Re: [Veritas-bu] zoming survey/question

2006-01-04 Thread Ed Wilts
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:37:54PM -0500, Dhotre, Shekhar wrote:
>  
> >>This makes it much easier if you ever have to swap an HBA (and we have
> had one fail on our master/media server) - I only >>have to update 1
> zone.
> 
> If you configure  port based zoning ,then you even don't have to make
> zone changes -just swap the failed HBAs or drives .

Vendors don't recommend this these days.  If a gbic fails on your
switch, you'll be rezoning then instead.

.../Ed

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] RE: vmphyinv "File name already exists"

2006-01-04 Thread Chaves, Jan Amcil L.

Got it.  Found some old MNT_BY_SLOT_x_x files lying around in
volmgr/misc.  

Duh :)


Thanks,

Jan

-Original Message-
From: Chaves, Jan Amcil L. 
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:26 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: vmphyinv "File name already exists"


Hello!  I get this output whenever I do vmphyinv:

vmphyinv -rn 0 -slot_range 1 7 -d hcart -non_interactive

Waiting for mount of media from TLD(0), slot # 1 on host mktibackup
Could not mount media from TLD(0), slot # 1
File name already exists

We're running NB 5.0 MP5 with two TLDs, TLD(0) and TLD(1).  

Any clues?


Thanks,

Jan

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] vmphyinv "File name already exists"

2006-01-04 Thread Chaves, Jan Amcil L.

Hello!  I get this output whenever I do vmphyinv:

vmphyinv -rn 0 -slot_range 1 7 -d hcart -non_interactive

Waiting for mount of media from TLD(0), slot # 1 on host mktibackup
Could not mount media from TLD(0), slot # 1
File name already exists

We're running NB 5.0 MP5 with two TLDs, TLD(0) and TLD(1).  

Any clues?


Thanks,

Jan

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] EMC SIME with Exchange 2003

2006-01-04 Thread Lee, Kenneth \(SBS US\)
Title: Message









Yes, I am mounting it to the SIME server. 
Yes, I can see the database files.  Yes, I even tried copying these files to a
different directory.  That is what I don’t understand.  I have no exclude
list yet when a backup runs for that directory, only the directories are backed
up, not the files themselves.  I only know this is because when I bring up the
restore screen, I only see directories.  The backup has a returned code of
zero.

 

Ken

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Keating
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006
9:46 AM
To:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] EMC SIME
with Exchange 2003

 



Not
with SIME.





 





SIME
integrates with Exchange to take a snapshot of the exchange database to a
flatfile that can be backed up to tape, mounted on another exchange server.





 





basically
the same as telling SQL to do a hot backup to a flat file, then using
netbackup to backup the flat fileno need for the SQL agent.





 





Kenneth,
are you mounting the snap on an second exchange server, starting exchange
services and backing it up from there if so, then yeah, you would
need to use the exchange agent to backup that server.





 





you
should be just mounting the volume as a share on a regular windows server, and
backing it up as D:\, E:\ or whatever.





 





can
you see the database files when you browse for restore, before performing the
actual restore?





 





Paul





-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eliza Yam
Sent: January 4, 2006 12:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] EMC SIME
with Exchange 2003



Exchange database backup
requires NBU Exchange Agent.  











From:
"Lee, Kenneth (SBS US)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Subject: [Veritas-bu] EMC SIME with Exchange
2003
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:20:13 -0500

NetBackup 5.1 – Solaris

 

Client:  Exchange 2003 server.

 

I am using EMC SIME to backup
Exchange.  On the SIME server where the copy of the Exchange database is
mounted, when I do a flat file backup of the Exchange database, I receive a
return code of zero.  But when I tried to restore the Exchange files, I
only see the directories and never the actual database files.  What am I
missing and has anyone run into this problem?

 

Thanks,

Ken

 



___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu 










[Veritas-bu] UNIX RAW PARTITION RESTORE QUESTION....

2006-01-04 Thread BeDour, Wayne
Title: UNIX RAW PARTITION RESTORE QUESTION






All..

My original e-mail got stepped on by someone replying with another question in it, so I changed my subject and will ask my question again, here goes..

Our environment is HP-UX 11.11, Netbackup 5.1 MP3 backing up mostly HP unix with some Sun and Windows backups.  I am doing a raw backup on one of the Sun servers and need to test the restore.  I  can’t find any info on the steps for a raw restore, searched Symantics site and got lost, looked in the archives for this mailing list and came up with nothing.  Looked in the System Administrator’s Guide and found very little.  Can anyone point me to any Unix raw partition restore examples?  My backup policy consists of 87 /dev/rdsk/c**t**d* entries.  Can the restore be done via the gui?  I know there is a “Raw Partition Backups” under the Restore Type pull down.  But I’m not sure what to do after that.  I looked at the “bprestore” command and do not see anything referring to a raw restore.  

Any help or direction will be appreciated, thanks in advance.



Wayne BeDour

IT Unix System Administrator

PH: 313-240-3374  FAX: 313-240-3065

Internet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 





**
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**

This E-mail message and any attachments may contain 
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of 
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender and 
delete this E-mail message from your computer.


RE: [Veritas-bu] Raw Partition Restore

2006-01-04 Thread Martin, Jonathan \(Contractor\)
Title: Raw Partition Restore



15:52:34.820 
[964.1180] <2> bprd: socket fd from accept() is 40815:52:34.820 
[964.1180] <2> listen_loop: request complete15:52:34.883 [1836.2136] 
<2> bprd: Created terminate event:"NetBackup Terminate Event, pid: 
1836"15:52:34.883 [1836.2136] <2> bprd: Created suspend 
event:"NetBackup Suspend Event, pid: 1836"15:52:34.883 [1836.2136] <2> 
logconnections: BPRD ACCEPT FROM 132.158.202.21.4535 TO 
132.158.202.21.1372015:52:34.883 [1836.2136] <2> process_request: 
setsockopt SO_LINGER on 408 succeeded.15:52:34.899 [1836.2136] <2> 
connected_peer: Connection from host SEMIBKUP1, 132.158.202.21, on non-reserved 
port 453515:52:34.899 [1836.2136] <2> ParseConfigExA: Unknown 
configuration option on line 75: RenameIfExists = 115:52:34.899 [1836.2136] 
<2> ParseConfigExA: Unknown configuration option on line 75: 
RenameIfExists = 115:52:34.899 [1836.2136] <2> process_request: 
command C_READ_HOST_CONFIG (73) received15:52:34.914 [1836.2136] <2> 
get_type_of_client_port: db_getCLIENT() failed: no entity was found 
(227)15:52:34.914 [1836.2136] <2> nb_getsockconnected: host=ISIL51 
service=bpcd address=192.157.180.7 protocol=tcp reserved 
port=1378215:52:34.914 [1836.2136] <2> nb_getsockconnected: Connect to 
ISIL51 on port 90615:52:34.914 [1836.2136] <2> logconnections: BPCD 
CONNECT FROM 132.158.202.21.906 TO 192.157.180.7.1378215:53:34.916 
[1836.2136] <2> bpcr_connect: bpcr_connect timeout during select after 60 
seconds on port 56315:53:34.916 [1836.2136] <2> put_string: cannot 
write data to network:  An established connection was aborted by the 
software in your host machine. 15:53:34.916 [1836.2136] <2> 
send_bprdES: put_string() failed - An established connection was aborted by the 
software in your host machine.  (10053), network write error 

Any ideas?
 
SEMIBKUP1 = Master Server
ISIL51 = Client
 
 
-Jonathan
 


From: Dhotre, Shekhar 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 
2006 3:36 PMTo: Martin, Jonathan (Contractor); 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Raw 
Partition Restore


add entry in the hosts file . 
run bpclntcmd -hn hostname and -ip on media and client 
servers .
restart the services 
check if the client has master and media server listed 
- add fully qualified domain name . 
enable the logs on client -there is a batch file in 
veritas/logs directory - it will create all the log file s.
monitor the error for any errors and post it 
..
 
But after following first three steps it must work 
...
 
 

Shekhar 
Dhotre
ICT Storage 
Engineering. 
v 404.846.7483 
| f 404.848.1077 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]48 
Perimeter Center East | Atlanta, GA  
30346
Remember the difference between a boss and a leader; a boss 
says "Go!" - a leader says "Let's go!"
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, 
Jonathan (Contractor)Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:48 
PMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: 
[Veritas-bu] Raw Partition Restore


 
I just 
rebuilt a server, new OS (WIN2003) and new hardware, but same network location, 
server name etc etc...
 
When I go 
into archive and restore I can see the old server's past backups but 
for some reason the media server cannot connect to this machine.  I've 
removed it from all policies and added it again but still nothing.  Any 
ideas?
 
Jonathan Martin
Intersil Corporation
Server 
and Security Operations
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(321) 724-7314




"This email (including any attachments) is confidential. If you are 
not the intended recipient you must not copy, use, disclose, distribute or rely 
on the information contained in it. If you have received this email in error, 
please notify the sender immediately by reply email and delete the email from 
your system. Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this communication 
are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you. Lend Lease does 
not guarantee that this email or the attachment(s) are unaffected by computer 
virus, corruption or other defects. Lend Lease may monitor incoming and outgoing 
emails for compliance with its Email Policy. Please note that our servers may 
not be located in your country." 


RE: [Veritas-bu] zoming survey/question

2006-01-04 Thread Dhotre, Shekhar
 
>>This makes it much easier if you ever have to swap an HBA (and we have
had one fail on our master/media server) - I only >>have to update 1
zone.

If you configure  port based zoning ,then you even don't have to make
zone changes -just swap the failed HBAs or drives .

Shekhar Dhotre
ICT Storage Engineering. 
v 404.846.7483 | f 404.848.1077 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
48 Perimeter Center East | Atlanta, GA  30346
Remember the difference between a boss and a leader; a boss says "Go!" -
a leader says "Let's go!"


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 3:11 PM
To: Paul Keating
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] zoming survey/question

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:50:46AM -0500, Paul Keating wrote:
> Just curiousthose of you who admin your own zones/FC switches.
>  
> How do you zone your drives/servers?
>  
> for each HBA port, do you create a zone for the HBA port and all 
> drives visable to it?
> ie. one HBA  and 3 drives = 1 zone?

Yup.  We create 1 zone per host (per fabric).

> ZONE_A = Server1_HBA0 & DRIVE0 & DRIVE1 & DRIVE2 (then assuming SSO) 
> ZONE_B = Server2_HBA0 & DRIVE0 & DRIVE1 & DRIVE2

In our case, our media server has a single zone on each fabric.  It
contains the WWNs of the HBA, the Fibre/SCSI bridges, and the storage
arrays for its DSSUs.

This makes it much easier if you ever have to swap an HBA (and we have
had one fail on our master/media server) - I only have to update 1 zone.

.../Ed

--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

-
"This email (including any attachments) is confidential.  If you are not
the intended recipient you must not copy, use, disclose, distribute or rely
on the information contained in it.  If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and delete the
email from your system.  Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to
this communication are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to
you.  Lend Lease does not guarantee that this email or the attachment(s)
are unaffected by computer virus, corruption or other defects. Lend Lease
may monitor incoming and outgoing emails for compliance with its Email
Policy.  Please note that our servers may not be located in your country."


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Raw Partition Restore

2006-01-04 Thread Dhotre, Shekhar
Title: Raw Partition Restore





add entry in the hosts file . 
run bpclntcmd -hn hostname and -ip on media and client 
servers .
restart the services 
check if the client has master and media server listed 
- add fully qualified domain name . 
enable the logs on client -there is a batch file in 
veritas/logs directory - it will create all the log file s.
monitor the error for any errors and post it 
..
 
But after following first three steps it must work 
...
 
 

Shekhar 
Dhotre
ICT Storage 
Engineering. 
v 404.846.7483 
| f 404.848.1077 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]48 
Perimeter Center East | Atlanta, GA  
30346
Remember the difference between a boss and a leader; a boss 
says "Go!" - a leader says "Let's go!"
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, 
Jonathan (Contractor)Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:48 
PMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: 
[Veritas-bu] Raw Partition Restore


 
I just 
rebuilt a server, new OS (WIN2003) and new hardware, but same network location, 
server name etc etc...
 
When I go 
into archive and restore I can see the old server's past backups but 
for some reason the media server cannot connect to this machine.  I've 
removed it from all policies and added it again but still nothing.  Any 
ideas?
 
Jonathan Martin
Intersil Corporation
Server 
and Security Operations
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(321) 
724-7314




"This email (including any attachments) is confidential.  If you are not
the intended recipient you must not copy, use, disclose, distribute or rely
on the information contained in it.  If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and delete the
email from your system.  Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to
this communication are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to
you.  Lend Lease does not guarantee that this email or the attachment(s)
are unaffected by computer virus, corruption or other defects. Lend Lease
may monitor incoming and outgoing emails for compliance with its Email
Policy.  Please note that our servers may not be located in your country."





Re: [Veritas-bu] zoming survey/question

2006-01-04 Thread Ed Wilts
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:50:46AM -0500, Paul Keating wrote:
> Just curiousthose of you who admin your own zones/FC switches.
>  
> How do you zone your drives/servers?
>  
> for each HBA port, do you create a zone for the HBA port and all drives
> visable to it?
> ie. one HBA  and 3 drives = 1 zone?

Yup.  We create 1 zone per host (per fabric).

> ZONE_A = Server1_HBA0 & DRIVE0 & DRIVE1 & DRIVE2
> (then assuming SSO)
> ZONE_B = Server2_HBA0 & DRIVE0 & DRIVE1 & DRIVE2

In our case, our media server has a single zone on each fabric.  It
contains the WWNs of the HBA, the Fibre/SCSI bridges, and the storage
arrays for its DSSUs.

This makes it much easier if you ever have to swap an HBA (and we have
had one fail on our master/media server) - I only have to update 1 zone.

.../Ed

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Raw Partition Restore

2006-01-04 Thread Martin, Jonathan \(Contractor\)
Title: Raw Partition Restore




 
I just 
rebuilt a server, new OS (WIN2003) and new hardware, but same network location, 
server name etc etc...
 
When I go 
into archive and restore I can see the old server's past backups but 
for some reason the media server cannot connect to this machine.  I've 
removed it from all policies and added it again but still nothing.  Any 
ideas?
 
Jonathan Martin
Intersil Corporation
Server 
and Security Operations
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(321) 
724-7314


[Veritas-bu] Command line reporting help

2006-01-04 Thread Andrew Stueve
I am trying to get a command line report that would give me the same
information as you can get in the Activity monitor.  Specifically, when
you click on a job in the Acitvity monitor, right click and select
Details, you see the file list.

I am trying to set some automated emails up.  They just don't want to
see the error codes that you get with bperror (0,1,41, etc.).  They want
to see that this job, with error code 0 backed up this filelist, and
that one with error code 1 was backing up that file list. Have I made sense?

-Andrew

-- 
Andrew Stueve
andrew.stueve AT neovera.com
571-437-5754

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread Scott Jacobson

After running getting them back, put an "ENABLE_AUTO_PATH_CORRECTION" entry in the vm.conf file.>>> "Xu, Ying" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1/4/2006 10:08:39 am >>>
Try running "sgscan tapes" to see if you could see all your tape drives.  If you dont see all your tape drives, you need to fix that problem first, then remap the drives.


From: Xu, Ying [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:58 AMTo: 'Diane Marcotte'; Barber, Layne (Contractor); WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down


You need to remap the tape drives with device tree.  This problem might occur if you reboot the server while one tape drive had issues, so the mapping messed up on OS.  It happened a couple of time in our environment. 
-Original Message- From: Diane Marcotte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:25 AM To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down 
Check that the /dev/rmt/* entries match the devices in the robot.  You can see if they do by inserting a tape into the drive and then issuing  a mt -f /dev/rmt/* status for the /dev/rmt/ number you have the drive configured to.  It should show a device is present, if not then you have a configuration issue.
--On Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:04 AM -0600 "Barber, Layne (Contractor)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> > tapes stay in the drives and must be manually ejected. The robot > doesn't remove the tapes because it thinks they are not there. It is > acting as if the OS is losing communication with the device since > robtest's unload command comes back with "device not present". > > > __ > From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 08:58 > To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down > > > > IF it happens at the end of the job, may be worth checking the robot > itself perhaps? > Do the tapes STAY in the tape drives when the error appears? In other > words, does the Robot manage to REMOVE the tape from the Drive? > > > > Simon Weaver > Technical Support > Windows Domain Administrator > > EADS Astrium > Tel: 02392-708598 > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -Original Message- > From: Barber, Layne (Contractor) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 January 2006 14:56 > To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down > > > Everything has been power cycled several times. The drives appear to > go down at the end of a job. > > > __ > From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 08:47 > To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down > > > > I assume its been physically powered down / restarted the drives / robot? > Also, do the tapes go into a DOWN STATE during the middle of a backup, > or beginning or would you say very random? > > > > Simon Weaver > Technical Support > Windows Domain Administrator > > EADS Astrium > Tel: 02392-708598 > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -Original Message- > From: Barber, Layne (Contractor) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 January 2006 14:34 > To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down > > > They have upgraded the FW to the latest/greatest and checked cables. I > agree on the polling. > > > __ > > > This email is for the intended addressee only. > If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, > disseminate or otherwise deal with it. > Please notify the sender by return email. > The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of > EADS Astrium Limited. > Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract > or obligation. > > EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 > Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 > 2AS, England 
___ Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu 




The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential,and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is notthe intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible fordelivering this message to the intended recipient, you are herebynotified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of thiscommunication is strictly prohibited. If you have received thiscommunication in error, please notify First Data immediately byreplying to this message and deleting it from your computer. 


RE: [Veritas-bu] EMC SIME with Exchange 2003

2006-01-04 Thread Paul Keating
Title: Message



Not 
with SIME.
 
SIME 
integrates with Exchange to take a snapshot of the exchange database to a 
flatfile that can be backed up to tape, mounted on another exchange 
server.
 
basically the same as telling SQL to do a hot backup to a flat file, 
then using netbackup to backup the flat fileno need for the SQL 
agent.
 
Kenneth, are you mounting the snap on an second exchange server, starting 
exchange services and backing it up from there if so, then yeah, 
you would need to use the exchange agent to backup that 
server.
 
you 
should be just mounting the volume as a share on a regular windows server, and 
backing it up as D:\, E:\ or whatever.
 
can 
you see the database files when you browse for restore, before performing the 
actual restore?
 
Paul

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eliza 
  YamSent: January 4, 2006 12:16 PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: 
  RE: [Veritas-bu] EMC SIME with Exchange 2003
  
  Exchange database backup requires NBU Exchange Agent.  
  
  

From: "Lee, Kenneth (SBS US)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: 
Subject: [Veritas-bu] 
EMC SIME with Exchange 2003Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:20:13 
-0500




NetBackup 5.1 – 
Solaris
 
Client:  Exchange 2003 
server.
 
I am using EMC SIME to backup 
Exchange.  On the SIME server where the copy of the Exchange database 
is mounted, when I do a flat file backup of the Exchange database, I receive 
a return code of zero.  But when I tried to restore the Exchange files, 
I only see the directories and never the actual database files.  What 
am I missing and has anyone run into this problem?
 
Thanks,
Ken___ 
  Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
  http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu 



Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 DSSU's

2006-01-04 Thread Karl . Rossing

I expired the image via the gui.

Thanks for setting me strait

Karl


RE: [Veritas-bu] EMC SIME with Exchange 2003

2006-01-04 Thread Eliza Yam
Exchange database backup requires NBU Exchange Agent.  


From: "Lee, Kenneth (SBS US)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Subject: [Veritas-bu] EMC SIME with Exchange 2003Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:20:13 -0500




NetBackup 5.1 – Solaris
 
Client:  Exchange 2003 server.
 
I am using EMC SIME to backup Exchange.  On the SIME server where the copy of the Exchange database is mounted, when I do a flat file backup of the Exchange database, I receive a return code of zero.  But when I tried to restore the Exchange files, I only see the directories and never the actual database files.  What am I missing and has anyone run into this problem?
 
Thanks,
Ken

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread Xu, Ying
Title: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down



Try 
running "sgscan tapes" to see if you could see all your tape drives.  If 
you dont see all your tape drives, you need to fix that problem first, then 
remap the drives.


From: Xu, Ying [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:58 AMTo: 'Diane 
Marcotte'; Barber, Layne (Contractor); WEAVER, Simon; 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives 
going down


You need to remap the tape drives with device tree.  This 
problem might occur if you reboot the server while one tape drive had issues, so 
the mapping messed up on OS.  It happened a couple of time in our 
environment. 
-Original Message- From: Diane 
Marcotte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:25 AM 
To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); WEAVER, Simon; 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: 
[Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down 
Check that the /dev/rmt/* entries match the devices in the 
robot.  You can see if they do by inserting a tape into the drive and then 
issuing  a mt -f /dev/rmt/* status for the /dev/rmt/ number you have the 
drive configured to.  It should show a device is present, if not then you 
have a configuration issue.
--On Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:04 AM -0600 "Barber, Layne 
(Contractor)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote: 
> > tapes stay in the drives and 
must be manually ejected. The robot > doesn't remove 
the tapes because it thinks they are not there. It is > acting as if the OS is losing communication with the device since 
> robtest's unload command comes back with "device 
not present". > > 
> __ 
> From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 08:58 > To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: RE: 
[Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down > > > > IF it 
happens at the end of the job, may be worth checking the robot > itself perhaps? > Do the tapes STAY in 
the tape drives when the error appears? In other > 
words, does the Robot manage to REMOVE the tape from the Drive? > > > 
> Simon Weaver > Technical 
Support > Windows Domain Administrator 
> > EADS Astrium > Tel: 02392-708598 > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > 
> -Original Message- > 
From: Barber, Layne (Contractor) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 04 January 2006 14:56 > 
To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down > > > Everything 
has been power cycled several times. The drives appear to > go down at the end of a job. > 
> > 
__ > 
From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 08:47 > To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: RE: 
[Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down > > > > I assume 
its been physically powered down / restarted the drives / robot? 
> Also, do the tapes go into a DOWN STATE during the middle 
of a backup, > or beginning or would you say very 
random? > > 
> > Simon Weaver > Technical Support > Windows Domain 
Administrator > > EADS 
Astrium > Tel: 02392-708598 > > Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > 
-Original Message- > From: Barber, Layne 
(Contractor) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 04 January 2006 14:34 > 
To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down > > > They have 
upgraded the FW to the latest/greatest and checked cables. I > agree on the polling. > > > 
__ > > > This email 
is for the intended addressee only. > If you have 
received it in error then you must not use, retain, > 
disseminate or otherwise deal with it. > Please 
notify the sender by return email. > The views of the 
author may not necessarily constitute the views of > 
EADS Astrium Limited. > Nothing in this email shall 
bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract > or 
obligation. > > EADS 
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 > Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 
> 2AS, England 
___ Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu 





The information in this message may be proprietary and/or 
confidential,and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is 
notthe intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible 
fordelivering this message to the intended recipient, you are 
herebynotified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of 
thiscommunication is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
thiscommunication in error, please notify First Data immediately 
byreplying to this message and deleting it from your computer. 



Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 DSSU's

2006-01-04 Thread Peter DrakeUnderkoffler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

You should use bpexpdate or the GUI to expire the backup image if
you want to actually remove the file.  But there is a default threshold of 80%
on dssu's in NBU6 I think.  Not sure what the problem is you are having, but the
natural behavior of dssu's are to be pretty full all the time.  If NBU
successfully performs the second phase of staging, then it will clear out
the oldest image copy on the dssu when it needs space

Peter DrakeUnderkoffler
Xinupro, LLC
617-834-2352



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have a SAN with two DSSU's on the same partition(probably not the best
> thing).I need to free up some space on my DSSU's because I'm running out
> of space.
> 
> Should i be using rm on the files i want to delete?
> 
> Thanks
> Karl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDu/tkl+lekZRM55oRAgqFAKDOkN76z0X4Nfyl0zOp9pfsOOhoIgCfcaP9
QG+6CIvrHgISd0w8evopefA=
=vG2S
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 DSSU's

2006-01-04 Thread Karl . Rossing


"Steven Cashman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 01/04/2006 10:21:35 AM:

> Also be aware of how DSSUs operate. They will keep images that have

> been moved onto tape available on the disk until the disk starts 
> getting full. Then as NBU needs more space it will start removeing

> older images. DSSU drives are almost always near full
>  
> You should work to remove 2 DSSU pointing to
the same device for this reason. 

Yea i found that out. I just need to free up some
space until i'm able to partition the disk.

Which means i might have to rm anyway.

Karl

RE: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 DSSU's

2006-01-04 Thread Dhotre, Shekhar





DSSU manages the space automatically ...although you 
will see df -k output as 100% full - I would not worry about it . if you 
delete the files /images you may not be able to restore the data . if you really 
need to remove the images then use bpexpire command . I have 6TB of DSSu on 
master/media and 6TB on media .they always show as 100% or 95% full (see below 
/masterfs01 /masterfs02 ) are the two file systems that I created -each FS is 
3TB . 
 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/veritas/NBU6.0>df -g 
Filesystem GB blocks Free %Used Iused %Iused Mounted on 
/dev/hd4 0.06 0.05 25% 2064 16% / 
/dev/hd2 3.44 0.57 84% 29258 18% /usr 
/dev/hd9var 0.06 0.05 28% 387 4% /var 
/dev/hd3 0.06 0.02 75% 359 9% /tmp 
/dev/hd1 0.06 0.06 9% 48 1% /home 
/proc - - - - - /proc 
/dev/hd10opt 0.12 0.00 97% 2808 66% /opt 
/dev/master_intlv01 20.00 6.02 70% 14986 2% /software 
/dev/nbudb_lv 100.00 64.78 36% 65778 1% /nbudb 
/dev/lv00 60.00 49.33 18% 265 1% /veritas 
/dev/fslv00 3000.00 5.98 100% 5371 1% /masterfs01 
/dev/fslv01 3000.00 77.60 98% 3192 1% /masterfs02 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/veritas/NBU6.0>uname -a 
AIX master 3 5 00CDBA4D4C00 
 
 
 
 

Shekhar 
Dhotre
ICT Storage 
Engineering. 
v 404.846.7483 
| f 404.848.1077 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]48 
Perimeter Center East | Atlanta, GA  
30346
Remember the difference between a boss and a leader; a boss 
says "Go!" - a leader says "Let's go!"
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 11:01 
AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: 
[Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 DSSU's
Hi, I have a SAN with two DSSU's on the same 
partition(probably not the best thing).I need to free up some space on my DSSU's 
because I'm running out of space. Should i be using rm on the files i want to delete? Thanks Karl




"This email (including any attachments) is confidential.  If you are not
the intended recipient you must not copy, use, disclose, distribute or rely
on the information contained in it.  If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and delete the
email from your system.  Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to
this communication are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to
you.  Lend Lease does not guarantee that this email or the attachment(s)
are unaffected by computer virus, corruption or other defects. Lend Lease
may monitor incoming and outgoing emails for compliance with its Email
Policy.  Please note that our servers may not be located in your country."





RE: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 DSSU's

2006-01-04 Thread Dhotre, Shekhar
Title: Message





I agree with kate :-)
 

Shekhar 
Dhotre
ICT Storage 
Engineering. 
v 404.846.7483 
| f 404.848.1077 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]48 
Perimeter Center East | Atlanta, GA  
30346
Remember the difference between a boss and a leader; a boss 
says "Go!" - a leader says "Let's go!"
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greenberg, 
Katherine ASent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 11:07 AMTo: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: 
RE: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 DSSU's


Definitely NOT.
 
Use 
the GUI and expire the PRIMARY IMAGE of backups that have been moved off to tape 
already.
 
~Kate
 
 
 -Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 11:01 
AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: 
[Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 DSSU'sHi, I have a SAN with two 
DSSU's on the same partition(probably not the best thing).I need to free up some 
space on my DSSU's because I'm running out of space. Should i be using rm on the files i want to 
delete? Thanks Karl 




This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If 
youthink you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the 
senderbyreply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately. Thank 
you.Aetna 




"This email (including any attachments) is confidential.  If you are not
the intended recipient you must not copy, use, disclose, distribute or rely
on the information contained in it.  If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and delete the
email from your system.  Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to
this communication are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to
you.  Lend Lease does not guarantee that this email or the attachment(s)
are unaffected by computer virus, corruption or other defects. Lend Lease
may monitor incoming and outgoing emails for compliance with its Email
Policy.  Please note that our servers may not be located in your country."





RE: [Veritas-bu] zoming survey/question

2006-01-04 Thread Dhotre, Shekhar
Title: Message





I have zoned 2 HBA to 4 drives ,Our AIX master and 
media server have : 4 HBAs each - two for  IBM SAN drives 2 for LTO3 tape 
librray . 
 
the backups goes  to IBM SAN (DSSU)  first 
and then from there to IBM3584 LTO3 librray . 
 
there is also a Multiprotocol router in between so that 
producstion SAN data can be backed up over to backup SAN -It requires creating 
LSAN (logical SANS ) .
 

IBM_2109_A16:admin> lsanshow 
lsanshow: not found 
IBM_2109_A16:admin> swicthshow 
swicthshow: not found 
IBM_2109_A16:admin> switchshow 
Switch Name : IBM_2109_A16 
Switch State : Online 
Switch Type : 38.0 
Switch Role : Principal 
Switch Domain: 100 
Switch ID : FFFC64 
Switch WWN : 10:00:00:05:1e:16:29:40 
beacon status: OFF 
zoning : OFF 

FC router BB Fabric ID: 1 

Port Media Speed State Info 
=== 
0 id N2 Online EX_PORT 10:00:00:05:1e:36:03:4e "sandirlog" (fabric 
1 id N2 Online EX_PORT 10:00:00:05:1e:36:03:4e "sandirlog" (fabric 
2 id N2 Online EX_PORT 10:00:00:60:69:90:1d:5e "sanmgmt2" (fabric i
3 id N2 Online EX_PORT 10:00:00:60:69:90:1e:25 "sanmgmt1" (fabric i
4 id N2 Online EX_PORT 10:00:00:05:1e:36:03:4e "sandirlog" (fabric 
5 id N2 Online EX_PORT 10:00:00:05:1e:36:03:4e "sandirlog" (fabric 
6 id N2 Online EX_PORT 10:00:00:60:69:90:88:df "sanmgmt3" (fabric i
7 id N2 Online EX_PORT 10:00:00:60:69:90:87:d4 "sanmgmt4" (fabric i
8 -- AN No_Module stopped 
9 -- AN No_Module stopped 
10 -- AN No_Module stopped 
11 -- AN No_Module stopped 
12 -- AN No_Module stopped 
13 -- AN No_Module stopped 
14 -- AN No_Module stopped 
15 -- AN No_Module stopped 
IBM_2109_A16:admin> 
 

Shekhar 
Dhotre
ICT Storage 
Engineering. 
v 404.846.7483 
| f 404.848.1077 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]48 
Perimeter Center East | Atlanta, GA  
30346
Remember the difference between a boss and a leader; a boss 
says "Go!" - a leader says "Let's go!"
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul 
KeatingSent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 10:51 AMTo: 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] zoming 
survey/question

Just 
curiousthose of you who admin your own zones/FC 
switches.
 
How do you zone your 
drives/servers?
 
for each HBA port, 
do you create a zone for the HBA port and all drives visable to 
it?
ie. one HBA  
and 3 drives = 1 zone?
 
ZONE_A = 
Server1_HBA0 & DRIVE0 & DRIVE1 & DRIVE2
(then assuming 
SSO)

ZONE_B = 
Server2_HBA0 & DRIVE0 & DRIVE1 & 
DRIVE2
 
or do you set up a 
zone for each device?
ie. one HBA and 3 
drives = 3 zones.
 
ZONE_A = 
SERVER1_HBA0 & DRIVE0

ZONE_B = 
SERVER1_HBA0 & DRIVE1

ZONE_C = 
SERVER1_HBA0 & DRIVE2
(again assuming SSO)

ZONE_D = 
SERVER2_HBA0 & DRIVE0

ZONE_E = 
SERVER2_HBA0 & DRIVE1
ZONE_F = SERVER2_HBA0 & 
DRIVE2




"This email (including any attachments) is confidential.  If you are not
the intended recipient you must not copy, use, disclose, distribute or rely
on the information contained in it.  If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and delete the
email from your system.  Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to
this communication are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to
you.  Lend Lease does not guarantee that this email or the attachment(s)
are unaffected by computer virus, corruption or other defects. Lend Lease
may monitor incoming and outgoing emails for compliance with its Email
Policy.  Please note that our servers may not be located in your country."





Re: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread Diane Marcotte

Try running devfsadm -c tape to get the drives back.

--On Wednesday, January 04, 2006 3:44 PM + Dave Markham 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Im seeing Drive downs on my systems using fibre. They seem to have
dissapeared from 2 of the media managers also.

running netbackup 5.0 mp4 with Sun L700 library 5 LTO2 drives, 3 of which
are shared SSO option to 2 other media servers.

All connected via a san switch ( what type i dont know as its in a remote
site and i didnt install it ). I know the drives are zoned somehow and
the wwn's for devices are in /kernel/drv/sd.conf. Everything was working
fine and now some devices cant be seen when running cfgadm -al it says
failing..

Storedgetek have been out to check drives and say they are fine , yet
every day my script notes 2 going down and brings them backup. It was
just one of the shared drives now it has moved to 2 so all my ITC fails
for the media servers.

I have been trying to run cfgadm to reconfigure but i cant seem to get
the syntax right

:(

D


WEAVER, Simon wrote:


Ok, what about re-running the DEVICE Manager wizard to see if NBU
thinks something changed back in October?
Let it find the robot / drives again? maybe there is a scsi ID change
somewhere?

*Simon Weaver*
*Technical Support*
*Windows Domain Administrator*

*/EADS Astrium/*
*/Tel: 02392-708598/*

*Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
*From:* Barber, Layne (Contractor)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* 04 January 2006 15:04
*To:* WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
*Subject:* RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

tapes stay in the drives and must be manually ejected. The robot
doesn't remove the tapes because it thinks they are not there. It
is acting as if the OS is losing communication with the device
since robtest's unload command comes back with "device not present".


 *From:* WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 04, 2006 08:58
*To:* Barber, Layne (Contractor); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
*Subject:* RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

IF it happens at the end of the job, may be worth checking the
robot itself perhaps?
Do the tapes STAY in the tape drives when the error appears? In
other words, does the Robot manage to REMOVE the tape from the Drive?



*Simon Weaver*
*Technical Support*
*Windows Domain Administrator*

*/EADS Astrium/*
*/Tel: 02392-708598/*

*Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of
EADS Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract
or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1
2AS, England



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu






___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread Dhotre, Shekhar
 
I would do the following :

>From sun server run : I have netbackup running on AIX servers . 

1) robtest -mount a scratch tape into one of the drives .
2)run a tar back to the tape of /tmp- if the tar backup is successful
then the OS and drives are fine - move to the NetBackup part.
3)Go back to the Library and write down S/N of the drives .
4)run NetBackup scan command and print the output .
5)match the S/N of the drives and scan out put and see the drive order
i.e. 1 2 3 4 5etc..
6)Run tpconfig  -and configure drives and robot in NBU.  There tpautocnf
command too but it messes up drive numbering.its in
/usr/openv/volmgr/bin. 

   WARNING
  
The Media Manager device daemon is active on this machine.
If any device changes are made, the daemon must be
stopped and restarted for the changes to take effect. 
To do this enter: 
/usr/openv/volmgr/bin/stopltid
/usr/openv/volmgr/bin/ltid  
  
Press any key to continue or CTRL-C to terminate tpconfig 
  
That's the clean way I know and use . 



Shekhar Dhotre.
Sr.Storage Engineer/Architect.
Bovis lend LeaseInc.
Atlanta,GA-30346.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Markham
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 10:45 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

Im seeing Drive downs on my systems using fibre. They seem to have
dissapeared from 2 of the media managers also.

running netbackup 5.0 mp4 with Sun L700 library 5 LTO2 drives, 3 of
which are shared SSO option to 2 other media servers.

All connected via a san switch ( what type i dont know as its in a
remote site and i didnt install it ). I know the drives are zoned
somehow and the wwn's for devices are in /kernel/drv/sd.conf. Everything
was working fine and now some devices cant be seen when running cfgadm
-al it says failing..

Storedgetek have been out to check drives and say they are fine , yet
every day my script notes 2 going down and brings them backup. It was
just one of the shared drives now it has moved to 2 so all my ITC fails
for the media servers.

I have been trying to run cfgadm to reconfigure but i cant seem to get
the syntax right

:(

D


WEAVER, Simon wrote:

> Ok, what about re-running the DEVICE Manager wizard to see if NBU 
> thinks something changed back in October?
> Let it find the robot / drives again? maybe there is a scsi ID change 
> somewhere?
>
> *Simon Weaver*
> *Technical Support*
> *Windows Domain Administrator*
>
> */EADS Astrium/*
> */Tel: 02392-708598/*
>
> *Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> *From:* Barber, Layne (Contractor)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* 04 January 2006 15:04
> *To:* WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> *Subject:* RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down
>
> tapes stay in the drives and must be manually ejected. The robot
> doesn't remove the tapes because it thinks they are not there. It
> is acting as if the OS is losing communication with the device
> since robtest's unload command comes back with "device not
present".
>
>

> *From:* WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 04, 2006 08:58
> *To:* Barber, Layne (Contractor);
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> *Subject:* RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down
>
> IF it happens at the end of the job, may be worth checking the
> robot itself perhaps?
> Do the tapes STAY in the tape drives when the error appears? In
> other words, does the Robot manage to REMOVE the tape from the
Drive?
>  
>  
>
> *Simon Weaver*
> *Technical Support*
> *Windows Domain Administrator*
>
> */EADS Astrium/*
> */Tel: 02392-708598/*
>
> *Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This email is for the intended addressee only.
> If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, 
> disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
> Please notify the sender by return email.
> The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of 
> EADS Astrium Limited.
> Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract 
> or obligation.
>
> EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 
> Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 
> 2AS, England
>

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

-
"T

RE: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 DSSU's

2006-01-04 Thread Greenberg, Katherine A
Title: Message





Definitely NOT.
 
Use 
the GUI and expire the PRIMARY IMAGE of backups that have been moved off to tape 
already.
 
~Kate
 
 
 -Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 11:01 
AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: 
[Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 DSSU'sHi, I have a SAN with two 
DSSU's on the same partition(probably not the best thing).I need to free up some 
space on my DSSU's because I'm running out of space. Should i be using rm on the files i want to 
delete? Thanks Karl




This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information.  If youthink you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the senderbyreply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately.  Thank you.Aetna





[Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 DSSU's

2006-01-04 Thread Karl . Rossing

Hi,

I have a SAN with two DSSU's on the
same partition(probably not the best thing).I need to free up some space
on my DSSU's because I'm running out of space.

Should i be using rm on the files i
want to delete?

Thanks
Karl

RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread Xu, Ying
Title: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down







You need to remap the tape drives with device tree.  This problem might occur if you reboot the server while one tape drive had issues, so the mapping messed up on OS.  It happened a couple of time in our environment. 

-Original Message-
From: Diane Marcotte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:25 AM
To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down



Check that the /dev/rmt/* entries match the devices in the robot.  You can see if they do by inserting a tape into the drive and then issuing  a mt -f /dev/rmt/* status for the /dev/rmt/ number you have the drive configured to.  It should show a device is present, if not then you have a configuration issue.

--On Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:04 AM -0600 "Barber, Layne (Contractor)" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


>
> tapes stay in the drives and must be manually ejected. The robot 
> doesn't remove the tapes because it thinks they are not there. It is 
> acting as if the OS is losing communication with the device since 
> robtest's unload command comes back with "device not present".
>
>
> __
> From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 08:58
> To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down
>
>
>
> IF it happens at the end of the job, may be worth checking the robot 
> itself perhaps?
> Do the tapes STAY in the tape drives when the error appears? In other 
> words, does the Robot manage to REMOVE the tape from the Drive?
>
>
>
> Simon Weaver
> Technical Support
> Windows Domain Administrator
>
> EADS Astrium
> Tel: 02392-708598
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Barber, Layne (Contractor) 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 04 January 2006 14:56
> To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down
>
>
> Everything has been power cycled several times. The drives appear to 
> go down at the end of a job.
>
>
> __
> From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 08:47
> To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down
>
>
>
> I assume its been physically powered down / restarted the drives / robot?
> Also, do the tapes go into a DOWN STATE during the middle of a backup, 
> or beginning or would you say very random?
>
>
>
> Simon Weaver
> Technical Support
> Windows Domain Administrator
>
> EADS Astrium
> Tel: 02392-708598
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Barber, Layne (Contractor) 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 04 January 2006 14:34
> To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down
>
>
> They have upgraded the FW to the latest/greatest and checked cables. I 
> agree on the polling.
>
>
> __
>
>
> This email is for the intended addressee only.
> If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, 
> disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
> Please notify the sender by return email.
> The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of 
> EADS Astrium Limited.
> Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract 
> or obligation.
>
> EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 
> Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 
> 2AS, England






___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu







The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential,and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is notthe intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible fordelivering this message to the intended recipient, you are herebynotified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of thiscommunication is strictly prohibited. If you have received thiscommunication in error, please notify First Data immediately byreplying to this message and deleting it from your computer.





[Veritas-bu] zoming survey/question

2006-01-04 Thread Paul Keating
Title: Message



Just 
curiousthose of you who admin your own zones/FC 
switches.
 
How do you zone your 
drives/servers?
 
for each HBA port, 
do you create a zone for the HBA port and all drives visable to 
it?
ie. one HBA  
and 3 drives = 1 zone?
 
ZONE_A = 
Server1_HBA0 & DRIVE0 & DRIVE1 & DRIVE2
(then assuming 
SSO)

ZONE_B = 
Server2_HBA0 & DRIVE0 & DRIVE1 & 
DRIVE2
 
or do you set up a 
zone for each device?
ie. one HBA and 3 
drives = 3 zones.
 
ZONE_A = 
SERVER1_HBA0 & DRIVE0

ZONE_B = 
SERVER1_HBA0 & DRIVE1

ZONE_C = 
SERVER1_HBA0 & DRIVE2
(again assuming SSO)

ZONE_D = 
SERVER2_HBA0 & DRIVE0

ZONE_E = 
SERVER2_HBA0 & DRIVE1
ZONE_F = SERVER2_HBA0 & 
DRIVE2


Re: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread Dave Markham
Im seeing Drive downs on my systems using fibre. They seem to have 
dissapeared from 2 of the media managers also.


running netbackup 5.0 mp4 with Sun L700 library 5 LTO2 drives, 3 of 
which are shared SSO option to 2 other media servers.


All connected via a san switch ( what type i dont know as its in a 
remote site and i didnt install it ). I know the drives are zoned 
somehow and the wwn's for devices are in /kernel/drv/sd.conf. Everything 
was working fine and now some devices cant be seen when running cfgadm 
-al it says failing..


Storedgetek have been out to check drives and say they are fine , yet 
every day my script notes 2 going down and brings them backup. It was 
just one of the shared drives now it has moved to 2 so all my ITC fails 
for the media servers.


I have been trying to run cfgadm to reconfigure but i cant seem to get 
the syntax right


:(

D


WEAVER, Simon wrote:

Ok, what about re-running the DEVICE Manager wizard to see if NBU 
thinks something changed back in October?
Let it find the robot / drives again? maybe there is a scsi ID change 
somewhere?


*Simon Weaver*
*Technical Support*
*Windows Domain Administrator*

*/EADS Astrium/*
*/Tel: 02392-708598/*

*Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
*From:* Barber, Layne (Contractor)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* 04 January 2006 15:04
*To:* WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
*Subject:* RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

tapes stay in the drives and must be manually ejected. The robot
doesn't remove the tapes because it thinks they are not there. It
is acting as if the OS is losing communication with the device
since robtest's unload command comes back with "device not present".


*From:* WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 04, 2006 08:58
*To:* Barber, Layne (Contractor); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
*Subject:* RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

IF it happens at the end of the job, may be worth checking the
robot itself perhaps?
Do the tapes STAY in the tape drives when the error appears? In
other words, does the Robot manage to REMOVE the tape from the Drive?
 
 


*Simon Weaver*
*Technical Support*
*Windows Domain Administrator*

*/EADS Astrium/*
*/Tel: 02392-708598/*

*Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, 
disseminate or otherwise deal with it.

Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of 
EADS Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract 
or obligation.


EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 
2AS, England




___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread Diane Marcotte


Check that the /dev/rmt/* entries match the devices in the robot.  You can
see if they do by inserting a tape into the drive and then issuing  a
mt -f /dev/rmt/* status for the /dev/rmt/ number you have the drive 
configured
to.  It should show a device is present, if not then you have a 
configuration

issue.

--On Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:04 AM -0600 "Barber, Layne (Contractor)" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:




tapes stay in the drives and must be manually ejected. The robot doesn't
remove the tapes because it thinks they are not there. It is acting as if
the OS is losing communication with the device since robtest's unload
command comes back with "device not present".


__
From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 08:58
To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down



IF it happens at the end of the job, may be worth checking the robot
itself perhaps?
Do the tapes STAY in the tape drives when the error appears? In other
words, does the Robot manage to REMOVE the tape from the Drive?



Simon Weaver
Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator

EADS Astrium
Tel: 02392-708598

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Barber, Layne (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 January 2006 14:56
To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down


Everything has been power cycled several times. The drives appear to go
down at the end of a job.


__
From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 08:47
To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down



I assume its been physically powered down / restarted the drives / robot?
Also, do the tapes go into a DOWN STATE during the middle of a backup, or
beginning or would you say very random?



Simon Weaver
Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator

EADS Astrium
Tel: 02392-708598

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Barber, Layne (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 January 2006 14:34
To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down


They have upgraded the FW to the latest/greatest and checked cables. I
agree on the polling.


__


This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England






___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message




Ok, 
what about re-running the DEVICE Manager wizard to see if NBU thinks something 
changed back in October?
Let it 
find the robot / drives again? maybe there is a scsi ID change 
somewhere?
Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Barber, Layne 
  (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 
  January 2006 15:04To: WEAVER, Simon; 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT 
  drives going down
  tapes stay in the drives and must be manually ejected. 
  The robot doesn't remove the tapes because it thinks they are not there. It is 
  acting as if the OS is losing communication with the device since robtest's 
  unload command comes back with "device not present".
  
  
  From: WEAVER, Simon 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 
  2006 08:58To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT 
  drives going down
  
  IF 
  it happens at the end of the job, may be worth checking the robot itself 
  perhaps?
  Do 
  the tapes STAY in the tape drives when the error appears? In other words, does 
  the Robot manage to REMOVE the tape from the Drive?
   
   
  Simon 
  WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
  EADS 
  AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
  Email: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  


This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread Dhotre, Shekhar





The scsi bridge is the culprit here .. seen it 
been  before many times -replaced scsi bridge with pure fiber LTOs - 
everything is working fine after that .


 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barber, 
Layne (Contractor)Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:10 
AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: 
[Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

We have an issue of 
drives randomly going down every night. NBU 5.0 mp5 HP-UX 11.11 STK L180 w/ STK 
3400 scsi bridge.
 
For some reason, 1 
or more drives go down at random every night when backups run. Different tapes 
and different drives. Backups will be running fine and then drives begin to go 
down. These are SDLT320 drives. once they go down, you can't use robtest to move 
the tapes (medium not present error) or use the robtest unload command (device 
not present).
 
If we power cycle 
the scsi bridge, we can talk to the drives and do what ever we want. STK is 
claiming that there is something coming from the host that is "polling" the 
library from the physical layer (assume HBA). We have had the SA for the 
master/media server disable any polling and load the latest patches from HP to 
no avail. We have changed from auto index to a manual map index as 
well.
 
This was working 
from the end of June up until the second week in October.
 
Thoughts/suggestions?
 
Log snippets from 
last night:
 
syslog entriesJan  4 05:37:42 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev 
= 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 05:50:10 ujachr01 vmunix: 
SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 11:27:52 
ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0800c0 I/O error during closeJan  
4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 0x3a, ascq = 0x0, 
MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) 
Move_medium errorJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 5 
(device 4) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic dismount failureJan  4 
11:34:36 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check integrity of the drive, drive path, and 
media
 
drive 5 (addr 504) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource address = 
1119 (slot 120)Barcode = JA1156
 
Jan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 1 (device 0) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic dismount 
failureJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check integrity of the 
drive, drive path, and media
 
drive 1 (addr 500) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource address = 
1106 (slot 107)Barcode = JA1064




"This email (including any attachments) is confidential.  If you are not
the intended recipient you must not copy, use, disclose, distribute or rely
on the information contained in it.  If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and delete the
email from your system.  Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to
this communication are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to
you.  Lend Lease does not guarantee that this email or the attachment(s)
are unaffected by computer virus, corruption or other defects. Lend Lease
may monitor incoming and outgoing emails for compliance with its Email
Policy.  Please note that our servers may not be located in your country."





RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread Barber, Layne \(Contractor\)
Title: Message



tapes stay in the drives and must be manually ejected. The 
robot doesn't remove the tapes because it thinks they are not there. It is 
acting as if the OS is losing communication with the device since robtest's 
unload command comes back with "device not present".


From: WEAVER, Simon 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 
2006 08:58To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives 
going down

IF it 
happens at the end of the job, may be worth checking the robot itself 
perhaps?
Do the 
tapes STAY in the tape drives when the error appears? In other words, does the 
Robot manage to REMOVE the tape from the Drive?
 
 
Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Barber, Layne 
  (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 
  January 2006 14:56To: WEAVER, Simon; 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT 
  drives going down
  Everything has been power cycled several times. The 
  drives appear to go down at the end of a job.
  
  
  From: WEAVER, Simon 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 
  2006 08:47To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT 
  drives going down
  
  I 
  assume its been physically powered down / restarted the drives / 
  robot?
  Also, do the tapes go into a DOWN STATE during the middle of a backup, 
  or beginning or would you say very random?
   
   
  Simon 
  WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
  EADS 
  AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
  Email: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  

-Original Message-From: Barber, Layne 
(Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 
January 2006 14:34To: WEAVER, Simon; 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT 
drives going down
They have upgraded the FW to the latest/greatest 
and checked cables. I agree on the polling.




  
  
This email is for the intended 
  addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, 
  retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender 
  by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute 
  the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind 
  EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.EADS Astrium 
  Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: 
  Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, 
  England


RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread Barber, Layne \(Contractor\)
Title: Message



Thanks! We too had the hand replaced in the robot (they 
actually tested it at their lab afterwards and it was faulty). We have to up the 
drives as well when the scsi bridge has been cycled. Also, the drives may go 
down over night or go down the next night. But 2 days is the max they stay 
up.


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ellwood, MW 
(Mike)Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 08:52To: 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives 
going down

Different hardware and software, but when we had a 
problem with drives going down, it was caused by problems on the robot. Power 
cycling the robot would usually get the robot going again, but it would often 
leave the drive(s) in a DOWN condition, and you had to manually UP them with 
vmoprcmd.  (This on Sun L20 robot, Solaris 5.10). I developed a little 
script to UP any drives it found in a DOWN condition.
 
(I 
think the problem in the robot was with the picker arm, and it went away when 
that was replaced).
 
Sorry, 
may not be too relevant to your problem, but I throw it into the mix in case it 
triggers any thoughts.
 
Regards,
Mike
 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barber, 
  Layne (Contractor)Sent: 04 January 2006 14:10To: 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives 
  going down
  We have an issue 
  of drives randomly going down every night. NBU 5.0 mp5 HP-UX 11.11 STK L180 w/ 
  STK 3400 scsi bridge.
   
  For some reason, 1 
  or more drives go down at random every night when backups run. Different tapes 
  and different drives. Backups will be running fine and then drives begin to go 
  down. These are SDLT320 drives. once they go down, you can't use robtest to 
  move the tapes (medium not present error) or use the robtest unload command 
  (device not present).
   
  If we power cycle 
  the scsi bridge, we can talk to the drives and do what ever we want. STK is 
  claiming that there is something coming from the host that is "polling" the 
  library from the physical layer (assume HBA). We have had the SA for the 
  master/media server disable any polling and load the latest patches from HP to 
  no avail. We have changed from auto index to a manual map index as 
  well.
   
  This was working 
  from the end of June up until the second week in October.
   
  Thoughts/suggestions?
   
  Log snippets from 
  last night:
   
  syslog entriesJan  4 05:37:42 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: 
  dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 05:50:10 ujachr01 
  vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 
  11:27:52 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0800c0 I/O error during 
  closeJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
  0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 
  tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 
  tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 5 (device 4) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic 
  dismount failureJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check integrity 
  of the drive, drive path, and media
   
  drive 5 (addr 504) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource address 
  = 1119 (slot 120)Barcode = JA1156
   
  Jan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
  0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
  tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
  tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 1 (device 0) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic 
  dismount failureJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check integrity 
  of the drive, drive path, and media
   
  drive 1 (addr 500) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource address 
  = 1106 (slot 107)Barcode = 
JA1064


RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread Ellwood, MW \(Mike\)
Title: Message



Different hardware and software, but when we had a 
problem with drives going down, it was caused by problems on the robot. Power 
cycling the robot would usually get the robot going again, but it would often 
leave the drive(s) in a DOWN condition, and you had to manually UP them with 
vmoprcmd.  (This on Sun L20 robot, Solaris 5.10). I developed a little 
script to UP any drives it found in a DOWN condition.
 
(I 
think the problem in the robot was with the picker arm, and it went away when 
that was replaced).
 
Sorry, 
may not be too relevant to your problem, but I throw it into the mix in case it 
triggers any thoughts.
 
Regards,
Mike
 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barber, 
  Layne (Contractor)Sent: 04 January 2006 14:10To: 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives 
  going down
  We have an issue 
  of drives randomly going down every night. NBU 5.0 mp5 HP-UX 11.11 STK L180 w/ 
  STK 3400 scsi bridge.
   
  For some reason, 1 
  or more drives go down at random every night when backups run. Different tapes 
  and different drives. Backups will be running fine and then drives begin to go 
  down. These are SDLT320 drives. once they go down, you can't use robtest to 
  move the tapes (medium not present error) or use the robtest unload command 
  (device not present).
   
  If we power cycle 
  the scsi bridge, we can talk to the drives and do what ever we want. STK is 
  claiming that there is something coming from the host that is "polling" the 
  library from the physical layer (assume HBA). We have had the SA for the 
  master/media server disable any polling and load the latest patches from HP to 
  no avail. We have changed from auto index to a manual map index as 
  well.
   
  This was working 
  from the end of June up until the second week in October.
   
  Thoughts/suggestions?
   
  Log snippets from 
  last night:
   
  syslog entriesJan  4 05:37:42 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: 
  dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 05:50:10 ujachr01 
  vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 
  11:27:52 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0800c0 I/O error during 
  closeJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
  0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 
  tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 
  tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 5 (device 4) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic 
  dismount failureJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check integrity 
  of the drive, drive path, and media
   
  drive 5 (addr 504) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource address 
  = 1119 (slot 120)Barcode = JA1156
   
  Jan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
  0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
  tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
  tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 1 (device 0) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic 
  dismount failureJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check integrity 
  of the drive, drive path, and media
   
  drive 1 (addr 500) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource address 
  = 1106 (slot 107)Barcode = 
JA1064


[Veritas-bu] Raw Partition Restore

2006-01-04 Thread BeDour, Wayne
Title: Raw Partition Restore






Our environment is HP-UX 11.11, Netbackup 5.1 MP3 backing up mostly HP unix with some Sun and Windows backups.  I am doing a raw backup on one of the Sun servers and need to test the restore.  I  can’t find any info on the steps for a raw restore, searched Symantics site and got lost, looked in the archives for this mailing list and came up with nothing.  Looked in the System Administrator’s Guide and found very little.  Can anyone point me to any Unix raw partition restore examples?  My backup policy consists of 87 /dev/rdsk/c**t**d* entries.  Can the restore be done via the gui?  I know there is a “Raw Partition Backups” under the Restore Type pull down.  But I’m not sure what to do after that.  I looked at the “bprestore” command and do not see anything referring to a raw restore.  

Any help or direction will be appreciated, thanks in advance.

Wayne BeDour

IT Unix System Administrator

PH: 313-240-3374  FAX: 313-240-3065

Internet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 





**
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**

This E-mail message and any attachments may contain 
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of 
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender and 
delete this E-mail message from your computer.


RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message



IF it 
happens at the end of the job, may be worth checking the robot itself 
perhaps?
Do the 
tapes STAY in the tape drives when the error appears? In other words, does the 
Robot manage to REMOVE the tape from the Drive?
 
 
Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Barber, Layne 
  (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 
  January 2006 14:56To: WEAVER, Simon; 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT 
  drives going down
  Everything has been power cycled several times. The 
  drives appear to go down at the end of a job.
  
  
  From: WEAVER, Simon 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 
  2006 08:47To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT 
  drives going down
  
  I 
  assume its been physically powered down / restarted the drives / 
  robot?
  Also, do the tapes go into a DOWN STATE during the middle of a backup, 
  or beginning or would you say very random?
   
   
  Simon 
  WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
  EADS 
  AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
  Email: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  

-Original Message-From: Barber, Layne 
(Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 
January 2006 14:34To: WEAVER, Simon; 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT 
drives going down
They have upgraded the FW to the latest/greatest 
and checked cables. I agree on the polling.




This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread Barber, Layne \(Contractor\)
Title: Message



Everything has been power cycled several times. The drives 
appear to go down at the end of a job.


From: WEAVER, Simon 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 
2006 08:47To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives 
going down

I 
assume its been physically powered down / restarted the drives / 
robot?
Also, 
do the tapes go into a DOWN STATE during the middle of a backup, or beginning or 
would you say very random?
 
 
Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Barber, Layne 
  (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 
  January 2006 14:34To: WEAVER, Simon; 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT 
  drives going down
  They have upgraded the FW to the latest/greatest and 
  checked cables. I agree on the polling.
  
  
  From: WEAVER, Simon 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 
  2006 08:21To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT 
  drives going down
  
  Hm what about Firmware for the SDLT tape 
drives?
  Any 
  loose cables / connections or possible to change Scsi 
  connectors?
   
  Not 
  too sure why they feel the software is polling a drive could cause a 
  problem? - if anything I would say polling a device is probably good as 
  Netbackup confirms it can see it!
   
  The 
  thing that makes me wonder if its cable / firmware issue is the comment 
  "MEDIUM NOT PRESENT".
  Thanks
  Simon 
  WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
  EADS 
  AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
  Email: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  

-Original Message-From: Barber, Layne 
(Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 
January 2006 14:10To: 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives 
going down
We have an issue 
of drives randomly going down every night. NBU 5.0 mp5 HP-UX 11.11 STK L180 
w/ STK 3400 scsi bridge.
 
For some reason, 
1 or more drives go down at random every night when backups run. Different 
tapes and different drives. Backups will be running fine and then drives 
begin to go down. These are SDLT320 drives. once they go down, you can't use 
robtest to move the tapes (medium not present error) or use the robtest 
unload command (device not present).
 
If we power 
cycle the scsi bridge, we can talk to the drives and do what ever we want. 
STK is claiming that there is something coming from the host that is 
"polling" the library from the physical layer (assume HBA). We have had the 
SA for the master/media server disable any polling and load the latest 
patches from HP to no avail. We have changed from auto index to a manual map 
index as well.
 
This was working 
from the end of June up until the second week in 
October.
 
Thoughts/suggestions?
 
Log snippets 
from last night:
 
syslog entriesJan  4 05:37:42 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: 
dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 05:50:10 ujachr01 
vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 
11:27:52 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0800c0 I/O error during 
closeJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 
tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 
tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 5 (device 4) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic 
dismount failureJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check 
integrity of the drive, drive path, and media
 
drive 5 (addr 504) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource 
address = 1119 (slot 120)Barcode = JA1156
 
Jan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 1 (device 0) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic 
dismount failureJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check 
integrity of the drive, drive path, and media
 
drive 1 (addr 500) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource 
address = 1106 (slot 107)Barcode = 
  JA1064
  


  This email is for the intended 
addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not 
use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the 
sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily 
constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email 
shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales 
No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, 
Hert

RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message



ACtually just one more thing I noticed - you said they checked cables - 
what about REPLACE? Reason I say this, is due to the amount of time its been 
working (June to Oct) and we are now in Jan, so I think its safe to say it 
sounds like H/W
Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Barber, Layne 
  (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 
  January 2006 14:34To: WEAVER, Simon; 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT 
  drives going down
  They have upgraded the FW to the latest/greatest and 
  checked cables. I agree on the polling.
  
  
  From: WEAVER, Simon 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 
  2006 08:21To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT 
  drives going down
  
  Hm what about Firmware for the SDLT tape 
drives?
  Any 
  loose cables / connections or possible to change Scsi 
  connectors?
   
  Not 
  too sure why they feel the software is polling a drive could cause a 
  problem? - if anything I would say polling a device is probably good as 
  Netbackup confirms it can see it!
   
  The 
  thing that makes me wonder if its cable / firmware issue is the comment 
  "MEDIUM NOT PRESENT".
  Thanks
  Simon 
  WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
  EADS 
  AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
  Email: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  

-Original Message-From: Barber, Layne 
(Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 
January 2006 14:10To: 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives 
going down
We have an issue 
of drives randomly going down every night. NBU 5.0 mp5 HP-UX 11.11 STK L180 
w/ STK 3400 scsi bridge.
 
For some reason, 
1 or more drives go down at random every night when backups run. Different 
tapes and different drives. Backups will be running fine and then drives 
begin to go down. These are SDLT320 drives. once they go down, you can't use 
robtest to move the tapes (medium not present error) or use the robtest 
unload command (device not present).
 
If we power 
cycle the scsi bridge, we can talk to the drives and do what ever we want. 
STK is claiming that there is something coming from the host that is 
"polling" the library from the physical layer (assume HBA). We have had the 
SA for the master/media server disable any polling and load the latest 
patches from HP to no avail. We have changed from auto index to a manual map 
index as well.
 
This was working 
from the end of June up until the second week in 
October.
 
Thoughts/suggestions?
 
Log snippets 
from last night:
 
syslog entriesJan  4 05:37:42 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: 
dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 05:50:10 ujachr01 
vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 
11:27:52 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0800c0 I/O error during 
closeJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 
tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 
tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 5 (device 4) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic 
dismount failureJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check 
integrity of the drive, drive path, and media
 
drive 5 (addr 504) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource 
address = 1119 (slot 120)Barcode = JA1156
 
Jan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 1 (device 0) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic 
dismount failureJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check 
integrity of the drive, drive path, and media
 
drive 1 (addr 500) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource 
address = 1106 (slot 107)Barcode = 
  JA1064
  


  This email is for the intended 
addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not 
use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the 
sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily 
constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email 
shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales 
No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, 
Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, 
England

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not nec

RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message



I 
assume its been physically powered down / restarted the drives / 
robot?
Also, 
do the tapes go into a DOWN STATE during the middle of a backup, or beginning or 
would you say very random?
 
 
Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Barber, Layne 
  (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 
  January 2006 14:34To: WEAVER, Simon; 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT 
  drives going down
  They have upgraded the FW to the latest/greatest and 
  checked cables. I agree on the polling.
  
  
  From: WEAVER, Simon 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 
  2006 08:21To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT 
  drives going down
  
  Hm what about Firmware for the SDLT tape 
drives?
  Any 
  loose cables / connections or possible to change Scsi 
  connectors?
   
  Not 
  too sure why they feel the software is polling a drive could cause a 
  problem? - if anything I would say polling a device is probably good as 
  Netbackup confirms it can see it!
   
  The 
  thing that makes me wonder if its cable / firmware issue is the comment 
  "MEDIUM NOT PRESENT".
  Thanks
  Simon 
  WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
  EADS 
  AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
  Email: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  

-Original Message-From: Barber, Layne 
(Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 
January 2006 14:10To: 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives 
going down
We have an issue 
of drives randomly going down every night. NBU 5.0 mp5 HP-UX 11.11 STK L180 
w/ STK 3400 scsi bridge.
 
For some reason, 
1 or more drives go down at random every night when backups run. Different 
tapes and different drives. Backups will be running fine and then drives 
begin to go down. These are SDLT320 drives. once they go down, you can't use 
robtest to move the tapes (medium not present error) or use the robtest 
unload command (device not present).
 
If we power 
cycle the scsi bridge, we can talk to the drives and do what ever we want. 
STK is claiming that there is something coming from the host that is 
"polling" the library from the physical layer (assume HBA). We have had the 
SA for the master/media server disable any polling and load the latest 
patches from HP to no avail. We have changed from auto index to a manual map 
index as well.
 
This was working 
from the end of June up until the second week in 
October.
 
Thoughts/suggestions?
 
Log snippets 
from last night:
 
syslog entriesJan  4 05:37:42 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: 
dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 05:50:10 ujachr01 
vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 
11:27:52 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0800c0 I/O error during 
closeJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 
tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 
tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 5 (device 4) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic 
dismount failureJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check 
integrity of the drive, drive path, and media
 
drive 5 (addr 504) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource 
address = 1119 (slot 120)Barcode = JA1156
 
Jan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 1 (device 0) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic 
dismount failureJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check 
integrity of the drive, drive path, and media
 
drive 1 (addr 500) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource 
address = 1106 (slot 107)Barcode = 
  JA1064
  


  This email is for the intended 
addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not 
use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the 
sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily 
constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email 
shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales 
No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, 
Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, 
England

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium L

RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread Barber, Layne \(Contractor\)
Title: Message



They have upgraded the FW to the latest/greatest and 
checked cables. I agree on the polling.


From: WEAVER, Simon 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 
2006 08:21To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives 
going down

Hm 
what about Firmware for the SDLT tape drives?
Any 
loose cables / connections or possible to change Scsi 
connectors?
 
Not 
too sure why they feel the software is polling a drive could cause a 
problem? - if anything I would say polling a device is probably good as 
Netbackup confirms it can see it!
 
The 
thing that makes me wonder if its cable / firmware issue is the comment "MEDIUM 
NOT PRESENT".
Thanks
Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Barber, Layne 
  (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 
  January 2006 14:10To: 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives 
  going down
  We have an issue 
  of drives randomly going down every night. NBU 5.0 mp5 HP-UX 11.11 STK L180 w/ 
  STK 3400 scsi bridge.
   
  For some reason, 1 
  or more drives go down at random every night when backups run. Different tapes 
  and different drives. Backups will be running fine and then drives begin to go 
  down. These are SDLT320 drives. once they go down, you can't use robtest to 
  move the tapes (medium not present error) or use the robtest unload command 
  (device not present).
   
  If we power cycle 
  the scsi bridge, we can talk to the drives and do what ever we want. STK is 
  claiming that there is something coming from the host that is "polling" the 
  library from the physical layer (assume HBA). We have had the SA for the 
  master/media server disable any polling and load the latest patches from HP to 
  no avail. We have changed from auto index to a manual map index as 
  well.
   
  This was working 
  from the end of June up until the second week in October.
   
  Thoughts/suggestions?
   
  Log snippets from 
  last night:
   
  syslog entriesJan  4 05:37:42 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: 
  dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 05:50:10 ujachr01 
  vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 
  11:27:52 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0800c0 I/O error during 
  closeJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
  0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 
  tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 
  tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 5 (device 4) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic 
  dismount failureJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check integrity 
  of the drive, drive path, and media
   
  drive 5 (addr 504) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource address 
  = 1119 (slot 120)Barcode = JA1156
   
  Jan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
  0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
  tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
  tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 1 (device 0) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic 
  dismount failureJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check integrity 
  of the drive, drive path, and media
   
  drive 1 (addr 500) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource address 
  = 1106 (slot 107)Barcode = JA1064

  
  
This email is for the intended 
  addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, 
  retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender 
  by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute 
  the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind 
  EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.EADS Astrium 
  Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: 
  Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, 
  England


RE: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message



Hm 
what about Firmware for the SDLT tape drives?
Any 
loose cables / connections or possible to change Scsi 
connectors?
 
Not 
too sure why they feel the software is polling a drive could cause a 
problem? - if anything I would say polling a device is probably good as 
Netbackup confirms it can see it!
 
The 
thing that makes me wonder if its cable / firmware issue is the comment "MEDIUM 
NOT PRESENT".
Thanks
Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Barber, Layne 
  (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 
  January 2006 14:10To: 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] DLT drives 
  going down
  We have an issue 
  of drives randomly going down every night. NBU 5.0 mp5 HP-UX 11.11 STK L180 w/ 
  STK 3400 scsi bridge.
   
  For some reason, 1 
  or more drives go down at random every night when backups run. Different tapes 
  and different drives. Backups will be running fine and then drives begin to go 
  down. These are SDLT320 drives. once they go down, you can't use robtest to 
  move the tapes (medium not present error) or use the robtest unload command 
  (device not present).
   
  If we power cycle 
  the scsi bridge, we can talk to the drives and do what ever we want. STK is 
  claiming that there is something coming from the host that is "polling" the 
  library from the physical layer (assume HBA). We have had the SA for the 
  master/media server disable any polling and load the latest patches from HP to 
  no avail. We have changed from auto index to a manual map index as 
  well.
   
  This was working 
  from the end of June up until the second week in October.
   
  Thoughts/suggestions?
   
  Log snippets from 
  last night:
   
  syslog entriesJan  4 05:37:42 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: 
  dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 05:50:10 ujachr01 
  vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 
  11:27:52 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0800c0 I/O error during 
  closeJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
  0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 
  tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 
  tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 5 (device 4) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic 
  dismount failureJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check integrity 
  of the drive, drive path, and media
   
  drive 5 (addr 504) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource address 
  = 1119 (slot 120)Barcode = JA1156
   
  Jan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
  0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
  tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
  tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 1 (device 0) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic 
  dismount failureJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check integrity 
  of the drive, drive path, and media
   
  drive 1 (addr 500) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource address 
  = 1106 (slot 107)Barcode = 
JA1064

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


[Veritas-bu] DLT drives going down

2006-01-04 Thread Barber, Layne \(Contractor\)



We have an issue of 
drives randomly going down every night. NBU 5.0 mp5 HP-UX 11.11 STK L180 w/ STK 
3400 scsi bridge.
 
For some reason, 1 
or more drives go down at random every night when backups run. Different tapes 
and different drives. Backups will be running fine and then drives begin to go 
down. These are SDLT320 drives. once they go down, you can't use robtest to move 
the tapes (medium not present error) or use the robtest unload command (device 
not present).
 
If we power cycle 
the scsi bridge, we can talk to the drives and do what ever we want. STK is 
claiming that there is something coming from the host that is "polling" the 
library from the physical layer (assume HBA). We have had the SA for the 
master/media server disable any polling and load the latest patches from HP to 
no avail. We have changed from auto index to a manual map index as 
well.
 
This was working 
from the end of June up until the second week in October.
 
Thoughts/suggestions?
 
Log snippets from 
last night:
 
syslog entriesJan  4 05:37:42 ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev 
= 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 05:50:10 ujachr01 vmunix: 
SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0801c0 I/O error during closeJan  4 11:27:52 
ujachr01 vmunix: SCSI TAPE: dev = 0xcd0800c0 I/O error during closeJan  
4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 0x3a, ascq = 0x0, 
MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldcd[18968]: TLD(1) 
Move_medium errorJan  4 11:34:36 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 5 
(device 4) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic dismount failureJan  4 
11:34:36 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check integrity of the drive, drive path, and 
media
 
drive 5 (addr 504) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource address = 
1119 (slot 120)Barcode = JA1156
 
Jan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) key = 0x5, asc = 
0x3a, ascq = 0x0, MEDIUM NOT PRESENTJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
tldcd[19684]: TLD(1) Move_medium errorJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 
tldd[4233]: TLD(1) drive 1 (device 0) is being DOWNED, status: Robotic dismount 
failureJan  4 11:55:12 ujachr01 tldd[4233]: Check integrity of the 
drive, drive path, and media
 
drive 1 (addr 500) access = 0 Contains Cartridge = yesSource address = 
1106 (slot 107)Barcode = JA1064


Re: [Veritas-bu] Restore NBU tape with tar command?

2006-01-04 Thread ida3248b
Hello Andrew

Here is what I have from an earlier mail (for extract just change t to x)

I have had succes with listing the files on a tape with Netbackup tar when I 
know the blocksize.
For nonmultipexed tape, blocksize 256k:
/usr/openv/netbackup/tar -itvf  -b 512

For multipexed tape, blocksize 256k:
/usr/openv/netbackup/tar -iMtvf  -b 512

If remember correctly /usr/openv/netbackup/tar ++help gives a list of options

Regards
Michael


On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 11:13:37 -0500, Andrew Armstrong wrote
>   I am in the process of putting together a disaster recovery plan in case 
our primary server goes down. This server is a stand-alone NBU server, 
backing up only itself, etc. I have no problems using NBU to do the recovery 
(bare metal restore, etc.), but those above me also require a vendor-
independent recovery plan, in case there are "problems" using NBU to recover 
the data. I have experimented with using the NBU version of tar, and have 
successfully restored files from the tape. My only question is this: is it 
possible to make tar continue to the next backup set on the tape 
automatically? Currently, I am only able to restore small pieces of the 
system at a time (looks like 2000k or so). I am familiar with the option to 
span multi-volume archives, but I would like to see if there is an option to 
(for lack of a better way to put it) start at a certain point on the tape and 
restore everything from that point on, without prompts for user intervention. 
(The requirements for the DR plan dictate that a user with little or no admin 
experience should be able to do the recovery... this is NOT my requirement, 
but one put on me by those above)
>  
> Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated!
>  
>  
>  
> Andrew Armstrong
> Network Engineer
> CNE CCNA MCP VCP
> T & S Brass and Bronze Works
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (864) 834-6785
>  
>  

--
Cybercity Webhosting (http://www.cybercity.dk)

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Exchange license

2006-01-04 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message



I did 
believe (when I used to backup Exchange) that one license coverd all the 
exchange servers.
 
With 
Symantec now holding the NBU License rules, it could well 
change
Hope 
this helps
 
 
Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: King, Cheryl 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 January 2006 
  16:08To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: 
  [Veritas-bu] Exchange license
  Last week there was a 
  discussion about licensing the Exchange client.  One of the responses 
  said something about running any number of exchange clients with one license.  I ordered one license per 
  client.  Did I overpay?

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


RE: [Veritas-bu] Database help

2006-01-04 Thread WEAVER, Simon

Sandy
Have you tried using a different tape to backup the DB? How large is it?
Is there any logging enabled to see at what point the backup of the DB
Fails?

Also, is it stored on a disk with sufficient space?
What is the retention periods? You could use bpexpdate to force them out of
Netbackup, and assuming the tapes are ok, you would need to Import ALL of
the tapes in 2 phases (from experience I can say it's a real nightmare to do
and takes approx 5 hours PER tape!)

Simon Weaver 
Technical Support 
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium 
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Elrick, Sandy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 03 January 2006 18:06
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Database help



Hello all,

NBDC 3.4.6/Solaris instance with NB Database backup issues.  I am pretty
much constantly getting 84's.  I know it's an old instance and before I go
down the road of modifying the database backups (I have narrowed it down to
the fact that the databases are too large / cannot span tape) I want to
check with you folk.

Is there any way to determine the specific failure point on the database
backup?  Can I remove some older tapes from the database and be able to
import them again?  If I can reimport, are there any gotchas I should be
aware of?

Thank you

Sandy Elrick
Calgary, Alberta

The information contained in this e-mail message is PRIVATE. It may contain
confidential information and may be legally privileged. It is intended for
the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If the intended
recipient(s) cannot be reached or if a transmission problem has occurred,
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and destroy all copies
of this message. 
Thank you. 


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or 
otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS 
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu