Re: Updated version of TilesViewHandler
If you are willing to use JSF RI 1.2 (not MyFaces), then I posted an experimental version as an attachment at: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-302 -=> Gregg <=- Garner, Shawn wrote: > Since the release of a GA version of Standalone Tiles when can we expect > a new version of the TilesViewHandler compatible with 2.0.5 of > standalone tiles? > > I tried the current one with 2.0.5 and got no class def found > exceptions. > > > Shawn > > > -Message Disclaimer- > > This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or > entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is > privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. > If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by > reply email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete or destroy all copies of > the original message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from the > Principal Financial Group or any of its member companies may be retained > as required by law or regulation. > > Nothing in this message is intended to constitute an Electronic signature > for purposes of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) or the > Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act ("E-Sign") > unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message. > > While this communication may be used to promote or market a transaction > or an idea that is discussed in the publication, it is intended to provide > general information about the subject matter covered and is provided with > the understanding that The Principal is not rendering legal, accounting, > or tax advice. It is not a marketed opinion and may not be used to avoid > penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. You should consult with > appropriate counsel or other advisors on all matters pertaining to legal, > tax, or accounting obligations and requirements. > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Updated version of TilesViewHandler
Since the release of a GA version of Standalone Tiles when can we expect a new version of the TilesViewHandler compatible with 2.0.5 of standalone tiles? I tried the current one with 2.0.5 and got no class def found exceptions. Shawn -Message Disclaimer- This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by reply email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete or destroy all copies of the original message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from the Principal Financial Group or any of its member companies may be retained as required by law or regulation. Nothing in this message is intended to constitute an Electronic signature for purposes of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) or the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act ("E-Sign") unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message. While this communication may be used to promote or market a transaction or an idea that is discussed in the publication, it is intended to provide general information about the subject matter covered and is provided with the understanding that The Principal is not rendering legal, accounting, or tax advice. It is not a marketed opinion and may not be used to avoid penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. You should consult with appropriate counsel or other advisors on all matters pertaining to legal, tax, or accounting obligations and requirements.
Re: TilesViewHandler
2006/8/29, Baker,Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I'm sure if I renamed my tiles to have the slash at the beginning of their names that it would work as well. My confusion is over the explicit statement that it will look for a tile both with and without the leading slash and that does not seem to be the case. It is no longer the case, and the latest documentation has been updated to reflect that. david JB -Original Message- From: Dick Starr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 8:37 AM To: user@shale.apache.org Subject: RE: TilesViewHandler Standalone Tiles works for me. In tiles.xml I use definitions like /myDef.jsp I do not have to do an extra jsp containing a mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 6:28 AM To: Shale User Group (E-mail 2) Subject: TilesViewHandler According to the Documentation for the shale-tiles TilesViewHandler: * Strips off the view ID's suffix (eg: "/tiles/test.jsp" becomes "/tiles/test") * Searches for a tile with the resulting name, with or without the leading slash (eg: "/tiles/test" or "tiles/test") I was not getting this behavior at all. My tile is defined as inbox, and my navigation rule points to /inbox.jsp. The view handler cannot successfully find the tile named inbox. I looked at the source for this class and even though the javadoc says that the leading slash is stripped off, I could find no code anywhere in that class that looked for the tile, and if it wasn't found stripped of a leading slash and looked for the tile again. If I remove the leading slash from my navigation rule, I get the follwoing error: (JspViewHandlerImpl.java:285) - ViewId must start with '/' (viewId = inbox.jsp) I am using the shale 1.03 release. Thanks for your help. JB
Re: TilesViewHandler
On Aug 29, 2006, at 8:13 AM, Dick Starr wrote: When I saw that the navigation rule required a slash, I went with a slash on the tiles defs. Per Kito's book (p 132), the view-id must always start with a slash - but I don't know why. Wow, I didn't know that. Sounds kinda restrictive. Does anyone have any idea why or if perhaps JSF 1.2 addresses this? Thanks, Greg
RE: TilesViewHandler
When I saw that the navigation rule required a slash, I went with a slash on the tiles defs. Per Kito's book (p 132), the view-id must always start with a slash - but I don't know why. Dick -Original Message- From: Baker,Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 7:48 AM To: user@shale.apache.org Subject: RE: TilesViewHandler I'm sure if I renamed my tiles to have the slash at the beginning of their names that it would work as well. My confusion is over the explicit statement that it will look for a tile both with and without the leading slash and that does not seem to be the case. JB -Original Message- From: Dick Starr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 8:37 AM To: user@shale.apache.org Subject: RE: TilesViewHandler Standalone Tiles works for me. In tiles.xml I use definitions like /myDef.jsp I do not have to do an extra jsp containing a mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 6:28 AM To: Shale User Group (E-mail 2) Subject: TilesViewHandler According to the Documentation for the shale-tiles TilesViewHandler: * Strips off the view ID's suffix (eg: "/tiles/test.jsp" becomes "/tiles/test") * Searches for a tile with the resulting name, with or without the leading slash (eg: "/tiles/test" or "tiles/test") I was not getting this behavior at all. My tile is defined as inbox, and my navigation rule points to /inbox.jsp. The view handler cannot successfully find the tile named inbox. I looked at the source for this class and even though the javadoc says that the leading slash is stripped off, I could find no code anywhere in that class that looked for the tile, and if it wasn't found stripped of a leading slash and looked for the tile again. If I remove the leading slash from my navigation rule, I get the follwoing error: (JspViewHandlerImpl.java:285) - ViewId must start with '/' (viewId = inbox.jsp) I am using the shale 1.03 release. Thanks for your help. JB
RE: TilesViewHandler
I'm sure if I renamed my tiles to have the slash at the beginning of their names that it would work as well. My confusion is over the explicit statement that it will look for a tile both with and without the leading slash and that does not seem to be the case. JB -Original Message- From: Dick Starr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 8:37 AM To: user@shale.apache.org Subject: RE: TilesViewHandler Standalone Tiles works for me. In tiles.xml I use definitions like /myDef.jsp I do not have to do an extra jsp containing a mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 6:28 AM To: Shale User Group (E-mail 2) Subject: TilesViewHandler According to the Documentation for the shale-tiles TilesViewHandler: * Strips off the view ID's suffix (eg: "/tiles/test.jsp" becomes "/tiles/test") * Searches for a tile with the resulting name, with or without the leading slash (eg: "/tiles/test" or "tiles/test") I was not getting this behavior at all. My tile is defined as inbox, and my navigation rule points to /inbox.jsp. The view handler cannot successfully find the tile named inbox. I looked at the source for this class and even though the javadoc says that the leading slash is stripped off, I could find no code anywhere in that class that looked for the tile, and if it wasn't found stripped of a leading slash and looked for the tile again. If I remove the leading slash from my navigation rule, I get the follwoing error: (JspViewHandlerImpl.java:285) - ViewId must start with '/' (viewId = inbox.jsp) I am using the shale 1.03 release. Thanks for your help. JB
RE: TilesViewHandler
Standalone Tiles works for me. In tiles.xml I use definitions like /myDef.jsp I do not have to do an extra jsp containing a mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 6:28 AM To: Shale User Group (E-mail 2) Subject: TilesViewHandler According to the Documentation for the shale-tiles TilesViewHandler: * Strips off the view ID's suffix (eg: "/tiles/test.jsp" becomes "/tiles/test") * Searches for a tile with the resulting name, with or without the leading slash (eg: "/tiles/test" or "tiles/test") I was not getting this behavior at all. My tile is defined as inbox, and my navigation rule points to /inbox.jsp. The view handler cannot successfully find the tile named inbox. I looked at the source for this class and even though the javadoc says that the leading slash is stripped off, I could find no code anywhere in that class that looked for the tile, and if it wasn't found stripped of a leading slash and looked for the tile again. If I remove the leading slash from my navigation rule, I get the follwoing error: (JspViewHandlerImpl.java:285) - ViewId must start with '/' (viewId = inbox.jsp) I am using the shale 1.03 release. Thanks for your help. JB
TilesViewHandler
According to the Documentation for the shale-tiles TilesViewHandler: * Strips off the view ID's suffix (eg: "/tiles/test.jsp" becomes "/tiles/test") * Searches for a tile with the resulting name, with or without the leading slash (eg: "/tiles/test" or "tiles/test") I was not getting this behavior at all. My tile is defined as inbox, and my navigation rule points to /inbox.jsp. The view handler cannot successfully find the tile named inbox. I looked at the source for this class and even though the javadoc says that the leading slash is stripped off, I could find no code anywhere in that class that looked for the tile, and if it wasn't found stripped of a leading slash and looked for the tile again. If I remove the leading slash from my navigation rule, I get the follwoing error: (JspViewHandlerImpl.java:285) - ViewId must start with '/' (viewId = inbox.jsp) I am using the shale 1.03 release. Thanks for your help. JB