Hi guys,
I'm using Kevin's KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC rules for the multi.pccc.com
URIBL. Why is it designed to be a poison pill? It caught cvent.com,
causing a bunch of mail to FP.
I'm just curious if this URIBL is indeed this trustworthy, if these
KAM rules are still used, and how it is working for you?
header KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCCeval:check_rbl_from_host('pccc',
'multi.pccc.com.', '127.0.0.4')
describe KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCCFrom address listed in PCCC URIBL
tflags KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCCnet
score KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC5.0
meta __KAM_URIBL_PCCC (KAM_BODY_URIBL_PCCC +
KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC + KAM_RCVD_URIBL_PCCC = 3)
Thanks,
Alex