Re: [T4] Modifying RadioGroup
Yeah the RadioGroup/Radio stuff enforces the containment pretty strictly currently - but as there is no actual notion of an actual RadioGroup element in html it may make sense to re-think this logic. An parameter referencing the RadioGroup to use for Radio options might make sense. It's too late to see it get in to the 4.1.5 release but if you log a jira issue it could probably make it in to 4.1.6. In the meantimeYou may very well have create your own local copy of Radio that allows for this functionality. On Feb 5, 2008 10:05 AM, Andrew Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dario, > > That only works if there's only one RadioGroup, the problem is that the > first RadioGroup needs to refer only to the first column of Radios in > the table, whilst the second needs to refer only to the second column. > Since Radios have to be inside RadioGroups and RadioGroups can't be > nested I can't see any way to do this without rewriting how these things > work (which I attempted but hit the problem outlined in my first message). > > Regards, > Andrew > > Darío Vasconcelos wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > if you start the RadioGroup in an "invisible" spot, it will render > > correctly, as in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or at least that's the case with lightly formatted tables... > > > > Regards, > > > > Dario > > > __ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > __ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry / OGNL / Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [T4] Modifying RadioGroup
Hey, you're right, I didn't notice you were talking about merging visually two radio groups. Sorry. I think the easiest way to solve this might be some kind of HTML/CSS trick. If you really need the two RadioGroup2 options to the right, the trivial thing would be changing the layout of the table, but I guess your real problem is a little harder. Anyway, maybe doing some positioning trick might be easier than trying to invent the RadioWithoutARadioGroup component... Regards, Dario On Feb 5, 2008 9:05 AM, Andrew Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dario, > > That only works if there's only one RadioGroup, the problem is that the > first RadioGroup needs to refer only to the first column of Radios in > the table, whilst the second needs to refer only to the second column. > Since Radios have to be inside RadioGroups and RadioGroups can't be > nested I can't see any way to do this without rewriting how these things > work (which I attempted but hit the problem outlined in my first message). > > Regards, > Andrew > > Darío Vasconcelos wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > if you start the RadioGroup in an "invisible" spot, it will render > > correctly, as in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or at least that's the case with lightly formatted tables... > > > > Regards, > > > > Dario > > __ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > __ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "A man in love is incomplete until he has married. Then he's finished." Zsa Zsa Gabor
Re: [T4] Modifying RadioGroup
Hi Dario, That only works if there's only one RadioGroup, the problem is that the first RadioGroup needs to refer only to the first column of Radios in the table, whilst the second needs to refer only to the second column. Since Radios have to be inside RadioGroups and RadioGroups can't be nested I can't see any way to do this without rewriting how these things work (which I attempted but hit the problem outlined in my first message). Regards, Andrew Darío Vasconcelos wrote: Hi Andrew, if you start the RadioGroup in an "invisible" spot, it will render correctly, as in or at least that's the case with lightly formatted tables... Regards, Dario __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [T4] Modifying RadioGroup
Hi Andrew, if you start the RadioGroup in an "invisible" spot, it will render correctly, as in or at least that's the case with lightly formatted tables... Regards, Dario On Feb 5, 2008 7:54 AM, Andrew Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to use radio options in the following way: > > pseudo-html: > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't work with Tapestry's RadioGroup component because there's > no way of wrapping a RadioGroup around the related radio fields without > wrapping the other. > > I tried the obvious approach of overriding Radio to allow me to specify > the RadioGroup to use as a parameter rather than requiring it to be > nested. To do this I changed the first line of Radio's renderComponent > to get a supplied RadioGroup rather than the one from the cycle. > > This is the only change I made, but I get this error: > > "Property 'rewinding' of [RadioGroup Instance] may only be accessed > while the component is rendering." > > Does anyone have any idea how I can solve this problem? I had expected > it to be something quite easy to do and it's already taken far longer > than I'd hoped. > > Regards, > Andrew Ingram > > __ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > __ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "A man in love is incomplete until he has married. Then he's finished." Zsa Zsa Gabor
[T4] Modifying RadioGroup
I'm trying to use radio options in the following way: pseudo-html: This doesn't work with Tapestry's RadioGroup component because there's no way of wrapping a RadioGroup around the related radio fields without wrapping the other. I tried the obvious approach of overriding Radio to allow me to specify the RadioGroup to use as a parameter rather than requiring it to be nested. To do this I changed the first line of Radio's renderComponent to get a supplied RadioGroup rather than the one from the cycle. This is the only change I made, but I get this error: "Property 'rewinding' of [RadioGroup Instance] may only be accessed while the component is rendering." Does anyone have any idea how I can solve this problem? I had expected it to be something quite easy to do and it's already taken far longer than I'd hoped. Regards, Andrew Ingram __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
