Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature tour
Hi WMID, fredagen den 29:e juli 2016 kl. 02:17:46 CEST, WMID skrev: I like this picture: http://storage6.static.itmages.com/i/16/0729/h_1469751263_9886431_931448cd0b.png I agree, it's beautiful! Geirdal is a great artist, we are lucky to benefit from his output. -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature tour (was: Seventh try )
fredagen den 29:e juli 2016 kl. 17:52:35 CEST, Kaj Ailomaa skrev: On Thu, Jul 28, 2016, at 02:33 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote: On 2016-06-23 02:00, Jóhann Örn Geirdal wrote: > Seventh try ;) Hi here is only a base I will ad to it some more but > what do you think about this? > http://geirdal.is/index.php/studio-0 I made a few shots that could work well as complementary pictures to the more abstracto-figurative pictures Geirdal made for the categories. I realize they might not be perfect, but maybe you like the idea? I tried to make one for each category, but i think they all end up having a lot of "audio focus" maybe it is a good thing? You tell me. One sure thing is that the "graphic workflow" one, needs a different on-screen content :D (too "cute, wtf, kindergarten") http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/featuretour__1.jpg http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/featuretour__2.jpg http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/featuretour__3.jpg The more i look at Geirdal pictures, the better i like these: http://geirdal.is/images/studio/audio_x.png http://geirdal.is/images/studio/graphic_03.png http://geirdal.is/images/studio/video_x.png If they are used without the pictograms, like they were intended: as backgrounds for text and screenshots, i think they are perfect! They refer to analogue times with very contemporary elements. I think it emulates what we are quite well: /linux for creative humans/ a digital product made by analogue robots ;) And they are quiet and noisy at the same time, which i find to be a really poetic contrast. I think this one is really beautyfull but it should be used without the logos for the general "about" text in the feature tour (: http://geirdal.is/images/studio/studio_07.png It is risky, but i also find it very cool, fresh and inspiring. 90's fractal with a millennial twist! This afternoon i will try put together what i mean in a collage. I'm convinced that, properly framed on the page, using geirdals pictures could make the sexiest feature tour, ever :) Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer The only thing I would like to remind of is of the "big picgture", which should be about information. It's easy to become a bit obsessed about the details of a design, but the importance is still around what the whole thing informs. And, what is the information? That is the question that needs to be answered - not only with graphics, but with the whole thing. The current feature tour is old, and should be buried. It should be replaced by something that does the same thing, but better. Better information. Better graphics, but most importantly - better information. Thank you, Kaj! I tried to base the text ( http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/feature-tour.txt ) and layout as good as i could on your and autumna's wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/FeatureDefinitions/WebsiteXenial The text (and me) is begging for review and i'd love to read/see what you all think should be corrected both text- and design-wise. I believe it's the typical kindof work that gets super strong from teamwork. After all, speaking to all, takes many. :) Yours, -- Set Hallström Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature tour (was: Seventh try )
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016, at 02:33 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > On 2016-06-23 02:00, Jóhann Örn Geirdal wrote: > > Seventh try ;) Hi here is only a base I will ad to it some more but > > what do you think about this? > > http://geirdal.is/index.php/studio-0 > > I made a few shots that could work well as complementary pictures to the > more abstracto-figurative pictures Geirdal made for the categories. > > I realize they might not be perfect, but maybe you like the idea? > > I tried to make one for each category, but i think they all end up > having a lot of "audio focus" maybe it is a good thing? You tell me. One > sure thing is that the "graphic workflow" one, needs a different > on-screen content :D (too "cute, wtf, kindergarten") > > http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/featuretour__1.jpg > http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/featuretour__2.jpg > http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/featuretour__3.jpg > > The more i look at Geirdal pictures, the better i like these: > > http://geirdal.is/images/studio/audio_x.png > http://geirdal.is/images/studio/graphic_03.png > http://geirdal.is/images/studio/video_x.png > > If they are used without the pictograms, like they were intended: as > backgrounds for text and screenshots, i think they are perfect! They > refer to analogue times with very contemporary elements. I think it > emulates what we are quite well: /linux for creative humans/ a digital > product made by analogue robots ;) And they are quiet and noisy at the > same time, which i find to be a really poetic contrast. > > I think this one is really beautyfull but it should be used without the > logos for the general "about" text in the feature tour (: > http://geirdal.is/images/studio/studio_07.png > > It is risky, but i also find it very cool, fresh and inspiring. 90's > fractal with a millennial twist! This afternoon i will try put together > what i mean in a collage. > > I'm convinced that, properly framed on the page, using geirdals pictures > could make the sexiest feature tour, ever :) > > Yours, > > -- > Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer > The only thing I would like to remind of is of the "big picgture", which should be about information. It's easy to become a bit obsessed about the details of a design, but the importance is still around what the whole thing informs. And, what is the information? That is the question that needs to be answered - not only with graphics, but with the whole thing. The current feature tour is old, and should be buried. It should be replaced by something that does the same thing, but better. Better information. Better graphics, but most importantly - better information. -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature tour
I like this picture: http://storage6.static.itmages.com/i/16/0729/h_1469751263_9886431_931448cd0b.png 2016-07-28 16:20 GMT-05:00 Set Sakrecoer : > On 2016-07-28 14:33, Set Hallstrom wrote: > >> This afternoon i will try put together >> > > Yeah... it became this evening, better than mañana? :D > > Anyways, here it is: > http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/render.png > > Misunderstand me right: this is _not_ how it /must/ look, it is just an > attempt to put together what we have and render it into something united > and comprehensible. Hopefully it will help us push the envelope... > > I put all the material i used here: > http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/website.tar.gz > > Looking forward to read you, > -- > Set aka ~sakrecoer > > -- > ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list > ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel > -- Ingeniero en Alimentos Washington Indacochea Delgado -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature tour
On 2016-07-28 14:33, Set Hallstrom wrote: This afternoon i will try put together Yeah... it became this evening, better than mañana? :D Anyways, here it is: http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/render.png Misunderstand me right: this is _not_ how it /must/ look, it is just an attempt to put together what we have and render it into something united and comprehensible. Hopefully it will help us push the envelope... I put all the material i used here: http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/website.tar.gz Looking forward to read you, -- Set aka ~sakrecoer -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel