+1 maint report
Hello, After two days of +1 maint, I worked on/resolved the following issues. Most time was spent figuring out what's wrong with iotjs (or rather it's vendorized dependency on jerryscript), as I've had worked on this before it was almost 100 days old and it was not resolved in the meantime. After quite some back and forth with upstream ( https://github.com/jerryscript-project/jerryscript/issues/4431) I figured out that the "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2" flags triggered compiler errors on s390x. This did not happen with the upstream build, because they use -Os (which disables fortification). So as a workaround I changed the package's CMake flags in debian/rules: CMAKE_OPTIONS+=-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=MinSizeRel autopkgtest: OK - dnspython vs python-ecdsa/amd64 (passes locally) OK - dgit vs groff/armhf (FAIL timed out) OK - django-ldapdb vs python-django/armhf (passes locally) OK - libhtml-formfu-perl vs libreadonly-perl/armhf ("unknown" version) OK - linux-show-player vs python-rtmidi/amd64,arm64,i386,ppc64el,s390x ("unknown" version) => state "Neutral" OK - patroni vs postgresql-common/s390x (adding etcd trigger) FTBFS: OK - iotjs/s390x (vendorized jerryscript) Merge: OK - intel-vaapi-drivers, sync DFSG version. Shaders are available in multiverse as intel-vaapi-driver-shaders. OK - libfiu, merged, keep failing dh_auto_tests disabled Cheers, Lukas -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: +1 maint report
Hi Iain, On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 06:07:13PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote: > * Rebootstrapped lintian on i386, but it still requires >libproc-processtable-perl to be promoted back to main. I remember >there being a lightweight process for this, if someone could remind >me / write up the details of that. There is no historic MIR for this package linked from https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html, and it's not in main in any supported release. When was it previously in main, since you say "promoted back"? The Foundations Team often takes the view of perl modules only used for e.g. lintian that a lightweight review suffices for promotion, but I'm not sure whether that would apply here (I would defer to Matthias). > * Removed i386 binaries for rust-gtk, were copied up from eoan which >was before the i386 removal in focal Heh, I then had to remove the same binaries from the release pocket ;) (e.g. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/groovy/i386/librust-gtk+v3-22-26-dev) Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
+1 maint report
Here's me stuff for this week. I think I did some stuff that I didn't take notes for too. 🙈 * transition-tracker: Made the runner script clear up old auto-* transitions, which should make the index much less cluttered as these were piling up forever * Retried a bunch of flakes * Did NBS cleanup * Noticed that gnome-control-center was in component-mismatches due to a libhandy API/ABI rename. Discussed with the MIR team (Didier) and promoted. * Restored lzop's i386 binaries to allow qtbase-opensource-src to build * Rebootstrapped lintian on i386, but it still requires libproc-processtable-perl to be promoted back to main. I remember there being a lightweight process for this, if someone could remind me / write up the details of that. * Added an i386 badtest to let hg-git migrate (it's uninstallable) * Fixed autodep8's autopkgtests https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autodep8/-/merge_requests/23/pipelines * Removed i386 binaries for rust-gtk, were copied up from eoan which was before the i386 removal in focal * Fixed haskell-genvalidity FTBFS, was actually a fix required in haskell-validity. https://github.com/NorfairKing/validity/pull/85 * Found a couple of builds which had been affected by the setuptools bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968410 and retried them Cheers, -- Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ] Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ] Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ] signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel