Re: doing 2.3.0 RC1 - tomorrow morning?

[Jörn Kottmann]

Marshall Schor wrote:

Jörn Kottmann wrote:
  

Marshall Schor wrote:


Unless I hear some objections, I would like to tag the first (and
hopefully only :-) ) release candidate for 2.3.0 tomorrow morning.
Please get any fixes finished up that you would like to get into the
release before then, or ask for a short delay if needed...

-Marshall
  
  

Would be nice to get some feedback on UIMA-1658
and UIMA-1659 before we do the rc. These
are the last to issue I have with our UIMA AS installation
which are important to get fixed.



1657 is fixed, 1658 will need perhaps extensive investigation involving
uima-as, spring, and activemq - any of which could be the underlying
cause. 


Because this may be quite open-ended, I will go ahead with doing release
candidates now, and we can work for as long as we need to on hardening
the fail-over.  Let's tentatively plan on a uima-as point release in a
couple of months to pick up these changes (assuming the fail-over
capability has stablized by then).
  

+1, through UIMA-1657 the failover now works after the worker nodes
and the clients are restarted. I agree with Marshall that it could
take some time to find out whats wrong.

Jörn

Re: doing 2.3.0 RC1 - tomorrow morning?

[Marshall Schor]

Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> Marshall Schor wrote:
>> Unless I hear some objections, I would like to tag the first (and
>> hopefully only :-) ) release candidate for 2.3.0 tomorrow morning.
>> Please get any fixes finished up that you would like to get into the
>> release before then, or ask for a short delay if needed...
>>
>> -Marshall
>>   
> Would be nice to get some feedback on UIMA-1658
> and UIMA-1659 before we do the rc. These
> are the last to issue I have with our UIMA AS installation
> which are important to get fixed.

1657 is fixed, 1658 will need perhaps extensive investigation involving
uima-as, spring, and activemq - any of which could be the underlying
cause. 

Because this may be quite open-ended, I will go ahead with doing release
candidates now, and we can work for as long as we need to on hardening
the fail-over.  Let's tentatively plan on a uima-as point release in a
couple of months to pick up these changes (assuming the fail-over
capability has stablized by then).

-Marshall
>
> Jörn
>
>

Re: doing 2.3.0 RC1 - tomorrow morning?

[Jaroslaw Cwiklik]

Ok, svn was temporarily unavailable. Now is back up. I submitted changes for
UIMA-1657. Jorn please test this a close the JIRA if the fixes work for you

Thanks, Jerry

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Jörn Kottmann  wrote:

> Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
>
>> *UIMA-1657  is finished*.
>>
>>
>> I've added two new testcases to test failover URI with tcp and http Both
>> seem to work. For some reason I can't submit changes to the svn from home.
>> I
>> will check this in tomorrow first thing in the morning. The changes I've
>> put
>> in only address support for URI's that contain failover string. I have not
>> tested, nor I claim support for, the actual failover from one broker to
>> the
>> next if the connection fails
>>
> Thanks :-) I will test it as soon as it is checked in.
>
> I hope there is only a small problem why the actual
> failover does not work. I will try to find the cause
> tomorrow.
>
> Jörn
>

Re: doing 2.3.0 RC1 - tomorrow morning?

[Jörn Kottmann]

Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:

*UIMA-1657  is finished*.
I've added two new testcases to test failover URI with tcp and http Both
seem to work. For some reason I can't submit changes to the svn from home. I
will check this in tomorrow first thing in the morning. The changes I've put
in only address support for URI's that contain failover string. I have not
tested, nor I claim support for, the actual failover from one broker to the
next if the connection fails

Thanks :-) I will test it as soon as it is checked in.

I hope there is only a small problem why the actual
failover does not work. I will try to find the cause
tomorrow.

Jörn

Re: doing 2.3.0 RC1 - tomorrow morning?

[Jaroslaw Cwiklik]

*UIMA-1657  is finished*.
I've added two new testcases to test failover URI with tcp and http Both
seem to work. For some reason I can't submit changes to the svn from home. I
will check this in tomorrow first thing in the morning. The changes I've put
in only address support for URI's that contain failover string. I have not
tested, nor I claim support for, the actual failover from one broker to the
next if the connection fails.


On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Jörn Kottmann  wrote:

> Marshall Schor wrote:
>
>> Jörn Kottmann wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Marshall Schor wrote:
>>>
>>>
 Unless I hear some objections, I would like to tag the first (and
 hopefully only :-) ) release candidate for 2.3.0 tomorrow morning.
 Please get any fixes finished up that you would like to get into the
 release before then, or ask for a short delay if needed...

 -Marshall


>>> Would be nice to get some feedback on UIMA-1658
>>> and UIMA-1659 before we do the rc. These
>>> are the last to issue I have with our UIMA AS installation
>>> which are important to get fixed.
>>>
>>>
>> OK - I think Jerry was looking at 1657 (which I think you meant instead
>> of 1659?).
>>
> Yes
>
>  I wonder, though, if getting fail-over to work (or work better) will be
>> a bit of a long journey, and whether we should do that in the next
>> release?
>>
>>
> Maybe Jerry can give me a few hints where I have to look
> for the code which is reading from the input queue.
> Then I maybe find out whats going wrong in the failover
> case on the worker node.  I have time for that tomorrow.
>
> On the other side I guess we are doing multiple release candidates
> anyway right ?
>
> Jörn
>

Re: doing 2.3.0 RC1 - tomorrow morning?

[Jörn Kottmann]

Marshall Schor wrote:

Jörn Kottmann wrote:
  

Marshall Schor wrote:


Unless I hear some objections, I would like to tag the first (and
hopefully only :-) ) release candidate for 2.3.0 tomorrow morning.
Please get any fixes finished up that you would like to get into the
release before then, or ask for a short delay if needed...

-Marshall
  
  

Would be nice to get some feedback on UIMA-1658
and UIMA-1659 before we do the rc. These
are the last to issue I have with our UIMA AS installation
which are important to get fixed.


OK - I think Jerry was looking at 1657 (which I think you meant instead
of 1659?). 
  

Yes

I wonder, though, if getting fail-over to work (or work better) will be
a bit of a long journey, and whether we should do that in the next release?
  

Maybe Jerry can give me a few hints where I have to look
for the code which is reading from the input queue.
Then I maybe find out whats going wrong in the failover
case on the worker node.  I have time for that tomorrow.

On the other side I guess we are doing multiple release candidates
anyway right ?

Jörn

Re: doing 2.3.0 RC1 - tomorrow morning?

[Marshall Schor]

Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> Marshall Schor wrote:
>> Unless I hear some objections, I would like to tag the first (and
>> hopefully only :-) ) release candidate for 2.3.0 tomorrow morning.
>> Please get any fixes finished up that you would like to get into the
>> release before then, or ask for a short delay if needed...
>>
>> -Marshall
>>   
> Would be nice to get some feedback on UIMA-1658
> and UIMA-1659 before we do the rc. These
> are the last to issue I have with our UIMA AS installation
> which are important to get fixed.
OK - I think Jerry was looking at 1657 (which I think you meant instead
of 1659?). 

I wonder, though, if getting fail-over to work (or work better) will be
a bit of a long journey, and whether we should do that in the next release?

I'm hoping we can release more often (presuming we graduate :-) ) so it
won't be so long between releases.

-Marshall
>
> Jörn
>
>

Re: doing 2.3.0 RC1 - tomorrow morning?

[Jörn Kottmann]

Marshall Schor wrote:

Unless I hear some objections, I would like to tag the first (and
hopefully only :-) ) release candidate for 2.3.0 tomorrow morning. 


Please get any fixes finished up that you would like to get into the
release before then, or ask for a short delay if needed...

-Marshall
  

Would be nice to get some feedback on UIMA-1658
and UIMA-1659 before we do the rc. These
are the last to issue I have with our UIMA AS installation
which are important to get fixed.

Jörn

doing 2.3.0 RC1 - tomorrow morning?

[Marshall Schor]

Unless I hear some objections, I would like to tag the first (and
hopefully only :-) ) release candidate for 2.3.0 tomorrow morning. 

Please get any fixes finished up that you would like to get into the
release before then, or ask for a short delay if needed...

-Marshall