Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hi Răzvan, if it’s possible, you can shoot me email to settest...@aol.com<mailto:settest...@aol.com> Thanks as ever From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ehrny Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 1:20 PM To: OpenSIPS users mailling list Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi Răzvan, Yes I can. Would you please shoot me e–mail so I’ll be able to send it. Thanks for your kind help, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 12:25 PM To: users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! I've just tested, and for me it works as it should - the reply goes through the interface it came from. Is there any chance you could send me your script (privately)? Perhaps I can spot some problems by looking at it. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/22/2016 07:45 PM, Ehrny wrote: Hi Răzvan, I’ve tried both # force_send_socket(udp:10.197.26.170:5060); and $fs="udp:10.197.26.170:5060"; with no luck (( Without any of these lines it doesn’t work either (( Ps.. in the main request routing logic I use force_send_socket(udp:x.x.82.39:5060); Best Regards, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 8:33 PM To: users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! If you completely remove the force_send_socket() and any $fs settings in onreply_route, is it doing the same thing? Normally the reply should be automatically routed through the same interface the request came from. Not sure why your reply goes over the other one. I will try to replicate this and let you know if it works or not. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hi Răzvan, Yes I can. Would you please shoot me e–mail so I’ll be able to send it. Thanks for your kind help, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 12:25 PM To: users@lists.opensips.org Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! I've just tested, and for me it works as it should - the reply goes through the interface it came from. Is there any chance you could send me your script (privately)? Perhaps I can spot some problems by looking at it. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/22/2016 07:45 PM, Ehrny wrote: Hi Răzvan, I’ve tried both # force_send_socket(udp:10.197.26.170:5060); and $fs="udp:10.197.26.170:5060"; with no luck (( Without any of these lines it doesn’t work either (( Ps.. in the main request routing logic I use force_send_socket(udp:x.x.82.39:5060); Best Regards, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 8:33 PM To: users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! If you completely remove the force_send_socket() and any $fs settings in onreply_route, is it doing the same thing? Normally the reply should be automatically routed through the same interface the request came from. Not sure why your reply goes over the other one. I will try to replicate this and let you know if it works or not. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/21/2016 06:40 PM, Ehrny wrote: Hi Răzvan, Thanks for your help. The call needs to be done through multi homed OpenSIPs (I don’t use mhomed flag) Caller -> Carrier1 -> OpenSIPs(eth1)---OpenSIPs(eth0) -> pbx -> Callee $var(upstream1) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.host}); returned the IP address I needed OpenSIPs(eth1) has private IP , so on requests I use force_send_socket(udp:OpenSIPs_PUB_IP:5060) to be able to send call to further destinations. When replies are back I need to change send _socket back to privateIP for the answers to Carrier1. I’ve got the IP address of the Carrier1 in the onreply_route . onreply_route[1] { … if ($(var(upstream1)) == "10.250.242.74") { force_send_socket(udp:10.197.26.170:5060); } … } It doesn’t seem to change ip address for replies . Would you please advise me how to change send_socket in onreply_route ? Kind regards, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 1:32 PM To: users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! You need the IP address of whom? Caller? Callee? $rd is null because a reply does not have a R-URI. Perhaps the reply doesn't have a received parameter in the reply either, that's why it is empty. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/21/2016 12:13 PM, Ehrny wrote: Hello Răzvan, I need to do some routing in onreply_route[] based on destination IP. Tried $rd with no avail , it returns null If I get you right regarding context, the var$var(upstream0) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.received}); Is empty also. What is the right way to get an IP address in replies and do further routing? Kind regards, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 11:50 AM To: users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! You don't need to use contexts in the onreply_route[], because that route is already ran in the context of the reply message. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hi, Ehrny! I've just tested, and for me it works as it should - the reply goes through the interface it came from. Is there any chance you could send me your script (privately)? Perhaps I can spot some problemsby looking at it. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com On 11/22/2016 07:45 PM, Ehrny wrote: Hi Răzvan, I’ve tried both # force_send_socket(udp:10.197.26.170:5060); and $fs="udp:10.197.26.170:5060"; with no luck (( Without any of these lines it doesn’t work either (( Ps.. in the main request routing logic I use force_send_socket(udp:x.x.82.39:5060); Best Regards, Ehrny *From:*users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *Razvan Crainea *Sent:* Tuesday, November 22, 2016 8:33 PM *To:* users@lists.opensips.org *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! If you completely remove the force_send_socket() and any $fs settings in onreply_route, is it doing the same thing? Normally the reply should be automatically routed through the same interface the request came from. Not sure why your reply goes over the other one. I will try to replicate this and let you know if it works or not. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/21/2016 06:40 PM, Ehrny wrote: Hi Răzvan, Thanks for your help. The call needs to be done through multi homed OpenSIPs (I don’t use mhomed flag) Caller -> Carrier1 -> OpenSIPs(eth1)---OpenSIPs(eth0) -> pbx -> Callee $var(upstream1) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.host}); returned the IP address I needed OpenSIPs(eth1) has private IP , so on requests I use force_send_socket(udp:OpenSIPs_PUB_IP:5060) to be able to send call to further destinations. When replies are back I need to change send _socket back to privateIP for the answers to Carrier1. I’ve got the IP address of the Carrier1 in the onreply_route . onreply_route[1] { … if ($(var(upstream1)) == "10.250.242.74") { force_send_socket(udp:10.197.26.170:5060); } … } It doesn’t seem to change ip address for replies . Would you please advise me how to change send_socket in onreply_route ? Kind regards, Ehrny *From:*users-boun...@lists.opensips.org <mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *Razvan Crainea *Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2016 1:32 PM *To:* users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! You need the IP address of whom? Caller? Callee? $rd is null because a reply does not have a R-URI. Perhaps the reply doesn't have a received parameter in the reply either, that's why it is empty. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/21/2016 12:13 PM, Ehrny wrote: Hello Răzvan, I need to do some routing in onreply_route[] based on destination IP. Tried $rd with no avail , it returns null If I get you right regarding context, the var $var(upstream0) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.received}); Is empty also. What is the right way to get an IP address in replies and do further routing? Kind regards, Ehrny *From:*users-boun...@lists.opensips.org <mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *Razvan Crainea *Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2016 11:50 AM *To:* users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! You don't need to use contexts in the onreply_route[], because that route is already ran in the context of the reply message. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com> ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hi Răzvan, I’ve tried both # force_send_socket(udp:10.197.26.170:5060); and $fs="udp:10.197.26.170:5060"; with no luck (( Without any of these lines it doesn’t work either (( Ps.. in the main request routing logic I use force_send_socket(udp:x.x.82.39:5060); Best Regards, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 8:33 PM To: users@lists.opensips.org Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! If you completely remove the force_send_socket() and any $fs settings in onreply_route, is it doing the same thing? Normally the reply should be automatically routed through the same interface the request came from. Not sure why your reply goes over the other one. I will try to replicate this and let you know if it works or not. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/21/2016 06:40 PM, Ehrny wrote: Hi Răzvan, Thanks for your help. The call needs to be done through multi homed OpenSIPs (I don’t use mhomed flag) Caller -> Carrier1 -> OpenSIPs(eth1)---OpenSIPs(eth0) -> pbx -> Callee $var(upstream1) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.host}); returned the IP address I needed OpenSIPs(eth1) has private IP , so on requests I use force_send_socket(udp:OpenSIPs_PUB_IP:5060) to be able to send call to further destinations. When replies are back I need to change send _socket back to privateIP for the answers to Carrier1. I’ve got the IP address of the Carrier1 in the onreply_route . onreply_route[1] { … if ($(var(upstream1)) == "10.250.242.74") { force_send_socket(udp:10.197.26.170:5060); } … } It doesn’t seem to change ip address for replies . Would you please advise me how to change send_socket in onreply_route ? Kind regards, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 1:32 PM To: users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! You need the IP address of whom? Caller? Callee? $rd is null because a reply does not have a R-URI. Perhaps the reply doesn't have a received parameter in the reply either, that's why it is empty. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/21/2016 12:13 PM, Ehrny wrote: Hello Răzvan, I need to do some routing in onreply_route[] based on destination IP. Tried $rd with no avail , it returns null If I get you right regarding context, the var$var(upstream0) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.received}); Is empty also. What is the right way to get an IP address in replies and do further routing? Kind regards, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 11:50 AM To: users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! You don't need to use contexts in the onreply_route[], because that route is already ran in the context of the reply message. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hi, Ehrny! If you completely remove the force_send_socket() and any $fs settings in onreply_route, is it doing the same thing? Normally the reply should be automatically routed through the same interface the request came from. Not sure why your reply goes over the other one. I willtry to replicate this and let you know if it works or not. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com On 11/21/2016 06:40 PM, Ehrny wrote: Hi Răzvan, Thanks for your help. The call needs to be done through multi homed OpenSIPs (I don’t use mhomed flag) Caller -> Carrier1 -> OpenSIPs(eth1)---OpenSIPs(eth0) -> pbx -> Callee $var(upstream1) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.host}); returned the IP address I needed OpenSIPs(eth1) has private IP , so on requests I use force_send_socket(udp:OpenSIPs_PUB_IP:5060) to be able to send call to further destinations. When replies are back I need to change send _socket back to privateIP for the answers to Carrier1. I’ve got the IP address of the Carrier1 in the onreply_route . onreply_route[1] { … if ($(var(upstream1)) == "10.250.242.74") { force_send_socket(udp:10.197.26.170:5060); } … } It doesn’t seem to change ip address for replies . Would you please advise me how to change send_socket in onreply_route ? Kind regards, Ehrny *From:*users-boun...@lists.opensips.org <mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *Razvan Crainea *Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2016 1:32 PM *To:* users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! You need the IP address of whom? Caller? Callee? $rd is null because a reply does not have a R-URI. Perhaps the reply doesn't have a received parameter in the reply either, that's why it is empty. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/21/2016 12:13 PM, Ehrny wrote: Hello Răzvan, I need to do some routing in onreply_route[] based on destination IP. Tried $rd with no avail , it returns null If I get you right regarding context, the var $var(upstream0) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.received}); Is empty also. What is the right way to get an IP address in replies and do further routing? Kind regards, Ehrny *From:*users-boun...@lists.opensips.org <mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *Razvan Crainea *Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2016 11:50 AM *To:* users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! You don't need to use contexts in the onreply_route[], because that route is already ran in the context of the reply message. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com> ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hi Răzvan, Thanks for your help. The call needs to be done through multi homed OpenSIPs (I don’t use mhomed flag) Caller -> Carrier1 -> OpenSIPs(eth1)---OpenSIPs(eth0) -> pbx -> Callee $var(upstream1) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.host}); returned the IP address I needed OpenSIPs(eth1) has private IP , so on requests I use force_send_socket(udp:OpenSIPs_PUB_IP:5060) to be able to send call to further destinations. When replies are back I need to change send _socket back to privateIP for the answers to Carrier1. I’ve got the IP address of the Carrier1 in the onreply_route . onreply_route[1] { … if ($(var(upstream1)) == "10.250.242.74") { force_send_socket(udp:10.197.26.170:5060); } … } It doesn’t seem to change ip address for replies . Would you please advise me how to change send_socket in onreply_route ? Kind regards, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 1:32 PM To: users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! You need the IP address of whom? Caller? Callee? $rd is null because a reply does not have a R-URI. Perhaps the reply doesn't have a received parameter in the reply either, that's why it is empty. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/21/2016 12:13 PM, Ehrny wrote: Hello Răzvan, I need to do some routing in onreply_route[] based on destination IP. Tried $rd with no avail , it returns null If I get you right regarding context, the var$var(upstream0) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.received}); Is empty also. What is the right way to get an IP address in replies and do further routing? Kind regards, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 11:50 AM To: users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! You don't need to use contexts in the onreply_route[], because that route is already ran in the context of the reply message. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hi, Ehrny! You need the IP address of whom? Caller? Callee? $rd is null because a reply does not have a R-URI. Perhaps the reply doesn't have a received parameter in the reply either, that's why it is empty. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com On 11/21/2016 12:13 PM, Ehrny wrote: Hello Răzvan, I need to do some routing in onreply_route[] based on destination IP. Tried $rd with no avail , it returns null If I get you right regarding context, the var$var(upstream0) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.received}); Is empty also. What is the right way to get an IP address in replies and do further routing? Kind regards, Ehrny *From:*users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *Razvan Crainea *Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2016 11:50 AM *To:* users@lists.opensips.org *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! You don't need to use contexts in the onreply_route[], because that route is already ran in the context of the reply message. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/19/2016 10:40 PM, Ehrny wrote: Dear Răzvan, … I’ve tried to add variable to onreply_route[1] $var(upstream0) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.param,received}); xlog("upstream0 = $var(upstream0) \n"); and in the log I get critical alert: CRITICAL:tm:tm_pv_context_reply: no picked branch (-1) for a final response *From:*users-boun...@lists.opensips.org <mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *Ehrny *Sent:* Saturday, November 19, 2016 2:06 PM *To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi Răzvan, I gues so. I’ve got t_on_reply("1"); in the route and at the end of the script there is: onreply_route[1] { force_send_socket(udp:10.197.26.170:5060); } But it doesn’t seem to change send_socket back to priv IP addr (( Kind regards, Ehrny *From:*users-boun...@lists.opensips.org <mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *Razvan Crainea *Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 12:22 PM *To:* users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! Did you try setting the private socket on the reply? Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/17/2016 01:00 AM, Ehrny wrote: Dear Răzvan, Thanks again for the prompt help. I was able to change the headers as needed but I’m stuck with another problem( I’ve got opensips with two Ethernet adapters, eth1 as a private and another one eth0 as public. Opensips works fine when the call is coming on the public eth0 and leaves opensips through the same public adapter. (All the GWs are behind that public eth0 instead of one ). The problem happens when the call comes in through the private eth1, please see the drawing in attachment. -sip1. After I’ve got invite from provider on the private eth1 , I send it through the public eth0. -sip2. I use force_send_socket(udp:PUBLIC_IP:PORT) for the call to be able to pass through the opensips and come back from external GW (x.x.82.139). I also change SIP Request's URI and use uac_replace_to () to change these fields as needed. -sip4. Opensips has got 180 Ringing from external GW (x.x.82.139) -sip5. Opensips tries to send it back to originator (10.250.242.74) which is behind private NIC eth0 (10.197.26.170) the call can not be set up because I send reply from my public eth1 2016-11-16 18:56:14 : x.x.80.43:5060 -> 10.250.242.74:5060 SIP/2.0 *180* Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.250.242.74:5060;branch=*z9hG4bKqci5ec *Record-Route: > Record-Route: > From: sip:300...@domain.com;tag=*2F81324631* To: sip:300...@domain.com:5060;tag=231469dIr894 Call-ID: *020A3EA03A8@SFESIP4-id1-ext* CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: I’m not sure if I do it right way because the packet (sip5) goes to 10.250.242.74 with the source ip of public eth0 and not the one it should pass through to be able to come back. What is the right way in my case to get the call through? Thank you for all of your help, Regards, Ehrny ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org <m
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hello Răzvan, I need to do some routing in onreply_route[] based on destination IP. Tried $rd with no avail , it returns null If I get you right regarding context, the var$var(upstream0) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.received}); Is empty also. What is the right way to get an IP address in replies and do further routing? Kind regards, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 11:50 AM To: users@lists.opensips.org Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! You don't need to use contexts in the onreply_route[], because that route is already ran in the context of the reply message. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/19/2016 10:40 PM, Ehrny wrote: Dear Răzvan, … I’ve tried to add variable to onreply_route[1] $var(upstream0) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.param,received}); xlog("upstream0 = $var(upstream0) \n"); and in the log I get critical alert: CRITICAL:tm:tm_pv_context_reply: no picked branch (-1) for a final response From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ehrny Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2016 2:06 PM To: OpenSIPS users mailling list Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi Răzvan, I gues so. I’ve got t_on_reply("1"); in the route and at the end of the script there is: onreply_route[1] { force_send_socket(udp:10.197.26.170:5060); } But it doesn’t seem to change send_socket back to priv IP addr (( Kind regards, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 12:22 PM To: users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! Did you try setting the private socket on the reply? Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/17/2016 01:00 AM, Ehrny wrote: Dear Răzvan, Thanks again for the prompt help. I was able to change the headers as needed but I’m stuck with another problem( I’ve got opensips with two Ethernet adapters, eth1 as a private and another one eth0 as public. Opensips works fine when the call is coming on the public eth0 and leaves opensips through the same public adapter. (All the GWs are behind that public eth0 instead of one ). The problem happens when the call comes in through the private eth1, please see the drawing in attachment. - sip1. After I’ve got invite from provider on the private eth1 , I send it through the public eth0. - sip2. I use force_send_socket(udp:PUBLIC_IP:PORT) for the call to be able to pass through the opensips and come back from external GW (x.x.82.139). I also change SIP Request's URI and use uac_replace_to () to change these fields as needed. - sip4. Opensips has got 180 Ringing from external GW (x.x.82.139) - sip5. Opensips tries to send it back to originator (10.250.242.74) which is behind private NIC eth0 (10.197.26.170) the call can not be set up because I send reply from my public eth1 2016-11-16 18:56:14 : x.x.80.43:5060 -> 10.250.242.74:5060 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.250.242.74:5060;branch=z9hG4bKqci5ec Record-Route: > Record-Route: > From: sip:300...@domain.com;tag=2F81324631 To: sip:300...@domain.com:5060;tag=231469dIr894 Call-ID: 020A3EA03A8@SFESIP4-id1-ext CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: I’m not sure if I do it right way because the packet (sip5) goes to 10.250.242.74 with the source ip of public eth0 and not the one it should pass through to be able to come back. What is the right way in my case to get the call through? Thank you for all of your help, Regards, Ehrny ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hi, Ehrny! You don't need to use contexts in the onreply_route[], because that route is already ran in the context of the reply message. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com On 11/19/2016 10:40 PM, Ehrny wrote: Dear Răzvan, … I’ve tried to add variable to onreply_route[1] $var(upstream0) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.param,received}); xlog("upstream0 = $var(upstream0) \n"); and in the log I get critical alert: CRITICAL:tm:tm_pv_context_reply: no picked branch (-1) for a final response *From:*users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *Ehrny *Sent:* Saturday, November 19, 2016 2:06 PM *To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi Răzvan, I gues so. I’ve got t_on_reply("1"); in the route and at the end of the script there is: onreply_route[1] { force_send_socket(udp:10.197.26.170:5060); } But it doesn’t seem to change send_socket back to priv IP addr (( Kind regards, Ehrny *From:*users-boun...@lists.opensips.org <mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *Razvan Crainea *Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 12:22 PM *To:* users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! Did you try setting the private socket on the reply? Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/17/2016 01:00 AM, Ehrny wrote: Dear Răzvan, Thanks again for the prompt help. I was able to change the headers as needed but I’m stuck with another problem( I’ve got opensips with two Ethernet adapters, eth1 as a private and another one eth0 as public. Opensips works fine when the call is coming on the public eth0 and leaves opensips through the same public adapter. (All the GWs are behind that public eth0 instead of one ). The problem happens when the call comes in through the private eth1, please see the drawing in attachment. -sip1. After I’ve got invite from provider on the private eth1 , I send it through the public eth0. -sip2. I use force_send_socket(udp:PUBLIC_IP:PORT) for the call to be able to pass through the opensips and come back from external GW (x.x.82.139). I also change SIP Request's URI and use uac_replace_to () to change these fields as needed. -sip4. Opensips has got 180 Ringing from external GW (x.x.82.139) -sip5. Opensips tries to send it back to originator (10.250.242.74) which is behind private NIC eth0 (10.197.26.170) the call can not be set up because I send reply from my public eth1 2016-11-16 18:56:14 : x.x.80.43:5060 -> 10.250.242.74:5060 SIP/2.0 *180* Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.250.242.74:5060;branch=*z9hG4bKqci5ec *Record-Route: > Record-Route: > From: sip:300...@domain.com;tag=*2F81324631* To: sip:300...@domain.com:5060;tag=231469dIr894 Call-ID: *020A3EA03A8@SFESIP4-id1-ext* CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: I’m not sure if I do it right way because the packet (sip5) goes to 10.250.242.74 with the source ip of public eth0 and not the one it should pass through to be able to come back. What is the right way in my case to get the call through? Thank you for all of your help, Regards, Ehrny ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Dear Răzvan, … I’ve tried to add variable to onreply_route[1] $var(upstream0) = $(hdr(Via)[0]{via.param,received}); xlog("upstream0 = $var(upstream0) \n"); and in the log I get critical alert: CRITICAL:tm:tm_pv_context_reply: no picked branch (-1) for a final response From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ehrny Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2016 2:06 PM To: OpenSIPS users mailling list Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi Răzvan, I gues so. I’ve got t_on_reply("1"); in the route and at the end of the script there is: onreply_route[1] { force_send_socket(udp:10.197.26.170:5060); } But it doesn’t seem to change send_socket back to priv IP addr (( Kind regards, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 12:22 PM To: users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:users@lists.opensips.org> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! Did you try setting the private socket on the reply? Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/17/2016 01:00 AM, Ehrny wrote: Dear Răzvan, Thanks again for the prompt help. I was able to change the headers as needed but I’m stuck with another problem( I’ve got opensips with two Ethernet adapters, eth1 as a private and another one eth0 as public. Opensips works fine when the call is coming on the public eth0 and leaves opensips through the same public adapter. (All the GWs are behind that public eth0 instead of one ). The problem happens when the call comes in through the private eth1, please see the drawing in attachment. - sip1. After I’ve got invite from provider on the private eth1 , I send it through the public eth0. - sip2. I use force_send_socket(udp:PUBLIC_IP:PORT) for the call to be able to pass through the opensips and come back from external GW (x.x.82.139). I also change SIP Request's URI and use uac_replace_to () to change these fields as needed. - sip4. Opensips has got 180 Ringing from external GW (x.x.82.139) - sip5. Opensips tries to send it back to originator (10.250.242.74) which is behind private NIC eth0 (10.197.26.170) the call can not be set up because I send reply from my public eth1 2016-11-16 18:56:14 : x.x.80.43:5060 -> 10.250.242.74:5060 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.250.242.74:5060;branch=z9hG4bKqci5ec Record-Route: > Record-Route: > From: sip:300...@domain.com;tag=2F81324631 To: sip:300...@domain.com:5060;tag=231469dIr894 Call-ID: 020A3EA03A8@SFESIP4-id1-ext CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: I’m not sure if I do it right way because the packet (sip5) goes to 10.250.242.74 with the source ip of public eth0 and not the one it should pass through to be able to come back. What is the right way in my case to get the call through? Thank you for all of your help, Regards, Ehrny ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hi Răzvan, I gues so. I’ve got t_on_reply("1"); in the route and at the end of the script there is: onreply_route[1] { force_send_socket(udp:10.197.26.170:5060); } But it doesn’t seem to change send_socket back to priv IP addr (( Kind regards, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 12:22 PM To: users@lists.opensips.org Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! Did you try setting the private socket on the reply? Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/17/2016 01:00 AM, Ehrny wrote: Dear Răzvan, Thanks again for the prompt help. I was able to change the headers as needed but I’m stuck with another problem( I’ve got opensips with two Ethernet adapters, eth1 as a private and another one eth0 as public. Opensips works fine when the call is coming on the public eth0 and leaves opensips through the same public adapter. (All the GWs are behind that public eth0 instead of one ). The problem happens when the call comes in through the private eth1, please see the drawing in attachment. - sip1. After I’ve got invite from provider on the private eth1 , I send it through the public eth0. - sip2. I use force_send_socket(udp:PUBLIC_IP:PORT) for the call to be able to pass through the opensips and come back from external GW (x.x.82.139). I also change SIP Request's URI and use uac_replace_to () to change these fields as needed. - sip4. Opensips has got 180 Ringing from external GW (x.x.82.139) - sip5. Opensips tries to send it back to originator (10.250.242.74) which is behind private NIC eth0 (10.197.26.170) the call can not be set up because I send reply from my public eth1 2016-11-16 18:56:14 : x.x.80.43:5060 -> 10.250.242.74:5060 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.250.242.74:5060;branch=z9hG4bKqci5ec Record-Route: > Record-Route: > From: sip:300...@domain.com;tag=2F81324631 To: sip:300...@domain.com:5060;tag=231469dIr894 Call-ID: 020A3EA03A8@SFESIP4-id1-ext CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: I’m not sure if I do it right way because the packet (sip5) goes to 10.250.242.74 with the source ip of public eth0 and not the one it should pass through to be able to come back. What is the right way in my case to get the call through? Thank you for all of your help, Regards, Ehrny ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
>> I’ve got opensips with two Ethernet adapters, eth1 as a private and another one eth0 as public. Opensips works fine when the call is coming on the public eth0 and leaves opensips through the same public adapter. (All the GWs are behind that public eth0 instead of one ). The problem happens when the call comes in through the private eth1, please see the drawing in attachment. >> This maybe helpful. https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Script-CoreParameters-1-11#toc72 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hi, Ehrny! Did you try setting the private socket on the reply? Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com On 11/17/2016 01:00 AM, Ehrny wrote: Dear Răzvan, Thanks again for the prompt help. I was able to change the headers as needed but I’m stuck with another problem( I’ve got opensips with two Ethernet adapters, eth1 as a private and another one eth0 as public. Opensips works fine when the call is coming on the public eth0 and leaves opensips through the same public adapter. (All the GWs are behind that public eth0 instead of one ). The problem happens when the call comes in through the private eth1, please see the drawing in attachment. -sip1. After I’ve got invite from provider on the private eth1 , I send it through the public eth0. -sip2. I use force_send_socket(udp:PUBLIC_IP:PORT) for the call to be able to pass through the opensips and come back from external GW (x.x.82.139). I also change SIP Request's URI and use uac_replace_to () to change these fields as needed. -sip4. Opensips has got 180 Ringing from external GW (x.x.82.139) -sip5. Opensips tries to send it back to originator (10.250.242.74) which is behind private NIC eth0 (10.197.26.170) the call can not be set up because I send reply from my public eth1 2016-11-16 18:56:14 : x.x.80.43:5060 -> 10.250.242.74:5060 SIP/2.0 *180*Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.250.242.74:5060;branch=*z9hG4bKqci5ec***Record-Route: > Record-Route: > From: sip:300...@domain.com;tag=*2F81324631* To: sip:300...@domain.com:5060;tag=231469dIr894 Call-ID: *020A3EA03A8@SFESIP4-id1-ext*CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: I’m not sure if I do it right way because the packet (sip5) goes to 10.250.242.74 with the source ip of public eth0 and not the one it should pass through to be able to come back. What is the right way in my case to get the call through? Thank you for all of your help, Regards, Ehrny ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Dear Răzvan, Thanks again for the prompt help. I was able to change the headers as needed but I’m stuck with another problem( I’ve got opensips with two Ethernet adapters, eth1 as a private and another one eth0 as public. Opensips works fine when the call is coming on the public eth0 and leaves opensips through the same public adapter. (All the GWs are behind that public eth0 instead of one ). The problem happens when the call comes in through the private eth1, please see the drawing in attachment. - sip1. After I’ve got invite from provider on the private eth1 , I send it through the public eth0. - sip2. I use force_send_socket(udp:PUBLIC_IP:PORT) for the call to be able to pass through the opensips and come back from external GW (x.x.82.139). I also change SIP Request's URI and use uac_replace_to () to change these fields as needed. - sip4. Opensips has got 180 Ringing from external GW (x.x.82.139) - sip5. Opensips tries to send it back to originator (10.250.242.74) which is behind private NIC eth0 (10.197.26.170) the call can not be set up because I send reply from my public eth1 2016-11-16 18:56:14 : x.x.80.43:5060 -> 10.250.242.74:5060 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.250.242.74:5060;branch=z9hG4bKqci5ec Record-Route: > Record-Route: > From: sip:300...@domain.com;tag=2F81324631 To: sip:300...@domain.com:5060;tag=231469dIr894p0D461D0t66 Call-ID: 020A3EA03A8@SFESIP4-id1-ext CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: I’m not sure if I do it right way because the packet (sip5) goes to 10.250.242.74 with the source ip of public eth0 and not the one it should pass through to be able to come back. What is the right way in my case to get the call through? Thank you for all of your help, Regards, Ehrny ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Dear Răzvan, Thanks again for the prompt help. I was able to change the headers as needed but I’m stuck with another problem( I’ve got opensips with two Ethernet adapters, eth1 as a private and another one eth0 as public. Opensips works fine when the call is coming on the public eth0 and leaves opensips through the same public adapter. (All the GWs are behind that public eth0 instead of one ). The problem happens when the call comes in through the private eth1, please see the drawing in attachment. - sip1. After I’ve got invite from provider on the private eth1 , I send it through the public eth0. - sip2. I use force_send_socket(udp:PUBLIC_IP:PORT) for the call to be able to pass through the opensips and come back from external GW (x.x.82.139). I also change SIP Request's URI and use uac_replace_to () to change these fields as needed. - sip4. Opensips has got 180 Ringing from external GW (x.x.82.139) - sip5. Opensips tries to send it back to originator (10.250.242.74) which is behind private NIC eth0 (10.197.26.170) the call can not be set up because I send reply from my public eth1 2016-11-16 18:56:14 : x.x.80.43:5060 -> 10.250.242.74:5060 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.250.242.74:5060;branch=z9hG4bKqci5ec Record-Route: > Record-Route: > From: sip:300...@domain.com;tag=2F81324631 To: sip:300...@domain.com:5060;tag=231469dIr894 Call-ID: 020A3EA03A8@SFESIP4-id1-ext CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: I’m not sure if I do it right way because the packet (sip5) goes to 10.250.242.74 with the source ip of public eth0 and not the one it should pass through to be able to come back. What is the right way in my case to get the call through? Thank you for all of your help, Regards, Ehrny ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hi, Răzvan, Very helpful, Thank you very much. Best Regards, Ehrny From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 11:03 AM To: users@lists.opensips.org Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation Hi, Ehrny! Yes, you can transform the P-Asserted-Identity header as you wish, by dropping the existing one and creating a new one. Use the remove_hf()[1] and append_hf()[2] headers for that, i.e.: if (is_present_hf("P-Asserted-Identity")) { remove_hf("P-Asserted-Identity"); $avp(rpid) = "new-header"; append_hf("P-Asserted-Identity: $avp(rpid) <mailto:sip:$avp(rpid)@opensips.org>\r\n"); } [1] http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.2.x/sipmsgops.html#id293937 [2] http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.2.x/sipmsgops.html#id249696 Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> On 11/13/2016 08:55 PM, Ehrny wrote: Hello team, I’m trying to follow my carrier’s request to transform P-Asserted-Identity header. Is there any possibilities to do that on the fly with opensips (v2.2.2)? Yet another project assume to add the redirecting number even if it’s not exists. Would it be possible to add it in the route? Your help is really appreciated, Best Regards, Ehrny ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hi, Ehrny! Yes, you can transform the P-Asserted-Identity header as you wish, by dropping the existing one and creating a new one. Use the remove_hf()[1] and append_hf()[2] headers for that, i.e.: if (is_present_hf("P-Asserted-Identity")) { remove_hf("P-Asserted-Identity"); $avp(rpid) = "new-header"; append_hf("P-Asserted-Identity: $avp(rpid) \r\n"); } [1] http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.2.x/sipmsgops.html#id293937 [2] http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.2.x/sipmsgops.html#id249696 Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com On 11/13/2016 08:55 PM, Ehrny wrote: Hello team, I’m trying to follow my carrier’s request to transform P-Asserted-Identity header. Is there any possibilities to do that on the fly with opensips (v2.2.2)? Yet another project assume to add the redirecting number even if it’s not exists. Would it be possible to add it in the route? Your help is really appreciated, Best Regards, Ehrny ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users