Re: [Vo]:Re: Rossi refuse to answer about the publication of calorimetry test that will be done in Universities
Useless. If negative, the Rossi camp could safely claim that the Bologna guys still did not know how to get the process started correctly - that does seem to be something touchy even for Rossi. And if positive, the anti-Rossi camp could safely claim (just as now) that at least someone in group running the tests was in on the Rossi scam, and had fooled the others. Single experimental points(or points coming all from the same source) are not sufficient to test a new device for much. On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.comwrote: Ah, ask if results will be made available BEFORE patent protection. *From:* Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com *Sent:* Sunday, November 27, 2011 4:04 AM *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com *Subject:* Rossi refuse to answer about the publication of calorimetry test that will be done in Universities Many and many times Rossi said that RD is confidential and that no more information will be made available until patent protection. Well, i and others guys have asked to Rossi about the publication of caolorimetry test results from Universities, and if Bologna and Uppsala will be free to publish the results, whatever the results will be. Rossi didn’t publish the questions. Since it’s not confidential data, PLEASE, go to Rossi’s website and ask it. We deserve an answer. Thank you for the attention.
Re: [Vo]:Re: Rossi refuse to answer about the publication of calorimetry test that will be done in Universities
Am 27.11.2011 12:05, schrieb Marcello Vitale: Useless. If negative, the Rossi camp could safely claim that the Bologna guys still did not know how to get the process started correctly - that does seem to be something touchy even for Rossi. And if positive, the anti-Rossi camp could safely claim (just as now) that at least someone in group running the tests was in on the Rossi scam, and had fooled the others. If university researchers cannot startup the device, then a customer cannot do it. Then it doesnt work as advertised and might be ready for RD, but not ready for market. Rossi himself could support them in this case. A test can be set up in such a way that the output heat cannot been faked. E.g. , if they succeed to heat some big radiators and measure this, errors are impossible. Of course still then, some silly guy can assume fraud, and can say, the energy was faked. In this case however, they have faked a room-heater. This fake, however would be a true scientific miracle and sensation and worth reseach by itself ;-) If it heats my room or boils my lunch then I dont care about faked energy, I happily use it. ;-) Best regards, Peter
