as https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu
/libreoffice-still

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz)

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843760

Title:
  Please add a PPA to track only the Still Branch across major versions
  of LibreOffice

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1843760/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1925008] Re: no memory hot-plugging in cloud-images

2021-05-18 Thread Benjamin Drung
The proposed package version is linux-kvm 5.4.0-1040.41

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925008

Title:
  no memory hot-plugging in cloud-images

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1925008/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928791] [NEW] gnome-shell runs on 60--100% CPU usage

2021-05-18 Thread Tobias Reich
Public bug reported:

from top output:

top - 14:18:02 up  5:45,  1 user,  load average: 1,55, 1,54, 1,77
Tasks: 419 total,   1 running, 418 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 13,2 us,  2,6 sy,  0,0 ni, 83,7 id,  0,1 wa,  0,0 hi,  0,4 si,  0,0 st
MiB Mem :   7960,7 total,233,0 free,   5719,6 used,   2008,1 buff/cache
MiB Swap:  26058,0 total,  23596,0 free,   2462,0 used.576,0 avail Mem 

PID USER  PR  NIVIRTRESSHR S  %CPU  %MEM TIME+ COMMAND  

 
  20866 tobias20   0 6652668 996,0m  83472 S  63,4  12,5  33:56.49 
gnome-shell 


this is so wrong… how to fix it?

best, Tobias

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: gnome-shell 3.36.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-53.60~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-53-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.17
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue May 18 14:11:41 2021
DisplayManager: gdm3
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-07-22 (300 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 3.36.7+git20201123-0.20.04.1
SourcePackage: gnome-shell
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928791

Title:
  gnome-shell runs on 60--100% CPU usage

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1928791/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928536] Re: VNC Password cleared on reboot

2021-05-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for your bug report. Could you perhaps report it upstream as
well on https://gitlab.gnome.org/jadahl/gnome-remote-desktop/issues ?

** Package changed: vino (Ubuntu) => gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928536

Title:
  VNC Password cleared on reboot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/1928536/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908775] Re: preinstall `earlyoom` by default

2021-05-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: kubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908775

Title:
   preinstall `earlyoom` by default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/+bug/1908775/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1921105] Re: SRU: backport cvise to 18.04 LTS, 20.04 LTS and 20.10

2021-05-18 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
** Description changed:

  A follow-up to LP: #1895971, now backporting cvise 2.3. Not planning any
  further backports.
  
  cvise is a test case reduction tool used to reduce test cases for
  compiler issues. It's not yet available in the LTS release. Having it
  available in the same release as the compilers that you are
  debugging/using makes the test case reduction easier. Also needed is the
  dependency python-pebble.
  
  Regression potential: Maybe, but the testsuite of the package should be
  good enough to provide the confidence to update. It's a tool for
  debugging compilers, and reducing test case, so the affected target
  audience should be minimal.
  
- Validation: the test suite succeeds during the build.
+ Validation: the test suite succeeds during the build + performing manual
+ exploratory smoketesting using the version of the package in -proposed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921105

Title:
  SRU: backport cvise to 18.04 LTS, 20.04 LTS and 20.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cvise/+bug/1921105/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928763] Re: Ubuntu does not recognize the touchpad

2021-05-18 Thread Daniel van Vugt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1881319 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881319

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 1881319, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you
can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may
find.


** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1881319
   Touchpad not recognized Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ARE05

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928763

Title:
  Ubuntu does not recognize the touchpad

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1928763/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1877088] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-base/4.5ubuntu1.4)

2021-05-18 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-base (4.5ubuntu1.4) for bionic 
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

linux-hwe-5.4/5.4.0-74.83~18.04.1 (amd64)
makedumpfile/1:1.6.5-1ubuntu1~18.04.6 (i386)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#linux-base

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877088

Title:
  [UBUNTU 20.04] installkernel script does not symlink /boot/initrd.img
  which is required with the default zipl.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1877088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928780] [NEW] [UBUNTU 21.04] openCryptoki: Soft token does not check if an EC key is valid

2021-05-18 Thread bugproxy
Public bug reported:

The Opencryptoki Soft token does not check if an EC key is valid when an
EC key is created via C_CreateObject, nor when C_DeriveKey is used with
ECDH public data. This may allow one to perform Invalid Curve Attacks.

Fix:
https://github.com/opencryptoki/opencryptoki/commit/4e3b43c3d8844402c04a66b55c6c940f965109f0
 (SOFT: Check the EC Key on C_CreateObject and C_DeriveKey)

This commit should apply smooth on top of OCK 3.16.0, but also on OCK
3.15.0 or 3.15.1.

EC support has been introduced in the Soft token with OCK 3.15.0. So all
OCK versions >= 3.15.0 are affected. Earlier OCK releases are not
affected.

This problem need only to be fixed with 21.04 wherer 3.15.1 is included.

** Affects: opencryptoki (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
 Status: New


** Tags: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-192742 severity-high 
targetmilestone-inin2104

** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-192742 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin2104

** Changed in: ubuntu
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)

** Package changed: ubuntu => opencryptoki (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928780

Title:
  [UBUNTU 21.04] openCryptoki: Soft token does not check if an EC key is
  valid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/+bug/1928780/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1921498] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-05-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-18 06:27 EDT---
IBM bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with all requested distros

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921498

Title:
  [Ubuntu 21.04] s390/vtime: fix increased steal time accounting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1921498/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899159] Autopkgtest regression report (python3.9/3.9.5-3~20.10)

2021-05-18 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted python3.9 (3.9.5-3~20.10) for groovy 
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

python3.9/3.9.5-3~20.10 (arm64, armhf, s390x, amd64, ppc64el)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/groovy/update_excuses.html#python3.9

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899159

Title:
  SRU: backport Python 3.9.5 to 20.04 LTS, 20.10 and 21.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-stdlib-extensions/+bug/1899159/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1857824] Re: kmimetypefinder5 misidentifies mimetype of python files containing certain strings

2021-05-18 Thread Kai Kasurinen
maybe fixed: https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/328240

** Package changed: kde-cli-tools (Ubuntu) => qtbase-opensource-src
(Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857824

Title:
  kmimetypefinder5 misidentifies mimetype of python files containing
  certain strings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/+bug/1857824/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 873072] Re: Postinst error: chown: invalid group: `root:messagebus'

2021-05-18 Thread Balint Reczey
Maybe you need to copy /etc/group as well?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873072

Title:
  Postinst error: chown: invalid group: `root:messagebus'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/873072/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1923685] Re: Unable to deploy LXD VM host on S390X

2021-05-18 Thread Alberto Donato
** Changed in: maas
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: maas
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923685

Title:
  Unable to deploy LXD VM host on S390X

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1923685/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928700] Re: new postinst hook requires initramfs-tools

2021-05-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-base - 4.5ubuntu7

---
linux-base (4.5ubuntu7) impish; urgency=medium

  * Check for update-initramfs being installed before running the postinst
hook which updates the softlinks (LP: #1928700).

 -- Stefan Bader   Mon, 17 May 2021 17:55:34
+0200

** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928700

Title:
  new postinst hook requires initramfs-tools

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-base/+bug/1928700/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928789] [NEW] bpool free space low caused package linux-firmware 1.187.12 failed to install/upgrade: installed linux-firmware package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit stat

2021-05-18 Thread Alistair
Public bug reported:

Warning from zsys that bpool only had 11% free space when manually running "apt 
upgrade".  There were also several packages that could be "auto-removed".  Once 
 apt autoremove was run, the linux-firmware was installed OK.  Perhaps apt (or 
package install) could:
a) detect low disk space
b) note that free space can be made with autoremove
c) stop and raise an error, rather than crashing.

$ sudo apt autoremove
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED
  linux-headers-5.8.0-49-generic linux-hwe-5.8-headers-5.8.0-49
  linux-image-5.8.0-49-generic linux-modules-5.8.0-49-generic
  linux-modules-extra-5.8.0-49-generic python3-appdirs python3-distlib
  python3-filelock python3-importlib-metadata python3-more-itertools
  python3-virtualenv python3-zipp
0 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 12 to remove and 1 not to upgrade.
2 not fully installed or removed.
After this operation, 391 MB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
Requesting to save current system state
ERROR couldn't save system state: Minimum free space to take a snapshot and 
preserve ZFS performance is 20%.
Free space on pool "bpool" is 11%.
Please remove some states manually to free up space. 
(Reading database ... 289639 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing linux-headers-5.8.0-49-generic (5.8.0-49.55~20.04.1) ...
Removing linux-hwe-5.8-headers-5.8.0-49 (5.8.0-49.55~20.04.1) ...
Removing linux-modules-extra-5.8.0-49-generic (5.8.0-49.55~20.04.1) ...
Removing linux-image-5.8.0-49-generic (5.8.0-49.55~20.04.1) ...
/etc/kernel/prerm.d/dkms:
dkms: removing: virtualbox 6.1.16 (5.8.0-49-generic) (x86_64)

 Uninstall Beginning 
Module:  virtualbox
Version: 6.1.16
Kernel:  5.8.0-49-generic (x86_64)
-

Status: Before uninstall, this module version was ACTIVE on this kernel.

vboxdrv.ko:
 - Uninstallation
   - Deleting from: /lib/modules/5.8.0-49-generic/updates/dkms/
 - Original module
   - No original module was found for this module on this kernel.
   - Use the dkms install command to reinstall any previous module version.


vboxnetadp.ko:
 - Uninstallation
   - Deleting from: /lib/modules/5.8.0-49-generic/updates/dkms/
 - Original module
   - No original module was found for this module on this kernel.
   - Use the dkms install command to reinstall any previous module version.


vboxnetflt.ko:
 - Uninstallation
   - Deleting from: /lib/modules/5.8.0-49-generic/updates/dkms/
 - Original module
   - No original module was found for this module on this kernel.
   - Use the dkms install command to reinstall any previous module version.

depmod...

DKMS: uninstall completed.
/etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools:
update-initramfs: Deleting /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-49-generic
/etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub:
Sourcing file `/etc/default/grub'
Sourcing file `/etc/default/grub.d/init-select.cfg'
Generating grub configuration file ...
Found linux image: vmlinuz-5.8.0-53-generic in rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7
Found initrd image: initrd.img-5.8.0-53-generic in rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7
Found linux image: vmlinuz-5.8.0-50-generic in rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7
Found initrd image: initrd.img-5.8.0-50-generic in rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7
Found linux image: vmlinuz-5.4.0-58-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_8mgn83
Found initrd image: initrd.img-5.4.0-58-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_8mgn83
Found linux image: vmlinuz-5.4.0-56-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_8mgn83
Found initrd image: initrd.img-5.4.0-56-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_8mgn83
Found linux image: vmlinuz-5.4.0-53-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_8mgn83
Found initrd image: initrd.img-5.4.0-53-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_8mgn83
Found linux image: vmlinuz-5.4.0-58-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_z80dj8
Found initrd image: initrd.img-5.4.0-58-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_z80dj8
Found linux image: vmlinuz-5.4.0-56-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_z80dj8
Found initrd image: initrd.img-5.4.0-56-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_z80dj8
Found linux image: vmlinuz-5.4.0-53-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_z80dj8
Found initrd image: initrd.img-5.4.0-53-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_z80dj8
Found linux image: vmlinuz-5.4.0-58-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_izpa76
Found initrd image: initrd.img-5.4.0-58-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_izpa76
Found linux image: vmlinuz-5.4.0-56-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_izpa76
Found initrd image: initrd.img-5.4.0-56-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_izpa76
Found linux image: vmlinuz-5.4.0-53-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_izpa76
Found initrd image: initrd.img-5.4.0-53-generic in 
rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_l3g9y7@autozsys_izpa76
Found linux image: 

[Bug 1926957] Re: security fix in pip 21.1: Don't split git references on unicode separators #9827

2021-05-18 Thread Stefano Rivera
Tested:
1. Clean installation of update
2. Upgrading to security update
3. pip installing from PyPI
4. pip installing from git
5. pip installing within a virtualenv

LGTM.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926957

Title:
  security fix in pip 21.1: Don't split git references on unicode
  separators #9827

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pip/+bug/1926957/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1916314] Re: HP Spectre x360 14-ea0xxx Tiger Lake Keyboard does not work until ~30-60 seconds after boot

2021-05-18 Thread Vishal Rao
Just wanted to post a comment here so others searching online might find
this workaround.

I have an HP Pavilion 14 dv0054tu laptop with an Intel Core i5 1135G7
Tiger Lake CPU and am facing this issue of the slow keyboard delay, not
responding for a few seconds after booting.

The kernel parameter "i8042.nopnp" appears to be working for me, after
trying several reboots.

This is on elementary OS 6.0 Odin beta based on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS with
the 5.8 kernel and also on openSUSE Tumbleweed with the 5.11 kernel and
Ubuntu and Ubuntu Budgie 21.04 also with the 5.11 kernel.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916314

Title:
  HP Spectre x360 14-ea0xxx Tiger Lake Keyboard does not work until
  ~30-60 seconds after boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1916314/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1926442] Re: cannot execute 'netplan generate' from within a snap

2021-05-18 Thread Lukas Märdian
The new io.netplan.Netplan.Generate() DBus API has been implemented in netplan 
upstream:
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/208
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/209

It needs to be released and SRUed down to Bionic for the snapd change to
be accepted (https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10212)

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: In Progress

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Summary changed:

- cannot execute 'netplan generate' from within a snap
+ [SRU] cannot execute 'netplan generate' from within a snap

** Tags added: fr-1382

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926442

Title:
  [SRU] cannot execute 'netplan generate' from within a snap

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snappy/+bug/1926442/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908452] Re: MAAS stops working and deployment fails after `Loading ephemeral` step

2021-05-18 Thread Paride Legovini
** Changed in: simplestreams (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Paride Legovini (paride)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908452

Title:
  MAAS stops working and deployment fails after `Loading ephemeral` step

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1908452/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1869792] Re: [MIR] u-boot-rpi

2021-05-18 Thread Dave Jones
** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869792

Title:
  [MIR] u-boot-rpi

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/1869792/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1875319] Re: Raspberry Pi doesn't boot anymore after installing a 64bit kernel

2021-05-18 Thread Dave Jones
Looks like there was some historical build of arm64 u-boot that didn't
include the "unzip" command in the build. Anyway, this definitely works
at this point (or focal wouldn't boot :)

** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875319

Title:
  Raspberry Pi doesn't boot anymore after installing a 64bit kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/1875319/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928586] Re: Desktop icons disappearing

2021-05-18 Thread Nav
No. It's not bug 1812883. I've actually described in detail what happens. The 
desktop icons aren't flashing. They disappear and stay invisible until I 
reactivate USB tethering. Let me describe the steps again:
Step 1. Desktop icons are visible.
Step 2. I connect my phone to the PC. Desktop icons are still visible. At this 
point, there's a dialog box on the phone's screen, asking "Allow access to 
phones data?". Options for me are to click "Allow" or "Deny". 
Step 3. Whether I click Allow or Deny, the Desktop icons disappear.
Step 4. I activate USB tethering, and the Desktop icons appear.
Step 5. I deactivate USB tethering, and the Desktop icons are still visible. 
The phone is again asking the Allow/Deny question.
Step 6. Goto Step 3.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928586

Title:
  Desktop icons disappearing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons/+bug/1928586/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928758] Re: All apt commands failed after upgrade to 27.0.2~20.04.1

2021-05-18 Thread Ulrik Sannsell
I can see in /var/crash that there is a core dump created.

# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
The following packages have been kept back:
  filebeat
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
root@1tvsjme03:~# ls -la /var/crash/*
-rw-r- 1 root root 460287 May 18 12:03 
/var/crash/_usr_lib_ubuntu-advantage_apt-esm-hook.0.crash
#

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928758

Title:
  All apt commands failed after upgrade to 27.0.2~20.04.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1928758/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1868711] Re: Unknown command 'bootz' - try 'help'

2021-05-18 Thread Dave Jones
** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868711

Title:
  Unknown command 'bootz' - try 'help'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/1868711/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928780] Re: [UBUNTU 21.04] openCryptoki: Soft token does not check if an EC key is valid

2021-05-18 Thread Frank Heimes
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Also affects: opencryptoki (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: opencryptoki (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
   Status: New

** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)

** Changed in: opencryptoki (Ubuntu Impish)
 Assignee: Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928780

Title:
  [UBUNTU 21.04] openCryptoki: Soft token does not check if an EC key is
  valid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1928780/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928642] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.0.6 for groovy

2021-05-18 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
   * LibreOffice 7.0.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.0 line:
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.0#7.0.6_release
  
   * Version 7.0.5 is currently released in groovy. For a list of fixed bugs 
compared to 7.0.5 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.0.6 
(that's a total of 50 bugs):
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.0.6/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.0.6/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs
  
   * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and
  the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a
  minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes.
  
  [Testing]
  
   * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include
  unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised
  (both in an automated manner and manually).
  
    * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
  https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_linux_gcc_release/82662/console
  
    * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
  * Automated tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests
  * Automated UI tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests
  * Regression tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests
  * Feature tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests
  
   * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were 
run and verified as passing.
  * [amd64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-groovy-ricotz-ppa/groovy/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20210518_015036_da635@/log.gz
  * [arm64] ...
- * [armhf] ...
+ * [armhf] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-groovy-ricotz-ppa/groovy/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20210518_112400_10446@/log.gz
  * [ppc64el] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-groovy-ricotz-ppa/groovy/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20210518_025204_037c5@/log.gz
  * [s390x] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-groovy-ricotz-ppa/groovy/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20210518_014102_69cc4@/log.gz
  
   * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite
  were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice
  
  [Regression Potential]
  
   * A minor release with a total of 50 bug fixes always carries the
  potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only
  release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing
  features were removed.
  
   * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described
  above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked
  in.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928642

Title:
  [SRU] libreoffice 7.0.6 for groovy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1928642/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1923685] Re: Unable to deploy LXD VM host on S390X

2021-05-18 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923685

Title:
  Unable to deploy LXD VM host on S390X

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1923685/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903288] Re: Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

2021-05-18 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
@Nayna Jain @Daniel

Hm but we have CONFIG_LOAD_PPC_KEYS=y already which I would expect
to be the only thing that loads keys into .platform keyring which was
enabled as part of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1866909 LTC-184073
. Which keys are present in firmware / get loaded into .platform because
of that? I would have expected canonical keys to be loaded by that into
the .platform keyring, or is that not the case?

Can you please share contents of "powerpc:db"? Ideally it should contain
Canonical's two OPAL signing certs.

If canonical keys are not in "powerpc:db", does it make sense to then
add the two Canonical keys to the .builtin_trusted_keys_keyring, and
then link the whole keyring into .ima keyring?

I will attach the two Canonical OPAL signing keys here, and the ESL for
them.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903288

Title:
  Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1903288/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903288] Re: Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

2021-05-18 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Attachment added: "opal-2017-ppc64el.pem"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1903288/+attachment/5498448/+files/opal-2017-ppc64el.pem

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903288

Title:
  Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1903288/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1925008] Re: no memory hot-plugging in cloud-images

2021-05-18 Thread Olaf Schmerse
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925008

Title:
  no memory hot-plugging in cloud-images

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1925008/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1877088] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-base/4.5ubuntu3.3)

2021-05-18 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-base (4.5ubuntu3.3) for focal 
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

linux-oem-5.6/5.6.0-1057.61 (amd64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-base

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877088

Title:
  [UBUNTU 20.04] installkernel script does not symlink /boot/initrd.img
  which is required with the default zipl.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1877088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1168030] Re: Apache2 with PHP FallbackResource doesn't work when Request-URI is / and encoding is gzip

2021-05-18 Thread amazing pharma chem
Hemp Farm Store offers Premium Hemp Flowers Europe 0.3% total THC. Buy
our high CBD Flowers strains for sale in Europe, UK in top-shelf, middle
and all budgets.

Buy Premium Hemp Flowers Europe
Hemp Farm Store
https://hempsfarmstore.com/

CBD flower for sale UK
https://hempsfarmstore.com/shop/

Order CBD Isolate Crystal
https://hempsfarmstore.com/product/cbd-isolate-crystal/

Best CBD flower companies 2021
https://hempsfarmstore.com/shop/

Buy wholesale CBD hemp flowers
https://hempsfarmstore.com/product-category/cbd-hemp-flowers/

Buy Hemp Flower EU
https://hempsfarmstore.com/product-category/hemp-flower/

Buy Hemp Pre-Roll
https://hempsfarmstore.com/product/hemp-pre-rolls/

Amnesia Haze CBD hemp flower
https://hempsfarmstore.com/product/amnesia-haze-cbd-hemp-flower/

Order CBN Distillate
https://hempsfarmstore.com/product/cbn-distillate/

Order Space Monkey CBD Hemp
https://hempsfarmstore.com/product/space-monkey-cbd-hemp/

Buy Exotic Cake CBD Hemp Flower
https://hempsfarmstore.com/product/buy-premium-exotic-cake-cbd-hemp-flower-online/

Order CBG Isolate Powder
https://hempsfarmstore.com/product/cbg-isolate-powder/

Buy Electric Dream CBD Hemp Flower
https://hempsfarmstore.com/product/electric-dream-cbd-hemp-flower/

Buy Premium CBD Isolate Powder
https://hempsfarmstore.com/product/cbd-isolate-powder/

Buy premium quality ACDC CBD Hemp Flower
https://hempsfarmstore.com/product/acdc/

Banana Kush CBD Hemp Flower for sale
https://hempsfarmstore.com/product/banana-kush-cbd-hemp-flower/

Order Skywalker Hemp Flower
https://hempsfarmstore.com/product/skywalker-cbd-hemp-flower/

Order CBD Slab
https://hempsfarmstore.com/product/cbd-slab/

Website: https://hempsfarmstore.com/

Whatsapp: +31 6 12978450

Email : i...@hempsfarmstore.com

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168030

Title:
  Apache2 with PHP FallbackResource doesn't work when Request-URI is /
  and encoding is gzip

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1168030/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1168030] Re: Apache2 with PHP FallbackResource doesn't work when Request-URI is / and encoding is gzip

2021-05-18 Thread amazing pharma chem
If you are looking to buy quality hemp or CBD i have come across the
best shop in Europe order with them now at https://hempsfarmstore.com/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168030

Title:
  Apache2 with PHP FallbackResource doesn't work when Request-URI is /
  and encoding is gzip

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1168030/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928788] [NEW] linux-azure: Add Mana network driver

2021-05-18 Thread Tim Gardner
Public bug reported:

SRU Justification

[Impact]

Microsoft has requested the addition of the "mana" driver from Linux
v5.11

[Fix]

This patch set consists of 5 patches that are now in mainline.

The patches add the VF driver for Microsoft Azure Network Adapter
(MANA), and also changes the hv_netvsc driver's netvsc/VF binding logic
to check both the MAC address and the serial number (this is required by
the MANA VF driver).

Microsoft would like to request the following 5 patches in all supported
releases:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=64ff412ad41fe3a5bf759ff4844dc1382176485c

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-
next.git/commit/?id=ca9c54d2d6a5ab2430c4eda364c77125d62e5e0f

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-
next.git/commit/?id=55cdc26a91ac270887583945aef2bd460a2805f7

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-
next.git/commit/?id=45b102dd81491e30ac7596b5515856141f99319f

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-
next.git/commit/?id=d90a94680bc0a8069d93282bc5f2966d00b9c4a4

[Test Plan]

2021-05-17 15:25 UTC-
-We tested the two versions of mana.ko:

root@decui-u2004-vf:~# uname -a
Linux decui-u2004-vf 5.4.0-1048-azure #50~sf00310147.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 11 
02:06:24 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@decui-u2004-vf:~# modinfo mana | grep filename
filename: 
/lib/modules/5.4.0-1048-azure/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana.ko

root@decui-u2004-vf:~# uname -a
Linux decui-u2004-vf 5.8.0-1032-azure #34~SF00310147.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 11 
02:01:58 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@decui-u2004-vf:~# modinfo mana | grep filename
filename: 
/lib/modules/5.8.0-1032-azure/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana.ko

Everything worked as expected in our testing:
1. The MANA driver loads and unloads multiple times without any issue.
2. iperf TX/RX tests run without any issue, and the performance numbers are on 
par with what we get with the latest mainline kernel: the TX number is pretty 
good; the RX number is sometimes not great but this is a known issue with the 
latest mainline kernel as well.
3. "ethtool -S" and "ethtool -L" work as expected.
4. When iperf TX/RX tests are running, changing the number of the MANA NIC 
TX/RX queues and unloading/reloading the MANA driver work without any issue.

[Where problems could occur]

The driver may have bug(s) that cause a kernel crash.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: bot-stop-nagging

** Summary changed:

- Add Mana network driver
+ linux-azure: Add Mana network driver

** Tags added: bot-stop-nagging

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928788

Title:
  linux-azure: Add Mana network driver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1928788/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 257996] Re: No reciprocal function

2021-05-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Galculator has been basically unmaintained since 2015 you should
probably search for an alternative software to use instead

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257996

Title:
  No reciprocal function

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/galculator/+bug/257996/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1925452] Re: [Ubuntu 21.04] net/mlx5: Fix HW spec violation configuring uplink

2021-05-18 Thread Frank Heimes
Thx for the verification(s) - adjusting tags accordingly ...

** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal verification-needed-groovy
** Tags added: verification-done-focal verification-done-groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925452

Title:
  [Ubuntu 21.04] net/mlx5: Fix HW spec violation configuring uplink

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1925452/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928564] Re: systemctl reboot hangs the machine under hirsute 21.04

2021-05-18 Thread Robert Dinse
Ok the other machine I was having this issue with is a kvm-qemu virtual machine 
acting as a mail server.  On it I remove xorg-xserver-video* and with those 
removed it no longer hangs.  So it seems somehow xserver graphics/video are 
involved.  My workstation is using intel internal graphics and
it is an i7-9700k so I use the kernel based x-server on it and don't need the 
others.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928564

Title:
  systemctl reboot hangs the machine under hirsute 21.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1928564/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928618] Re: Desktop Sharing password not being saved

2021-05-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The desktop sharing is using gnome-remote-desktop now. Why did you close
the report?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928618

Title:
  Desktop Sharing password not being saved

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vino/+bug/1928618/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1926584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-05-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-18 05:04 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926584

Title:
  [21.10 FEAT] Upgrade openssl-ibmca to latest version (crypto) (version
  2.1.2)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1926584/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1925522] Re: Introduce the 465 driver series, fabric-manager, and libnvidia-nscq

2021-05-18 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
** Changed in: fabric-manager-460 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: fabric-manager-450 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925522

Title:
  Introduce the 465 driver series, fabric-manager, and libnvidia-nscq

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/1925522/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1770271] Re: VegaM support

2021-05-18 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Changed in: amd
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770271

Title:
  VegaM support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/amd/+bug/1770271/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1758364] Re: add audio kernel patches for Raven

2021-05-18 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Changed in: amd
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758364

Title:
  add audio kernel patches for Raven

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/amd/+bug/1758364/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1729442] Re: Prevent timer value 0 for MWAITX

2021-05-18 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Zesty)
   Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Released

** Changed in: amd
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1729442

Title:
  Prevent timer value 0 for MWAITX

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/amd/+bug/1729442/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1882143]

2021-05-18 Thread Adolfo Jayme
Thanks for testing! Setting to Verified then

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882143

Title:
  
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin:11:SvtBroadcaster::Add:SvtListener::StartListening:SwAccessibleNoTextFrame::SwAccessibleNoTextFrame:SwAccessibleGraphic::SwAccessibleGraphic:SwAccessibleMap::GetContext

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1882143/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1890716] Re: misidentifies .html file as Perl script when it contains JavaScript "use strict"

2021-05-18 Thread Kai Kasurinen
** Package changed: kde-cli-tools (Ubuntu) => qtbase-opensource-src
(Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890716

Title:
  misidentifies .html file as Perl script when it contains JavaScript
  "use strict"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/shared-mime-info/+bug/1890716/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928642] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.0.6 for groovy

2021-05-18 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Rico, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libreoffice into groovy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.0.6-0ubuntu0.20.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
groovy to verification-done-groovy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-groovy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
   * LibreOffice 7.0.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.0 line:
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.0#7.0.6_release
  
   * Version 7.0.5 is currently released in groovy. For a list of fixed bugs 
compared to 7.0.5 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.0.6 
(that's a total of 50 bugs):
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.0.6/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs
   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.0.6/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs
  
   * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and
  the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a
  minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes.
  
  [Testing]
  
   * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include
  unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised
  (both in an automated manner and manually).
  
    * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
  https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_linux_gcc_release/82662/console
  
    * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
  * Automated tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests
  * Automated UI tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests
  * Regression tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests
  * Feature tests
    https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests
  
   * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were 
run and verified as passing.
  * [amd64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-groovy-ricotz-ppa/groovy/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20210518_015036_da635@/log.gz
  * [arm64] ...
  * [armhf] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-groovy-ricotz-ppa/groovy/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20210518_112400_10446@/log.gz
  * [ppc64el] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-groovy-ricotz-ppa/groovy/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20210518_025204_037c5@/log.gz
  * [s390x] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-groovy-ricotz-ppa/groovy/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20210518_014102_69cc4@/log.gz
  
   * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite
  were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice
  
  [Regression Potential]
  
   * A minor release with a total of 50 bug fixes always carries the
  potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only
  release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing
  features were removed.
  
   * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described
  above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked
  in.
+ 
+ [Additional Information]
+ 
+ This upload carries two new patches without DEP-3 headers - their meaning can 
be seen through the commit messages here though:
+  * 
https://git.launchpad.net/~libreoffice/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/commit/?h=wip/groovy-7.0=1105fa6e0e54e12a48c7a2115c61c8f8353f4ede
+  * 
https://git.launchpad.net/~libreoffice/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/commit/?h=wip/groovy-7.0=4d38d4a68b6fe542d10712d38ff92fd9dc296014

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928642

Title:
  [SRU] libreoffice 7.0.6 for groovy

To manage notifications 

[Bug 1923415] Re: Hirsute update: v5.11.13 upstream stable release

2021-05-18 Thread Tim Gardner
** Also affects: linux-aws (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923415

Title:
  Hirsute update: v5.11.13 upstream stable release

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1923415/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928710] Re: ubuntu server 20.04 LTS for ARM64 on Raspberry Pi4 could not handle more than 32 USB3 devices

2021-05-18 Thread Ye He
~$ uname -a
Linux Ubuntu1 5.4.0-1034-raspi #37-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 12 23:14:49 UTC 
2021 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux

Imaged this through the Raspian Imager after selecting the 20.4.02.
Server LTS for ARM64

~$ lsusb -t
/:  Bus 02.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/4p, 5000M
|__ Port 1: Dev 5, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/4p, 5000M
|__ Port 1: Dev 6, If 0, Class=Mass Storage, Driver=uas, 5000M
|__ Port 2: Dev 9, If 0, Class=Mass Storage, Driver=uas, 5000M
|__ Port 3: Dev 10, If 0, Class=Mass Storage, Driver=uas, 5000M
|__ Port 4: Dev 7, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/4p, 5000M
|__ Port 3: Dev 15, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/3p, 5000M
|__ Port 1: Dev 16, If 0, Class=Mass Storage, Driver=uas, 5000M
|__ Port 1: Dev 11, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/3p, 5000M
|__ Port 1: Dev 12, If 0, Class=Mass Storage, Driver=uas, 5000M
|__ Port 4: Dev 8, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/4p, 5000M
|__ Port 2: Dev 19, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/3p, 5000M
|__ Port 1: Dev 20, If 0, Class=Mass Storage, Driver=uas, 
5000M
|__ Port 1: Dev 17, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/3p, 5000M
|__ Port 1: Dev 18, If 0, Class=Mass Storage, Driver=uas, 
5000M
|__ Port 2: Dev 13, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/3p, 5000M
|__ Port 1: Dev 14, If 0, Class=Mass Storage, Driver=uas, 5000M
/:  Bus 01.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/1p, 480M
|__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/4p, 480M
|__ Port 1: Dev 30, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/4p, 480M
|__ Port 4: Dev 31, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/4p, 480M
|__ Port 1: Dev 34, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/3p, 480M
|__ Port 2: Dev 38, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/3p, 480M
|__ Port 3: Dev 42, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/3p, 480M
|__ Port 4: Dev 32, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/4p, 480M
|__ Port 2: Dev 50, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/3p, 480M
|__ Port 1: Dev 46, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/3p, 480M

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928710

Title:
  ubuntu server 20.04 LTS for ARM64 on Raspberry Pi4 could not handle
  more than 32 USB3 devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1928710/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1921105] Re: SRU: backport cvise to 18.04 LTS, 20.04 LTS and 20.10

2021-05-18 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted cvise into groovy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cvise/2.3.0-0ubuntu1~20.10 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
groovy to verification-done-groovy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-groovy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: cvise (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921105

Title:
  SRU: backport cvise to 18.04 LTS, 20.04 LTS and 20.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cvise/+bug/1921105/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1857824] Re: kmimetypefinder5 misidentifies mimetype of python files containing certain strings

2021-05-18 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Qt actually prefers system copy from shared-mime-info if it's available.
Here is the code for 5.12.8 (used in Ubuntu 20.04):

https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/src/corelib/mimetypes/qmimedatabase.cpp?h=5.12.8#n99

The internal copy (":/qt-project.org/qmime") is only used when the
system one is missing (fdoIterator == mimeDirs.constEnd()).

Furthermore, in Ubuntu 20.10 and 21.04 we are building Qt with -no-
mimetype-database, which makes Qt use *only* the system copy:

https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtbase/-/commit/f0d53be16a31ea55

So I think it is a bug in shared-mime-info only, not in Qt. Do you
agree?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857824

Title:
  kmimetypefinder5 misidentifies mimetype of python files containing
  certain strings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/+bug/1857824/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903288] Re: Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

2021-05-18 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
We should not add opal keys to the built_trusted_keys_keyring as that's
not the purpose of these keys. We could add them direct to .platform or
.ima keyrings, but it would be best to load them from firmware direct.
Are the above attached keys & ESL available from the "powerpc:db"?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903288

Title:
  Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1903288/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903288] Re: Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

2021-05-18 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Attachment added: "opal-2019-ppc64el.pem"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1903288/+attachment/5498449/+files/opal-2019-ppc64el.pem

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903288

Title:
  Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1903288/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903288] Re: Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

2021-05-18 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Attachment added: "opal.esl"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1903288/+attachment/5498450/+files/opal.esl

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903288

Title:
  Power guest secure boot with static keys: kernel portion

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1903288/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899159] Autopkgtest regression report (python3.9/3.9.5-3~20.04)

2021-05-18 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted python3.9 (3.9.5-3~20.04) for focal 
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

python3.9/3.9.5-3~20.04 (amd64, ppc64el, arm64, armhf, s390x)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#python3.9

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899159

Title:
  SRU: backport Python 3.9.5 to 20.04 LTS, 20.10 and 21.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-stdlib-extensions/+bug/1899159/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1921484] Re: libedit no longer reads editrc

2021-05-18 Thread roger espel llima
Same here, mysql command line used to read bindings from .editrc in
previous versions of Ubuntu Server, now fails to honor them in 20.04
LTS.  Strace confirms that libedit is not opening the file .editrc.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921484

Title:
  libedit no longer reads editrc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libedit/+bug/1921484/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928674] Re: grub-efi-amd64 from grub2-unsigned has lost kernel/postinst.d script

2021-05-18 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
How can you introduce conffiles in grub-efi-amd64 & grub-efi-arm64 which
is shared across releases? If in later series they have been removed
from said package. That will cause a mess in focal+ then, since it will
conflict with grub2-common there.

Given that the future is for these conffiles to live in grub2-common, it
might be easier to backport the move from grub-{platform} to
grub2-common.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928674

Title:
  grub-efi-amd64 from grub2-unsigned has lost kernel/postinst.d script

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-unsigned/+bug/1928674/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1921484] Re: libedit no longer reads editrc

2021-05-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: libedit (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921484

Title:
  libedit no longer reads editrc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libedit/+bug/1921484/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928787] [NEW] package libreoffice-common 1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to open '/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/template/common/presnt/Progress.otp.dpkg-new': Operation n

2021-05-18 Thread Ronald Butler
Public bug reported:

Background update failed.  This followed system boot.
I am not skilled enough in Ubuntu to be able to troubleshoot to determine if 
truly a bug or something else.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: libreoffice-common 1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-52.57-generic 5.4.65
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-52-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: lkp_Ubuntu_5_4_0_52_57_generic_77
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.16
AptOrdering:
 libreoffice-common:amd64: Install
 NULL: ConfigurePending
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Tue May 11 21:15:03 2021
DpkgHistoryLog:
 Start-Date: 2021-05-11  21:14:48
 Commandline: apt-get install -f
 Requested-By: ibgrizzly (1000)
 Upgrade: libreoffice-common:amd64 (1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1, 
1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1)
DpkgTerminalLog:
 Preparing to unpack .../libreoffice-common_1%3a6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1_all.deb 
...
 Unpacking libreoffice-common (1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) over 
(1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) ...
 dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-common_1%3a6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1_all.deb 
(--unpack):
  unable to open 
'/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/template/common/presnt/Progress.otp.dpkg-new': 
Operation not permitted
DuplicateSignature:
 package:libreoffice-common:1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
 Unpacking libreoffice-common (1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) over 
(1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) ...
 dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-common_1%3a6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1_all.deb 
(--unpack):
  unable to open 
'/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/template/common/presnt/Progress.otp.dpkg-new': 
Operation not permitted
ErrorMessage: unable to open 
'/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/template/common/presnt/Progress.otp.dpkg-new': 
Operation not permitted
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-10-18 (212 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
PackageArchitecture: all
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.5
SourcePackage: libreoffice
Title: package libreoffice-common 1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to 
install/upgrade: unable to open 
'/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/template/common/presnt/Progress.otp.dpkg-new': 
Operation not permitted
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928787

Title:
  package libreoffice-common 1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: unable to open
  '/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/template/common/presnt/Progress.otp.dpkg-
  new': Operation not permitted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1928787/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928787] Re: package libreoffice-common 1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to open '/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/template/common/presnt/Progress.otp.dpkg-new': Operation not

2021-05-18 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928787

Title:
  package libreoffice-common 1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: unable to open
  '/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/template/common/presnt/Progress.otp.dpkg-
  new': Operation not permitted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1928787/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1925522] Re: Introduce the 465 driver series, fabric-manager, and libnvidia-nscq

2021-05-18 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
(oh, and libnvidia-nscq-450 also has 460 .install file, this needs
cleanup)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925522

Title:
  Introduce the 465 driver series, fabric-manager, and libnvidia-nscq

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/1925522/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910094] Re: uboot fails to save env after core18 refresh

2021-05-18 Thread Dave Jones
** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910094

Title:
  uboot fails to save env after core18 refresh

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snap-core18/+bug/1910094/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928788] Re: linux-azure: Add Mana network driver

2021-05-18 Thread Tim Gardner
Patches submitted https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-
team/2021-May/120313.html

** Description changed:

  SRU Justification
  
  [Impact]
  
- Microsoft has requested the addition of the "mana" driver from Linux
- v5.11
+ Microsoft has requested the addition of the "mana" driver from Linux v5.11
+ https://canonical.my.salesforce.com//5004K05pZQCQA2
  
  [Fix]
  
  This patch set consists of 5 patches that are now in mainline.
  
  The patches add the VF driver for Microsoft Azure Network Adapter
  (MANA), and also changes the hv_netvsc driver's netvsc/VF binding logic
  to check both the MAC address and the serial number (this is required by
  the MANA VF driver).
  
  Microsoft would like to request the following 5 patches in all supported
  releases:
  
  
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=64ff412ad41fe3a5bf759ff4844dc1382176485c
  
  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-
  next.git/commit/?id=ca9c54d2d6a5ab2430c4eda364c77125d62e5e0f
  
  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-
  next.git/commit/?id=55cdc26a91ac270887583945aef2bd460a2805f7
  
  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-
  next.git/commit/?id=45b102dd81491e30ac7596b5515856141f99319f
  
  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-
  next.git/commit/?id=d90a94680bc0a8069d93282bc5f2966d00b9c4a4
  
  [Test Plan]
  
  2021-05-17 15:25 UTC-
  -We tested the two versions of mana.ko:
  
  root@decui-u2004-vf:~# uname -a
  Linux decui-u2004-vf 5.4.0-1048-azure #50~sf00310147.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 11 
02:06:24 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
  root@decui-u2004-vf:~# modinfo mana | grep filename
  filename: 
/lib/modules/5.4.0-1048-azure/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana.ko
  
  root@decui-u2004-vf:~# uname -a
  Linux decui-u2004-vf 5.8.0-1032-azure #34~SF00310147.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 11 
02:01:58 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
  root@decui-u2004-vf:~# modinfo mana | grep filename
  filename: 
/lib/modules/5.8.0-1032-azure/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana.ko
  
  Everything worked as expected in our testing:
  1. The MANA driver loads and unloads multiple times without any issue.
  2. iperf TX/RX tests run without any issue, and the performance numbers are 
on par with what we get with the latest mainline kernel: the TX number is 
pretty good; the RX number is sometimes not great but this is a known issue 
with the latest mainline kernel as well.
  3. "ethtool -S" and "ethtool -L" work as expected.
  4. When iperf TX/RX tests are running, changing the number of the MANA NIC 
TX/RX queues and unloading/reloading the MANA driver work without any issue.
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  
  The driver may have bug(s) that cause a kernel crash.

** Description changed:

  SRU Justification
  
  [Impact]
  
  Microsoft has requested the addition of the "mana" driver from Linux v5.11
- https://canonical.my.salesforce.com//5004K05pZQCQA2
+ https://canonical.my.salesforce.com/5004K05pZQCQA2
  
  [Fix]
  
  This patch set consists of 5 patches that are now in mainline.
  
  The patches add the VF driver for Microsoft Azure Network Adapter
  (MANA), and also changes the hv_netvsc driver's netvsc/VF binding logic
  to check both the MAC address and the serial number (this is required by
  the MANA VF driver).
  
  Microsoft would like to request the following 5 patches in all supported
  releases:
  
  
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=64ff412ad41fe3a5bf759ff4844dc1382176485c
  
  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-
  next.git/commit/?id=ca9c54d2d6a5ab2430c4eda364c77125d62e5e0f
  
  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-
  next.git/commit/?id=55cdc26a91ac270887583945aef2bd460a2805f7
  
  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-
  next.git/commit/?id=45b102dd81491e30ac7596b5515856141f99319f
  
  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-
  next.git/commit/?id=d90a94680bc0a8069d93282bc5f2966d00b9c4a4
  
  [Test Plan]
  
  2021-05-17 15:25 UTC-
  -We tested the two versions of mana.ko:
  
  root@decui-u2004-vf:~# uname -a
  Linux decui-u2004-vf 5.4.0-1048-azure #50~sf00310147.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 11 
02:06:24 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
  root@decui-u2004-vf:~# modinfo mana | grep filename
  filename: 
/lib/modules/5.4.0-1048-azure/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana.ko
  
  root@decui-u2004-vf:~# uname -a
  Linux decui-u2004-vf 5.8.0-1032-azure #34~SF00310147.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 11 
02:01:58 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
  root@decui-u2004-vf:~# modinfo mana | grep filename
  filename: 
/lib/modules/5.8.0-1032-azure/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana.ko
  
  Everything worked as expected in our testing:
  1. The MANA driver loads and unloads multiple times without any issue.
  2. iperf TX/RX tests run 

[Bug 1928790] [NEW] Unable to upgrade 18.04 LTS to 20.04 LTS

2021-05-18 Thread Norbert
Public bug reported:

The system does not have any PPA added.
The system does not have obsolete and/or locally installed packages.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:18.04.44
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-143.147-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-143-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.23
Architecture: amd64
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue May 18 14:59:48 2021
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2021-05-18 (0 days ago)
VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic dist-upgrade third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928790

Title:
  Unable to upgrade 18.04 LTS to 20.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1928790/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   >