[Vo]:History: Stanford Robert A. Huggins positive LENr result...
Franck Ackalnd digged that old article on a sucessful LENr experiment in 89 http://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/19/us/stanford-reports-success.html I know there was many false positive at the beginning... what is the final story on that experiment? was it finally positive ? It seems too short to have a positive result as most say few month are required just for loading? Stanford Reports Success > By WILLIAM J. BROAD > Published: April 19, 1989 > A team of scientists at Stanford University said yesterday that they had > duplicated the experiment in which nuclear fusion was reportedly achieved > in a jar of water at room temperature. The Stanford researchers said they > measured heat but not radiation or subatomic particles that are often > produced by nuclear fusion. >
Re: [Vo]:History: Stanford Robert A. Huggins positive LENr result...
Alain Sepeda wrote: > I know there was many false positive at the beginning... > No, there were not many false positives. I know of only one or two, and they were not published. > what is the final story on that experiment? was it finally positive ? > It was positive, and repeated several times. See: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SchreiberMrecentmeas.pdf > It seems too short to have a positive result as most say few month are > required just for loading? > It takes a week or two, not months. I have never heard of an experiment that took months to load. If it does not work after a month, it never will. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:History: Stanford Robert A. Huggins positive LENr result...
This article appeared a few weeks later. http://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/03/us/physicists-debunk-claim-of-a-new-kind-of-fusion.html quote from the second page: <> Harry On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > > Franck Ackalnd digged that old article on a sucessful LENr experiment in 89 > http://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/19/us/stanford-reports-success.html > > I know there was many false positive at the beginning... > what is the final story on that experiment? was it finally positive ? > > It seems too short to have a positive result as most say few month are > required just for loading? > > > > Stanford Reports Success >> By WILLIAM J. BROAD >> Published: April 19, 1989 >> > A team of scientists at Stanford University said yesterday that they had >> duplicated the experiment in which nuclear fusion was reportedly achieved >> in a jar of water at room temperature. The Stanford researchers said they >> measured heat but not radiation or subatomic particles that are often >> produced by nuclear fusion. >> >
Re: [Vo]:History: Stanford Robert A. Huggins positive LENr result...
so it is good... I remember about Fire From Ice that there was very negative impact of some false positive it was simply isolated failure that was exploited ? 2014-12-07 23:41 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell : > Alain Sepeda wrote: > > >> I know there was many false positive at the beginning... >> > > No, there were not many false positives. I know of only one or two, and > they were not published. > > > >> what is the final story on that experiment? was it finally positive ? >> > > It was positive, and repeated several times. See: > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SchreiberMrecentmeas.pdf > > > >> It seems too short to have a positive result as most say few month are >> required just for loading? >> > > It takes a week or two, not months. I have never heard of an experiment > that took months to load. If it does not work after a month, it never will. > > - Jed > >
