date:20131002

RE: cloudstack 4.1 KVM There no secondary storage for secondary VM

2013-10-02 Thread Sanjeev Neelarapu

If you have created the bridges as per the instructions in section "8.1.8.3. 
Configuring the network bridges" then you need to specify those bridge names 
(e.g cloudbr0 and cloudbr1) as traffic labels in the physical network for 
respective traffics like guest and management traffic.  After this destroy all 
the vms (If any are already created) and re-launch. 

Hope this will solve the problem.

-Sanjeev

-Original Message-
From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 11:05 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: cloudstack 4.1 KVM There no secondary storage for secondary VM

yes, I did.however i think cloudstack traffic is trying to go through public 
network and NFS server in an a private network. each hypervisor has two network 
cards, public and private private is nic ifcfg-eth0 and public ifcfg-eth1

the management has only one network interface, configured to static on the 
private network(same subnet as nfs server)

I believe that my problem is network bridges on my hypervisor machine,  I 
followed this guide:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.1/html/Installation_Guide/hypervisor-kvm-install-flow.html#hypervisor-kvm-requirements

but no success.

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:08 AM,  wrote:

> Do you have an NFS share created and added to Cloudstack for it to use 
> as Secondary Storage?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "motty cruz" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 8:43:05 PM
> Subject: cloudstack 4.1 KVM There no secondary storage for secondary 
> VM
>
> Hello, I need help!
> I have installed CloudStack 4.1 on CentOS, I have two hypervisors KVM 
> running on CentOS 6.4. both KVM hypervison have 2 network cards one 
> have static public IP and 2nd has a private IP. can someone point the 
> steps to have basic network to run with CloudStack?
>
> currently I have cloudstack working but the error I'm getting is 
> "There are no secondary storage for secondary VM" I know is because my 
> network interfaces are not configure correctly.
>
> Thanks,
>  Motty
>

Re: cloudstack 4.1 GRE/SDN

2013-10-02 Thread murali reddy

Have you tried to create a new isolated network for the VM after setting
'sdn.ovs.controller' to  true? Please see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2878


On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Luca Salvatore  wrote:

> i'm trying to do some testing with cloudstack 4.1, specifically around the
> GRE and SDN features.
> I have configured the management server and I have two zones.  Everything
> is working well, I can deploy VMs in each zone and everything there is
> good. Each zone is configured with GRE isolation.
> When I changed the sdn.ovs.controller to true and tried to deploy VMs they
> all failed, weird thing is that they don't even appear in the management
> console in a error state, just nothing happens.  The logs do show an
> exception:
>
>
> 2013-10-03 11:48:47,171 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (catalina-exec-20:null) Allocating entries for VM: VM[User|test1]
> 2013-10-03 11:48:47,172 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (catalina-exec-20:null) Allocating nics for VM[User|test1]
> 2013-10-03 11:48:47,173 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
> (catalina-exec-20:null) Allocating nic for vm VM[User|test1] in network
> Ntwk[208|Guest|8] with requested profile NicProfile[0-0-null-null-null
> 2013-10-03 11:48:47,179 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction]
> (catalina-exec-20:null) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 22 Name =
>  createVirtualMachine; called by
> -Transaction.rollback:890-Transaction.removeUpTo:833-Transaction.close:657-TransactionContextBuilder.interceptException:63-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:133-VirtualMachineManagerImpl.allocate:304-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:125-CloudOrchestrator.createVirtualMachine:211-UserVmManagerImpl.createVirtualMachine:3384-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:125-UserVmManagerImpl.createAdvancedVirtualMachine:3101-DeployVMCmd.create:460
> 2013-10-03 11:48:47,189 ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer]
> (catalina-exec-20:null) unhandled exception executing api command:
> deployVirtualMachine
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
> com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.allocateNic(NetworkManagerImpl.java:1267)
> at
> com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125)
> at
> com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.allocate(NetworkManagerImpl.java:1206)
> at
> com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125)
> at
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.allocate(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:304)
> at
> com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125)
>
>
> Not sure what is going on here.  Any thoughts?
> I'm using XenSever 6.1 with a single bond (2 NICs) for all networks, also
> using local storage for all VMs.
> Can't seem to find much doco on how to configure zones for SDN… Any help
> would be great
>
> Thanks
> Luca.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

cloudstack 4.1 GRE/SDN

2013-10-02 Thread Luca Salvatore

i'm trying to do some testing with cloudstack 4.1, specifically around the GRE 
and SDN features.
I have configured the management server and I have two zones.  Everything is 
working well, I can deploy VMs in each zone and everything there is good. Each 
zone is configured with GRE isolation.
When I changed the sdn.ovs.controller to true and tried to deploy VMs they all 
failed, weird thing is that they don't even appear in the management console in 
a error state, just nothing happens.  The logs do show an exception:


2013-10-03 11:48:47,171 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] 
(catalina-exec-20:null) Allocating entries for VM: VM[User|test1]
2013-10-03 11:48:47,172 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] 
(catalina-exec-20:null) Allocating nics for VM[User|test1]
2013-10-03 11:48:47,173 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] 
(catalina-exec-20:null) Allocating nic for vm VM[User|test1] in network 
Ntwk[208|Guest|8] with requested profile NicProfile[0-0-null-null-null
2013-10-03 11:48:47,179 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] 
(catalina-exec-20:null) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 22 Name =  
createVirtualMachine; called by 
-Transaction.rollback:890-Transaction.removeUpTo:833-Transaction.close:657-TransactionContextBuilder.interceptException:63-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:133-VirtualMachineManagerImpl.allocate:304-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:125-CloudOrchestrator.createVirtualMachine:211-UserVmManagerImpl.createVirtualMachine:3384-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:125-UserVmManagerImpl.createAdvancedVirtualMachine:3101-DeployVMCmd.create:460
2013-10-03 11:48:47,189 ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-20:null) 
unhandled exception executing api command: deployVirtualMachine
java.lang.NullPointerException
at 
com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.allocateNic(NetworkManagerImpl.java:1267)
at 
com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125)
at 
com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.allocate(NetworkManagerImpl.java:1206)
at 
com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125)
at 
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.allocate(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:304)
at 
com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125)


Not sure what is going on here.  Any thoughts?
I'm using XenSever 6.1 with a single bond (2 NICs) for all networks, also using 
local storage for all VMs.
Can't seem to find much doco on how to configure zones for SDN… Any help would 
be great

Thanks
Luca.

Re: Cloudstack 4.1

2013-10-02 Thread Kirk Kosinski

Hi, the log shows a VM being destroyed, which doesn't match the
description of the problem.  If the description is correct, upload more
of the load to Pastebin.  The log that needs to be provided will most
likely include the error text from the UI.

Best regards,
Kirk

On 10/02/2013 09:59 AM, motty cruz wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm trying to build a VM but I get the following error "Unable to create a
> deployment for VM[User]test4]"
> 
> primary storage is up CLVM,
> secondary storage nfs is up
> 
> logs:
> 2013-10-02 09:46:07,885 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (catalina-exec-1:null) submit async job-50, details: AsyncJobVO {id:50,
> userId: 2, accountId: 2, sessionKey: null, instanceT
> ype: VirtualMachine, instanceId: 8, cmd:
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DestroyVMCmd, cmdOriginator:
> null, cmdInfo: {"id":"9a48d353-f57a-46b4-8a32-3f09fa114409","response":"json
> ","sessionkey":"XXXUS8OPHkdR1qhkb8bAUYFHfps\u003d","ctxUserId":"2","_":"1380732367999","ctxAccountId":"2","ctxStartEventId":"204"},
> cmdVersion: 0, callbackType: 0, callbackAddress: null, s
> tatus: 0, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid:
> 73644477032, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null,
> created: null}
> 2013-10-02 09:46:07,887 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-3:job-50) Executing
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DestroyVMCmd for job-50
> 2013-10-02 09:46:07,892 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-1:null)
> ===END===  ... -- GET
>  
> command=destroyVirtualMachine&id=9a48d353-f57a-46b4-8a32-3f09fa114409&response=j
> son&sessionkey=XXXUS8OPHkdR1qhkb8bAUYFHfps%3D&_=1380732367999
> 2013-10-02 09:46:07,946 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-3:job-50) Destroying vm VM[User|test4]
> 2013-10-02 09:46:07,947 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-3:job-50) Stopped called on VM[User|test4] but the state is
> Error
> 2013-10-02 09:46:07,963 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-3:job-50) VM state transitted from :Error to Expunging with
> event: DestroyRequestedvm's original host id: n
> ull new host id: null host id before state transition: null
> 2013-10-02 09:46:08,001 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-3:job-50) Complete async job-50, jobStatus: 1, resultCode: 0,
> result: org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.UserV
> mResponse@2d453a4b
> 2013-10-02 09:46:08,017 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-3:job-50) Done executing
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DestroyVMCmd for job-50
> 2013-10-02 09:46:10,931 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-5:null)
> ===START===...-- GET
>  
> command=queryAsyncJobResult&jobId=16b35e61-cedd-4173-90ce-aad61486b001&respons
> e=json&sessionkey=XXXUS8OPHkdR1qhkb8bAUYFHfps%3D&_=1380732371066
> 2013-10-02 09:46:10,974 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (catalina-exec-5:null) Async job-50 completed
> 2013-10-02 09:46:11,003 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-5:null)
> ===END===... -- GET
>  command=queryAsyncJobResult&jobId=16b35e61-cedd-4173-90ce-aad6148
>

Re: Choosing VMWare SCSI Controller Type

2013-10-02 Thread Chris Sciarrino

I have reported it, the id is cloudstack-4787.


On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Francois Gaudreault <
fgaudrea...@cloudops.com> wrote:

> We came across the same issue at some point in the past, but we decided to
> change the templates to reflect to proper controller. There might be a
> thread on the dev list around that.
>
> Let me know the bug id once you create it, one of our customer might need
> that feature.
>
> Francois
>
>
> On 2013-10-02 1:43 PM, Kelven Yang wrote:
>
>>
>> On 10/2/13 3:00 AM, "Chris Sciarrino"  wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Sean,
>>>
>>> I have tried this in 4.1.1 and 4.2. I have tried the HDD adapter type in
>>> the register template screen like you also suggested but that did not
>>> have
>>> an effect.
>>>
>>> Unless I am mistaken, I think that option will set the disk type to ide
>>> or
>>> scsi and not change the actual controller type that the scsi disk uses.
>>>
>>>  Please report it as a feature-request bug, choosing controller type is
>> not
>> currently supported yet
>>
>> Kelven
>>
>>  Thanks,
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Sean Hamilton
>>> **wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hey Chris,

 What version of CS are you running? I've seen a bug in the "Register
 Template" screen. If you select the location for the template it should
 open up more options, one of which is the HDD adapter type.

 Let me know how it goes.


 On 2 October 2013 05:12, Chris Sciarrino 
 wrote:

  Hi,
>
> I am having an issue where my vmware templates are being deployed with
>
 the

> lsi parallel scsi controller type which is causing them to blue
>
 screen.
 Is

> there any way to choose which scsi controller type it will be deployed
> with? Or is there any other way to make it deploy the lsi sas
>
 controller?

>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Francois Gaudreault
> Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
> fgaudrea...@cloudops.com
> 514-629-6775
> - - -
> CloudOps
> 420 rue Guy
> Montréal QC  H3J 1S6
> www.cloudops.com
> @CloudOps_
>
>

CS 4.2 storage vm

2013-10-02 Thread Erdősi Péter


Dear,

I installed CS 4.2 from rpm packages to Centos 6.4.
Everything works fine, with install, and with configuration, but after 
the CS deploy the storage VM I can't add ISO-s.


After some research in the logs I found this on a secstorage system VM:

s-1-VM: /var/log/cloud.log
2013-10-02 13:31:19,269 INFO  [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Agent 
started
2013-10-02 13:31:19,273 INFO  [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) 
Implementation Version is 4.2.0
2013-10-02 13:31:19,274 INFO  [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) 
agent.properties found at /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/conf/agent.properties
2013-10-02 13:31:19,281 DEBUG [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Found 
property: instance
2013-10-02 13:31:19,281 DEBUG [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Found 
property: resource
2013-10-02 13:31:19,281 INFO  [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) 
Defaulting to using properties file for storage
2013-10-02 13:31:19,283 INFO  [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) 
Defaulting to the constant time backoff algorithm
2013-10-02 13:31:19,290 INFO  [cloud.utils.LogUtils] (main:null) log4j 
configuration found at /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/conf/log4j-cloud.xml
2013-10-02 13:31:19,318 DEBUG [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) 
Checking to see if agent.SecStorage.pid exists.
2013-10-02 13:31:19,326 DEBUG [cloud.utils.ProcessUtil] (main:null) 
environment.properties could not be opened
2013-10-02 13:31:19,337 DEBUG [cloud.utils.ProcessUtil] (main:null) 
Executing: bash -c echo $PPID
2013-10-02 13:31:19,344 DEBUG [cloud.utils.ProcessUtil] (main:null) 
Execution is successful.
2013-10-02 13:31:19,345 ERROR [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) 
*Unable to start agent: Resource class not found: 
com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource due to: 
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: 
com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource *



Can somebody help me with this?

Thanks,
 Peter ERDOSI

Re: Choosing VMWare SCSI Controller Type

2013-10-02 Thread Francois Gaudreault

We came across the same issue at some point in the past, but we decided 
to change the templates to reflect to proper controller. There might be 
a thread on the dev list around that.


Let me know the bug id once you create it, one of our customer might 
need that feature.


Francois

On 2013-10-02 1:43 PM, Kelven Yang wrote:


On 10/2/13 3:00 AM, "Chris Sciarrino"  wrote:


Hi Sean,

I have tried this in 4.1.1 and 4.2. I have tried the HDD adapter type in
the register template screen like you also suggested but that did not have
an effect.

Unless I am mistaken, I think that option will set the disk type to ide or
scsi and not change the actual controller type that the scsi disk uses.


Please report it as a feature-request bug, choosing controller type is not
currently supported yet

Kelven


Thanks,

Chris


On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Sean Hamilton
wrote:


Hey Chris,

What version of CS are you running? I've seen a bug in the "Register
Template" screen. If you select the location for the template it should
open up more options, one of which is the HDD adapter type.

Let me know how it goes.


On 2 October 2013 05:12, Chris Sciarrino 
wrote:


Hi,

I am having an issue where my vmware templates are being deployed with

the

lsi parallel scsi controller type which is causing them to blue

screen.
Is

there any way to choose which scsi controller type it will be deployed
with? Or is there any other way to make it deploy the lsi sas

controller?


Thanks,

Chris







--
Francois Gaudreault
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
fgaudrea...@cloudops.com
514-629-6775
- - -
CloudOps
420 rue Guy
Montréal QC  H3J 1S6
www.cloudops.com
@CloudOps_

Re: Choosing VMWare SCSI Controller Type

2013-10-02 Thread Kelven Yang



On 10/2/13 3:00 AM, "Chris Sciarrino"  wrote:

>Hi Sean,
>
>I have tried this in 4.1.1 and 4.2. I have tried the HDD adapter type in
>the register template screen like you also suggested but that did not have
>an effect.
>
>Unless I am mistaken, I think that option will set the disk type to ide or
>scsi and not change the actual controller type that the scsi disk uses.
>

Please report it as a feature-request bug, choosing controller type is not
currently supported yet

Kelven

>
>Thanks,
>
>Chris
>
>
>On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Sean Hamilton
>wrote:
>
>> Hey Chris,
>>
>> What version of CS are you running? I've seen a bug in the "Register
>> Template" screen. If you select the location for the template it should
>> open up more options, one of which is the HDD adapter type.
>>
>> Let me know how it goes.
>>
>>
>> On 2 October 2013 05:12, Chris Sciarrino 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am having an issue where my vmware templates are being deployed with
>> the
>> > lsi parallel scsi controller type which is causing them to blue
>>screen.
>> Is
>> > there any way to choose which scsi controller type it will be deployed
>> > with? Or is there any other way to make it deploy the lsi sas
>>controller?
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Chris
>> >
>>

RE: error when I try to create a virtual machine

2013-10-02 Thread David Ortiz

What is your environment, and what was the error in the management log?

> Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 11:19:05 +0200
> Subject: error when I try to create a virtual machine
> From: proyecto.pablomar...@gmail.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> 
> when we try to create a virtual machine system returns the following error"
> "HTTP Status 530-Failed to create VM due you java.lang.String /" Unable to
> create vm for account (2): admin"
> 
>   not know how to fix this problem
> 
> thank you very much

RE: Error in backing up cloud database

2013-10-02 Thread David Ortiz

Indra,
 Have you tried importing the backup into an empty database and seeing if 
that query works?
Thanks, David Ortiz

> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 21:25:57 +0800
> Subject: Error in backing up cloud database
> From: in...@sg.or.id
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I tried to perform another upgrade today with Abhinav's assistance, and
> right now I am not able to backup the cloud database. This is the error
> when doing mysqldump:
> 
> root@pri-db-01:~/backup/20131001# mysqldump -u cloud -p cloud >
> cloudstack-backup3.sql
> Enter password:
> mysqldump: Couldn't execute 'show create table `template_view`': View
> 'cloud.template_view' references invalid table(s) or column(s) or
> function(s) or definer/invoker of view lack rights to use them (1356)
> 
> When I tried to do a select command to the table directly, I got this error
> message:
> 
> mysql> select * from template_view;
> ERROR 1356 (HY000): View 'cloud.template_view' references invalid table(s)
> or column(s) or function(s) or definer/invoker of view lack rights to use
> them
> 
> We noted that the problem started to happen last week when I performed a
> failed upgrade attempt from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0. At that time, the database was
> already upgraded but because of some issues, we needed to revert back to
> 4.1.1 and I did a restore of the 4.1.1 version database. However, there was
> no error message during restoration and CloudStack was running fine since
> then so I didn't realise about this problem until today when I perform
> another upgrade attempt.
> 
> Anyone has encountered this problem before and what can we do to resolve
> this problem?
> 
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> 
> Cheers.

Cloudstack 4.1

2013-10-02 Thread motty cruz

Hello,
I'm trying to build a VM but I get the following error "Unable to create a
deployment for VM[User]test4]"

primary storage is up CLVM,
secondary storage nfs is up

logs:
2013-10-02 09:46:07,885 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-1:null) submit async job-50, details: AsyncJobVO {id:50,
userId: 2, accountId: 2, sessionKey: null, instanceT
ype: VirtualMachine, instanceId: 8, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DestroyVMCmd, cmdOriginator:
null, cmdInfo: {"id":"9a48d353-f57a-46b4-8a32-3f09fa114409","response":"json
","sessionkey":"XXXUS8OPHkdR1qhkb8bAUYFHfps\u003d","ctxUserId":"2","_":"1380732367999","ctxAccountId":"2","ctxStartEventId":"204"},
cmdVersion: 0, callbackType: 0, callbackAddress: null, s
tatus: 0, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid:
73644477032, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null,
created: null}
2013-10-02 09:46:07,887 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-3:job-50) Executing
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DestroyVMCmd for job-50
2013-10-02 09:46:07,892 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-1:null)
===END===  ... -- GET
 
command=destroyVirtualMachine&id=9a48d353-f57a-46b4-8a32-3f09fa114409&response=j
son&sessionkey=XXXUS8OPHkdR1qhkb8bAUYFHfps%3D&_=1380732367999
2013-10-02 09:46:07,946 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-3:job-50) Destroying vm VM[User|test4]
2013-10-02 09:46:07,947 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-3:job-50) Stopped called on VM[User|test4] but the state is
Error
2013-10-02 09:46:07,963 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-3:job-50) VM state transitted from :Error to Expunging with
event: DestroyRequestedvm's original host id: n
ull new host id: null host id before state transition: null
2013-10-02 09:46:08,001 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-3:job-50) Complete async job-50, jobStatus: 1, resultCode: 0,
result: org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.UserV
mResponse@2d453a4b
2013-10-02 09:46:08,017 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-3:job-50) Done executing
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DestroyVMCmd for job-50
2013-10-02 09:46:10,931 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-5:null)
===START===...-- GET
 command=queryAsyncJobResult&jobId=16b35e61-cedd-4173-90ce-aad61486b001&respons
e=json&sessionkey=XXXUS8OPHkdR1qhkb8bAUYFHfps%3D&_=1380732371066
2013-10-02 09:46:10,974 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-5:null) Async job-50 completed
2013-10-02 09:46:11,003 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-5:null)
===END===... -- GET
 command=queryAsyncJobResult&jobId=16b35e61-cedd-4173-90ce-aad6148

Re: GPG key expired

2013-10-02 Thread Dean Kamali

I'm having the same issue, please advise :)


On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:27 AM, David Nalley  wrote:

> Hi Markus.
>
> That repository is maintained by Wido den Hollander - and I just spoke with
> him on IRC and he indicates that he has updated the key located there. Let
> us know if you have any other problems.
>
> --David
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Dietsch, Markus  wrote:
>
> >   Hi list,
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > the gpg key of http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/release.asc seems to be
> > expired:
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > apt-key list
> >
> > /etc/apt/trusted.gpg
> >
> > 
> >
> > pub   2048R/86C278E3 2012-09-07 [expired: 2013-09-07]
> >
> > uid  Apache CloudStack cloudstack-...@apache.org
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > After updating the sources.list I always get the following error:
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > W: GPG error: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu precise Release: The
> following
> > signatures were invalid: KEYEXPIRED 1378559179 KEYEXPIRED 1378559179
> > KEYEXPIRED 1378559179
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > Can you please provide a new key?
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > Sorry for writing directly but I don’t want to subcribe to the list but
> > only report this issue.
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > Thanks in advance and cheers,
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > Markus
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > [image:
> >
> http://www.mid.de/fileadmin/templates/mid_v2/images/MID_Logo_RGB_80_40.jpg
> ]
> > 
> >
> > Markus Dietsch, Administrator
> > MID GmbH | Kressengartenstr. 10 | 90402 Nürnberg | Germany
> > phone: +49 911 96836-433 | fax: +49 911 96836-100
> > email: m.diet...@mid.de | www.mid.de 
> >
> > Sitz des Unternehmens/Registered Office: Nürnberg
> > Handelsregister/Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Nürnberg HRB Nr. 21108
> > Vorsitzender Geschäftsführer/CEO: Bertram Geck
> > Geschäftsführer/Management Board: Andreas Ditze, Jürgen Leuschel, Jochen
> > Seemann
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > ** **
> >
> >  
> > *
> >
> > *
> >
> > <
> http://www.mid.de/produkte/innovator-for-business-analysts/bpmn-tool-download.html
> >
> >
> > Sichern Sie sich schon jetzt Ihren Frühbuchervorteil für die Insight
> 2013und erleben Sie einen Tag zu den Themen BPMN,
> SOA, Process Optimization,
> > Big Data, BI, Innovation uvm.. Wir freuen uns auf Sie!
> >
>

RE: cannot delete primary storage

2013-10-02 Thread Geoff Higginbottom

>From memory the entries in tables 'storage_pool_host_ref' and 'storage_pool' 
>are closely linked.

Remember backup the DB first, as I have found getting this clean-up process 
wrong can cause havoc with the system.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Kirk Jantzer [mailto:kirk.jant...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 October 2013 17:31
To: Cloudstack users mailing list
Subject: Re: cannot delete primary storage

Ditto to Geoff - when I've had issues deleting primary storages in the past, 
I've ended up having to delete volumes that were still associated with the 
datastore from the cloud.volumes table.


Regards,

Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer


On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Geoff Higginbottom < 
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Hi Len,
>
> I've had similar with NFS Storage and had to revert to changing
> settings directly in the DB
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Len Bellemore [mailto:len.bellem...@controlcircle.com]
> Sent: 02 October 2013 15:32
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: cannot delete primary storage
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I've got an iSCSI-based Primary Storage pool that I am unable to delete.
>  I'm running XenServer 6.1 and have created the storage pool via the
> PreSetup option in CS.
>
> I've had other pools set up exactly the same way and they have removed
> without problems.
>
> When I try to delete the pool (via the GUI or the API) the state of
> the storage pool goes to "Removed" and throws an error:
>
> 530Fa
> iled to finish storage pool removal. The storage pool will not be used
> but cleanup is needed
>
> Anyone seen this before?
>
> thanks
>
> Len
>
>
> 
> IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from
> Control Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The
> information is intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity
> named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or email
> (to the number or email address
> above) immediately. Activity and use of the ControlCircle e-mail
> system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other
> lawful business purposes. Communications using this system will also
> be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for
> other lawful business purposes This email and any attachments to it
> may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the
> individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those
> of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended
> recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd
> is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India
> LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license
> from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company
> incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: cannot delete primary storage

2013-10-02 Thread Kirk Jantzer

Ditto to Geoff - when I've had issues deleting primary storages in the
past, I've ended up having to delete volumes that were still associated
with the datastore from the cloud.volumes table.


Regards,

Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer


On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Hi Len,
>
> I've had similar with NFS Storage and had to revert to changing settings
> directly in the DB
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Len Bellemore [mailto:len.bellem...@controlcircle.com]
> Sent: 02 October 2013 15:32
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: cannot delete primary storage
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I've got an iSCSI-based Primary Storage pool that I am unable to delete.
>  I'm running XenServer 6.1 and have created the storage pool via the
> PreSetup option in CS.
>
> I've had other pools set up exactly the same way and they have removed
> without problems.
>
> When I try to delete the pool (via the GUI or the API) the state of the
> storage pool goes to "Removed" and throws an error:
>
> 530Failed
> to finish storage pool removal. The storage pool will not be used but
> cleanup is needed
>
> Anyone seen this before?
>
> thanks
>
> Len
>
>
> 
> IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from
> Control Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The
> information is intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity named
> above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error,
> please notify me by telephone or email (to the number or email address
> above) immediately. Activity and use of the ControlCircle e-mail system is
> monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business
> purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may
> be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business
> purposes
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a
> registered trademark.
>

RE: cannot delete primary storage

2013-10-02 Thread Geoff Higginbottom

Hi Len,

I've had similar with NFS Storage and had to revert to changing settings 
directly in the DB

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Len Bellemore [mailto:len.bellem...@controlcircle.com]
Sent: 02 October 2013 15:32
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: cannot delete primary storage

Hi Guys,

I've got an iSCSI-based Primary Storage pool that I am unable to delete.  I'm 
running XenServer 6.1 and have created the storage pool via the PreSetup option 
in CS.

I've had other pools set up exactly the same way and they have removed without 
problems.

When I try to delete the pool (via the GUI or the API) the state of the storage 
pool goes to "Removed" and throws an error:

530Failed to 
finish storage pool removal. The storage pool will not be used but cleanup is 
needed

Anyone seen this before?

thanks

Len



IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from Control 
Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The information is 
intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are 
not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution 
or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or 
email (to the number or email address above) immediately. Activity and use of 
the ControlCircle e-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation 
and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system will 
also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for 
other lawful business purposes
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Bare Metal Docs for 4.2.0?

2013-10-02 Thread Jason Davis

Looking at the release notes it looks like Bare Metal guests are back from
their hiatus!

Looking around however, I'm not seeing any documentation for this as of
yet. Is there any documentation available and if so, where can it be found
as it's not on the official documentation portion of the website.

Re: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'

2013-10-02 Thread sebgoa


On Oct 2, 2013, at 3:43 PM, sebgoa  wrote:

> 
> On Oct 2, 2013, at 3:28 PM, Geoff Higginbottom 
>  wrote:
> 
>> Did you by chance configure the 'Storage' network when you created the Zone
>> 
> 
> Found the issue, the host IP of the mgt server was wrong ( I have two 
> interfaces) and the ssvm was on private network.
> Fixed that and the templates are downloading, but it's stuck at 99% in the 
> UI….hunting that one now 

It works fine if I register an ISO, but for a qcow2 image (KVM hypervisor), the 
download happens and completes (file totally downloaded on systemvm mounted 
secondary storage), but the percentage completion of the download on the UI is 
stuck 99%, 84%, 67%….

Any idea why the mgt server would not think that the template has finished 
downloading ?


> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Geoff Higginbottom
>> 
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>> 
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 02 October 2013 14:13
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 2, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Geoff Higginbottom 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Sebastien,
>>> 
>>> If the web server hosting the template is on the same network as the 
>>> management server, you need to configure  the following global setting with 
>>> the IP range
>>> 
>>> secstorage.allowed.internal.sites
>>> 
>> 
>> I did that thanks, but my secondary storage is not mounted in the ssvm.
>> 
>> I can mount it by hand, the ssvm is up, yet I get:
>> 
>>> There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host 
>>> nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary
>> 
>> 
>> -sebastien
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>> 
>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>> 
>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 02 October 2013 13:06
>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'
>>> 
>>> HI,
>>> 
>>> I am setting up basic zone. I have one mgt, one hypervisor (KVM, Ubuntu 
>>> 12.04), I am on ACS 4.1.1
>>> 
>>> Everything seems fine, the ssvm starts, I can log into it. Everything is on 
>>> a private network without outside connectivity.
>>> 
>>> I am serving a template from that private network.
>>> From the ssvm I can ping the mgt server and the hypervisor, I can also 
>>> mount the secondary storage by hand.
>>> 
>>> However it does not get mounted automatically and when I try to register 
>>> the template I get the dreaded:
>>> 
>>> 2013-10-02 05:00:13,407 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] 
>>> (catalina-exec-20:null) ===START===  172.16.153.1 -- GET  
>>> command=registerTemplate&response=json&sessionkey=ErhEwVpkdKXC3br3zZUoAyaFY7E%3D&name=toto&displayText=toto&url=http%3A%2F%2F192.168.38.100%3A80%2Ftinylinux.qcow2&zoneid=-1&format=QCOW2&isextractable=false&passwordEnabled=false&osTypeId=278f54ca-29d1-11e3-9b24-000c290705d2&hypervisor=KVM&ispublic=true&isfeatured=true&_=1380715213357
>>> 2013-10-02 05:00:13,452 WARN  [storage.download.DownloadMonitorImpl] 
>>> (catalina-exec-20:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary 
>>> storage host nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary
>>> 
>>> I am at a loss on this one..
>>> 
>>> -sebastien
>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
>>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
>>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
>>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
>>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
>>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender 
>>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
>>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a 
>>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
>>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil 
>>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a 
>>> registered trademark.
>> 
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender 
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a 
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
>> Ltd.

cannot delete primary storage

2013-10-02 Thread Len Bellemore

Hi Guys,

I've got an iSCSI-based Primary Storage pool that I am unable to delete.  I'm 
running XenServer 6.1 and have created the storage pool via the PreSetup option 
in CS.

I've had other pools set up exactly the same way and they have removed without 
problems.

When I try to delete the pool (via the GUI or the API) the state of the storage 
pool goes to "Removed" and throws an error:

530Failed to 
finish storage pool removal. The storage pool will not be used but cleanup is 
needed

Anyone seen this before?

thanks

Len



IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from Control 
Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The information is 
intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are 
not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution 
or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or 
email (to the number or email address above) immediately. Activity and use of 
the ControlCircle e-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation 
and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system will 
also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for 
other lawful business purposes

Re: GPG key expired

2013-10-02 Thread David Nalley

Hi Markus.

That repository is maintained by Wido den Hollander - and I just spoke with
him on IRC and he indicates that he has updated the key located there. Let
us know if you have any other problems.

--David


On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Dietsch, Markus  wrote:

>   Hi list,
>
> ** **
>
> the gpg key of http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/release.asc seems to be
> expired:
>
> ** **
>
> apt-key list
>
> /etc/apt/trusted.gpg
>
> 
>
> pub   2048R/86C278E3 2012-09-07 [expired: 2013-09-07]
>
> uid  Apache CloudStack cloudstack-...@apache.org
>
> ** **
>
> After updating the sources.list I always get the following error:
>
> ** **
>
> W: GPG error: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu precise Release: The following
> signatures were invalid: KEYEXPIRED 1378559179 KEYEXPIRED 1378559179
> KEYEXPIRED 1378559179
>
> ** **
>
> Can you please provide a new key?
>
> ** **
>
> Sorry for writing directly but I don’t want to subcribe to the list but
> only report this issue.
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks in advance and cheers,
>
> ** **
>
> Markus
>
> ** **
>
> [image:
> http://www.mid.de/fileadmin/templates/mid_v2/images/MID_Logo_RGB_80_40.jpg]
> 
>
> Markus Dietsch, Administrator
> MID GmbH | Kressengartenstr. 10 | 90402 Nürnberg | Germany
> phone: +49 911 96836-433 | fax: +49 911 96836-100
> email: m.diet...@mid.de | www.mid.de 
>
> Sitz des Unternehmens/Registered Office: Nürnberg
> Handelsregister/Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Nürnberg HRB Nr. 21108
> Vorsitzender Geschäftsführer/CEO: Bertram Geck
> Geschäftsführer/Management Board: Andreas Ditze, Jürgen Leuschel, Jochen
> Seemann
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
>  
> *
>
> *
>
> 
>
> Sichern Sie sich schon jetzt Ihren Frühbuchervorteil für die Insight 
> 2013und erleben Sie einen Tag zu den Themen BPMN, SOA, 
> Process Optimization,
> Big Data, BI, Innovation uvm.. Wir freuen uns auf Sie!
>

Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack 4.2.0

2013-10-02 Thread Indra Pramana

Hi Wei Zhou,

Thank you for your e-mail.

May I know where is this script "ConfigurationServerImpl" located? Can we
run this script manually?

Is there a way we can run the script so that it will insert the records
without having to check for any conditions?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.




On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Wei ZHOU  wrote:

> ConfigurationServerImpl will insert missing records to resource_count table
> at management server startup.
> It is strange you meet some issues others do not meet.
>
>
> 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
>
> > Dear Animesh, Sanjay and all,
> >
> > Latest test that I and Abhinav done earlier this morning:
> >
> > - Abhinav tested upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 on his lab and he noticed
> that
> > the additional resource_count types (total 4 of them: cpu, memory,
> > primary_storage and secondary_storage) were added automatically during DB
> > schema upgrade.
> >
> > Excerpts from his management-server.log file:
> >
> > 
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,318 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) resource_count table has records missing for some
> > domains...going to insert them
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,339 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type cpu for domain id=1
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,341 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type memory for domain id=1
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,349 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type primary_storage for
> domain
> > id=1
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,351 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type secondary_storage for
> > domain id=1
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,362 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) resource_count table has records missing for some
> > accounts...going to insert them
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,372 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type cpu for account id=1
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,379 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type memory for account id=1
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,381 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type primary_storage for
> account
> > id=1
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,388 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type secondary_storage for
> > account id=1
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,418 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type cpu for account id=2
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,420 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type memory for account id=2
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,428 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type primary_storage for
> account
> > id=2
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,429 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type secondary_storage for
> > account id=2
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,439 INFO  [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) Processing updateSSLKeyStore
> > 2013-10-01 23:56:46,499 INFO  [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (Timer-2:null) SSL keystore located at
> > /etc/cloudstack/management/cloud.keystore
> > 
> >
> > However, I didn't have the above during the DB schema upgrade.
> >
> > May I know which process triggers the above situation and leads to the
> > additional records to be inserted? Tried to go through the
> > /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-410to420.sql script and
> > cannot find the above.
> >
> > Any reason why my upgrade didn't trigger the insertion of the additional
> > records?
> >
> > Urgently looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Copying Sanjay
> > >
> > > Animesh
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 11:06 AM
> > > > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack
> > > > 4.2.0
> > > >
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > > Further investigation reveals that there might be some issues with
> the
> > > > schema upgrade. When we check the resource_count table for the
> account
> > > > ID:
> > > >
> > > > mysql> select * from resource_count where account_id=2;
> > > > +++---+---+---+
> > > > | id | account_id | domain_id | type  | count |
> > > > +++---+---+---+
> > > > | 17 |  2 |  NULL | user_vm   |30 |
> > > > | 18 |  2 |

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation

2013-10-02 Thread Rafael Weingartner

Nice, I did something similar to work this problem around on my backup
routine.

But, instead of removing the definer statement I replaced it with
DEFINER=CURRENT_USER


2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 

> Hi Rafael,
>
> I managed to resolve the problem by removing all the DEFINER statements
> from the dump .sql file.
>
> sed '/^\/\*\!50013 DEFINER/d' cloudstack-backup-2013100201-fix.sql >
> cloudstack-backup-2013100201-fix-without-definer.sql
>
> I then restored the cloudstack-backup-2013100201-fix-without-definer.sql
> into the database and the upgrade works.
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Could you log in to the database with the user you are using to execute
> the
> > upgrade and use the command show grants;
> > and post me the results?
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> >
> > > Hi Rafael,
> > >
> > > I believe the upgrade script is run by 'cloud' user, correct? By
> default
> > > full permission to the 'cloud' user has been given, and I even added
> > > 'super' privilege to the cloud user but the problem still persists.
> > >
> > > May I know how to change the DEFINER statement? Which statement you are
> > > referring to?
> > >
> > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > >
> > > Cheers.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, I was getting this error because I was using an Amazon RDS
> > > database,
> > > > and there the users, even the master do not have super privileges.
> So,
> > I
> > > > could not create a table logged with a user (e.g. root) and using
> > > > DEFINER=cloud@'%'.
> > > >
> > > > But, since you have full access to the database, I do believe that
> you
> > > just
> > > > need to give grant permission to the user you are using to run the
> > > queries,
> > > > or simple try to change the DEFINER statement to something like:
> > > > DEFINER=CURRENT_USER
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Rafael,
> > > > >
> > > > > May I know how did you resolve the problem? Do we need to manually
> > > grant
> > > > > super privilege to an account, e.g. 'cloud'@'%'?
> > > > >
> > > > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I had the exactly same problem when I was backing up my CS
> database
> > > on
> > > > a
> > > > > > Amazon RDS.
> > > > > > There was a problem with some DEFINER command generated by the
> > > > mysqldump.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Rafael,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What I did is just to setup a new CloudStack 4.1.1 on a test
> VM,
> > > > > restore
> > > > > > > the dump backup of our production database into the test
> > > environment,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > try to upgrade to 4.2.0.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Could it be because the database was taken from a different
> > > > > environment?
> > > > > > > However, I tested accessing the GUI of the test environment
> after
> > > the
> > > > > > dump
> > > > > > > restore and I can access it, prior to the upgrade.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > > > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Interesting errors, just by any change are you using the
> > database
> > > > on
> > > > > > > Amazon
> > > > > > > > RDS?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack
> > > 4.1.1
> > > > to
> > > > > > > 4.2.0
> > > > > > > > > on my test environment and getting below error message:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at
> least
> > > one
> > > > > of)
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The
> > > database
> > > > > > worked
> > > > > > > > > fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Below is more logs from the management-server.log:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> > > > > (Timer-1:null)
> > > > > > > > UPDATE
> > > > > > > > > `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE
> id
> > IN
> > > > > (1,2)
> > > > > > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> > > > > (Timer-1:null)
> > > > > > > > UPDATE
> > > > > > > > > `cloud_usage`.`accou

[SOLVED] Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation

2013-10-02 Thread Indra Pramana

Hi Rafael,

I managed to resolve the problem by removing all the DEFINER statements
from the dump .sql file.

sed '/^\/\*\!50013 DEFINER/d' cloudstack-backup-2013100201-fix.sql >
cloudstack-backup-2013100201-fix-without-definer.sql

I then restored the cloudstack-backup-2013100201-fix-without-definer.sql
into the database and the upgrade works.

Thank you for your help.

Cheers.



On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Could you log in to the database with the user you are using to execute the
> upgrade and use the command show grants;
> and post me the results?
>
>
> 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
>
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > I believe the upgrade script is run by 'cloud' user, correct? By default
> > full permission to the 'cloud' user has been given, and I even added
> > 'super' privilege to the cloud user but the problem still persists.
> >
> > May I know how to change the DEFINER statement? Which statement you are
> > referring to?
> >
> > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Well, I was getting this error because I was using an Amazon RDS
> > database,
> > > and there the users, even the master do not have super privileges. So,
> I
> > > could not create a table logged with a user (e.g. root) and using
> > > DEFINER=cloud@'%'.
> > >
> > > But, since you have full access to the database, I do believe that you
> > just
> > > need to give grant permission to the user you are using to run the
> > queries,
> > > or simple try to change the DEFINER statement to something like:
> > > DEFINER=CURRENT_USER
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> > >
> > > > Hi Rafael,
> > > >
> > > > May I know how did you resolve the problem? Do we need to manually
> > grant
> > > > super privilege to an account, e.g. 'cloud'@'%'?
> > > >
> > > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I had the exactly same problem when I was backing up my CS database
> > on
> > > a
> > > > > Amazon RDS.
> > > > > There was a problem with some DEFINER command generated by the
> > > mysqldump.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Rafael,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What I did is just to setup a new CloudStack 4.1.1 on a test VM,
> > > > restore
> > > > > > the dump backup of our production database into the test
> > environment,
> > > > and
> > > > > > try to upgrade to 4.2.0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could it be because the database was taken from a different
> > > > environment?
> > > > > > However, I tested accessing the GUI of the test environment after
> > the
> > > > > dump
> > > > > > restore and I can access it, prior to the upgrade.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Interesting errors, just by any change are you using the
> database
> > > on
> > > > > > Amazon
> > > > > > > RDS?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack
> > 4.1.1
> > > to
> > > > > > 4.2.0
> > > > > > > > on my test environment and getting below error message:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least
> > one
> > > > of)
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The
> > database
> > > > > worked
> > > > > > > > fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Below is more logs from the management-server.log:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> > > > (Timer-1:null)
> > > > > > > UPDATE
> > > > > > > > `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id
> IN
> > > > (1,2)
> > > > > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> > > > (Timer-1:null)
> > > > > > > UPDATE
> > > > > > > > `cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > > > > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> > > > (Timer-1:null)
> > > > > > > UPDATE
> > > > > > > > `cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN
> (1,2)
> > > > > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> > > > (Timer-1:null)
> > > > > > > ALTER
> > > > > > > > VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select  user.id,
> > > > > > > > user.uuid, user.username, user.password,
> > > > > > > > us

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 Released

2013-10-02 Thread Dean Kamali

Indra,

I have downloaded new system vm and registered it, it didn't make much
difference, usage logs is overwriting management logs and all hypervisors
are in disconnected state.

So, I guess this upgrade wasn't tested properly on Ubuntu unfortunately.

Dean






On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:00 AM, benoit lair  wrote:

> Very great Job all of you !! I'm very excited to be able to use the new
> version of cloudstack 4.2 !!
> There were several weeks (months ?) that i was expecting features such load
> balancing betweens vpc tiers.
> Now it's done !!
> I have upgraded my preproduction environment from cs 4.1 to cs 4.2 and all
> is clear, the upgrade worked nice !!
> I use mgmt server with centos 6.3 with xcp and xenserver 6.2 hypervisors
> and it rocks a lot !!
>
> Very nice work guys !! Now i can prepare my future production environment
>
> Best regards,
>
> Benoit
>
>
> 2013/10/2 Kirk Kosinski 
>
> > I filed a bug for the error when running cloudstack-sysvmadm on Ubuntu.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4778
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Kirk
> >
> > On 10/01/2013 10:09 PM, Indra Pramana wrote:
> > > Hi Dean,
> > >
> > > I encountered exactly the same error message when running the
> > > cloudstack-sysvmadm script. I am also using Ubuntu but using KVM
> > > hypervisor. Some things to check:
> > >
> > > 1. Have you registered the system VM template for 4.2 prior to the
> > upgrade?
> > > If not yet, you need to register the template first.
> > > 2. After upgrading both the management server and the hypervisor hosts,
> > log
> > > in to the GUI and ensure that the hosts are up, before performing the
> > > cloudstack-sysvmadm script.
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Dean Kamali 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> update:
> > >> I'm using Ubuntu on my management server, and currently all of my
> > >> hypervisors are in disconnected state, I have also noticed that usage
> > >> server log is overwriting management logs
> > >>
> > >> I must say "ouch!"
> > >>
> > >> D
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Dean Kamali 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Thanks Travis
> > >>>
> > >>> Any one have tried to upgrade?
> > >>>
> > >>> I followed upgrade process from 4.1.1 to 4.2 (xenserver) is running
> on
> > >> all
> > >>> of my hyperviroues
> > >>>
> > >>> However when I try and run  cloudstack-sysvmadm to stop then start
> all
> > >>> running SSVMs, Console Proxies, and Virtual Routers
> > >>>
> > >>> I get the following:
> > >>>
> > >>> /usr/bin/cloudstack-sysvmadm: line 21: /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions: No
> > >> such
> > >>> file or directory
> > >>>
> > >>> Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage vm(s)...
> > >>> ERROR: Failed to stop secondary storage vm with id 5
> > >>>
> > >>> Done stopping and starting secondary storage vm(s)
> > >>>
> > >>> Stopping and starting 1 console proxy vm(s)...
> > >>> ERROR: Failed to stop console proxy vm with id 19
> > >>>
> > >>> Done stopping and starting console proxy vm(s) .
> > >>>
> > >>> Stopping and starting 6 running routing vm(s)...
> > >>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 13
> > >>>
> > >>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 112
> > >>>
> > >>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 108
> > >>>
> > >>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 94
> > >>>
> > >>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 120
> > >>>
> > >>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 83
> > >>>
> > >>> Done restarting router(s).
> > >>>
> > >>> Any ideas?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Travis Graham 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  Hey Dean,
> > 
> >  I've had the same problem this morning. It's actually from the old
> > docs
> >  site being cached. You'll want to clear your cache or use a
> different
> >  browser.
> > 
> >  Here's a direct link:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >>
> >
> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Release_Notes/index.html
> > 
> >  Travis
> > 
> >  On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Dean Kamali 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Thank you, I'm very excited, where can we find the release notes?
> > they
> >  are
> > > not on http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/index.html yet!
> > >
> > > I'm actually more interested in upgrade notes for xenserver from
> > 4.1.1
> > >
> > > Thanks again
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Animesh 
> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> The Apache CloudStack project is excited to announce the
> > >> 4.2 feature release of the CloudStack cloud orchestration
> platform.
> >  This
> > >> is the
> > >> next feature release of the 4.0 branch which first released on
> >  November 6,
> > >> 2012
> > >> with the 4.1 release on June 5. This is the second major release
> > from
> > >> Apache
> > >> CloudStack since its graduation from the Apache Incuba

Re: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'

2013-10-02 Thread sebgoa


On Oct 2, 2013, at 3:28 PM, Geoff Higginbottom 
 wrote:

> Did you by chance configure the 'Storage' network when you created the Zone
> 

Found the issue, the host IP of the mgt server was wrong ( I have two 
interfaces) and the ssvm was on private network.
Fixed that and the templates are downloading, but it's stuck at 99% in the 
UI….hunting that one now 

> Regards
> 
> Geoff Higginbottom
> 
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
> 
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 02 October 2013 14:13
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'
> 
> 
> On Oct 2, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Geoff Higginbottom 
>  wrote:
> 
>> Sebastien,
>> 
>> If the web server hosting the template is on the same network as the 
>> management server, you need to configure  the following global setting with 
>> the IP range
>> 
>> secstorage.allowed.internal.sites
>> 
> 
> I did that thanks, but my secondary storage is not mounted in the ssvm.
> 
> I can mount it by hand, the ssvm is up, yet I get:
> 
>> There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host 
>> nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary
> 
> 
> -sebastien
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Geoff Higginbottom
>> 
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>> 
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 02 October 2013 13:06
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'
>> 
>> HI,
>> 
>> I am setting up basic zone. I have one mgt, one hypervisor (KVM, Ubuntu 
>> 12.04), I am on ACS 4.1.1
>> 
>> Everything seems fine, the ssvm starts, I can log into it. Everything is on 
>> a private network without outside connectivity.
>> 
>> I am serving a template from that private network.
>> From the ssvm I can ping the mgt server and the hypervisor, I can also mount 
>> the secondary storage by hand.
>> 
>> However it does not get mounted automatically and when I try to register the 
>> template I get the dreaded:
>> 
>> 2013-10-02 05:00:13,407 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-20:null) 
>> ===START===  172.16.153.1 -- GET  
>> command=registerTemplate&response=json&sessionkey=ErhEwVpkdKXC3br3zZUoAyaFY7E%3D&name=toto&displayText=toto&url=http%3A%2F%2F192.168.38.100%3A80%2Ftinylinux.qcow2&zoneid=-1&format=QCOW2&isextractable=false&passwordEnabled=false&osTypeId=278f54ca-29d1-11e3-9b24-000c290705d2&hypervisor=KVM&ispublic=true&isfeatured=true&_=1380715213357
>> 2013-10-02 05:00:13,452 WARN  [storage.download.DownloadMonitorImpl] 
>> (catalina-exec-20:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary 
>> storage host nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary
>> 
>> I am at a loss on this one..
>> 
>> -sebastien
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender 
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a 
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil 
>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered 
>> trademark.
> 
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered 
> trademark.

Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation

2013-10-02 Thread Rafael Weingartner

I had the exactly same problem when I was backing up my CS database on a
Amazon RDS.
There was a problem with some DEFINER command generated by the mysqldump.


2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 

> Hi Rafael,
>
> What I did is just to setup a new CloudStack 4.1.1 on a test VM, restore
> the dump backup of our production database into the test environment, and
> try to upgrade to 4.2.0.
>
> Could it be because the database was taken from a different environment?
> However, I tested accessing the GUI of the test environment after the dump
> restore and I can access it, prior to the upgrade.
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Interesting errors, just by any change are you using the database on
> Amazon
> > RDS?
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack 4.1.1 to
> 4.2.0
> > > on my test environment and getting below error message:
> > >
> > > MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of)
> the
> > > SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
> > >
> > > Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The database worked
> > > fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade.
> > >
> > > Below is more logs from the management-server.log:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> > UPDATE
> > > `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> > UPDATE
> > > `cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> > UPDATE
> > > `cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> > ALTER
> > > VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select  user.id,
> > > user.uuid, user.username, user.password,
> > > user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email,
> > > user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key,
> > > user.created, user.removed, user.timezone,
> > > user.registration_token, user.is_registered,
> > > user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default,
> > > account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid,
> > > account.account_name
> > > account_name, account.type account_type,
> > > domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid,
> > > domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path,
> > > async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid,
> > > async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id
> > > job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner
> > > join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id
> > > inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id
> > > left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id =
> > > user.id
> > > and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and
> > async_job.job_status =
> > > 0
> > > 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> > Error
> > > executing: ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select
> > > user.id,
> > > user.uuid, user.username, user.password,
> > > user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email,
> > > user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key,
> > > user.created, user.removed, user.timezone,
> > > user.registration_token, user.is_registered,
> > > user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default,
> > > account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid,
> > > account.account_name
> > > account_name, account.type account_type,
> > > domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid,
> > > domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path,
> > > async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid,
> > > async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id
> > > job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner
> > > join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id
> > > inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id
> > > left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id =
> > > user.id
> > > and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and
> > async_job.job_status =
> > > 0
> > > 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> > > com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access
> denied;
> > > you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
> > > 2013-10-02 20:33:06,009 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
> > > (Timer-1:null) Unable to execute upgrade script:
> > > /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-410to420.sql
> > > com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access
> de

Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation

2013-10-02 Thread Rafael Weingartner

Could you log in to the database with the user you are using to execute the
upgrade and use the command show grants;
and post me the results?


2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 

> Hi Rafael,
>
> I believe the upgrade script is run by 'cloud' user, correct? By default
> full permission to the 'cloud' user has been given, and I even added
> 'super' privilege to the cloud user but the problem still persists.
>
> May I know how to change the DEFINER statement? Which statement you are
> referring to?
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Well, I was getting this error because I was using an Amazon RDS
> database,
> > and there the users, even the master do not have super privileges. So, I
> > could not create a table logged with a user (e.g. root) and using
> > DEFINER=cloud@'%'.
> >
> > But, since you have full access to the database, I do believe that you
> just
> > need to give grant permission to the user you are using to run the
> queries,
> > or simple try to change the DEFINER statement to something like:
> > DEFINER=CURRENT_USER
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> >
> > > Hi Rafael,
> > >
> > > May I know how did you resolve the problem? Do we need to manually
> grant
> > > super privilege to an account, e.g. 'cloud'@'%'?
> > >
> > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > >
> > > Cheers.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I had the exactly same problem when I was backing up my CS database
> on
> > a
> > > > Amazon RDS.
> > > > There was a problem with some DEFINER command generated by the
> > mysqldump.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Rafael,
> > > > >
> > > > > What I did is just to setup a new CloudStack 4.1.1 on a test VM,
> > > restore
> > > > > the dump backup of our production database into the test
> environment,
> > > and
> > > > > try to upgrade to 4.2.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could it be because the database was taken from a different
> > > environment?
> > > > > However, I tested accessing the GUI of the test environment after
> the
> > > > dump
> > > > > restore and I can access it, prior to the upgrade.
> > > > >
> > > > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Interesting errors, just by any change are you using the database
> > on
> > > > > Amazon
> > > > > > RDS?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack
> 4.1.1
> > to
> > > > > 4.2.0
> > > > > > > on my test environment and getting below error message:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least
> one
> > > of)
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The
> database
> > > > worked
> > > > > > > fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Below is more logs from the management-server.log:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> > > (Timer-1:null)
> > > > > > UPDATE
> > > > > > > `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN
> > > (1,2)
> > > > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> > > (Timer-1:null)
> > > > > > UPDATE
> > > > > > > `cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > > > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> > > (Timer-1:null)
> > > > > > UPDATE
> > > > > > > `cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > > > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> > > (Timer-1:null)
> > > > > > ALTER
> > > > > > > VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select  user.id,
> > > > > > > user.uuid, user.username, user.password,
> > > > > > > user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email,
> > > > > > > user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key,
> > > > > > > user.created, user.removed, user.timezone,
> > > > > > > user.registration_token, user.is_registered,
> > > > > > > user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default,
> > > > > > > account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid,
> > > > > > > account.account_name
> > > > > > > account_name, account.type account_type,
> > > > > > > domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid,
> > > > > > > domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path,
> > > > > > > async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid,
> > > > > > > async_job.job_status job_status,

Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation

2013-10-02 Thread Indra Pramana

Hi Rafael,

I believe the upgrade script is run by 'cloud' user, correct? By default
full permission to the 'cloud' user has been given, and I even added
'super' privilege to the cloud user but the problem still persists.

May I know how to change the DEFINER statement? Which statement you are
referring to?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.


On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, I was getting this error because I was using an Amazon RDS database,
> and there the users, even the master do not have super privileges. So, I
> could not create a table logged with a user (e.g. root) and using
> DEFINER=cloud@'%'.
>
> But, since you have full access to the database, I do believe that you just
> need to give grant permission to the user you are using to run the queries,
> or simple try to change the DEFINER statement to something like:
> DEFINER=CURRENT_USER
>
>
> 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
>
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > May I know how did you resolve the problem? Do we need to manually grant
> > super privilege to an account, e.g. 'cloud'@'%'?
> >
> > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I had the exactly same problem when I was backing up my CS database on
> a
> > > Amazon RDS.
> > > There was a problem with some DEFINER command generated by the
> mysqldump.
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> > >
> > > > Hi Rafael,
> > > >
> > > > What I did is just to setup a new CloudStack 4.1.1 on a test VM,
> > restore
> > > > the dump backup of our production database into the test environment,
> > and
> > > > try to upgrade to 4.2.0.
> > > >
> > > > Could it be because the database was taken from a different
> > environment?
> > > > However, I tested accessing the GUI of the test environment after the
> > > dump
> > > > restore and I can access it, prior to the upgrade.
> > > >
> > > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Interesting errors, just by any change are you using the database
> on
> > > > Amazon
> > > > > RDS?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> > > > >
> > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack 4.1.1
> to
> > > > 4.2.0
> > > > > > on my test environment and getting below error message:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one
> > of)
> > > > the
> > > > > > SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The database
> > > worked
> > > > > > fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Below is more logs from the management-server.log:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> > (Timer-1:null)
> > > > > UPDATE
> > > > > > `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN
> > (1,2)
> > > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> > (Timer-1:null)
> > > > > UPDATE
> > > > > > `cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> > (Timer-1:null)
> > > > > UPDATE
> > > > > > `cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> > (Timer-1:null)
> > > > > ALTER
> > > > > > VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select  user.id,
> > > > > > user.uuid, user.username, user.password,
> > > > > > user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email,
> > > > > > user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key,
> > > > > > user.created, user.removed, user.timezone,
> > > > > > user.registration_token, user.is_registered,
> > > > > > user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default,
> > > > > > account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid,
> > > > > > account.account_name
> > > > > > account_name, account.type account_type,
> > > > > > domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid,
> > > > > > domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path,
> > > > > > async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid,
> > > > > > async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id
> > > > > > job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner
> > > > > > join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id
> > > > > > inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id =
> > domain.id
> > > > > > left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id =
> > > > > > user.id
> > > > > > and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and
> > > > > async_job.job

RE: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'

2013-10-02 Thread Geoff Higginbottom

Did you by chance configure the 'Storage' network when you created the Zone

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 October 2013 14:13
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'


On Oct 2, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Geoff Higginbottom 
 wrote:

> Sebastien,
>
> If the web server hosting the template is on the same network as the 
> management server, you need to configure  the following global setting with 
> the IP range
>
> secstorage.allowed.internal.sites
>

I did that thanks, but my secondary storage is not mounted in the ssvm.

I can mount it by hand, the ssvm is up, yet I get:

> There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host 
> nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary


-sebastien

>
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 02 October 2013 13:06
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'
>
> HI,
>
> I am setting up basic zone. I have one mgt, one hypervisor (KVM, Ubuntu 
> 12.04), I am on ACS 4.1.1
>
> Everything seems fine, the ssvm starts, I can log into it. Everything is on a 
> private network without outside connectivity.
>
> I am serving a template from that private network.
> From the ssvm I can ping the mgt server and the hypervisor, I can also mount 
> the secondary storage by hand.
>
> However it does not get mounted automatically and when I try to register the 
> template I get the dreaded:
>
> 2013-10-02 05:00:13,407 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-20:null) 
> ===START===  172.16.153.1 -- GET  
> command=registerTemplate&response=json&sessionkey=ErhEwVpkdKXC3br3zZUoAyaFY7E%3D&name=toto&displayText=toto&url=http%3A%2F%2F192.168.38.100%3A80%2Ftinylinux.qcow2&zoneid=-1&format=QCOW2&isextractable=false&passwordEnabled=false&osTypeId=278f54ca-29d1-11e3-9b24-000c290705d2&hypervisor=KVM&ispublic=true&isfeatured=true&_=1380715213357
> 2013-10-02 05:00:13,452 WARN  [storage.download.DownloadMonitorImpl] 
> (catalina-exec-20:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary 
> storage host nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary
>
> I am at a loss on this one..
>
> -sebastien
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered 
> trademark.

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [POLL] Latency between Management Server and zones

2013-10-02 Thread Chip Childers

On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 04:58:26PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> [Apologize for the crosspost, but I think there may be answers from the dev 
> perspective]
> [Also, this is poll / opinion question]
> 
> What is the maximum latency / minimum bandwidth folks have between their 
> Management Server and the hypervisor?
> What works? What needs to be tweaked?
> 
> TIA

FWIW, $dayjob has taken the approach of mgmt server clusters being
geographically local to the zones under management (so sub 5ms
typically).  Bandwidth requirements from mgmt servers to hosts is
actually so small in the aggregate, that it's not even a consideration
really.  Production traffic / storage IO / secondary storage activity
are what drive the BW requirements, and mgmt traffic gets to come along
for the ride.  The regions feature makes it perfectly reasonable to have
multiple mgmt clusters, and frankly they have a small footprint...  so
there isn't much downside to this approach.  

Why push the limits of latency tolerance if not required. ;-)

This doesn't directly answer you question, but it's one approach.

-chip

Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation

2013-10-02 Thread Rafael Weingartner

Well, I was getting this error because I was using an Amazon RDS database,
and there the users, even the master do not have super privileges. So, I
could not create a table logged with a user (e.g. root) and using
DEFINER=cloud@'%'.

But, since you have full access to the database, I do believe that you just
need to give grant permission to the user you are using to run the queries,
or simple try to change the DEFINER statement to something like:
DEFINER=CURRENT_USER


2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 

> Hi Rafael,
>
> May I know how did you resolve the problem? Do we need to manually grant
> super privilege to an account, e.g. 'cloud'@'%'?
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I had the exactly same problem when I was backing up my CS database on a
> > Amazon RDS.
> > There was a problem with some DEFINER command generated by the mysqldump.
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> >
> > > Hi Rafael,
> > >
> > > What I did is just to setup a new CloudStack 4.1.1 on a test VM,
> restore
> > > the dump backup of our production database into the test environment,
> and
> > > try to upgrade to 4.2.0.
> > >
> > > Could it be because the database was taken from a different
> environment?
> > > However, I tested accessing the GUI of the test environment after the
> > dump
> > > restore and I can access it, prior to the upgrade.
> > >
> > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > >
> > > Cheers.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Interesting errors, just by any change are you using the database on
> > > Amazon
> > > > RDS?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> > > >
> > > > > Dear all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack 4.1.1 to
> > > 4.2.0
> > > > > on my test environment and getting below error message:
> > > > >
> > > > > MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one
> of)
> > > the
> > > > > SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The database
> > worked
> > > > > fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade.
> > > > >
> > > > > Below is more logs from the management-server.log:
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> (Timer-1:null)
> > > > UPDATE
> > > > > `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN
> (1,2)
> > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> (Timer-1:null)
> > > > UPDATE
> > > > > `cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> (Timer-1:null)
> > > > UPDATE
> > > > > `cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> (Timer-1:null)
> > > > ALTER
> > > > > VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select  user.id,
> > > > > user.uuid, user.username, user.password,
> > > > > user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email,
> > > > > user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key,
> > > > > user.created, user.removed, user.timezone,
> > > > > user.registration_token, user.is_registered,
> > > > > user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default,
> > > > > account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid,
> > > > > account.account_name
> > > > > account_name, account.type account_type,
> > > > > domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid,
> > > > > domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path,
> > > > > async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid,
> > > > > async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id
> > > > > job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner
> > > > > join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id
> > > > > inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id =
> domain.id
> > > > > left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id =
> > > > > user.id
> > > > > and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and
> > > > async_job.job_status =
> > > > > 0
> > > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner]
> (Timer-1:null)
> > > > Error
> > > > > executing: ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select
> > > > > user.id,
> > > > > user.uuid, user.username, user.password,
> > > > > user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email,
> > > > > user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key,
> > > > > user.created, user.removed, user.timezone,
> > > > > user.registration_token, user.is_registered,
> > > > > user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default,
> > > > > account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid,
> > > > > account.account_name

Re: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'

2013-10-02 Thread sebgoa


On Oct 2, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Geoff Higginbottom 
 wrote:

> Sebastien,
> 
> If the web server hosting the template is on the same network as the 
> management server, you need to configure  the following global setting with 
> the IP range
> 
> secstorage.allowed.internal.sites
> 

I did that thanks, but my secondary storage is not mounted in the ssvm.

I can mount it by hand, the ssvm is up, yet I get:

> There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host 
> nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary


-sebastien

> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Geoff Higginbottom
> 
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
> 
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 02 October 2013 13:06
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'
> 
> HI,
> 
> I am setting up basic zone. I have one mgt, one hypervisor (KVM, Ubuntu 
> 12.04), I am on ACS 4.1.1
> 
> Everything seems fine, the ssvm starts, I can log into it. Everything is on a 
> private network without outside connectivity.
> 
> I am serving a template from that private network.
> From the ssvm I can ping the mgt server and the hypervisor, I can also mount 
> the secondary storage by hand.
> 
> However it does not get mounted automatically and when I try to register the 
> template I get the dreaded:
> 
> 2013-10-02 05:00:13,407 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-20:null) 
> ===START===  172.16.153.1 -- GET  
> command=registerTemplate&response=json&sessionkey=ErhEwVpkdKXC3br3zZUoAyaFY7E%3D&name=toto&displayText=toto&url=http%3A%2F%2F192.168.38.100%3A80%2Ftinylinux.qcow2&zoneid=-1&format=QCOW2&isextractable=false&passwordEnabled=false&osTypeId=278f54ca-29d1-11e3-9b24-000c290705d2&hypervisor=KVM&ispublic=true&isfeatured=true&_=1380715213357
> 2013-10-02 05:00:13,452 WARN  [storage.download.DownloadMonitorImpl] 
> (catalina-exec-20:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary 
> storage host nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary
> 
> I am at a loss on this one..
> 
> -sebastien
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered 
> trademark.

Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation

2013-10-02 Thread Indra Pramana

Hi Rafael,

May I know how did you resolve the problem? Do we need to manually grant
super privilege to an account, e.g. 'cloud'@'%'?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.



On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I had the exactly same problem when I was backing up my CS database on a
> Amazon RDS.
> There was a problem with some DEFINER command generated by the mysqldump.
>
>
> 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
>
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > What I did is just to setup a new CloudStack 4.1.1 on a test VM, restore
> > the dump backup of our production database into the test environment, and
> > try to upgrade to 4.2.0.
> >
> > Could it be because the database was taken from a different environment?
> > However, I tested accessing the GUI of the test environment after the
> dump
> > restore and I can access it, prior to the upgrade.
> >
> > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Interesting errors, just by any change are you using the database on
> > Amazon
> > > RDS?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
> > >
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > > I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack 4.1.1 to
> > 4.2.0
> > > > on my test environment and getting below error message:
> > > >
> > > > MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of)
> > the
> > > > SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
> > > >
> > > > Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The database
> worked
> > > > fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade.
> > > >
> > > > Below is more logs from the management-server.log:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> > > UPDATE
> > > > `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> > > UPDATE
> > > > `cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> > > UPDATE
> > > > `cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> > > ALTER
> > > > VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select  user.id,
> > > > user.uuid, user.username, user.password,
> > > > user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email,
> > > > user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key,
> > > > user.created, user.removed, user.timezone,
> > > > user.registration_token, user.is_registered,
> > > > user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default,
> > > > account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid,
> > > > account.account_name
> > > > account_name, account.type account_type,
> > > > domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid,
> > > > domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path,
> > > > async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid,
> > > > async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id
> > > > job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner
> > > > join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id
> > > > inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id
> > > > left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id =
> > > > user.id
> > > > and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and
> > > async_job.job_status =
> > > > 0
> > > > 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> > > Error
> > > > executing: ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select
> > > > user.id,
> > > > user.uuid, user.username, user.password,
> > > > user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email,
> > > > user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key,
> > > > user.created, user.removed, user.timezone,
> > > > user.registration_token, user.is_registered,
> > > > user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default,
> > > > account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid,
> > > > account.account_name
> > > > account_name, account.type account_type,
> > > > domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid,
> > > > domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path,
> > > > async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid,
> > > > async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id
> > > > job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner
> > > > join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id
> > > > inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id
> > > > left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id =
> > > > user.id
> > > > and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and
> > > async_job.job_status =
> > > > 0
> > > > 20

Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation

2013-10-02 Thread Indra Pramana

Hi Rafael,

What I did is just to setup a new CloudStack 4.1.1 on a test VM, restore
the dump backup of our production database into the test environment, and
try to upgrade to 4.2.0.

Could it be because the database was taken from a different environment?
However, I tested accessing the GUI of the test environment after the dump
restore and I can access it, prior to the upgrade.

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.




On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Interesting errors, just by any change are you using the database on Amazon
> RDS?
>
>
> 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
> > on my test environment and getting below error message:
> >
> > MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the
> > SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
> >
> > Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The database worked
> > fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade.
> >
> > Below is more logs from the management-server.log:
> >
> > 
> > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> UPDATE
> > `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> UPDATE
> > `cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> UPDATE
> > `cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> > 2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> ALTER
> > VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select  user.id,
> > user.uuid, user.username, user.password,
> > user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email,
> > user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key,
> > user.created, user.removed, user.timezone,
> > user.registration_token, user.is_registered,
> > user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default,
> > account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid,
> > account.account_name
> > account_name, account.type account_type,
> > domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid,
> > domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path,
> > async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid,
> > async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id
> > job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner
> > join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id
> > inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id
> > left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id =
> > user.id
> > and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and
> async_job.job_status =
> > 0
> > 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> Error
> > executing: ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select
> > user.id,
> > user.uuid, user.username, user.password,
> > user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email,
> > user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key,
> > user.created, user.removed, user.timezone,
> > user.registration_token, user.is_registered,
> > user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default,
> > account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid,
> > account.account_name
> > account_name, account.type account_type,
> > domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid,
> > domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path,
> > async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid,
> > async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id
> > job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner
> > join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id
> > inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id
> > left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id =
> > user.id
> > and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and
> async_job.job_status =
> > 0
> > 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> > com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied;
> > you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
> > 2013-10-02 20:33:06,009 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
> > (Timer-1:null) Unable to execute upgrade script:
> > /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-410to420.sql
> > com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied;
> > you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
> > at
> com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:193)
> > at
> com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:87)
> > at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.runScript(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:201)
> > at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.upgrade.Data

Re: migration fails when iso is attached to running vm

2013-10-02 Thread Daan Hoogland

H Valery,

sounds like something a ticket should be created for. It probably already
is. Have a look in jira and create one if you can't find it please.

regards,
Daan


On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Valery Ciareszka
wrote:

> Travis,
> Ok, thx.
> But it would be much better if UI could prevent possibility of migration of
> such VMs instead of trying and throwing error .
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Travis Graham  wrote:
>
> > Hello Valery,
> >
> > That is expected. You'll need to always unmount ISO files from a VM
> before
> > migrating.
> >
> > Travis
> >
> > On Oct 2, 2013, at 5:26 AM, Valery Ciareszka 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all.
> > > I am testing CS 4.2+KVM and when I try to migrate running VM I get
> > > following error:
> > >
> > > jobresult:
> > > errorcode = 530
> > > errortext = Failed to migrate vm
> > > jobresultcode = 530
> > > jobresulttype = object
> > > jobstatus = 2
> > >
> > > According to the logs, vm fails to migrate due to secondary storage is
> > not
> > > mounted on the node this vm is trying to migrate to:
> > >
> > > 2013-10-02 09:15:19,124 ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > > (Job-Executor-16:job-1573 = [ 7b3332b4-dcfa-4a82-847f-d3f6159e65c0 ])
> > > Unable to migrate due to cannot open file
> > >
> >
> '/mnt/ae12c83d-5bc2-3bdb-9a83-f181209879c5/225-2-78686e44-457d-34e2-afb6-926583401caf.iso':
> > > No such file or directory
> > >
> > > If I detach iso from vm, migration works correctly.
> > >
> > > Is this expected behaviour or should I report a bug ?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Valery
> > >
> > > http://protocol.by/slayer
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Valery
>
> http://protocol.by/slayer
>

Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation

2013-10-02 Thread Rafael Weingartner

Interesting errors, just by any change are you using the database on Amazon
RDS?


2013/10/2 Indra Pramana 

> Dear all,
>
> I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
> on my test environment and getting below error message:
>
> MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the
> SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
>
> Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The database worked
> fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade.
>
> Below is more logs from the management-server.log:
>
> 
> 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE
> `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE
> `cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> 2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE
> `cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
> 2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) ALTER
> VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select  user.id,
> user.uuid, user.username, user.password,
> user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email,
> user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key,
> user.created, user.removed, user.timezone,
> user.registration_token, user.is_registered,
> user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default,
> account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid,
> account.account_name
> account_name, account.type account_type,
> domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid,
> domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path,
> async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid,
> async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id
> job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner
> join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id
> inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id
> left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id =
> user.id
> and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and async_job.job_status =
> 0
> 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) Error
> executing: ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select
> user.id,
> user.uuid, user.username, user.password,
> user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email,
> user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key,
> user.created, user.removed, user.timezone,
> user.registration_token, user.is_registered,
> user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default,
> account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid,
> account.account_name
> account_name, account.type account_type,
> domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid,
> domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path,
> async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid,
> async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id
> job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner
> join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id
> inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id
> left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id =
> user.id
> and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and async_job.job_status =
> 0
> 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
> com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied;
> you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
> 2013-10-02 20:33:06,009 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
> (Timer-1:null) Unable to execute upgrade script:
> /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-410to420.sql
> com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied;
> you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
> at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:193)
> at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:87)
> at
>
> com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.runScript(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:201)
> at
>
> com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:262)
> at
>
> com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:391)
> at
>
> com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentContext.initComponentsLifeCycle(ComponentContext.java:90)
> at
> com.cloud.servlet.CloudStartupServlet$1.run(CloudStartupServlet.java:54)
> at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:534)
> at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:484)
> 2013-10-02 20:33:06,011 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
> (Timer-1:null) Unable to upgrade the database
> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to execute upgrade
> script: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schem

GPG key expired

2013-10-02 Thread Dietsch, Markus

Hi list,

the gpg key of http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/release.asc seems to be expired:

apt-key list
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg

pub   2048R/86C278E3 2012-09-07 [expired: 2013-09-07]
uid  Apache CloudStack 
cloudstack-...@apache.org

After updating the sources.list I always get the following error:

W: GPG error: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu precise Release: The following 
signatures were invalid: KEYEXPIRED 1378559179 KEYEXPIRED 1378559179 KEYEXPIRED 
1378559179

Can you please provide a new key?

Sorry for writing directly but I don’t want to subcribe to the list but only 
report this issue.

Thanks in advance and cheers,

Markus

[http://www.mid.de/fileadmin/templates/mid_v2/images/MID_Logo_RGB_80_40.jpg]

Markus Dietsch, Administrator
MID GmbH | Kressengartenstr. 10 | 90402 Nürnberg | Germany
phone: +49 911 96836-433 | fax: +49 911 96836-100
email: m.diet...@mid.de | www.mid.de

Sitz des Unternehmens/Registered Office: Nürnberg
Handelsregister/Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Nürnberg HRB Nr. 21108
Vorsitzender Geschäftsführer/CEO: Bertram Geck
Geschäftsführer/Management Board: Andreas Ditze, Jürgen Leuschel, Jochen Seemann






[cid:imagebf589a.JPG@8fa9969e.419804a8][cid:image3d8e90.JPG@7a150851.418cde93]

Sichern Sie sich schon jetzt Ihren Frühbuchervorteil für die Insight 
2013 und erleben Sie einen Tag zu den Themen BPMN, SOA, 
Process Optimization, Big Data, BI, Innovation uvm.. Wir freuen uns auf Sie!

Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation

2013-10-02 Thread Indra Pramana

Dear all,

I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
on my test environment and getting below error message:

MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the
SUPER privilege(s) for this operation

Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The database worked
fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade.

Below is more logs from the management-server.log:


2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE
`cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE
`cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE
`cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2)
2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) ALTER
VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select  user.id,
user.uuid, user.username, user.password,
user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email,
user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key,
user.created, user.removed, user.timezone,
user.registration_token, user.is_registered,
user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default,
account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid,
account.account_name
account_name, account.type account_type,
domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid,
domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path,
async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid,
async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id
job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner
join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id
inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id
left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id =
user.id
and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and async_job.job_status =
0
2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) Error
executing: ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select
user.id,
user.uuid, user.username, user.password,
user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email,
user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key,
user.created, user.removed, user.timezone,
user.registration_token, user.is_registered,
user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default,
account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid,
account.account_name
account_name, account.type account_type,
domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid,
domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path,
async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid,
async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id
job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner
join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id
inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id
left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id =
user.id
and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and async_job.job_status =
0
2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied;
you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
2013-10-02 20:33:06,009 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
(Timer-1:null) Unable to execute upgrade script:
/usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-410to420.sql
com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied;
you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:193)
at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:87)
at
com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.runScript(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:201)
at
com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:262)
at
com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:391)
at
com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentContext.initComponentsLifeCycle(ComponentContext.java:90)
at
com.cloud.servlet.CloudStartupServlet$1.run(CloudStartupServlet.java:54)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:534)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:484)
2013-10-02 20:33:06,011 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
(Timer-1:null) Unable to upgrade the database
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to execute upgrade
script: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-410to420.sql
at
com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.runScript(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:210)
at
com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:262)
at
com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:391)

Migrating/managing secondary storages

2013-10-02 Thread mailinglists

Hi everyone.

 I have a CS 4.2 and 4 secondary NFS storages (s1, s2, s3, s4). I'd like
to migrate everything (all the templates, snapshots,…) from s1 and s2 to s3
and s4 and then shutdown s1 & s2. Is there a way to do it via GUI? 

The only instructions I found are to stop CloudStack, copy everything from
one secondary storage to another change the references to that secondary
storage in the database to the new secondary storage and restart
cloudstack.

Any first hand experiences/advices on how to do it, what to look out for?

Best regards,

F.

Re: migration fails when iso is attached to running vm

2013-10-02 Thread Valery Ciareszka

Travis,
Ok, thx.
But it would be much better if UI could prevent possibility of migration of
such VMs instead of trying and throwing error .


On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Travis Graham  wrote:

> Hello Valery,
>
> That is expected. You'll need to always unmount ISO files from a VM before
> migrating.
>
> Travis
>
> On Oct 2, 2013, at 5:26 AM, Valery Ciareszka 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all.
> > I am testing CS 4.2+KVM and when I try to migrate running VM I get
> > following error:
> >
> > jobresult:
> > errorcode = 530
> > errortext = Failed to migrate vm
> > jobresultcode = 530
> > jobresulttype = object
> > jobstatus = 2
> >
> > According to the logs, vm fails to migrate due to secondary storage is
> not
> > mounted on the node this vm is trying to migrate to:
> >
> > 2013-10-02 09:15:19,124 ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > (Job-Executor-16:job-1573 = [ 7b3332b4-dcfa-4a82-847f-d3f6159e65c0 ])
> > Unable to migrate due to cannot open file
> >
> '/mnt/ae12c83d-5bc2-3bdb-9a83-f181209879c5/225-2-78686e44-457d-34e2-afb6-926583401caf.iso':
> > No such file or directory
> >
> > If I detach iso from vm, migration works correctly.
> >
> > Is this expected behaviour or should I report a bug ?
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Valery
> >
> > http://protocol.by/slayer
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Valery

http://protocol.by/slayer

RE: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'

2013-10-02 Thread Geoff Higginbottom

Sebastien,

If the web server hosting the template is on the same network as the management 
server, you need to configure  the following global setting with the IP range

secstorage.allowed.internal.sites



Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 October 2013 13:06
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'

HI,

I am setting up basic zone. I have one mgt, one hypervisor (KVM, Ubuntu 12.04), 
I am on ACS 4.1.1

Everything seems fine, the ssvm starts, I can log into it. Everything is on a 
private network without outside connectivity.

I am serving a template from that private network.
>From the ssvm I can ping the mgt server and the hypervisor, I can also mount 
>the secondary storage by hand.

However it does not get mounted automatically and when I try to register the 
template I get the dreaded:

2013-10-02 05:00:13,407 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-20:null) 
===START===  172.16.153.1 -- GET  
command=registerTemplate&response=json&sessionkey=ErhEwVpkdKXC3br3zZUoAyaFY7E%3D&name=toto&displayText=toto&url=http%3A%2F%2F192.168.38.100%3A80%2Ftinylinux.qcow2&zoneid=-1&format=QCOW2&isextractable=false&passwordEnabled=false&osTypeId=278f54ca-29d1-11e3-9b24-000c290705d2&hypervisor=KVM&ispublic=true&isfeatured=true&_=1380715213357
2013-10-02 05:00:13,452 WARN  [storage.download.DownloadMonitorImpl] 
(catalina-exec-20:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage 
host nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary

I am at a loss on this one..

-sebastien
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'

2013-10-02 Thread sebgoa

HI,

I am setting up basic zone. I have one mgt, one hypervisor (KVM, Ubuntu 12.04), 
I am on ACS 4.1.1

Everything seems fine, the ssvm starts, I can log into it. Everything is on a 
private network without outside connectivity.

I am serving a template from that private network.
From the ssvm I can ping the mgt server and the hypervisor, I can also mount 
the secondary storage by hand.

However it does not get mounted automatically and when I try to register the 
template I get the dreaded:

2013-10-02 05:00:13,407 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-20:null) 
===START===  172.16.153.1 -- GET  
command=registerTemplate&response=json&sessionkey=ErhEwVpkdKXC3br3zZUoAyaFY7E%3D&name=toto&displayText=toto&url=http%3A%2F%2F192.168.38.100%3A80%2Ftinylinux.qcow2&zoneid=-1&format=QCOW2&isextractable=false&passwordEnabled=false&osTypeId=278f54ca-29d1-11e3-9b24-000c290705d2&hypervisor=KVM&ispublic=true&isfeatured=true&_=1380715213357
2013-10-02 05:00:13,452 WARN  [storage.download.DownloadMonitorImpl] 
(catalina-exec-20:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage 
host nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary

I am at a loss on this one..

-sebastien

Re: migration fails when iso is attached to running vm

2013-10-02 Thread Travis Graham

Hello Valery,

That is expected. You'll need to always unmount ISO files from a VM before 
migrating.

Travis

On Oct 2, 2013, at 5:26 AM, Valery Ciareszka  wrote:

> Hi all.
> I am testing CS 4.2+KVM and when I try to migrate running VM I get
> following error:
> 
> jobresult:
> errorcode = 530
> errortext = Failed to migrate vm
> jobresultcode = 530
> jobresulttype = object
> jobstatus = 2
> 
> According to the logs, vm fails to migrate due to secondary storage is not
> mounted on the node this vm is trying to migrate to:
> 
> 2013-10-02 09:15:19,124 ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-16:job-1573 = [ 7b3332b4-dcfa-4a82-847f-d3f6159e65c0 ])
> Unable to migrate due to cannot open file
> '/mnt/ae12c83d-5bc2-3bdb-9a83-f181209879c5/225-2-78686e44-457d-34e2-afb6-926583401caf.iso':
> No such file or directory
> 
> If I detach iso from vm, migration works correctly.
> 
> Is this expected behaviour or should I report a bug ?
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Valery
> 
> http://protocol.by/slayer

4.2.0 Install guide, section 4.4.2 RPM Repo

2013-10-02 Thread Old, Curtis


Has anyone thought of updating the section 4.4.2 on the yum repo from:


[cloudstack]
name=cloudstack
baseurl=http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.1/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0

To

[cloudstack]
name=cloudstack
baseurl=http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.2/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0


After I changed it I see:

[root@lab2-mgt-cloud-1 ~]# yum list cloud*
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: mirror.nexcess.net
 * extras: mirror.es.its.nyu.edu
 * updates: mirror.trouble-free.net
cloudstack  
 | 1.1 kB 00:00
cloudstack/primary  
 | 2.6 kB 00:00
cloudstack  
7/7
Available Packages
cloudstack-agent.x86_64   4.2.0-1.el6   
  cloudstack
cloudstack-awsapi.x86_64  4.2.0-1.el6   
  cloudstack
cloudstack-baremetal-agent.x86_64 4.2.0-1.el6   
  cloudstack
cloudstack-cli.x86_64 4.2.0-1.el6   
  cloudstack
cloudstack-common.x86_64  4.2.0-1.el6   
  cloudstack
cloudstack-management.x86_64  4.2.0-1.el6   
  cloudstack
cloudstack-usage.x86_64   4.2.0-1.el6   
  cloudstack

Just a thought, and sorry if this has been brought up already :-)

Curtis Old
Neustar, Inc. / Neustarlabs / Senior Research Engineer
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5384 Mobile: +1.540.532.2230 / 
curtis@neustar.biz  / 
www.neustar.biz

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.

Re: Choosing VMWare SCSI Controller Type

2013-10-02 Thread Chris Sciarrino

Hi Sean,

I have tried this in 4.1.1 and 4.2. I have tried the HDD adapter type in
the register template screen like you also suggested but that did not have
an effect.

Unless I am mistaken, I think that option will set the disk type to ide or
scsi and not change the actual controller type that the scsi disk uses.

Thanks,

Chris

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Sean Hamilton wrote:

> Hey Chris,
>
> What version of CS are you running? I've seen a bug in the "Register
> Template" screen. If you select the location for the template it should
> open up more options, one of which is the HDD adapter type.
>
> Let me know how it goes.
>
>
> On 2 October 2013 05:12, Chris Sciarrino 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am having an issue where my vmware templates are being deployed with
> the
> > lsi parallel scsi controller type which is causing them to blue screen.
> Is
> > there any way to choose which scsi controller type it will be deployed
> > with? Or is there any other way to make it deploy the lsi sas controller?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Chris
> >
>

qemu-kvm tweaking (CloudStack-2.2.14)

2013-10-02 Thread Vladimir Melnik

Dear colleagues,

Has anybody managed to set/change parameters of qemu-kvm for certain
instance before it launches?
For example, if I want to add the 3rd drive or to emulate some different
model of the NIC and so on...
Are there any working hacks for that?

Thanks!

-- 
V.Melnik

migration fails when iso is attached to running vm

2013-10-02 Thread Valery Ciareszka

Hi all.
I am testing CS 4.2+KVM and when I try to migrate running VM I get
following error:

jobresult:
errorcode = 530
errortext = Failed to migrate vm
jobresultcode = 530
jobresulttype = object
jobstatus = 2

According to the logs, vm fails to migrate due to secondary storage is not
mounted on the node this vm is trying to migrate to:

2013-10-02 09:15:19,124 ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-16:job-1573 = [ 7b3332b4-dcfa-4a82-847f-d3f6159e65c0 ])
Unable to migrate due to cannot open file
'/mnt/ae12c83d-5bc2-3bdb-9a83-f181209879c5/225-2-78686e44-457d-34e2-afb6-926583401caf.iso':
No such file or directory

If I detach iso from vm, migration works correctly.

Is this expected behaviour or should I report a bug ?

-- 
Regards,
Valery

http://protocol.by/slayer

error when I try to create a virtual machine

2013-10-02 Thread pablo martin

when we try to create a virtual machine system returns the following error"
"HTTP Status 530-Failed to create VM due you java.lang.String /" Unable to
create vm for account (2): admin"

  not know how to fix this problem

thank you very much

Re: [POLL] Latency between Management Server and zones

2013-10-02 Thread Sean Hamilton

The max currently is around 140ms for us. We see a noticeable lag, but
regions should sort that out.


On 1 October 2013 17:58, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:

> [Apologize for the crosspost, but I think there may be answers from the
> dev perspective]
> [Also, this is poll / opinion question]
>
> What is the maximum latency / minimum bandwidth folks have between their
> Management Server and the hypervisor?
> What works? What needs to be tweaked?
>
> TIA
>

Re: Choosing VMWare SCSI Controller Type

2013-10-02 Thread Sean Hamilton

Hey Chris,

What version of CS are you running? I've seen a bug in the "Register
Template" screen. If you select the location for the template it should
open up more options, one of which is the HDD adapter type.

Let me know how it goes.

On 2 October 2013 05:12, Chris Sciarrino  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am having an issue where my vmware templates are being deployed with the
> lsi parallel scsi controller type which is causing them to blue screen. Is
> there any way to choose which scsi controller type it will be deployed
> with? Or is there any other way to make it deploy the lsi sas controller?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 Released

2013-10-02 Thread benoit lair

Very great Job all of you !! I'm very excited to be able to use the new
version of cloudstack 4.2 !!
There were several weeks (months ?) that i was expecting features such load
balancing betweens vpc tiers.
Now it's done !!
I have upgraded my preproduction environment from cs 4.1 to cs 4.2 and all
is clear, the upgrade worked nice !!
I use mgmt server with centos 6.3 with xcp and xenserver 6.2 hypervisors
and it rocks a lot !!

Very nice work guys !! Now i can prepare my future production environment

Best regards,

Benoit


2013/10/2 Kirk Kosinski 

> I filed a bug for the error when running cloudstack-sysvmadm on Ubuntu.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4778
>
> Best regards,
> Kirk
>
> On 10/01/2013 10:09 PM, Indra Pramana wrote:
> > Hi Dean,
> >
> > I encountered exactly the same error message when running the
> > cloudstack-sysvmadm script. I am also using Ubuntu but using KVM
> > hypervisor. Some things to check:
> >
> > 1. Have you registered the system VM template for 4.2 prior to the
> upgrade?
> > If not yet, you need to register the template first.
> > 2. After upgrading both the management server and the hypervisor hosts,
> log
> > in to the GUI and ensure that the hosts are up, before performing the
> > cloudstack-sysvmadm script.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Dean Kamali 
> wrote:
> >
> >> update:
> >> I'm using Ubuntu on my management server, and currently all of my
> >> hypervisors are in disconnected state, I have also noticed that usage
> >> server log is overwriting management logs
> >>
> >> I must say "ouch!"
> >>
> >> D
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Dean Kamali 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Travis
> >>>
> >>> Any one have tried to upgrade?
> >>>
> >>> I followed upgrade process from 4.1.1 to 4.2 (xenserver) is running on
> >> all
> >>> of my hyperviroues
> >>>
> >>> However when I try and run  cloudstack-sysvmadm to stop then start all
> >>> running SSVMs, Console Proxies, and Virtual Routers
> >>>
> >>> I get the following:
> >>>
> >>> /usr/bin/cloudstack-sysvmadm: line 21: /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions: No
> >> such
> >>> file or directory
> >>>
> >>> Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage vm(s)...
> >>> ERROR: Failed to stop secondary storage vm with id 5
> >>>
> >>> Done stopping and starting secondary storage vm(s)
> >>>
> >>> Stopping and starting 1 console proxy vm(s)...
> >>> ERROR: Failed to stop console proxy vm with id 19
> >>>
> >>> Done stopping and starting console proxy vm(s) .
> >>>
> >>> Stopping and starting 6 running routing vm(s)...
> >>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 13
> >>>
> >>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 112
> >>>
> >>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 108
> >>>
> >>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 94
> >>>
> >>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 120
> >>>
> >>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 83
> >>>
> >>> Done restarting router(s).
> >>>
> >>> Any ideas?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Travis Graham 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
>  Hey Dean,
> 
>  I've had the same problem this morning. It's actually from the old
> docs
>  site being cached. You'll want to clear your cache or use a different
>  browser.
> 
>  Here's a direct link:
> 
> 
> 
> >>
> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Release_Notes/index.html
> 
>  Travis
> 
>  On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Dean Kamali 
> wrote:
> 
> > Thank you, I'm very excited, where can we find the release notes?
> they
>  are
> > not on http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/index.html yet!
> >
> > I'm actually more interested in upgrade notes for xenserver from
> 4.1.1
> >
> > Thanks again
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Animesh  wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> The Apache CloudStack project is excited to announce the
> >> 4.2 feature release of the CloudStack cloud orchestration platform.
>  This
> >> is the
> >> next feature release of the 4.0 branch which first released on
>  November 6,
> >> 2012
> >> with the 4.1 release on June 5. This is the second major release
> from
> >> Apache
> >> CloudStack since its graduation from the Apache Incubator on March
>  20th.
> >>
> >> This release represents over six months of work from the
> >> Apache CloudStack community with 57 new and 29 improved features
> >> being
> >> provided. Many new features incorporate contributions from major
> >> corporations
> >> and support for industry standards. New integrated support of the
>  Cisco UCS
> >> compute chassis, SolidFire storage arrays, and the S3 storage
> >> protocol
>  are
> >> just
> >> a few of the features available in this release.
> >>
> >> ## Documentation
> >> The 4.2 release includes over 160 issues from 4

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 Released

2013-10-02 Thread Kirk Kosinski

I filed a bug for the error when running cloudstack-sysvmadm on Ubuntu.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4778

Best regards,
Kirk

On 10/01/2013 10:09 PM, Indra Pramana wrote:
> Hi Dean,
> 
> I encountered exactly the same error message when running the
> cloudstack-sysvmadm script. I am also using Ubuntu but using KVM
> hypervisor. Some things to check:
> 
> 1. Have you registered the system VM template for 4.2 prior to the upgrade?
> If not yet, you need to register the template first.
> 2. After upgrading both the management server and the hypervisor hosts, log
> in to the GUI and ensure that the hosts are up, before performing the
> cloudstack-sysvmadm script.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
> 
>> update:
>> I'm using Ubuntu on my management server, and currently all of my
>> hypervisors are in disconnected state, I have also noticed that usage
>> server log is overwriting management logs
>>
>> I must say "ouch!"
>>
>> D
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Dean Kamali 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Travis
>>>
>>> Any one have tried to upgrade?
>>>
>>> I followed upgrade process from 4.1.1 to 4.2 (xenserver) is running on
>> all
>>> of my hyperviroues
>>>
>>> However when I try and run  cloudstack-sysvmadm to stop then start all
>>> running SSVMs, Console Proxies, and Virtual Routers
>>>
>>> I get the following:
>>>
>>> /usr/bin/cloudstack-sysvmadm: line 21: /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions: No
>> such
>>> file or directory
>>>
>>> Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage vm(s)...
>>> ERROR: Failed to stop secondary storage vm with id 5
>>>
>>> Done stopping and starting secondary storage vm(s)
>>>
>>> Stopping and starting 1 console proxy vm(s)...
>>> ERROR: Failed to stop console proxy vm with id 19
>>>
>>> Done stopping and starting console proxy vm(s) .
>>>
>>> Stopping and starting 6 running routing vm(s)...
>>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 13
>>>
>>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 112
>>>
>>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 108
>>>
>>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 94
>>>
>>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 120
>>>
>>> ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 83
>>>
>>> Done restarting router(s).
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Travis Graham 
>> wrote:
>>>
 Hey Dean,

 I've had the same problem this morning. It's actually from the old docs
 site being cached. You'll want to clear your cache or use a different
 browser.

 Here's a direct link:



>> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Release_Notes/index.html

 Travis

 On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Dean Kamali  wrote:

> Thank you, I'm very excited, where can we find the release notes? they
 are
> not on http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/index.html yet!
>
> I'm actually more interested in upgrade notes for xenserver from 4.1.1
>
> Thanks again
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Animesh  wrote:
>
>>
>> The Apache CloudStack project is excited to announce the
>> 4.2 feature release of the CloudStack cloud orchestration platform.
 This
>> is the
>> next feature release of the 4.0 branch which first released on
 November 6,
>> 2012
>> with the 4.1 release on June 5. This is the second major release from
>> Apache
>> CloudStack since its graduation from the Apache Incubator on March
 20th.
>>
>> This release represents over six months of work from the
>> Apache CloudStack community with 57 new and 29 improved features
>> being
>> provided. Many new features incorporate contributions from major
>> corporations
>> and support for industry standards. New integrated support of the
 Cisco UCS
>> compute chassis, SolidFire storage arrays, and the S3 storage
>> protocol
 are
>> just
>> a few of the features available in this release.
>>
>> ## Documentation
>> The 4.2 release includes over 160 issues from 4.1.0 and
>> 4.1.1 were fixed; including fixes for swift support, fixes to
>> documentation,
>> and more. Please see the Release Notes for a full list of corrected
 issues
>> and
>> upgrade instructions.
>>
>> The official installation, administration and API
>> documentation for each release are available on our Documentation
>> Page.
>>
>> ## Downloads
>> The official source code for the 4.2 release can be
>> downloaded from our Downloads Page.
>>
>> In addition to the official source code release,
>> individual contributors have also made convenience binaries available
 on
>> the
>> Apache CloudStack download page.
>>
>> ## Apache CloudStack
>> Apache CloudStack is an integrated
>> Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) software platform that allows
>

51 matches

Mail list logo