Re: [Vo]:Rossi long term test

[Alan Fletcher]

At 10:18 PM 4/10/2014, Eric Walker wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:19 PM,
Alan Fletcher 
wrote:


It is located in a Country that is not Italy and is not USA.

Maybe China?
Sweden, most likely Uppsala.

Re: [Vo]:Rossi long term test

[Daniel Rocha]

Knowing the stories from Rossi regarding the Ecat, the option should be
Sweden...

2014-04-11 2:18 GMT-03:00 Eric Walker :

>
> Maybe China?
>
>

-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com

Re: [Vo]:Rossi long term test

[Eric Walker]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Alan Fletcher  wrote:

It is located in a Country that is not Italy and is not USA.
>

Maybe China?

I am reading Mats Lewan's book right now and am about a third of the way
through it.  It is well worth reading for the backstory, although I
sometimes wonder whether Lewan too readily repeats uncritically the
information that has been given to him, as has been said in connection with
Isaacson's book about Steve Jobs.

Following are companies that Rossi has started or purchased at the point
where I am in my reading:

   - Petroldragon
   - Omar
   - Leonardo Corporation
   - Leonardo Technologies Inc. (different from Leonardo Corp.)
   - Eon
   - Energia da Fonti Alternative (EFA)

So far the story has been quite an adventure, including a description of a
stay for over a year in an Italian jail, where Rossi was in a cell with
five other inmates.  At one point a secret factory is set up in Florida,
which partly manufactures E-Cats and for which there is another
"blue-collar business" that serves as a cover.  Sometimes LTI handles a
transaction, and sometimes Leonardo Corp. does.  Rossi (as you know) starts
a Web site called the Journal of Nuclear Physics, which purports to be a
peer reviewed journal.  I am now convinced that Rossi is exactly as
colorful as he gives the impression of being.  I am reminded of John Nash.

Eric

Re: [Vo]:Rossi long term test

[Alan Fletcher]

At 08:37 AM 4/9/2014, Daniel Rocha  wrote:
I hope this is the 6 month test
he promised, heh! 
Yes.
Teemu 

April 10th, 2014 at 8:30 AM 
Dear Andrea Rossi,
When you say that the Professors are conducting their work “in a neutral
laboratory”, do you mean they are still in your premises, or instead
situated in a laboratory that is not owned by you?
Best Regards,
Teemu
Andrea Rossi 

April 10th, 2014 at 6:02 PM 
Teemu:
The Professors have worked and are working in a laboratory that is not
owned by us, is totally out of our premises and that we never used
before. We knew of it few days before the beginning of the test and sent
there the E-Cat. It is located in a Country that is not Italy and is not
USA. I cannot give further information, but, obviously, the precise
location where the test will have been completed will be described in the
Report that will be written by the Third Indipendent Party. When we
arrived there for the assembling of the reactor, some of the components
of the t.i.p. were already there for the set up.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

Koen Vandewalle 

April 10th, 2014 at 6:37 PM 
Dear Andrea,
Supposed that at the beginning of the test, the Professors did discover
that the E-Cat does what is is meant to do. One question that should be
asked: how much energy can produce one E-Cat ? Did you make agreements on
this item ?
And when the answer is that it continues in eternity to “catalyze
energy”, then the test will never be over. A catalyzer is not
consumed….
Did you agree on limits in time or amount of energy ?
Kind Regards,
Koen.
P.S. : the congratulations were not for the results of these tests, but
for the respect that is finally given to your work.
Andrea Rossi 

April 10th, 2014 at 9:20 PM 
Koen Vandewalle:
No, the total endurance , or the life-span of the charge and the E-Cat
are not in the protocol of the experiment. Obviously, if the exhaustion
will happen during the experiment, that would be a serendipity.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

Frank Acland 

April 10th, 2014 at 7:47 PM 
Dear Andrea,
You mentioned you sent your E-Cat to the neutral location when you
learned about it. Did you send multiple reactors, or only one?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Andrea Rossi 

April 10th, 2014 at 9:17 PM 
Frank Acland:
We sent 3 of them, as spare parts, but ( this I can say) we did not have
breaks or malfunctions, so far, so the spare parts are intact.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

Re: [Vo]:Nikkei reports on Iwamura's transumtation research

[H Veeder]

Thanks for the tidbits...google's English translation of Japanese is not
clear.

Harry


On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Another interesting tidbit: p. 1 says they were awarded a patent in Japan,
> and a patent in Europe in 2013.
>
> Page 1 also quotes the guy in charge of the research center, Ishide,
> saying that they have made progress in recent years. He says the amount of
> material transmuted has increased from "nanogram levels to micrograms; an
> improvement by 3 orders of magnitude . . ."
>
> I think the rest of the technical content can be found in recent papers by
> Iwamura.
>
> - Jed
>
>

Re: [Vo]:Problem with glare at Ivanpah CSP plant

[Bob Cook]

Ol"Bab--

What kind of engineer were you?

Older Bob?
  - Original Message - 
  From: David L Babcock 
  To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:55 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Problem with glare at Ivanpah CSP plant


  It is a little more complex. There is a distance from the (presumed flat) 
mirror such that the angular extent of the mirror is about the same as that of 
the sun (1/2 deg). From there out the intercepted flux decreases, by the square 
of the distance.

  From the birds view, at that distance it sees the whole sun fill the mirror. 
Any farther out the image is bigger than the mirror -only part of the sun is 
supplying heat.

  If the mirrors are curved, then each mirror will have a hot focal point, but 
not super hot: again it is limited by the angular extent of the sun and the 
mirror. A ideal mirror will project an image of the sun on the boiler (or bird, 
if at focus), and the intensity is that of sunlight multiplied by the square of 
the ratio of the two angular extents. Maybe 10 or 20 to 1? WAG here. 



  As Bob points out, the "nimbus" effect strongly suggests that the designers 
were aware of a possible problem and made sure mirrors in standby don't all 
point at a single point, or even parallel.

  Ol' Bab, who was an engineer.



  On 4/10/2014 11:06 AM, Bob Cook wrote:

The mirrors would not be focused at one spot when idle.   Also it is a good 
idea to reduce global warming by directing the light back into space instead 
into the ground.  

- Original Message - 
  From: Jed Rothwell 
  To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 7:59 AM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Problem with glare at Ivanpah CSP plant


  ChemE Stewart  wrote:

Efficiency/85% heat transfer efficiency @ solar boiler/90% mirror 
efficiency = 1700 megawatts airborne flux, THAT IS A GOOD BIRD ZAPPER


  Close to the tower it would be. When a bird flies a few meters away from 
the surface of one mirror, it is no different than flying in full sunlight or 
in sunlight reflected from glass or water.


  I do not know at what distance from the tower the beams of light join 
together to be brighter and hotter than ordinary sunlight.


  I expect birds would not approach the tower because it is so bright.


  Millions of birds are killed by smoke from coal plants, and steam from 
coal, gas and nuke plants.


  - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Problem with glare at Ivanpah CSP plant

[David L Babcock]

It is a little more complex. There is a distance from the (presumed 
flat) mirror such that the angular extent of the mirror is about the 
same as that of the sun (1/2 deg). From there out the intercepted flux 
decreases, by the square of the distance.


From the birds view, at that distance it sees the whole sun fill the 
mirror. Any farther out the image is bigger than the mirror -only part 
of the sun is supplying heat.


If the mirrors are curved, then each mirror will have a hot focal point, 
but not super hot: again it is limited by the angular extent of the sun 
and the mirror. A ideal mirror will project an image of the sun on the 
boiler (or bird, if at focus), and the intensity is that of sunlight 
multiplied by the square of the ratio of the two angular extents. Maybe 
10 or 20 to 1? WAG here.




As Bob points out, the "nimbus" effect strongly suggests that the 
designers were aware of a possible problem and made sure mirrors in 
standby don't all point at a single point, or even parallel.


Ol' Bab, who was an engineer.



On 4/10/2014 11:06 AM, Bob Cook wrote:
The mirrors would not be focused at one spot when idle.   Also it is a 
good idea to reduce global warming by directing the light back into 
space instead into the ground.

- Original Message -

*From:* Jed Rothwell 
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com 
*Sent:* Thursday, April 10, 2014 7:59 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Problem with glare at Ivanpah CSP plant

ChemE Stewart mailto:cheme...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Efficiency/85% heat transfer efficiency @ solar boiler/90%
mirror efficiency = 1700 megawatts airborne flux, THAT IS A
GOOD BIRD ZAPPER


Close to the tower it would be. When a bird flies a few meters
away from the surface of one mirror, it is no different than
flying in full sunlight or in sunlight reflected from glass or water.

I do not know at what distance from the tower the beams of light
join together to be brighter and hotter than ordinary sunlight.

I expect birds would not approach the tower because it is so bright.

Millions of birds are killed by smoke from coal plants, and steam
from coal, gas and nuke plants.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:Problem with glare at Ivanpah CSP plant

[Jed Rothwell]

Terry Blanton  wrote:


> In 1958, the science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke published "A
> Slight Case of Sunstroke" . . . In the story, a large number of hostile
> spectators aim reflective program covers at the unfortunate umpire,
> who collapses and dies from the concentrated solar energy focused
> where he stood.
>

He doesn't just collapse and die. It takes place in South America. The
stadium has thousands army troops in the audience. Halfway through the
game, a whistle blows, and the troops all aim their reflective programs at
the ref, who vanishes in a puff of smoke.

The other story is about an astronomer who murders his wife by aiming a
searchlight at her car as she is driving home along the edge of cliff, late
at night.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:Problem with glare at Ivanpah CSP plant

[Terry Blanton]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Arthur Clarke wrote two short stories along those lines.

LOL!  I remember one:

In 1958, the science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke published "A
Slight Case of Sunstroke" (also called "The Stroke of the Sun"), a
short story in which a diabolical card stunt was used to kill an
unpopular soccer referee. In the story, a large number of hostile
spectators aim reflective program covers at the unfortunate umpire,
who collapses and dies from the concentrated solar energy focused
where he stood.

Re: [Vo]:Nikkei reports on Iwamura's transumtation research

[Jed Rothwell]

Another interesting tidbit: p. 1 says they were awarded a patent in Japan,
and a patent in Europe in 2013.

Page 1 also quotes the guy in charge of the research center, Ishide, saying
that they have made progress in recent years. He says the amount of
material transmuted has increased from "nanogram levels to micrograms; an
improvement by 3 orders of magnitude . . ."

I think the rest of the technical content can be found in recent papers by
Iwamura.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:Nikkei reports on Iwamura's transumtation research

[Jed Rothwell]

The second page of this article discusses cold fusion. It includes the
usual blather about how it was "mostly" not replicated, and how it is
considered no better than alchemy. The article implies Iwamura is trying to
distance himself from cold fusion, which is not true. Then it has a photo
of Prof. Arima visiting the experiment in 2007. Arima is Japan's version of
Robert Park. He denounced cold fusion when it was first reported, and he is
the go-to source for the newspapers when they want a fresh attack. I hope
Iwamura rubbed his nose in the results.

- Jed

[Vo]:Fabricating Hydrocarbons

[Terry Blanton]

This article represents well how LENR would benefit the Navy.  They're
willing to fabricate fuel from seawater at $6/gal:

http://news.yahoo.com/us-navy-game-changer-converting-seawater-fuel-150544958.html

Re: [Vo]:Problem with glare at Ivanpah CSP plant

[Jed Rothwell]

Bob Cook  wrote:

 The mirrors would not be focused at one spot when idle.   Also it is a
> good idea to reduce global warming by directing the light back into space
> instead into the ground.
>

Since it is near an airport I think it would be better to aim for the
ground.

I wonder . . . could you focus them on the parking lot? That would make a
good murder mystery. A jealous lover is the programmer in charge of the
array. Her boyfriend parks his car, walks toward the building . . . He does
not notice the mirrors turning toward him. He vanishes in a puff of smoke.
The mirrors swing back. No trace of the program code or activity log is
found.

Arthur Clarke wrote two short stories along those lines.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:Nikkei reports on Iwamura's transumtation research

[Jed Rothwell]

Ah, thanks. Someone told me about this, but I could not find it with the
Nikkei's search function.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:Problem with glare at Ivanpah CSP plant

[Bob Cook]

The mirrors would not be focused at one spot when idle.   Also it is a good 
idea to reduce global warming by directing the light back into space instead 
into the ground.  

- Original Message - 
  From: Jed Rothwell 
  To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 7:59 AM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Problem with glare at Ivanpah CSP plant


  ChemE Stewart  wrote:

Efficiency/85% heat transfer efficiency @ solar boiler/90% mirror 
efficiency = 1700 megawatts airborne flux, THAT IS A GOOD BIRD ZAPPER


  Close to the tower it would be. When a bird flies a few meters away from the 
surface of one mirror, it is no different than flying in full sunlight or in 
sunlight reflected from glass or water.


  I do not know at what distance from the tower the beams of light join 
together to be brighter and hotter than ordinary sunlight.


  I expect birds would not approach the tower because it is so bright.


  Millions of birds are killed by smoke from coal plants, and steam from coal, 
gas and nuke plants.


  - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Problem with glare at Ivanpah CSP plant

[ChemE Stewart]

In high winds, mirrors go to flat position and all of the flux goes
incident and airborne.  Ivanpah is a high wind area.
http://www.nabsa.org

On Thursday, April 10, 2014, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> ChemE Stewart 
> 
> > wrote:
>
>
>> Efficiency/85% heat transfer efficiency @ solar boiler/90% mirror
>> efficiency = 1700 megawatts airborne flux, THAT IS A GOOD BIRD ZAPPER
>>
>
> Close to the tower it would be. When a bird flies a few meters away from
> the surface of one mirror, it is no different than flying in full sunlight
> or in sunlight reflected from glass or water.
>
> I do not know at what distance from the tower the beams of light join
> together to be brighter and hotter than ordinary sunlight.
>
> I expect birds would not approach the tower because it is so bright.
>
> Millions of birds are killed by smoke from coal plants, and steam from
> coal, gas and nuke plants.
>
> - Jed
>
>

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:The Video: Dr, Ahern does not yet understand.

[Bob Cook]

Fran and Axil--

Ahern noted that the micro particle was Zr02.  This does not conduct heat very 
well and it may not conduct current either.  I doubt that there is a dipole 
current in the micro-particle.  However there may be spin coupling to the 
micro-particle particularly at the interface between the nano Ni particle and 
the ZrO2 micro particle.  Both particles may be single crystals that act 
coherently.  The magnetic fields would link the two particles  together better 
than an electric dipole connection.  Of course there may be magnetic dipoles 
that also function in the connection and couple spin energy transmission.

Bob
  - Original Message - 
  From: Axil Axil 
  To: vortex-l 
  Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 7:57 AM
  Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:The Video: Dr, Ahern does not yet understand.









Axil, I like your theory as far as linkage between the nano and micro scale 
using SPP but am not convinced the SPP is the "power" source. 



  The power source is dipole motion in the micro-particle. This particle is 
sized to be resonant with the operating temperature of the reactor. The dipole 
vibrations caused by the ambient temperature of the reactor produces maximum 
electron oscillation. This electron motion is an alternating current that flows 
back and forth across the micro-particle. The nanowire provides a 1 dimensional 
superconducting path for the dipole current to accumulate at the tip of the 
nanowire. this super current accumulates  electrons at the nanowire tips in the 
fractional mega amp range.


  Nanowire coating on the surface of the micro-particle is a critical power 
concentration mechanism.   This nanowire power concentration  is what makes 
LENR+ go.







Why does SPP have the potential for over unity? 



  The extreme curvature at the tips of nanowire produces a vortex of SPPs to 
develop where the boson nature of the SPP makes possible extreme concentration 
of a EMF soliton. This soliton produces a anapole magnetic field that gets 
strong enough to produce pions through vacuum breakdown.


  Hydrogen rydberg matter is attracted to these nanowire tips that further 
increase the EMF power application because of the extreme curvature related to 
the very small size of these nanoparticles.


  Larger nanoparticles also amplify the EMF concentration of the vortex formed 
at and around the tips of the wire in a zero loss dark mode energy transfer 
mechanism. 

Wouldn't it be far likelier that you are setting the stage for a self 
assembled Maxwellian demon to exploit the known HUP energies at the end of 
these hairs? The geometrical confinement being one side of the vice and this 
SPP linkage to the moving ions being the other side it accepts and accumulates 
energy from the gas motion in contradiction to COE which claims this energy of 
gas motion can not be exploited..and admittedly a single gas atom in our macro 
isotropy can not but I am convinced this isotropy breaking geometry and your 
linkage demonstrates the potential for a real world demon that self assembles 
and is the root bootstrap energy that initiates these anomalies.

Fran



  There is a positive feedback mechanism that takes the gamma energy from the 
nuclear fusion of hydrogen present in the Rydberg crystals and adds that to the 
energy content of the vortex based soliton at the tips of the nanowire.  This 
optical nano-cavity down shifts this gamma energy into the extreme ultraviolet 
range and through power reincorporation makes the amplitude of the SPP soliton 
and the associated magnetic field produced by the soliton even stronger over 
time.



From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 3:08 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:The Video: Dr, Ahern does not yet understand.



Ahern is correct in stating that the "magic" particle size is very small; 3 
to 15 nanometers in diameter. This type of particle is the business end of the 
reaction in the same way the sharp tip of an electrode is where the energy of a 
spark is concentrated and amplified. 





But other size particles are required to get magnetic field strength up. 
The particle size produce by low melting point metals also must be supplied in 
the size particle mix.





This is what Rossi is producing with his secret sauce addition. Yes, he 
adds a low melting point alkali metal to his reaction as a power amplifier. 
This type particle acts as a step up transformer coil where power is 
concentrated into a high voltage capacitive discharge.





But the most important particle size is the 5 micron particle covered with 
nano hair. This particle is the power house of the reaction. This particle 
provides the receiving antenna for the SPP pumping generated from the "mouse" 
component of the reactor. You can think of this large particle as the "Cat". 



The Mouse produces dipole oscillations in the large body of this jumbo 
particle where t

[Vo]:Nikkei reports on Iwamura's transumtation research

[H Veeder]

放射性廃棄物の無害化に道？ 三菱重、実用研究へ

(google translation)

The road to the detoxification of radioactive waste? Mitsubishi Heavy, to
practical research

2014/4/8 7:00

Use the deuterium, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries established the basic
technology of the element conversion to change the type of the element with
less energy. Without a large-scale nuclear reactors and accelerators, for
example cesium was confirmed by experiment and can vary in many
praseodymium element number four. Toward demonstration equipment
installation in the future and into the practical application research.
Converted to harmless non-radioactive elements, the same strontium and
radioactive cesium radioactive waste and those that open the way for
detoxification of, the rush to put to practical use as a primary
manufacturer.

conversion element in a hundred hours

Late March, lecture room of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in
the U.S. Boston. Before researchers of more than 100 people that gathered
from the world, Iwamura Yasuhiro intelligence group length in the
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Advanced Technology Research Center was
reported, "was confirmed micro parts per million () grams elemental
conversion".Proposal of theory which receives numerous questions, to
explain the experiment that the company also announced a number...

http://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXNASDZ040JJ_X00C14A400/

Re: [Vo]:Problem with glare at Ivanpah CSP plant

[Jed Rothwell]

ChemE Stewart  wrote:


> Efficiency/85% heat transfer efficiency @ solar boiler/90% mirror
> efficiency = 1700 megawatts airborne flux, THAT IS A GOOD BIRD ZAPPER
>

Close to the tower it would be. When a bird flies a few meters away from
the surface of one mirror, it is no different than flying in full sunlight
or in sunlight reflected from glass or water.

I do not know at what distance from the tower the beams of light join
together to be brighter and hotter than ordinary sunlight.

I expect birds would not approach the tower because it is so bright.

Millions of birds are killed by smoke from coal plants, and steam from
coal, gas and nuke plants.

- Jed

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:The Video: Dr, Ahern does not yet understand.

[Axil Axil]

 Axil, I like your theory as far as linkage between the nano and micro
> scale using SPP but am not convinced the SPP is the "power" source.
>

The power source is dipole motion in the micro-particle. This particle is
sized to be resonant with the operating temperature of the reactor. The
dipole vibrations caused by the ambient temperature of the reactor produces
maximum electron oscillation. This electron motion is an alternating
current that flows back and forth across the micro-particle. The nanowire
provides a 1 dimensional superconducting path for the dipole current to
accumulate at the tip of the nanowire. this super current accumulates
electrons at the nanowire tips in the fractional mega amp range.

Nanowire coating on the surface of the micro-particle is a critical power
concentration mechanism.   This nanowire power concentration  is what makes
LENR+ go.





> Why does SPP have the potential for over unity?
>

The extreme curvature at the tips of nanowire produces a vortex of SPPs
to develop where the boson nature of the SPP makes possible extreme
concentration of a EMF soliton. This soliton produces a anapole magnetic
field that gets strong enough to produce pions through vacuum breakdown.

Hydrogen rydberg matter is attracted to these nanowire tips that further
increase the EMF power application because of the extreme curvature related
to the very small size of these nanoparticles.

Larger nanoparticles also amplify the EMF concentration of the vortex
formed at and around the tips of the wire in a zero loss dark mode energy
transfer mechanism.


> Wouldn't it be far likelier that you are setting the stage for a self
> assembled Maxwellian demon to exploit the known HUP energies at the end of
> these hairs? The geometrical confinement being one side of the vice and
> this SPP linkage to the moving ions being the other side it accepts and
> accumulates energy from the gas motion in contradiction to COE which claims
> this energy of gas motion can not be exploited..and admittedly a single gas
> atom in our macro isotropy can not but I am convinced this isotropy
> breaking geometry and your linkage demonstrates the potential for a real
> world demon that self assembles and is the root bootstrap energy that
> initiates these anomalies.
>
> Fran
>

There is a positive feedback mechanism that takes the gamma energy from the
nuclear fusion of hydrogen present in the Rydberg crystals and adds that to
the energy content of the vortex based soliton at the tips of the nanowire.
 This optical nano-cavity down shifts this gamma energy into the extreme
ultraviolet range and through power reincorporation makes the amplitude of
the SPP soliton and the associated magnetic field produced by the soliton
even stronger over time.

>
>
> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 09, 2014 3:08 PM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]:The Video: Dr, Ahern does not yet understand.
>
>
>
> Ahern is correct in stating that the "magic" particle size is very small;
> 3 to 15 nanometers in diameter. This type of particle is the business end
> of the reaction in the same way the sharp tip of an electrode is where the
> energy of a spark is concentrated and amplified.
>
>
>
>
>
> But other size particles are required to get magnetic field strength up.
> The particle size produce by low melting point metals also must be supplied
> in the size particle mix.
>
>
>
>
>
> This is what Rossi is producing with his secret sauce addition. Yes, he
> adds a low melting point alkali metal to his reaction as a power amplifier.
> This type particle acts as a step up transformer coil where power is
> concentrated into a high voltage capacitive discharge.
>
>
>
>
>
> But the most important particle size is the 5 micron particle covered with
> nano hair. This particle is the power house of the reaction. This particle
> provides the receiving antenna for the SPP pumping generated from the
> "mouse" component of the reactor. You can think of this large particle as
> the "Cat".
>
>
>
> The Mouse produces dipole oscillations in the large body of this jumbo
> particle where the SPP are born.  The power produced by this huge particle
> is feed down the nano-hair covering to their sharp tips at tremendous power
> amplification. This dipole power produced in this micro particle feeds the
> step up power amplification process that occurs in the smaller diameter
> particle assemblages down the particle size chain to those magic 2
> nanometer particles.
>
>
>
>
>
> Ahern does not understand this power concentration system and has only
> seen limited magnetic power produce by his particles because of this lack
> of this understanding.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:Problem with glare at Ivanpah CSP plant

[ChemE Stewart]

What the Flux?

392 MW generated from steam turbine generators/30% Rankine Efficiency/85%
heat transfer efficiency @ solar boiler/90% mirror efficiency = 1700
megawatts airborne flux, THAT IS A GOOD BIRD ZAPPER


On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> See:
>
>
> http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2014/04/concentrating-solar-power-under-fire-glaring-planning-oversight-or-easily-remedied-issue
>
> QUOTES
>
> [Clifford Ho of Sandia National Laboratories' Concentrating Solar
> Technologies Department says] "I believe some of the glare that's being
> viewed is taking place when the heliostats are in a standby mode."
>
> During peak daylight hours, it is common for a number of heliostat mirrors
> to be taken offline to prevent heliostats from directing more thermal
> energy to the turbine than it is capable of receiving. Ho said that during
> standby, these heliostats are focused on aim points next to the receiver,
> forming a ring of glare above the tower.
>
> According to Ho, the sunlight reflected from heliostats that are in
> standby mode could be having an exacerbating effect on the amount of
> reflection being emitted.
>
> In examining photos of the glare taken by passengers flying over the
> Ivanpah plant, Ho said it's apparent to him the intense light is emanating
> from the heliostats not in use. "You can clearly see the difference between
> what's just the diffuse reflection from the towers versus one or more
> heliostats that are in standby mode and reflecting light toward the
> observer."
>
> Ho has performed helicopter surveys of heliostats in standby mode at
> Sandia National Laboratories' National Solar Thermal Test Facility. "It's
> bright," he said, emphasizing that the Sandia CSP array is much smaller
> than that of Ivanpah. "When you're close, it can be like looking into the
> sun."
>
> . . . One possible solution, as suggested by Ho, is to reposition
> heliostats that are in standby mode so that they stand vertically -- thus
> reflecting the glare toward the ground instead of upward.
>
>
> - Jed
>
>

[Vo]:Problem with glare at Ivanpah CSP plant

[Jed Rothwell]

See:

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2014/04/concentrating-solar-power-under-fire-glaring-planning-oversight-or-easily-remedied-issue

QUOTES

[Clifford Ho of Sandia National Laboratories' Concentrating Solar
Technologies Department says] "I believe some of the glare that's being
viewed is taking place when the heliostats are in a standby mode."

During peak daylight hours, it is common for a number of heliostat mirrors
to be taken offline to prevent heliostats from directing more thermal
energy to the turbine than it is capable of receiving. Ho said that during
standby, these heliostats are focused on aim points next to the receiver,
forming a ring of glare above the tower.

According to Ho, the sunlight reflected from heliostats that are in standby
mode could be having an exacerbating effect on the amount of reflection
being emitted.

In examining photos of the glare taken by passengers flying over the
Ivanpah plant, Ho said it's apparent to him the intense light is emanating
from the heliostats not in use. "You can clearly see the difference between
what's just the diffuse reflection from the towers versus one or more
heliostats that are in standby mode and reflecting light toward the
observer."

Ho has performed helicopter surveys of heliostats in standby mode at Sandia
National Laboratories' National Solar Thermal Test Facility. "It's bright,"
he said, emphasizing that the Sandia CSP array is much smaller than that of
Ivanpah. "When you're close, it can be like looking into the sun."

. . . One possible solution, as suggested by Ho, is to reposition
heliostats that are in standby mode so that they stand vertically -- thus
reflecting the glare toward the ground instead of upward.


- Jed

Re: [Vo]:Lewan book

[Blaze Spinnaker]

That's a good sign.   Because the reality is, no one is going to care
whatsoever about Rossi's quirks if he really has what he says he has.  I
think that's what Rossi is thinking too.


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Okay, I have the book. The .mobi version opens automatically with the
> Kindle for PC program.
>
> This is an accurate and well-written account. It is depressing. I am glad
> Lewan made public many events and people's names, because it means I do not
> keep them secret any more.
>
> The book harshly criticizes Rossi in places. I am a little surprised that
> Rossi is not upset with Lewan. Rossi has a generous nature at times.
>
> The history described in this book is depressing, but the present is
> somewhat brighter. I have a good impression of the people in North
> Carolina, Cherokee Investments Partners, who are now working with Rossi. I
> do not know much about them, but I have a good impression. I think Rossi
> likes them, which is essential for success. This is probably the best
> opportunity Rossi can hope for.
>
> - Jed
>
>

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:The Video: Dr, Ahern does not yet understand.

[Roarty, Francis X]

Axil, I like your theory as far as linkage between the nano and micro scale 
using SPP but am not convinced the SPP is the "power" source. Why does SPP have 
the potential for over unity? Wouldn't it be far likelier that you are setting 
the stage for a self assembled Maxwellian demon to exploit the known HUP 
energies at the end of these hairs? The geometrical confinement being one side 
of the vice and this SPP linkage to the moving ions being the other side it 
accepts and accumulates energy from the gas motion in contradiction to COE 
which claims this energy of gas motion can not be exploited..and admittedly a 
single gas atom in our macro isotropy can not but I am convinced this isotropy 
breaking geometry and your linkage demonstrates the potential for a real world 
demon that self assembles and is the root bootstrap energy that initiates these 
anomalies.
Fran

From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 3:08 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:The Video: Dr, Ahern does not yet understand.


Ahern is correct in stating that the "magic" particle size is very small; 3 to 
15 nanometers in diameter. This type of particle is the business end of the 
reaction in the same way the sharp tip of an electrode is where the energy of a 
spark is concentrated and amplified.





But other size particles are required to get magnetic field strength up. The 
particle size produce by low melting point metals also must be supplied in the 
size particle mix.





This is what Rossi is producing with his secret sauce addition. Yes, he adds a 
low melting point alkali metal to his reaction as a power amplifier. This type 
particle acts as a step up transformer coil where power is concentrated into a 
high voltage capacitive discharge.





But the most important particle size is the 5 micron particle covered with nano 
hair. This particle is the power house of the reaction. This particle provides 
the receiving antenna for the SPP pumping generated from the "mouse" component 
of the reactor. You can think of this large particle as the "Cat".



The Mouse produces dipole oscillations in the large body of this jumbo particle 
where the SPP are born.  The power produced by this huge particle is feed down 
the nano-hair covering to their sharp tips at tremendous power amplification. 
This dipole power produced in this micro particle feeds the step up power 
amplification process that occurs in the smaller diameter particle assemblages 
down the particle size chain to those magic 2 nanometer particles.





Ahern does not understand this power concentration system and has only seen 
limited magnetic power produce by his particles because of this lack of this 
understanding.