Re: Last Resort Font
At 06:48 -0700 2003-09-02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Eversion wrote on 08/19/2003 02:52:55 PM: >p. 63 (Syloti Nagri): both top and bottom read "SILOTI NAGRI". > I will look into all of that, and thank you for it; but note that of those only Thaana can be expected to display, as none of the others > have been encoded. So none of those could EVER be displayed; they are just extra glyphs in the current font. Syloti Nagri has been approved by UTC and assigned to A800..A82F, though this is yet to be ratified by WG2 (presumably will happen in October) and published in a new version of Unicode (will be 4.1) or an amendment to ISO 10646 (I don't know what timetable is in place for publishing further amendments). And it will be two years before the LR font has to be updated -- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
Re: Last Resort Font
Michael Eversion wrote on 08/19/2003 02:52:55 PM: > >p. 63 (Syloti Nagri): both top and bottom read "SILOTI NAGRI". > I will look into all of that, and thank you for it; but note that of > those only Thaana can be expected to display, as none of the others > have been encoded. So none of those could EVER be displayed; they are > just extra glyphs in the current font. Syloti Nagri has been approved by UTC and assigned to A800..A82F, though this is yet to be ratified by WG2 (presumably will happen in October) and published in a new version of Unicode (will be 4.1) or an amendment to ISO 10646 (I don't know what timetable is in place for publishing further amendments). Peter Constable
Re: Last Resort Font
At 17:26 -0400 2003-08-19, John Cowan wrote: Michael Everson scripsit: No. It generates much much better glyphs than that. See http://developer.apple.com/fonts/LastResortFont/ Out of mild curiosity: (a) what font did you use to create the legends in the frame of each glyph; Chicago. (b) are all the various representative glyphs drawn from a common font, and if so, which one? Of course they were not. No such font exists. Defect reports based on the 236-page PDF: p. 17 (Thaana): the bottom of the frame reads "THAAN" with a broken glyph following. p. 18 (Phoenician): the top of the frame reads "OENECIAN", the bottom is blank, and the rest of the glyph is black. p. 55 (Pahawh): bottom of frame is blank. p. 63 (Syloti Nagri): both top and bottom read "SILOTI NAGRI". p. 171 (Brahmi): both top and bottom read "BRAMHI". I will look into all of that, and thank you for it; but note that of those only Thaana can be expected to display, as none of the others have been encoded. So none of those could EVER be displayed; they are just extra glyphs in the current font. -- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
Re: Last Resort Font
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 17:08, Michael Everson wrote: > At 16:24 -0400 2003-08-19, Owen Taylor wrote: > > >If you have a Last Resort style font, Pango should pick it up as well. > > I don't know what Pango is but I guess it isn't relevant to me... It was mentioned in the mail that you replied to (because of it's hex-box-drawing) so I didn't feel a need to gloss. Pango is an text layout library roughly along the lines of Uniscribe/ATSUI/etc, developed largely by myself, with lots of help from the open-source community, including various people on this list. See http://www.pango.org for really outdated content. (Not much time to update the web page these days.) If you don't use Linux or Unix, it's likely not relevant to you. It's used pretty widely these days in that arena. Regards, Owen
Re: Last Resort Font
Michael Everson scripsit: > No. It generates much much better glyphs than that. See > http://developer.apple.com/fonts/LastResortFont/ Out of mild curiosity: (a) what font did you use to create the legends in the frame of each glyph; (b) are all the various representative glyphs drawn from a common font, and if so, which one? Defect reports based on the 236-page PDF: p. 17 (Thaana): the bottom of the frame reads "THAAN" with a broken glyph following. p. 18 (Phoenician): the top of the frame reads "OENECIAN", the bottom is blank, and the rest of the glyph is black. p. 55 (Pahawh): bottom of frame is blank. p. 63 (Syloti Nagri): both top and bottom read "SILOTI NAGRI". p. 171 (Brahmi): both top and bottom read "BRAMHI". -- One Word to write them all, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> One Access to find them, http://www.reutershealth.com One Excel to count them all,http://www.ccil.org/~cowan And thus to Windows bind them.--Mike Champion
Re: Last Resort Font
At 16:51 -0400 2003-08-19, Jim Allan wrote: The Last Resort Font has glyphs for all the characters, so it's the last one looked at. I hope that it is not just for that reason that it is the last one looked at. Eh? The system looks for Unicode glyphs in all the other fonts and if there's no available glyph the the LRF is displayed. It's the "last resort". There are, of course, some lovely easter-eggs in the font -- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
Re: Last Resort Font
At 16:24 -0400 2003-08-19, Owen Taylor wrote: > No. It generates much much better glyphs than that. See http://developer.apple.com/fonts/LastResortFont/ Of course, "better" here really depends on what you want. Prettier? Yes. Thanks. :-) More useful for Joe User who gets Sinhala spam? Yes. Exactly. More useful if you are trying to debug why, in a span of Arabic text, some characters aren't being located in a font? Not really. The glyph (if you look at it zoomed in enough) tells you the block the character is encoded in. It doesn't tell you WHICH character isn't in any usable font. If you have a Last Resort style font, Pango should pick it up as well. I don't know what Pango is but I guess it isn't relevant to me... -- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
Re: Last Resort Font
Michael Everson wrote: The Last Resort Font has glyphs for all the characters, so it's the last one looked at. I hope that it is not just for that reason that it is the last one looked at. Jim Allan
Re: Last Resort Font
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 15:45, Michael Everson wrote: > At 15:04 -0400 2003-08-19, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote: > > > "John" == John Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >John> (Apple's LastResort font [contains every Unicode character], > >John> of course, but by virtually of rampant reuse of glyphs.) > > > >Does this Generate glyphs like the following ascii- & utf8-art? > > No. It generates much much better glyphs than that. See > http://developer.apple.com/fonts/LastResortFont/ Of course, "better" here really depends on what you want. Prettier? Yes. More useful for Joe User who gets Sinhala spam? Yes. More useful if you are trying to debug why, in a span of Arabic text, some characters aren't being located in a font? Not really. > >I find it interesting, if so, that Apple uses a font to acheive that > >rather than a bit of code in the rendering libs. > > What Mac OS X does is when it encounters a Unicode character, it sees > if it's in the current font. If it's not, it starts looking through > all the other fonts until it finds one that is suitable. The Last > Resort Font has glyphs for all the characters, so it's the last one > looked at. If you have a Last Resort style font, Pango should pick it up as well (*). The hex boxes are only drawn when *no* font on the system contains the character. Regards, Owen (*) With some caveats about fontconfig configuration that I'm not going to get into here.
