Re: Move parts of documentation from wiki to WICKETxSITE
the hsqldb guys did a splendid job with their documentation they maintain it in docbook so they have a manual on-line, can generate pdf and a zillion other formats from it today's technologies (i.e. wiki's) are gone tomorrow, docbook is prepared for the future, write an xslt and you are ready - nilo my 0,02euri Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > This is a proposal to move some documentation that is written and > maintained by core developers to the WICKETxSITE. This gives our > official site more body and content. > > Immediate moveable parts: > - migration guides > - ? > > Martijn > > -- > Vote for Wicket at the > http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! > http://wicketframework.org > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Move-parts-of-documentation-from-wiki-to-WICKETxSITE-tf3166152.html#a8790725 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Move parts of documentation from wiki to WICKETxSITE
the hsqldb guys did a splendid job with their documentation they maintain it in docbook so they have a manual on-line, can generate pdf and a zillion other formats from it today's technologies (i.e. wiki's) are gone tomorrow, docbook is prepared for the future, write an xslt and you are ready - nilo my 0,02euri Been there, done that (more than 2 years ago). Doesn't work in team, at least not in ours. And personally, I find docbook quite horrible to work with compared to a WIKI. Eelco
Re: wicket-1.3
Thanks, I blame it on my Wicketnewbieness for not finding my way around. Al Maw wrote: > > nilo de roock wrote: >> I downloaded wicket-1.x >> mvn install does not work ( see below ) >> Is there something wrong with the pom.xml, perhaps? > > Please read and follow the instructions on the wiki, which point you to > this document: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-parent/README.TXT > > > > Regards, > > Al > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/wicket-1.3-tf3168142.html#a8790889 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Move parts of documentation from wiki to WICKETxSITE
It is as easy to maintain as the WICKET site. It is the same confluence. Same markup. If you can write in WICKET, then you can write in WICKETxSITE. After the export to cwiki.apache.org a script from Jeff Turner copies the contents of all confluence spaces to his people.apache.org home directory, found here: http://people.apache.org/~jefft/confluence/ Now the difference kicks in: a small script (attached to the JIRA issue WICKET-25 or one of its subtasks) runs in my crontab and copies the files from Jeff's folders to our /www/incubator.apache.org and that is it. Martijn On 2/4/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If it is (at least almost) as easy to maintain then the WIKI, then fine, so I guess we can see how well the confluence export (cause that's still what we're going to do right? is there any work done on documenting how that would work?) works, and if that works well, then we can give our site some more body. Eelco On 2/3/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why? It is part of our documentation. It is maintained by wicket core > devs. There is no reason for it to be at the general wiki. The purpose > of our core site is to add content to it, not keep it a 2 pager. > > Martijn -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
[Wicket-Dev] error in build
I use windows XP, downloaded wicket-1.x with svn to a directory wicket-1.x [J:\wicket-1.x]dir Volume in drive J is 50_05_27 Serial number is 2CFB:D6F8 Directory of J:\wicket-1.x\* 4-02-2007 12:01 . 4-02-2007 12:01 .. 4-02-2007 12:11 wicket 4-02-2007 12:20 wicket-auth-roles 4-02-2007 11:59 wicket-auth-roles-examples 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-examples 4-02-2007 12:16 wicket-extensions 4-02-2007 11:59 wicket-jmx 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-parent 4-02-2007 12:00 wicket-portlet-examples 4-02-2007 12:02 wicket-quickstart 4-02-2007 11:58 wicket-sandbox 4-02-2007 11:59 wicket-spring 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-spring-annot 4-02-2007 11:58 wicket-spring-annot-examples 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-spring-cattr 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-spring-cattr-examples 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-spring-examples 4-02-2007 12:00 wicket-threadtest cd wicket mvn -Pjdk1.5 -Dmaven.test.skip=true install works fine, maven got installed into the local repository but a cd wicket-auth-roles ( or wicket-extensions ) mvn -Pjdk1.5 -Dmaven.test.skip=true install halts with... what am I doing wrong ? [J:\wicket-1.x\wicket-auth-roles]mvn -Pjdk1.5 -Dmaven.test.skip=true install [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] Building Wicket Auth Roles [INFO]task-segment: [install] [INFO] [INFO] [resources:resources] [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM). Project ID: null:wicket:jar:1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT Reason: Cannot find parent: org.apache.wicket:wicket-parent for project: null:wicket:jar:1.3-incubat ing-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 2 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Sun Feb 04 12:36:30 CET 2007 [INFO] Final Memory: 5M/10M [INFO] 4NT: J:\maven-2.0.4\bin\mvn.bat [145] Missing SETLOCAL [J:\wicket-1.x\wicket-auth-roles] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-Dev--error-in-build-tf3169365.html#a8791845 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Wicket-Dev] error in build
cd wicket-parent mvn -N install cd ../wicket mvn install cd ../wicket-auth-roles mvn install etc. Martijn On 2/4/07, nilo de roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I use windows XP, downloaded wicket-1.x with svn to a directory wicket-1.x [J:\wicket-1.x]dir Volume in drive J is 50_05_27 Serial number is 2CFB:D6F8 Directory of J:\wicket-1.x\* 4-02-2007 12:01 . 4-02-2007 12:01 .. 4-02-2007 12:11 wicket 4-02-2007 12:20 wicket-auth-roles 4-02-2007 11:59 wicket-auth-roles-examples 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-examples 4-02-2007 12:16 wicket-extensions 4-02-2007 11:59 wicket-jmx 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-parent 4-02-2007 12:00 wicket-portlet-examples 4-02-2007 12:02 wicket-quickstart 4-02-2007 11:58 wicket-sandbox 4-02-2007 11:59 wicket-spring 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-spring-annot 4-02-2007 11:58 wicket-spring-annot-examples 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-spring-cattr 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-spring-cattr-examples 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-spring-examples 4-02-2007 12:00 wicket-threadtest cd wicket mvn -Pjdk1.5 -Dmaven.test.skip=true install works fine, maven got installed into the local repository but a cd wicket-auth-roles ( or wicket-extensions ) mvn -Pjdk1.5 -Dmaven.test.skip=true install halts with... what am I doing wrong ? [J:\wicket-1.x\wicket-auth-roles]mvn -Pjdk1.5 -Dmaven.test.skip=true install [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] Building Wicket Auth Roles [INFO]task-segment: [install] [INFO] [INFO] [resources:resources] [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM). Project ID: null:wicket:jar:1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT Reason: Cannot find parent: org.apache.wicket:wicket-parent for project: null:wicket:jar:1.3-incubat ing-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 2 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Sun Feb 04 12:36:30 CET 2007 [INFO] Final Memory: 5M/10M [INFO] 4NT: J:\maven-2.0.4\bin\mvn.bat [145] Missing SETLOCAL [J:\wicket-1.x\wicket-auth-roles] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-Dev--error-in-build-tf3169365.html#a8791845 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: [Wicket-Dev] error in build
see a 2 or 3 post down: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-parent/README.TXT On 2/4/07, nilo de roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I use windows XP, downloaded wicket-1.x with svn to a directory wicket-1.x [J:\wicket-1.x]dir Volume in drive J is 50_05_27 Serial number is 2CFB:D6F8 Directory of J:\wicket-1.x\* 4-02-2007 12:01 . 4-02-2007 12:01 .. 4-02-2007 12:11 wicket 4-02-2007 12:20 wicket-auth-roles 4-02-2007 11:59 wicket-auth-roles-examples 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-examples 4-02-2007 12:16 wicket-extensions 4-02-2007 11:59 wicket-jmx 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-parent 4-02-2007 12:00 wicket-portlet-examples 4-02-2007 12:02 wicket-quickstart 4-02-2007 11:58 wicket-sandbox 4-02-2007 11:59 wicket-spring 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-spring-annot 4-02-2007 11:58 wicket-spring-annot-examples 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-spring-cattr 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-spring-cattr-examples 4-02-2007 12:01 wicket-spring-examples 4-02-2007 12:00 wicket-threadtest cd wicket mvn -Pjdk1.5 -Dmaven.test.skip=true install works fine, maven got installed into the local repository but a cd wicket-auth-roles ( or wicket-extensions ) mvn -Pjdk1.5 -Dmaven.test.skip=true install halts with... what am I doing wrong ? [J:\wicket-1.x\wicket-auth-roles]mvn -Pjdk1.5 -Dmaven.test.skip=trueinstall [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] Building Wicket Auth Roles [INFO]task-segment: [install] [INFO] [INFO] [resources:resources] [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM). Project ID: null:wicket:jar:1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT Reason: Cannot find parent: org.apache.wicket:wicket-parent for project: null:wicket:jar:1.3-incubat ing-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 2 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Sun Feb 04 12:36:30 CET 2007 [INFO] Final Memory: 5M/10M [INFO] 4NT: J:\maven-2.0.4\bin\mvn.bat [145] Missing SETLOCAL [J:\wicket-1.x\wicket-auth-roles] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-Dev--error-in-build-tf3169365.html#a8791845 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?
Adventures in modern compillation of the phonebook app, 6 hours yesterday, 6 hours today, what a complete waste of time. Yeah, I know: "you should not touch anything beyond 1.2.4" "If you can't stand the heat..." I am off. [J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target]dir Volume in drive J is 50_05_27 Serial number is 2CFB:D6F8 Directory of J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target\* 4-02-2007 13:18 . 4-02-2007 13:18 .. 4-02-2007 13:16 apidocs 4-02-2007 12:05 classes 4-02-2007 12:06 surefire-reports 4-02-2007 12:06 test-classes 4-02-2007 13:18 5,171,647 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar 4-02-2007 13:26 2,695,811,776 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar 4-02-2007 13:16 1,378,241 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar 2,702,361,664 bytes in 3 files and 6 dirs2,702,368,768 bytes allocated 13,240,459,264 bytes free -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-dev--2GB-sources--tf3169499.html#a8792201 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: VOTE: wicket-datetime (was: VOTE: add Joda time as a dependency)
One of the issues with the old one was that it depended on the date format that was used by the date converter(s). It is/ was pretty ugly actually. It would be great if we would have a way to get the pattern that will be used for input/ output for date, time and number converters used by a component. That way, several components like a date field and date picker can work better together than is the case now. isn't that how it is done with the old datepicker? it gets the format out of the converter and that is as far as i know the only thing how to really do it if you want client side validation or have the pattern on the clientside for what ever reason. in the end the converter of the DatePicker converts the string. so that has to be in sync johan
Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?
thats very strange. We do those build all the time and on our build server they are done after every commit http://wicketstuff.org/bamboo/start.action? i guess everybody can get the latest build (that was successful) from that location. http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/ On 2/4/07, nilo de roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Adventures in modern compillation of the phonebook app, 6 hours yesterday, 6 hours today, what a complete waste of time. Yeah, I know: "you should not touch anything beyond 1.2.4" "If you can't stand the heat..." I am off. [J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target]dir Volume in drive J is 50_05_27 Serial number is 2CFB:D6F8 Directory of J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target\* 4-02-2007 13:18 . 4-02-2007 13:18 .. 4-02-2007 13:16 apidocs 4-02-2007 12:05 classes 4-02-2007 12:06 surefire-reports 4-02-2007 12:06 test-classes 4-02-2007 13:18 5,171,647 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar 4-02-2007 13:26 2,695,811,776 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar 4-02-2007 13:16 1,378,241 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar 2,702,361,664 bytes in 3 files and 6 dirs2,702,368,768 bytes allocated 13,240,459,264 bytes free -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-dev--2GB-sources--tf3169499.html#a8792201 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
WICKETxSITE and svn
As per requirement of our incubation process I have committed our exported site to our subversion repository. Changes to the stylesheet can now be done 'off line' and then committed to svn. If you have made such changes, and they are trivial or apparent bug fixes then please feel free to svn update our website yourself. To do so, log on using ssh to people.apache.org and perform a svn up /www/incubator.apache.org/wicket If the change is larger, then please check out the site to your own people.apache.org public_html directory and ask for a vote or comments on the matter at hand, providing your public_html directory link. setting that up is as easy as svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wicket/site Things as fixes to font sizes, margins, paddings and better alignment of headings are welcomed. Martijn -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: WICKETxSITE and svn
As a warning... the contents of the html files is scrapped and overwritten by our export from confluence. So don't commit that to subversion. Martijn On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As per requirement of our incubation process I have committed our exported site to our subversion repository. Changes to the stylesheet can now be done 'off line' and then committed to svn. If you have made such changes, and they are trivial or apparent bug fixes then please feel free to svn update our website yourself. To do so, log on using ssh to people.apache.org and perform a svn up /www/incubator.apache.org/wicket If the change is larger, then please check out the site to your own people.apache.org public_html directory and ask for a vote or comments on the matter at hand, providing your public_html directory link. setting that up is as easy as svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wicket/site Things as fixes to font sizes, margins, paddings and better alignment of headings are welcomed. Martijn -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
[wicket-1.2.5] unittest failures when running from wicket-parent
The file upload field test fails because it can't find the DTD file. I think this is because the multimodule build keeps the startup directory inside the wicket-parent folder. Another one: === wicket.markup.html.panel.PanelWithAttributeModifierPage === [surefire] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Time elapsed: 0.079 sec FAILURE !! Martijn -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: [wicket-1.2.5] unittest failures when running from wicket-parent
OK, I fixed the first one. the second doesn't come up anymore... Martijn On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The file upload field test fails because it can't find the DTD file. I think this is because the multimodule build keeps the startup directory inside the wicket-parent folder. Another one: === wicket.markup.html.panel.PanelWithAttributeModifierPage === [surefire] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Time elapsed: 0.079 sec FAILURE !! Martijn -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: [wicket-1.2.5] unittest failures when running from wicket-parent
On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The file upload field test fails because it can't find the DTD file. I think this is because the multimodule build keeps the startup directory inside the wicket-parent folder. We have talked about it before and I still have an outstanding with using a mock test file which we know will be there. Perhaps I can use your testfile :) Frank
Re: [wicket-1.2.5] unittest failures when running from wicket-parent
The fix:
URI uri = new URI(getClass().getResource("localfileinclasspathdir").toString());
... new File(uri) ...
Martijn
On 2/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The file upload field test fails because it can't find the DTD file. I
> think this is because the multimodule build keeps the startup
> directory inside the wicket-parent folder.
>
We have talked about it before and I still have an outstanding with using a
mock test file which we know will be there. Perhaps I can use your testfile
:)
Frank
--
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?
12 hours for installing maven 2, getting the sources from svn and running 'mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true'? Wow, that must be a world record :) Takes less than a minute to run for me. And my wicket target dir is just a couple of MB. Maybe building from source is just not for you and you're better off getting the snapshots from http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/ (like Johan said). There are separate jars with the javadocs and sources. Eelco On 2/4/07, nilo de roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Adventures in modern compillation of the phonebook app, 6 hours yesterday, 6 hours today, what a complete waste of time. Yeah, I know: "you should not touch anything beyond 1.2.4" "If you can't stand the heat..." I am off. [J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target]dir Volume in drive J is 50_05_27 Serial number is 2CFB:D6F8 Directory of J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target\* 4-02-2007 13:18 . 4-02-2007 13:18 .. 4-02-2007 13:16 apidocs 4-02-2007 12:05 classes 4-02-2007 12:06 surefire-reports 4-02-2007 12:06 test-classes 4-02-2007 13:18 5,171,647 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar 4-02-2007 13:26 2,695,811,776 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar 4-02-2007 13:16 1,378,241 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar 2,702,361,664 bytes in 3 files and 6 dirs2,702,368,768 bytes allocated 13,240,459,264 bytes free -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-dev--2GB-sources--tf3169499.html#a8792201 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: VOTE: wicket-datetime (was: VOTE: add Joda time as a dependency)
the one i started in wicket-stuff works a bit different afair. it has javascript that can parse simpledateformat expressions. so you give the expression to the component - or it gets one out of locale, whatever, and then passes it to the javascript. so it stays in sync that way. -igor On 2/4/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One of the issues with the old one was that it depended on the date > format that was used by the date converter(s). It is/ was pretty ugly > actually. It would be great if we would have a way to get the pattern > that will be used for input/ output for date, time and number > converters used by a component. That way, several components like a > date field and date picker can work better together than is the case > now. isn't that how it is done with the old datepicker? it gets the format out of the converter and that is as far as i know the only thing how to really do it if you want client side validation or have the pattern on the clientside for what ever reason. in the end the converter of the DatePicker converts the string. so that has to be in sync johan
Re: VOTE: wicket-datetime (was: VOTE: add Joda time as a dependency)
isn't that how it is done with the old datepicker?
it gets the format out of the converter
Yeah, with this code:
if (dateConverter == null)
{
// TODO this should be much easier and nicer to do in
2.0
IConverter typeConverter =
target.getConverter(Date.class);
if (typeConverter instanceof DateConverter)
{
dateConverter = (DateConverter)typeConverter;
}
if (dateConverter == null)
{
dateConverter = new DateConverter();
}
}
DateFormat df = dateConverter.getDateFormat(target.getLocale());
if (df instanceof SimpleDateFormat)
{
pattern = ((SimpleDateFormat)df).toPattern();
}
b.append(settings.toScript(target.getLocale(), pattern));
int last = b.length() - 1;
if (',' == b.charAt(last))
{
b.deleteCharAt(last);
}
Looking at that definitively doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling inside.
Eelco
Re: VOTE: wicket-datetime (was: VOTE: add Joda time as a dependency)
and where does it get the expression from? You give it to the component? So when you say: setFormatString(String) you also initialize the dateconverter? That would be a bit better yes. If the component just makes the converter instead of getting one and then extracting the string. johan On 2/4/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the one i started in wicket-stuff works a bit different afair. it has javascript that can parse simpledateformat expressions. so you give the expression to the component - or it gets one out of locale, whatever, and then passes it to the javascript. so it stays in sync that way. -igor On 2/4/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > One of the issues with the old one was that it depended on the date > > format that was used by the date converter(s). It is/ was pretty ugly > > actually. It would be great if we would have a way to get the pattern > > that will be used for input/ output for date, time and number > > converters used by a component. That way, several components like a > > date field and date picker can work better together than is the case > > now. > > > isn't that how it is done with the old datepicker? > it gets the format out of the converter > and that is as far as i know the only thing how to really do it if you > want > client side validation or have the pattern on the clientside for what ever > reason. > > in the end the converter of the DatePicker converts the string. so that > has > to be in sync > > johan > >
Re: Move parts of documentation from wiki to WICKETxSITE
Very cool. Thanks for explaining Martijn, Eelco On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It is as easy to maintain as the WICKET site. It is the same confluence. Same markup. If you can write in WICKET, then you can write in WICKETxSITE. After the export to cwiki.apache.org a script from Jeff Turner copies the contents of all confluence spaces to his people.apache.org home directory, found here: http://people.apache.org/~jefft/confluence/ Now the difference kicks in: a small script (attached to the JIRA issue WICKET-25 or one of its subtasks) runs in my crontab and copies the files from Jeff's folders to our /www/incubator.apache.org and that is it. Martijn On 2/4/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it is (at least almost) as easy to maintain then the WIKI, then > fine, so I guess we can see how well the confluence export (cause > that's still what we're going to do right? is there any work done on > documenting how that would work?) works, and if that works well, then > we can give our site some more body. > > Eelco > > > On 2/3/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why? It is part of our documentation. It is maintained by wicket core > > devs. There is no reason for it to be at the general wiki. The purpose > > of our core site is to add content to it, not keep it a 2 pager. > > > > Martijn > -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: Move parts of documentation from wiki to WICKETxSITE
I've created a document on our site for this... http://incubator.apache.org/wicket/writing-documentation.html Martijn On 2/4/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Very cool. Thanks for explaining Martijn, Eelco On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is as easy to maintain as the WICKET site. It is the same > confluence. Same markup. If you can write in WICKET, then you can > write in WICKETxSITE. > > After the export to cwiki.apache.org a script from Jeff Turner copies > the contents of all confluence spaces to his people.apache.org home > directory, found here: > http://people.apache.org/~jefft/confluence/ > > Now the difference kicks in: a small script (attached to the JIRA > issue WICKET-25 or one of its subtasks) runs in my crontab and copies > the files from Jeff's folders to our /www/incubator.apache.org > > and that is it. > > Martijn > > On 2/4/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If it is (at least almost) as easy to maintain then the WIKI, then > > fine, so I guess we can see how well the confluence export (cause > > that's still what we're going to do right? is there any work done on > > documenting how that would work?) works, and if that works well, then > > we can give our site some more body. > > > > Eelco > > > > > > On 2/3/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Why? It is part of our documentation. It is maintained by wicket core > > > devs. There is no reason for it to be at the general wiki. The purpose > > > of our core site is to add content to it, not keep it a 2 pager. > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > -- > Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! > http://wicketframework.org > -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?
I had something similar running 'mvn package' for the 1.3 snapshot: -rw-r--r-- 1 nick nick5026495 Jan 30 12:27 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 nick nick 343219914 Jan 30 12:28 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 nick nick1381628 Jan 30 12:26 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar On 2/4/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 12 hours for installing maven 2, getting the sources from svn and running 'mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true'? Wow, that must be a world record :) Takes less than a minute to run for me. And my wicket target dir is just a couple of MB. Maybe building from source is just not for you and you're better off getting the snapshots from http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/ (like Johan said). There are separate jars with the javadocs and sources. Eelco On 2/4/07, nilo de roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Adventures in modern compillation of the phonebook app, 6 hours yesterday, 6 > hours today, what a complete waste of time. Yeah, I know: "you should not > touch anything beyond 1.2.4" "If you can't stand the heat..." > I am off. > > [J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target]dir > > Volume in drive J is 50_05_27 Serial number is 2CFB:D6F8 > Directory of J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target\* > > 4-02-2007 13:18 . > 4-02-2007 13:18 .. > 4-02-2007 13:16 apidocs > 4-02-2007 12:05 classes > 4-02-2007 12:06 surefire-reports > 4-02-2007 12:06 test-classes > 4-02-2007 13:18 5,171,647 > wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar > 4-02-2007 13:26 2,695,811,776 > wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar > 4-02-2007 13:16 1,378,241 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar > 2,702,361,664 bytes in 3 files and 6 dirs2,702,368,768 bytes allocated > 13,240,459,264 bytes free > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-dev--2GB-sources--tf3169499.html#a8792201 > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Nick Heudecker Professional Wicket Training & Consulting http://www.systemmobile.com Eventful - Intelligent Event Management http://www.eventfulhq.com
Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?
Hmm seems something wrong with the settings I think? Can you see what is inside the sources jar? It looks like it took your movies collection and put it in there. Martijn On 2/4/07, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I had something similar running 'mvn package' for the 1.3 snapshot: -rw-r--r-- 1 nick nick5026495 Jan 30 12:27 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 nick nick 343219914 Jan 30 12:28 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 nick nick1381628 Jan 30 12:26 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar On 2/4/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 12 hours for installing maven 2, getting the sources from svn and > running 'mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true'? Wow, that must be > a world record :) Takes less than a minute to run for me. And my > wicket target dir is just a couple of MB. > > Maybe building from source is just not for you and you're better off > getting the snapshots from > http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/ (like Johan > said). There are separate jars with the javadocs and sources. > > Eelco > > > On 2/4/07, nilo de roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Adventures in modern compillation of the phonebook app, 6 hours > yesterday, 6 > > hours today, what a complete waste of time. Yeah, I know: "you should > not > > touch anything beyond 1.2.4" "If you can't stand the heat..." > > I am off. > > > > [J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target]dir > > > > Volume in drive J is 50_05_27 Serial number is 2CFB:D6F8 > > Directory of J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target\* > > > > 4-02-2007 13:18 . > > 4-02-2007 13:18 .. > > 4-02-2007 13:16 apidocs > > 4-02-2007 12:05 classes > > 4-02-2007 12:06 surefire-reports > > 4-02-2007 12:06 test-classes > > 4-02-2007 13:18 5,171,647 > > wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar > > 4-02-2007 13:26 2,695,811,776 > > wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar > > 4-02-2007 13:16 1,378,241 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar > > 2,702,361,664 bytes in 3 files and 6 dirs2,702,368,768 bytes > allocated > > 13,240,459,264 bytes free > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-dev--2GB-sources--tf3169499.html#a8792201 > > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > -- Nick Heudecker Professional Wicket Training & Consulting http://www.systemmobile.com Eventful - Intelligent Event Management http://www.eventfulhq.com -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?
It looks like it's attempting to jar up the entire 'wicket' directory. On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hmm seems something wrong with the settings I think? Can you see what is inside the sources jar? It looks like it took your movies collection and put it in there. Martijn On 2/4/07, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had something similar running 'mvn package' for the 1.3 snapshot: > > -rw-r--r-- 1 nick nick5026495 Jan 30 12:27 > wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar > -rw-r--r-- 1 nick nick 343219914 Jan 30 12:28 > wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar > -rw-r--r-- 1 nick nick1381628 Jan 30 12:26 > wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar > > On 2/4/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 12 hours for installing maven 2, getting the sources from svn and > > running 'mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true'? Wow, that must be > > a world record :) Takes less than a minute to run for me. And my > > wicket target dir is just a couple of MB. > > > > Maybe building from source is just not for you and you're better off > > getting the snapshots from > > http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/ (like Johan > > said). There are separate jars with the javadocs and sources. > > > > Eelco > > > > > > On 2/4/07, nilo de roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Adventures in modern compillation of the phonebook app, 6 hours > > yesterday, 6 > > > hours today, what a complete waste of time. Yeah, I know: "you should > > not > > > touch anything beyond 1.2.4" "If you can't stand the heat..." > > > I am off. > > > > > > [J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target]dir > > > > > > Volume in drive J is 50_05_27 Serial number is 2CFB:D6F8 > > > Directory of J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target\* > > > > > > 4-02-2007 13:18 . > > > 4-02-2007 13:18 .. > > > 4-02-2007 13:16 apidocs > > > 4-02-2007 12:05 classes > > > 4-02-2007 12:06 surefire-reports > > > 4-02-2007 12:06 test-classes > > > 4-02-2007 13:18 5,171,647 > > > wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar > > > 4-02-2007 13:26 2,695,811,776 > > > wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar > > > 4-02-2007 13:16 1,378,241 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar > > > 2,702,361,664 bytes in 3 files and 6 dirs2,702,368,768 bytes > > allocated > > > 13,240,459,264 bytes free > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-dev--2GB-sources--tf3169499.html#a8792201 > > > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Nick Heudecker > Professional Wicket Training & Consulting > http://www.systemmobile.com > > Eventful - Intelligent Event Management > http://www.eventfulhq.com > > -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org -- Nick Heudecker Professional Wicket Training & Consulting http://www.systemmobile.com Eventful - Intelligent Event Management http://www.eventfulhq.com
Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?
Gah... also on our repository it is too big: wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar 18346.6 kb Martijn On 2/4/07, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It looks like it's attempting to jar up the entire 'wicket' directory. On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm seems something wrong with the settings I think? > > Can you see what is inside the sources jar? It looks like it took your > movies collection and put it in there. > > Martijn > > On 2/4/07, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had something similar running 'mvn package' for the 1.3 snapshot: > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 nick nick5026495 Jan 30 12:27 > > wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar > > -rw-r--r-- 1 nick nick 343219914 Jan 30 12:28 > > wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar > > -rw-r--r-- 1 nick nick1381628 Jan 30 12:26 > > wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar > > > > On 2/4/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > 12 hours for installing maven 2, getting the sources from svn and > > > running 'mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true'? Wow, that must be > > > a world record :) Takes less than a minute to run for me. And my > > > wicket target dir is just a couple of MB. > > > > > > Maybe building from source is just not for you and you're better off > > > getting the snapshots from > > > http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/ (like Johan > > > said). There are separate jars with the javadocs and sources. > > > > > > Eelco > > > > > > > > > On 2/4/07, nilo de roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Adventures in modern compillation of the phonebook app, 6 hours > > > yesterday, 6 > > > > hours today, what a complete waste of time. Yeah, I know: "you > should > > > not > > > > touch anything beyond 1.2.4" "If you can't stand the heat..." > > > > I am off. > > > > > > > > [J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target]dir > > > > > > > > Volume in drive J is 50_05_27 Serial number is 2CFB:D6F8 > > > > Directory of J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target\* > > > > > > > > 4-02-2007 13:18 . > > > > 4-02-2007 13:18 .. > > > > 4-02-2007 13:16 apidocs > > > > 4-02-2007 12:05 classes > > > > 4-02-2007 12:06 surefire-reports > > > > 4-02-2007 12:06 test-classes > > > > 4-02-2007 13:18 5,171,647 > > > > wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar > > > > 4-02-2007 13:26 2,695,811,776 > > > > wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar > > > > 4-02-2007 13:16 1,378,241 > wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar > > > > 2,702,361,664 bytes in 3 files and 6 dirs2,702,368,768 bytes > > > allocated > > > > 13,240,459,264 bytes free > > > > > > > > -- > > > > View this message in context: > > > > http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-dev--2GB-sources--tf3169499.html#a8792201 > > > > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Nick Heudecker > > Professional Wicket Training & Consulting > > http://www.systemmobile.com > > > > Eventful - Intelligent Event Management > > http://www.eventfulhq.com > > > > > > > -- > Vote for Wicket at the > http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! > http://wicketframework.org > -- Nick Heudecker Professional Wicket Training & Consulting http://www.systemmobile.com Eventful - Intelligent Event Management http://www.eventfulhq.com -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: VOTE: add Joda time as a dependency
It is so big because it contains a snapshot of the tz database. Regards, Erik. Johan Compagner wrote: why is it so big? complete wicket is 1.5 so only some date manipulations are 1/3th? johan -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?
Hi, "... building from source is just not for you ..." That's too friendly, let me bite some dust. I explained why I can't use the snapshots for my purpose. To the point. I am not a quitter, as you can see: [INFO]Installing Q:\wicket-phonebook-1.x\target\wicket-phonebook-1.2.war to j:\maven-2.0.4\repository\wicket-stuff\wicket-phonebook\1.2\wicket-phonebook-1.2.war [INFO] [INFO]BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] [INFO]Total time: 20 seconds [INFO]Finished at: Sun Feb 04 22:02:45 CET 2007 [INFO]Final Memory: 42M/85M [INFO] It took some time because there were some tiny-typo's in the pom.xml, which I would not have mentioned if it was not something that a decent Maven-IDE-plugin would have taken care of. I have mevenide for NetBeans, but there is one for Eclipse as well. Do I have commit access to where the phonebook app is? If so, I'll update the pom. Weekend, at last - nilo Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > 12 hours for installing maven 2, getting the sources from svn and > running 'mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true'? Wow, that must be > a world record :) Takes less than a minute to run for me. And my > wicket target dir is just a couple of MB. > > Maybe building from source is just not for you and you're better off > getting the snapshots from > http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/ (like Johan > said). There are separate jars with the javadocs and sources. > > Eelco > > > On 2/4/07, nilo de roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Adventures in modern compillation of the phonebook app, 6 hours >> yesterday, 6 >> hours today, what a complete waste of time. Yeah, I know: "you should not >> touch anything beyond 1.2.4" "If you can't stand the heat..." >> I am off. >> >> [J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target]dir >> >> Volume in drive J is 50_05_27 Serial number is 2CFB:D6F8 >> Directory of J:\wicket-1.x\wicket\target\* >> >> 4-02-2007 13:18 . >> 4-02-2007 13:18 .. >> 4-02-2007 13:16 apidocs >> 4-02-2007 12:05 classes >> 4-02-2007 12:06 surefire-reports >> 4-02-2007 12:06 test-classes >> 4-02-2007 13:18 5,171,647 >> wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar >> 4-02-2007 13:26 2,695,811,776 >> wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar >> 4-02-2007 13:16 1,378,241 wicket-1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar >> 2,702,361,664 bytes in 3 files and 6 dirs2,702,368,768 bytes >> allocated >> 13,240,459,264 bytes free >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-dev--2GB-sources--tf3169499.html#a8792201 >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-dev--2GB-sources--tf3169499.html#a8797515 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?
On 2/4/07, nilo de roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To the point. I am not a quitter, as you can see: Great! On the 2GB thing, how is that possible? It looks like the source plugin takes it one directory too high up. I'm curious if it added the whole j: drive. It took some time because there were some tiny-typo's in the pom.xml, which I would not have mentioned if it was not something that a decent Maven-IDE-plugin would have taken care of. I have mevenide for NetBeans, but there is one for Eclipse as well. Do I have commit access to where the phonebook app is? If so, I'll update the pom. Do you have commit access to the Wicket Stuff svn? If so, then you can modify the files. If not, I guess we can grant access. Especially when/if you are going to upgrade the groovy integration. Anyone object? Martijn -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: [Wicket-dev] 2GB sources?
Do you have commit access to the Wicket Stuff svn? If so, then you can modify the files. If not, I guess we can grant access. Especially when/if you are going to upgrade the groovy integration. Anyone object? I already added Nilo when he proposed to work on Groovy integration. Fixes are welcome, thanks, Eelco
[Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5
This is a vote to release Wicket 1.2.5. I have uploaded (or am in the process of uploading) the distributions to my people.apache.org account. You can download the archives here: http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-1.2.5/ Please check the release and cast your vote. This vote is for all projects listed on this site. [ ] Don't release, because... [ ] Share these files with the greater public Note that this release is not to be released at Apache but at the SourceForge servers. This vote is primarily a practice run for 1.3. Martijn -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Wicket incubator status page
The page at: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/wicket Seems a bit out of date. Are the PPMC members or the mentors responsible for maintaining this file? Martijn -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: [Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5
[ ] Don't release, because... [ x ] Share these files with the greater public Looks good! Eelco
Re: [Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5
On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [ ] Don't release, because... [x] Share these files with the greater public Well... :o) The artifacts looks "ok" since we don't release them as ASF endorsed. They of cause lack the stuff we have been working on for 1.3. One thing though. It's good that you have put the DISCLAIMER in the NOTICE files, but perhaps we should also have it in the jar files (the NOTICE I mean). But then again it's an unofficial release... WDYT? Frank
Re: [Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5
Another thing: Where is wicket-examples? Frank On 2/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ ] Don't release, because... > [x] Share these files with the greater public > Well... :o) The artifacts looks "ok" since we don't release them as ASF endorsed. They of cause lack the stuff we have been working on for 1.3. One thing though. It's good that you have put the DISCLAIMER in the NOTICE files, but perhaps we should also have it in the jar files (the NOTICE I mean). But then again it's an unofficial release... WDYT? Frank
Re: [Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5
The artifacts looks "ok" since we don't release them as ASF endorsed. They of cause lack the stuff we have been working on for 1.3. The idea was to check if we don't rubberstamp our release. Any issues found with this release should be noted, and then flagged as not needed *this* time. One thing though. It's good that you have put the DISCLAIMER in the NOTICE files, but perhaps we should also have it in the jar files (the NOTICE I mean). But then again it's an unofficial release... WDYT? I'd like us to discover the issues as were it an ASF project, but not do anything about it, or as little as possible. In this case however, adding the license and notice files to the JAR seems like a good idea to do. That would make sure RAT doesn't go into a fit? Martijn -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: [Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5
Good catch! Martijn On 2/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Another thing: Where is wicket-examples? Frank On 2/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [ ] Don't release, because... > > [x] Share these files with the greater public > > > > > Well... :o) > The artifacts looks "ok" since we don't release them as ASF endorsed. They > of cause lack the stuff we have been working on for 1.3. > > One thing though. It's good that you have put the DISCLAIMER in the NOTICE > files, but perhaps we should also have it in the jar files (the NOTICE I > mean). But then again it's an unofficial release... WDYT? > > Frank > -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: [Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5
Now available. Martijn On 2/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Another thing: Where is wicket-examples? Frank On 2/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [ ] Don't release, because... > > [x] Share these files with the greater public > > > > > Well... :o) > The artifacts looks "ok" since we don't release them as ASF endorsed. They > of cause lack the stuff we have been working on for 1.3. > > One thing though. It's good that you have put the DISCLAIMER in the NOTICE > files, but perhaps we should also have it in the jar files (the NOTICE I > mean). But then again it's an unofficial release... WDYT? > > Frank > -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
Re: VOTE: wicket-datetime (was: VOTE: add Joda time as a dependency)
On 2/3/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok, what about this: we create wicket-datetime, which depends on Joda time, and includes all the date/ time nifty stuff we can come up with, including the dreaded date picker? I went ahead with the project and committed wicket-datetime in the 1.x branch. The components are reasonably stable and feature complete as they are partially based on stuff I already had, and this time (learning from past mistakes) I'm trying to keep them simple (so rather then having everything configurable, people should start implementing their own variations soon with a little bit more hand work). The date picker is based on YUI. I agree with some of you it is a bit on the heavy side, and unfortunately, it doesn't come packed with a bunch of localized texts, but otoh, it looks very decent and is very flexbile and the API is very nice. I have no problem at all with us having multiple datepickers (depending on Joda time or not) in Wicket core projects; I would say more choice == power to our users. So Al/ Igor/ ... if you have one you think is good, please go ahead and commit to wicket-extensions. I hope other people do take a look at wicket-datetime and come up with some useful additions (or suggestions). Martijn/ Frank, I think I got all the headers, notices and patch to wicket-parent done ok and testing building the whole bunch. But if one of you could double check please... Eelco
Re: ASL compatibility overview for 3rd party tools
On 2/3/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2/3/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Important discussions that happen on IRC (of course, "define > important" is the next question...) must also be summarized to the > list or the tracker. Important would mean in my book: resulting in changes in our code base, or the lack thereof (i.e. the decision/discussion not to do something)... 100% agreed. ...At least it helps prevent heraldry type of comments regarding offline development. (I know there is more to Heraldry than just not functioning on the dev list).. Yes, and it goes much further than just comments: making sure everything "important" happens on the lists or in the tracker is the best way to ensure a long life for a project, by exposing all decisions in our archives. This helps make the software maintainable by other people than the ones who create it, which is a major goal of the ASF. -Bertrand
