Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment: optionally replace the tag

[Thomas Singer]

BTW, for what purpose the Fragment constructor with the MarkupStream  
parameter exists?

Tom


On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:14:36 +0200, Martijn Dashorst  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> This is very nasty code: creating a page upfront and not having it be
> part of the request cycle. Constructing a page can be very costly in
> terms of memory usage and performance (models pulling data).
>
> I highly recommend pulling this example from confluence, as it is
> unnecessary (use panels instead) and is as dangerous as adding new
> Page()'s to a PageLink (also not recommended).
>
> Martijn
>
>
> On 4/9/07, Thomas Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I meant, when I don't use the -tags (like in the  
>> example at
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Fragment#Fragment-Fragmentsfromotherpages
>> ).
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
>> > fragment doesnt own wicket:fragment, only whatever is inside the
>> >  tags
>> >
>> > -igor
>> >
>> >
>> > On 4/8/07, *Thomas Singer* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Currently, when using the Fragment component, only the content
>> > between the
>> > opening and closing tag seems to be replaced. What about  
>> optionally
>> > replacing the tag, too?
>> >
>> > Tom
>>
>>
>> -
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share  
>> your
>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> ___
>> Wicket-user mailing list
>> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>>
>
>



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Submit failure

[Roman Mandeleil]

Hi , 


What is the right way to identify that a submit was failed ( e.g. there is
no connection to the server ) ? 


Best regards 
Mandeleil Roman
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Submit-failure-tf3551190.html#a9914206
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment: optionally replace the tag

[Thomas Singer]

OK, do so.

Tom


On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:14:36 +0200, Martijn Dashorst  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> This is very nasty code: creating a page upfront and not having it be
> part of the request cycle. Constructing a page can be very costly in
> terms of memory usage and performance (models pulling data).
>
> I highly recommend pulling this example from confluence, as it is
> unnecessary (use panels instead) and is as dangerous as adding new
> Page()'s to a PageLink (also not recommended).
>
> Martijn
>
>
> On 4/9/07, Thomas Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I meant, when I don't use the -tags (like in the  
>> example at
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Fragment#Fragment-Fragmentsfromotherpages
>> ).
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
>> > fragment doesnt own wicket:fragment, only whatever is inside the
>> >  tags
>> >
>> > -igor
>> >
>> >
>> > On 4/8/07, *Thomas Singer* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Currently, when using the Fragment component, only the content
>> > between the
>> > opening and closing tag seems to be replaced. What about  
>> optionally
>> > replacing the tag, too?
>> >
>> > Tom
>>
>>
>> -
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share  
>> your
>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> ___
>> Wicket-user mailing list
>> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>>
>
>



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page

[Peter Thomas]

created JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-456

And when I use HeaderContributor (instead of wicket:head in the markup) it
works fine as expected.

Thanks,

Peter.

On 4/9/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


We already do parse content of , but only to filter hader
contribution contributed by ajax (in javascript).

-Matej

On 4/9/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we are talking about two different panel classes contributing the same
> , that means we need to break the head down into individual tags
and
> process them that way.
>
> this isnt the case where we filter contributions from two instances of
the
> same panel class.
>
> -igor
>
>
>
> On 4/9/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > it shouldn't be to hard i guess to send that blob through the header
> > > contributor?
> > > Because then it will be filtered because the head part is always the
> same
> > > for a static script
> >
> > I would have sworn we already did that. Calls for a JIRA issue.
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> >
>
-
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share
> your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> >
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
>
>
-
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component

[Igor Vaynberg]

looks good without actually running the code :)

-igor


On 4/9/07, Carlos Pita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Well, here is what I've done based on your suggestions. Please review
this and tell me if it can be improved, if you are so kind:

1)  An inherited model that looks into the passed model. If it's not
null it returns a propertymodel for the component id a la
CompoundPropertyModel. If it's null it returns a propertymodel for the
parent's model with the full path of the component. So inside my panel
I can add form components as add(new TextField("month",
Integer.class)) independently of the model passed (null or a real
date)

private class MyModel extends Model implements IComponentInheritedModel {
 
public IWrapModel wrapOnInheritance(Component component) {
final IModel wrappedModel;
if (model == null) {
IModel parentModel = DatePanel.this.getParent
().getModel();
String path = DatePanel.this.getParent().getId() + "."
+ component.getId();
wrappedModel = new PropertyModel(parentModel, path);
} else {
wrappedModel = new PropertyModel(model, component.getId
());
}
return new AbstractWrapModel() {
public IModel getWrappedModel() { return wrappedModel;
}
};
}
}

2) To have control on when children are really validated and their
models updated:

public boolean processChildren() { return false; }

3) A DatePanel validator that first validate its fields (so they are
converted too) and finally do global validation (validateDate()). Note
that individual validators can do global validation do, depending on
whether the validation was ajax-triggered or not, so validateDate()
will occur depending on the value of the validateDate flag (true for
ajax-validation, false for individual validators during submit
validation). Notice that validateOnNullValue() must return true or
this validator won't be invoked.

  add(new AbstractValidator() {
protected void onValidate(IValidatable validatable) {
validateDate = false;
yearField.validate();
monthField.validate();
dayField.validate();
validateDate = true;
if (!(yearField.hasErrorMessage() ||
monthField.hasErrorMessage() || dayField.hasErrorMessage())) {
validateDate();
}
}
public boolean validateOnNullValue() { return true; }
});

4) updateModel. Just delegate to fields.

public void updateModel() {
dayField.updateModel();
monthField.updateModel();
yearField.updateModel();
}

Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Carlos

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component

[Carlos Pita]

Well, here is what I've done based on your suggestions. Please review
this and tell me if it can be improved, if you are so kind:

1)  An inherited model that looks into the passed model. If it's not
null it returns a propertymodel for the component id a la
CompoundPropertyModel. If it's null it returns a propertymodel for the
parent's model with the full path of the component. So inside my panel
I can add form components as add(new TextField("month",
Integer.class)) independently of the model passed (null or a real
date)

private class MyModel extends Model implements IComponentInheritedModel {
 
public IWrapModel wrapOnInheritance(Component component) {
final IModel wrappedModel;
if (model == null) {
IModel parentModel = DatePanel.this.getParent().getModel();
String path = DatePanel.this.getParent().getId() + "."
 + component.getId();
wrappedModel = new PropertyModel(parentModel, path);
} else {
wrappedModel = new PropertyModel(model, component.getId());
}
return new AbstractWrapModel() {
public IModel getWrappedModel() { return wrappedModel;
}
};
}
}

2) To have control on when children are really validated and their
models updated:

public boolean processChildren() { return false; }

3) A DatePanel validator that first validate its fields (so they are
converted too) and finally do global validation (validateDate()). Note
that individual validators can do global validation do, depending on
whether the validation was ajax-triggered or not, so validateDate()
will occur depending on the value of the validateDate flag (true for
ajax-validation, false for individual validators during submit
validation). Notice that validateOnNullValue() must return true or
this validator won't be invoked.

  add(new AbstractValidator() {
protected void onValidate(IValidatable validatable) {
validateDate = false;
yearField.validate();
monthField.validate();
dayField.validate();
validateDate = true;
if (!(yearField.hasErrorMessage() ||
monthField.hasErrorMessage() || dayField.hasErrorMessage())) {
validateDate();
}
}
public boolean validateOnNullValue() { return true; }
});

4) updateModel. Just delegate to fields.

public void updateModel() {
dayField.updateModel();
monthField.updateModel();
yearField.updateModel();
}

Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Carlos

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component

[Jonathan Locke]

maybe have FormComponentFeedbackBorders for the individual
components and then a global feedback panel to catch the general
ones (install a filter to ignore reporters that have feedback borders)


Carlos Pita-4 wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> suppose you have to implement some form input component that is
> composed from other simple FormComponents. These simple input fields
> will be ajax-validated individually, and they will be subject to some
> global (inter-field) validation too. An example could be three
> drop-downs for a date, with local validation requiring each field and
> global validation asking for a valid Gregorian calendar date. AFAIK
> there are nothing like nested forms in wicket, you have a form and
> then at the next level its FormComponents and that's all. So I tend to
> think of a static helper method that instantiates the individual form
> fields and registers them with the form. Maybe there must be some
> "synthetic" invisible component just to attach feedback from the date
> global-validation, which will be implemented as a form validator. For
> example:
> 
> class MyForm extends Form {
> 
>public MyForm(String id) {
>   
>   DateComponent.add(this, "birthDate");
>   
>}
> }
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> There are two things in this approach that I don't particularly like:
> 
> 1) Having a dummy component to attach date global-validation errors
> (notice that they are not the same as form errors).
> 
> 2) The procedural nature of the solution, there is no real Date component.
> 
> What do you think? Do you have a better alternative that is not too
> convolved?
> 
> Best regards,
> Carlos
> 
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Form-macro-component-tf3549549.html#a9911009
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component

[Igor Vaynberg]

On 4/9/07, Carlos Pita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



1) How can I use a compound property model without naming the nested
form components with their full path (ie. 'birthDate.year' instead of
simply 'year').



use the model luke

what is below is some pseudocode, it is not the best way to do this, but it
will give you an idea.

leave the formcomponentpanel's model null. immediately under it add a
webmarkupcontainer with the following model

class indentingmodel extends Model implements icomponentinheritedmodel {
iwrapmodel wraponinheritance(Component c) {
return new PropertyModel(FormComponentPanel.this.getModel(),
FormComponentPanel.this.getId()+"."+c.getId());
}
}

add all the children to this webmarkupcontainer instead of directly to the
panel. what this model does is any children created without a model will
inherit a model that looks up the property that is prefixed with the
formcomponentpanel's id.

-igor
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component

[Eelco Hillenius]

> 1) How can I use a compound property model without naming the nested
> form components with their full path (ie. 'birthDate.year' instead of
> simply 'year').
>
> 2) If I add a validator to the form component panel (for panel level
> validation), can I assume that the nested component models will be
> already bound when the validator is triggered, or at least that
> getConvertedInput() will work on them?

As you're looking at the date-time components, the answer to both
questions is that clients of those components should consider it
implementation details. Like FormComponentPanel says, it doesn't
typically get any input itself. The nested components really are for
recording intermediate input, which is applied to the model of the
panel when updateModel is called, and as you can see, the internal
state is synchronized in onAttach. I believe you should design such
compound components like black boxes, which from a user's perspective
behave like normal form components (they work on one model, and you
only have to know it's public API).

Eelco

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component

[Carlos Pita]

Hi Eelco,

I've looked at the examples. There are a couple of things that still
troubles me:

1) How can I use a compound property model without naming the nested
form components with their full path (ie. 'birthDate.year' instead of
simply 'year').

2) If I add a validator to the form component panel (for panel level
validation), can I assume that the nested component models will be
already bound when the validator is triggered, or at least that
getConvertedInput() will work on them?

Thank you.
Cheers,
Carlos



On 4/9/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > as a formcomponent itself. and actually wicket does support embedded 
> > > forms.
> >
> > Can you expand on this? Will nested forms be validated and bound
> > before their containers?
>
> Look at wicket.examples.forminput.Multiply and
> wicket.extensions.yui.calendar.(Date)TimeField for examples.
>
> Eelco
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component

[Matej Knopp]

When nested form is submitted, the form components in surrounding
models are given the user input, but they are not processed. So the
input is "persisted" during request, but not validated and processed.
The inner (nested) form, that is submitted is both validated and if
validation succeeds, the models are updated.

-Matej

On 4/9/07, Carlos Pita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > there is a FormComponentPanel that can embed other form components, and act
>
> Great! Btw, is there something more like a border or fragment, to
> "inline" the markup?
>
> > as a formcomponent itself. and actually wicket does support embedded forms.
>
> Can you expand on this? Will nested forms be validated and bound
> before their containers?
>
> Cheers,
> Carlos
>
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/9/07, Carlos Pita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > suppose you have to implement some form input component that is
> > > composed from other simple FormComponents. These simple input fields
> > > will be ajax-validated individually, and they will be subject to some
> > > global (inter-field) validation too. An example could be three
> > > drop-downs for a date, with local validation requiring each field and
> > > global validation asking for a valid Gregorian calendar date. AFAIK
> > > there are nothing like nested forms in wicket, you have a form and
> > > then at the next level its FormComponents and that's all. So I tend to
> > > think of a static helper method that instantiates the individual form
> > > fields and registers them with the form. Maybe there must be some
> > > "synthetic" invisible component just to attach feedback from the date
> > > global-validation, which will be implemented as a form validator. For
> > > example:
> > >
> > > class MyForm extends Form {
> > >
> > >public MyForm(String id) {
> > >   
> > >   DateComponent.add(this, "birthDate");
> > >   
> > >}
> > > }
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> > >  
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > > There are two things in this approach that I don't particularly like:
> > >
> > > 1) Having a dummy component to attach date global-validation errors
> > > (notice that they are not the same as form errors).
> > >
> > > 2) The procedural nature of the solution, there is no real Date component.
> > >
> > > What do you think? Do you have a better alternative that is not too
> > convolved?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > >
> > -
> > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> > your
> > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> > >
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > ___
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > >
> >
> >
> > -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
> >
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component

[Eelco Hillenius]

> > as a formcomponent itself. and actually wicket does support embedded forms.
>
> Can you expand on this? Will nested forms be validated and bound
> before their containers?

Look at wicket.examples.forminput.Multiply and
wicket.extensions.yui.calendar.(Date)TimeField for examples.

Eelco

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component

[Carlos Pita]

> there is a FormComponentPanel that can embed other form components, and act

Great! Btw, is there something more like a border or fragment, to
"inline" the markup?

> as a formcomponent itself. and actually wicket does support embedded forms.

Can you expand on this? Will nested forms be validated and bound
before their containers?

Cheers,
Carlos

>
> -igor
>
>
>
> On 4/9/07, Carlos Pita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > suppose you have to implement some form input component that is
> > composed from other simple FormComponents. These simple input fields
> > will be ajax-validated individually, and they will be subject to some
> > global (inter-field) validation too. An example could be three
> > drop-downs for a date, with local validation requiring each field and
> > global validation asking for a valid Gregorian calendar date. AFAIK
> > there are nothing like nested forms in wicket, you have a form and
> > then at the next level its FormComponents and that's all. So I tend to
> > think of a static helper method that instantiates the individual form
> > fields and registers them with the form. Maybe there must be some
> > "synthetic" invisible component just to attach feedback from the date
> > global-validation, which will be implemented as a form validator. For
> > example:
> >
> > class MyForm extends Form {
> >
> >public MyForm(String id) {
> >   
> >   DateComponent.add(this, "birthDate");
> >   
> >}
> > }
> >
> > 
> > 
> >
> > 
> > 
> >
> > 
> > 
> >
> >  
> > 
> >
> >
> > There are two things in this approach that I don't particularly like:
> >
> > 1) Having a dummy component to attach date global-validation errors
> > (notice that they are not the same as form errors).
> >
> > 2) The procedural nature of the solution, there is no real Date component.
> >
> > What do you think? Do you have a better alternative that is not too
> convolved?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> >
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Form macro-component

[Igor Vaynberg]

there is a FormComponentPanel that can embed other form components, and act
as a formcomponent itself. and actually wicket does support embedded forms.

-igor


On 4/9/07, Carlos Pita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi all,

suppose you have to implement some form input component that is
composed from other simple FormComponents. These simple input fields
will be ajax-validated individually, and they will be subject to some
global (inter-field) validation too. An example could be three
drop-downs for a date, with local validation requiring each field and
global validation asking for a valid Gregorian calendar date. AFAIK
there are nothing like nested forms in wicket, you have a form and
then at the next level its FormComponents and that's all. So I tend to
think of a static helper method that instantiates the individual form
fields and registers them with the form. Maybe there must be some
"synthetic" invisible component just to attach feedback from the date
global-validation, which will be implemented as a form validator. For
example:

class MyForm extends Form {

   public MyForm(String id) {
  
  DateComponent.add(this, "birthDate");
  
   }
}










 



There are two things in this approach that I don't particularly like:

1) Having a dummy component to attach date global-validation errors
(notice that they are not the same as form errors).

2) The procedural nature of the solution, there is no real Date component.

What do you think? Do you have a better alternative that is not too
convolved?

Best regards,
Carlos

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Form macro-component

[Carlos Pita]

Hi all,

suppose you have to implement some form input component that is
composed from other simple FormComponents. These simple input fields
will be ajax-validated individually, and they will be subject to some
global (inter-field) validation too. An example could be three
drop-downs for a date, with local validation requiring each field and
global validation asking for a valid Gregorian calendar date. AFAIK
there are nothing like nested forms in wicket, you have a form and
then at the next level its FormComponents and that's all. So I tend to
think of a static helper method that instantiates the individual form
fields and registers them with the form. Maybe there must be some
"synthetic" invisible component just to attach feedback from the date
global-validation, which will be implemented as a form validator. For
example:

class MyForm extends Form {

   public MyForm(String id) {
  
  DateComponent.add(this, "birthDate");
  
   }
}










 



There are two things in this approach that I don't particularly like:

1) Having a dummy component to attach date global-validation errors
(notice that they are not the same as form errors).

2) The procedural nature of the solution, there is no real Date component.

What do you think? Do you have a better alternative that is not too convolved?

Best regards,
Carlos

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Help Me Improve Wicket Quickstart

[Martin Funk]

> Well, isn't that just what "mvn jetty:run" gives you? :-)
>
talking about quickstart and mvn jetty:run:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-455

Martin

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment: optionally replace the tag

[Igor Vaynberg]

yes +1, just revert to version 3

-igor


On 4/9/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


This is very nasty code: creating a page upfront and not having it be
part of the request cycle. Constructing a page can be very costly in
terms of memory usage and performance (models pulling data).

I highly recommend pulling this example from confluence, as it is
unnecessary (use panels instead) and is as dangerous as adding new
Page()'s to a PageLink (also not recommended).

Martijn


On 4/9/07, Thomas Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I meant, when I don't use the -tags (like in the
example at
>
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Fragment#Fragment-Fragmentsfromotherpages
> ).
>
> Tom
>
> Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
> > fragment doesnt own wicket:fragment, only whatever is inside the
> >  tags
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On 4/8/07, *Thomas Singer* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> > wrote:
> >
> > Currently, when using the Fragment component, only the content
> > between the
> > opening and closing tag seems to be replaced. What about
optionally
> > replacing the tag, too?
> >
> > Tom
>
>
>
-
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment: optionally replace the tag

[Martijn Dashorst]

This is very nasty code: creating a page upfront and not having it be
part of the request cycle. Constructing a page can be very costly in
terms of memory usage and performance (models pulling data).

I highly recommend pulling this example from confluence, as it is
unnecessary (use panels instead) and is as dangerous as adding new
Page()'s to a PageLink (also not recommended).

Martijn


On 4/9/07, Thomas Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I meant, when I don't use the -tags (like in the example at
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Fragment#Fragment-Fragmentsfromotherpages
> ).
>
> Tom
>
> Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
> > fragment doesnt own wicket:fragment, only whatever is inside the
> >  tags
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On 4/8/07, *Thomas Singer* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> > wrote:
> >
> > Currently, when using the Fragment component, only the content
> > between the
> > opening and closing tag seems to be replaced. What about optionally
> > replacing the tag, too?
> >
> > Tom
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


-- 
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page

[Matej Knopp]

We already do parse content of , but only to filter hader
contribution contributed by ajax (in javascript).

-Matej

On 4/9/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we are talking about two different panel classes contributing the same
> , that means we need to break the head down into individual tags and
> process them that way.
>
> this isnt the case where we filter contributions from two instances of the
> same panel class.
>
> -igor
>
>
>
> On 4/9/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > it shouldn't be to hard i guess to send that blob through the header
> > > contributor?
> > > Because then it will be filtered because the head part is always the
> same
> > > for a static script
> >
> > I would have sworn we already did that. Calls for a JIRA issue.
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> >
> -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> >
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page

[Igor Vaynberg]

we are talking about two different panel classes contributing the same
, that means we need to break the head down into individual tags and
process them that way.

this isnt the case where we filter contributions from two instances of the
same panel class.

-igor


On 4/9/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> it shouldn't be to hard i guess to send that blob through the header
> contributor?
> Because then it will be filtered because the head part is always the
same
> for a static script

I would have sworn we already did that. Calls for a JIRA issue.

Eelco

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page

[Eelco Hillenius]

> it shouldn't be to hard i guess to send that blob through the header
> contributor?
> Because then it will be filtered because the head part is always the same
> for a static script

I would have sworn we already did that. Calls for a JIRA issue.

Eelco

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page

[Johan Compagner]

it shouldn't be to hard i guess to send that blob through the header
contributor?
Because then it will be filtered because the head part is always the same
for a static script

johan


On 4/9/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


use IHeaderContributor, contributions through that are filtered.

i dont think we currently parse what exactly is in wicket:head, we just
blob it in. it might be nice to parse it, i dont know, but it is a lot of
work. you can add an rfe if you want, but it will not get a high priority
imho

-igor


On 4/9/07, Peter Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use some Yahoo UI widgets and currently things work fine
> when the required javascript files are contributed using 
>
> But when I have two different panels appearing within the same page -
> and both contributing the same common *.js files, - the page HTML has
> duplicate 

Re: [Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page

[Peter Thomas]

Thanks Igor I'll use IHeaderContributor for now.

On 4/9/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


use IHeaderContributor, contributions through that are filtered.

i dont think we currently parse what exactly is in wicket:head, we just
blob it in. it might be nice to parse it, i dont know, but it is a lot of
work. you can add an rfe if you want, but it will not get a high priority
imho

-igor


On 4/9/07, Peter Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use some Yahoo UI widgets and currently things work fine
> when the required javascript files are contributed using 
>
> But when I have two different panels appearing within the same page -
> and both contributing the same common *.js files, - the page HTML has
> duplicate 

[Wicket-user] failure notice

[MAILER-DAEMON]

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at cenia.net.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

:
66.35.250.206 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 451-Could not complete sender verify callout
451-Could not complete sender verify callout for
451-.
451-The mail server(s) for the domain may be temporarily unreachable, or
451-they may be permanently unreachable from this server. In the latter case,
451-you need to change the address or create an MX record for its domain
451-if it is supposed to be generally accessible from the Internet.
451 Talk to your mail administrator for details.
Giving up on 66.35.250.206.
I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: 
Received: (qmail 6465 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 18:07:55 +0200
Received: from r2j243.net.upc.cz (HELO ?192.168.0.78?) (62.245.73.243)
  by iregistr.cz with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 18:07:55 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:07:24 +0200
From:  wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070305)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Custom component with css style
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

hello,
I have custom component FoldingBorder extends Border with associated css 
style e.g. in package  com.example.components. If I want to use style 
within the package (FoldingBorder.css) I do following:

public class FoldingBorder extends Border implements Serializable {
public FoldingBorder (String id, String title) {
//...omited

add(HeaderContributor.forCss(FoldingBorder.class, FoldingBorder.css"));

//...omited
}
}

On rendered page I have this:


...and it surprisingly doesn't work;-) I'm little confused how to work 
with resources... What's the best practice to use resources within some 
component (styles, images, etc.)?

thanks for help,
marek




-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page

[Igor Vaynberg]

use IHeaderContributor, contributions through that are filtered.

i dont think we currently parse what exactly is in wicket:head, we just blob
it in. it might be nice to parse it, i dont know, but it is a lot of work.
you can add an rfe if you want, but it will not get a high priority imho

-igor


On 4/9/07, Peter Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi,

I'm trying to use some Yahoo UI widgets and currently things work fine
when the required javascript files are contributed using 

But when I have two different panels appearing within the same page - and
both contributing the same common *.js files, - the page HTML has duplicate

[Wicket-user] Duplicate wicket:head contributed entries with multiple panels on a page

[Peter Thomas]

Hi,

I'm trying to use some Yahoo UI widgets and currently things work fine when
the required javascript files are contributed using 

But when I have two different panels appearing within the same page - and
both contributing the same common *.js files, - the page HTML has duplicate

Re: [Wicket-user] Creating Entire Forms in Java Code Only?

[Nathan Hamblen]

I'm just going to echo what Eelco originally said: HTML is quite good 
for defining forms. I'm glad people have found ways to generate them 
from XML or whatever (and for some purposes I'm sure that's best), but I 
would encourage new users to keep an open mind about plain HTML 
templates for forms (and everything else). It's not always easy to 
accept coming from other Java frameworks where things are so different, 
but I hate to see people building heavy-duty (and ultimately inflexible) 
form generators just to avoid coding up ten different forms in HTML.

A really swell idea from Galligan's Groovy demo was generating basic 
form markup for components and dumping it to stdout. Ideally, this would 
go into the component missing from markup error screen. Then you could 
copy, paste, and add whatever extra markup you want. The demo is here if 
anyone missed it:
http://bigheadco.blogspot.com/2007/03/party-on-patio.html

Nathan


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Internationalization and DropDownChoice

[Timo Rantalaiho]

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007, Toscano wrote:
> The getCountries() method outputs the list of countries depending on the
> language stored in session.
> But if I create the DropDownChoice as you said:
> 
>  countries = new DropDownChoice("country", 
> new Model() {
> public List getObject()
> {
> return getCountries();}
> }, new ChoiceRenderer ("countryName", "countryID"));
> 
> I have a RunTimeException: java.lang.NullPointerException: List of choices
> is null - Was the supplied 'Choices' model empty?

As far as I remember, at least in 2.0 DropDownChoice takes
in two models: a list of the choices, and the initial
choice.  (By the way, this is an excellent example of where
generics make the constructor more explicit). 

So double-check that you are supplying the choices
correctly, and not in fact invoking a constructor that only
determines the default choice.

-- 
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations Oyhttp://www.ri.fi/ >

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket "gui building"

[Eelco Hillenius]

Check out how panels, fragments and borders work. That will let you
break things up in smaller pieces and defer the decission of which
actual markup will be used.

if (x) {
  add(new TextFieldPanel("editor");
} else {
  add(new ListEditor("editor);
}
...


  ...
  
  ...


etc.

Just play with it a bit, I'm sure you'll get it :) Also, check out
dynamic components like Tree and Wizard etc and see how they use
panels internally.

Eelco



On 4/9/07, Pieter Laeremans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just getting started with wicket and I like. (I have a strong
> Swing background :-)) .
>
> Bat it looks to me that I sort of have to "design" each gui, i.e. I
> have to write markup files.
>
> In some cases I would like to be able to generate a form based on a
> database table.  And I wouldn't like to adapt my code  when the table
> structure changes.
>
> But it seems to me I always have to supply a html file were each
> component is mapped to.  Is there a way to generate the html on the
> fly ? It is not immediatly clear to me.
>
> kind regards,
>
> Pieter
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Creating Entire Forms in Java Code Only?

[Igor Vaynberg]

search the list and wiki for bean panels. there is also a bean panel project
in wicket-stuff although i dont know how usable it is.
-igor


On 4/8/07, Philip Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I am interested in creating a complex form in Java code without needing to
manually configure any html for that form. In Swing for example, when you
create a text field, it automatically has a default representation/view. If
I decide I'd like to change the view, I set a new UI object.

It basically would be really sweet to be able to create forms, form
elements, form layouts directly in Java code - and then later be able to
tweak or tailor layout, css, etc. (perhaps via fragments?) As a Swing
developer, I tend to develop every aspect of UIs in code.

I've been using Wicket for just a couple of days. Where should I be
looking? How do I approach this? strategies, Fragments, WebComponents?
markup inheritance? ...

Thanks,
Phil



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] TopToolbar in datatable dispeared when ajax modal window closed

[Matej Knopp]

Yes, this is a known issue with refreshing dataview with toolbars
using ajax. The problem is that toolbars use non-invalid markup which
works fine with regular requests, but doesn't work using ajax.

-Matej

On 4/9/07, tooy li(Gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi
> i used a defaultdatatable to show the data list , and add some ajax link in 
> it to open some modal window to show detail.
> the toptoolbar will dispeared when these modal window closed, it's only 
> happen in firefox, work well in IE 6.
> so ,is there any one can help me ? the below is my code.
>
> ps. the crypted url and customed error page cannot work in the current 2.0 
> snapshot when i used modal window.
>
> it' seem that the current 2.0 is very not stable for some ajax behavior. no 
> body care it again?
>
>
> table.addTopToolbar(new IToolbarFactory() {
>public AbstractToolbar newToolbar(WebMarkupContainer parent,
>  String id, DataTable dataTable) {
> FilterToolbar tt = new FilterToolbar(parent, id, instance, dataProvider);
> tt.setOutputMarkupId(true);
> return tt;
>}
>   });
>  table.setOutputMarkupId(true);
>
> setWindowClosedCallback(new ModalWindow.WindowClosedCallback() {
>public void onClose(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
> target.addComponent(table);
>  }
>   });
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] TopToolbar in datatable dispeared when ajax modal window closed

[tooy li(Gmail)]

hi
i used a defaultdatatable to show the data list , and add some ajax link in it 
to open some modal window to show detail.
the toptoolbar will dispeared when these modal window closed, it's only happen 
in firefox, work well in IE 6.
so ,is there any one can help me ? the below is my code. 

ps. the crypted url and customed error page cannot work in the current 2.0 
snapshot when i used modal window.

it' seem that the current 2.0 is very not stable for some ajax behavior. no 
body care it again?


table.addTopToolbar(new IToolbarFactory() {
   public AbstractToolbar newToolbar(WebMarkupContainer parent,
 String id, DataTable dataTable) {
FilterToolbar tt = new FilterToolbar(parent, id, instance, dataProvider);
tt.setOutputMarkupId(true);
return tt;
   }
  });
 table.setOutputMarkupId(true);

setWindowClosedCallback(new ModalWindow.WindowClosedCallback() {
   public void onClose(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
target.addComponent(table);
 }
  });

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] XSD / Validation

[Dmitry Kandalov]

ali-13 wrote:
> 
> I link your xsd to external resources of IDEA and add wicket:id to custom  
> html tags/attributes, and now it know wicket'tags
> , but  after validate following xhtml file :
> 
 
Sorry, but it's just a workaround for IDEA inspection, it's not a real
schema for wicket.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/XSD---Validation-tf3488923.html#a9901301
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] Wicket "gui building"

[Pieter Laeremans]

Hi,

I'm just getting started with wicket and I like. (I have a strong  
Swing background :-)) .

Bat it looks to me that I sort of have to "design" each gui, i.e. I  
have to write markup files.

In some cases I would like to be able to generate a form based on a  
database table.  And I wouldn't like to adapt my code  when the table  
structure changes.

But it seems to me I always have to supply a html file were each  
component is mapped to.  Is there a way to generate the html on the  
fly ? It is not immediatly clear to me.

kind regards,

Pieter 

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] having a (newbie) Ajax problem

[Robbert Vergeten]

great link thank you.

can't believe I missed that...


On 4/9/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-repaint-a-listview-via-ajax.html

And Igor was correct, just not the general faq :-P

http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/listview.html#ListView-FAQ

On 4/9/07, Robbert Vergeten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response i'll try that. I can't seem to find it in
the
> FAQ though.
>
>
>
> On 4/8/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > you cannot update a listview with ajax, i think its in the faq. wrap
it in
> a webmarkupcontainer and update that instead.
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/8/07, Robbert Vergeten < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi, i'm new to wicket and currently trying out some things to learn
> wicket and to do proof-of-concepts with ajax functionality.
> > > Because for what I want for my actual application i'm going to need
a
> lot of Ajax.
> > >
> > > I'm having a problem with an ajax update of a list through ajax. The
> concept is a simple variation of the databinder.net example.
> > > Its like a guestbook/chat example with a form for input and a list
for
> the output. With both the ajax and the normal submit
> > > the server sends and receives the proper data only with the ajax the
> list is not properly updated because it works with id's.
> > > And all items in my list have the same id and therefore only the
first
> gets updated so to speak.
> > > (IE and FF give quite different (both wrong) results.)
> > >
> > > I'm quite stuck on this so my question is how should i properly pack
the
> output list into a single object with custom behavior
> > > that can handle its own update as a single component. Like a table
> instead of a list of rows.
> > > Any hints or links on where to start are most welcome.
> > >
> > > my current code:
> > >
> > >
> > > list = new PropertyListView("list", new
> HibernateListModel(ChatLine.class, new ICriteriaBuilder(){
> > >  public void build(Criteria criteria){
> > >   criteria.addOrder (Order.desc ("id"));
> > >   criteria.setMaxResults(10);
> > >  }})){
> > >  @Override
> > >  protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
> > >   Label textLine = new Label("text");
> > >   Label userName = new Label("username");
> > >   item.add(userName);
> > >   item.add(textLine);
> > >  }};
> > > list.setOutputMarkupId(true);
> > > add(list);
> > >
> > > form = new DataForm("chatform", ChatLine.class){
> > >  @Override
> > >  protected void onSubmit() {
> > >   super.onSubmit();
> > >   clearPersistentObject();
> > >  }};
> > > form.add (new TextField("text"));
> > > form.add(new TextField("username"));
> > > form.add(new AjaxSubmitButton("ajaxsubmit", form){
> > >  @Override
> > >  protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form f) {
> > >   target.addComponent(list);
> > >  }});
> > > add(form);
> > >
> > > 
> > >  
> > >   
> > >
> > > 
> > > : 
> > > 
> > >
> > >   
> > >  
> > >
> > >  
> > >   
> > >
> > > 
> > >  Username:
> > >  Chat Message:
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > >  
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >   
> > >  
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > >
> > > Robbert
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
-
> > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share
> your
> > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> > >
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > ___
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
-
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share
> your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> >
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
> >
>
>
>
-
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>


--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon E

Re: [Wicket-user] Creating Entire Forms in Java Code Only?

[Justin Lee]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Actually I just did this at work but I used fragments rather than
panels.  We just need a simpler datatype->html widget look up so I just
went with fragments so that I don't need to build a bunch of java class
and html files.  The fragments are named according to the type they
represent so I can simply say :

Fragment f = new Fragment("item", typeName);
f.add(new TextField(...));

etc.

There are, of course, some if checks to determine which component to add
to f but this makes it pretty easy to add new widgets.  Now if we ever
need to start adding some very complex components I might move over to
using panels.  But for our simple form builder, the fragments work just
fine.


Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>> Hello, I've been following the discussions here, and this one caught my eye.
>> Does this mean that Wicket is ill suited for example for creating dynamic
>> forms that are built dynamically at runtime after reading some page
>> definition file from xml or some other data store. I havent looked into
>> Wicket deeply, I just skimmed the surface, but I'm currently thinking about
>> converting a Struts solution that builds forms based on form metadata stored
>> in xml files. In my case, almost all jsp's have the same layout, and only
>> differ in the form fields shown.
> 
> On the contrairy, Wicket is very well suited for that. Panels is the magic 
> word.
> 
> Eelco
> 
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

- --
Justin Lee
http://www.antwerkz.com
AIM : evan chooly
Skype : evanchooly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)

iD8DBQFGGiTLJnQfEGuJ90MRA+GxAKCqEmm3J1/k2O4xGD4x+7Q/Tw6PaQCdHyyh
5RWxlT4OYskq9NivC3mpa5Y=
=5LJx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] No Page found for component after selecting TreeNode

[Isaac Weng]

Thanks for the quick replay. After some digging, I found that I forgot 
to check that TreeItem is also a WebMarkupContainer which is rebuilt. A 
wrong way to re-implement my requirement in the Tree component let me 
think it worked on the Tree component in wicket-extension, which is 
obvious not after some serious thought.

Seems like I asked a dumb question, hah

Isaac

Matej Knopp wrote:
> When tree node is selected the appropriate part of tree is rebuilt,
> which also involves recreating the components. So the component on
> which you're calling getPage() is no longer in hierarchy, thus the
> page returned is null.
>
> -Matej
>
> On 4/8/07, Isaac Weng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> Similar to ILinkCallback of Tree in wicket-extension, I created a
>> callback link which allows me to select a tree node in my custom Link
>> component. After the link is clicked, the callback is executed and the
>> node is selected. However, after selectNode() runs, getPage() in the
>> Link component results in "No Page found for component". Following is a
>> brief sample code:
>> 

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] having a (newbie) Ajax problem

[Martijn Dashorst]

http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-repaint-a-listview-via-ajax.html

And Igor was correct, just not the general faq :-P

http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/listview.html#ListView-FAQ

On 4/9/07, Robbert Vergeten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response i'll try that. I can't seem to find it in the
> FAQ though.
>
>
>
> On 4/8/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > you cannot update a listview with ajax, i think its in the faq. wrap it in
> a webmarkupcontainer and update that instead.
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/8/07, Robbert Vergeten < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi, i'm new to wicket and currently trying out some things to learn
> wicket and to do proof-of-concepts with ajax functionality.
> > > Because for what I want for my actual application i'm going to need a
> lot of Ajax.
> > >
> > > I'm having a problem with an ajax update of a list through ajax. The
> concept is a simple variation of the databinder.net example.
> > > Its like a guestbook/chat example with a form for input and a list for
> the output. With both the ajax and the normal submit
> > > the server sends and receives the proper data only with the ajax the
> list is not properly updated because it works with id's.
> > > And all items in my list have the same id and therefore only the first
> gets updated so to speak.
> > > (IE and FF give quite different (both wrong) results.)
> > >
> > > I'm quite stuck on this so my question is how should i properly pack the
> output list into a single object with custom behavior
> > > that can handle its own update as a single component. Like a table
> instead of a list of rows.
> > > Any hints or links on where to start are most welcome.
> > >
> > > my current code:
> > >
> > >
> > > list = new PropertyListView("list", new
> HibernateListModel(ChatLine.class, new ICriteriaBuilder(){
> > >  public void build(Criteria criteria){
> > >   criteria.addOrder (Order.desc ("id"));
> > >   criteria.setMaxResults(10);
> > >  }})){
> > >  @Override
> > >  protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
> > >   Label textLine = new Label("text");
> > >   Label userName = new Label("username");
> > >   item.add(userName);
> > >   item.add(textLine);
> > >  }};
> > > list.setOutputMarkupId(true);
> > > add(list);
> > >
> > > form = new DataForm("chatform", ChatLine.class){
> > >  @Override
> > >  protected void onSubmit() {
> > >   super.onSubmit();
> > >   clearPersistentObject();
> > >  }};
> > > form.add (new TextField("text"));
> > > form.add(new TextField("username"));
> > > form.add(new AjaxSubmitButton("ajaxsubmit", form){
> > >  @Override
> > >  protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form f) {
> > >   target.addComponent(list);
> > >  }});
> > > add(form);
> > >
> > > 
> > >  
> > >   
> > >
> > > 
> > > : 
> > > 
> > >
> > >   
> > >  
> > >
> > >  
> > >   
> > >
> > > 
> > >  Username:
> > >  Chat Message:
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > >  
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >   
> > >  
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > >
> > > Robbert
> > >
> > >
> > >
> -
> > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> > >
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > ___
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> >
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
> >
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>


-- 
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your s

Re: [Wicket-user] having a (newbie) Ajax problem

[Robbert Vergeten]

Thanks for the quick response i'll try that. I can't seem to find it in the
FAQ though.

On 4/8/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


you cannot update a listview with ajax, i think its in the faq. wrap it in
a webmarkupcontainer and update that instead.

-igor


 On 4/8/07, Robbert Vergeten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Hi, i'm new to wicket and currently trying out some things to learn
> wicket and to do proof-of-concepts with ajax functionality.
> Because for what I want for my actual application i'm going to need a
> lot of Ajax.
>
> I'm having a problem with an ajax update of a list through ajax. The
> concept is a simple variation of the databinder.net example.
> Its like a guestbook/chat example with a form for input and a list for
> the output. With both the ajax and the normal submit
> the server sends and receives the proper data only with the ajax the
> list is not properly updated because it works with id's.
> And all items in my list have the same id and therefore only the first
> gets updated so to speak.
> (IE and FF give quite different (both wrong) results.)
>
> I'm quite stuck on this so my question is how should i properly pack the
> output list into a single object with custom behavior
> that can handle its own update as a single component. Like a table
> instead of a list of rows.
> Any hints or links on where to start are most welcome.
>
> my current code:
>
> list = new PropertyListView("list", new HibernateListModel(
> ChatLine.class, new ICriteriaBuilder(){
>  public void build(Criteria criteria){
>   criteria.addOrder (Order.desc ("id"));
>   criteria.setMaxResults(10);
>  }})){
>  @Override
>  protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
>   Label textLine = new Label("text");
>   Label userName = new Label("username");
>   item.add(userName);
>   item.add(textLine);
>  }};
> list.setOutputMarkupId(true);
> add(list);
>
> form = new DataForm("chatform", ChatLine.class){
>  @Override
>  protected void onSubmit() {
>   super.onSubmit();
>   clearPersistentObject();
>  }};
> form.add (new TextField("text"));
> form.add(new TextField("username"));
> form.add(new AjaxSubmitButton("ajaxsubmit", form){
>  @Override
>  protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form f) {
>   target.addComponent(list);
>  }});
> add(form);
>
> 
>  
>   
>
> 
> : 
> 
>
>   
>  
>
>  
>   
>
> 
>  Username:
>  Chat Message:
> 
> 
>  
>  
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>   
>  
> 
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Robbert
>
>
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] localized resource property file - fallback to default?

[Wilko Hische]

Thanks Jurgen & Eelco,

I understand you would not want this as default behaviour & I suppose I can
figure it out.

Cheers,

Wilko


Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> 
> I see what you mean, and understand this use case may be good for some
> occasions. There is a big danger however, of Wicket 'silently' failing
> (depending on your settings not throwing an exception or displaying a
> place holder with a warning) when it cannot locate messages. It would
> be too easy to overlook messages that aren't localized.
> 
> I think Wicket's defaults are good. And like Juergen said, if you feel
> you need another algorithm, you can implement this yourself by doing
> an extra bit of work. Shouldn't be too difficult.
> 
> Eelco
> 
> 
> On 4/8/07, Wilko Hische <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I do understand this, but that is not really my question. Let's assume
>> all
>> my keys are in an application scoped property file
>> MyApplication.properties,
>> where MyApplication.java extends the WebApplication. Let this file
>> contain a
>> large amount of keys. Now some customer of ours comes along and insists
>> on
>> the use of specific terminology for a few of the keys. I think the Wicket
>> approach would be to create a variant of MyApplication.properties,
>> MyApplication_customer.properties? But then I have to copy *all* keys,
>> not
>> only the few that will have another translation. Because if I don't
>> provide
>> the other keys as well Wicket will follow the tree upwards to
>> WebApplication.properties, and of course will not find them. In other
>> words,
>> defaults are looked for on a higher level, not sideways as well. But
>> maybe
>> there is another way to tackle this case? Because now I would be stuck
>> with
>> maintaining files that are almost identical.
>>
>> Wilko
>>
>>
>> Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
>> >
>> > Wicket does not only fall back to the default. It iterates over a long
>> > list of property filenames which are created from the component tree,
>> > locale, style and variation.
>> >
>> > Juergen
>> >
>> > On 4/8/07, Wilko Hische <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Erik,
>> >>
>> >> Wicket does fall back to the default *file* but what about the case
>> where
>> >> you have one (or more) large properties file(s) for your default
>> language
>> >> and you want to create a variation in which you want to change just a
>> few
>> >> words for instance to make them more domain specific?
>> >> In that case I would like a way to override just those few domain
>> >> specific
>> >> terms, ie an additional .properties file for that variation containing
>> >> only
>> >> the deviating terms instead of a copy of the original with just a few
>> >> changes. Is there a wicket way to implement that?
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> Wilko
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Erik van Oosten wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > It already does work like that.
>> >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/i18n-and-resource-bundles.html
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards,
>> >> >  Erik.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > dukejansen wrote:
>> >> >> Right now, if I have a localized property file (e.g.
>> >> >> Welcome_de.properties),
>> >> >> it seems I must have all resource keys defined in it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I would prefer to have the localizer be smart enough to fallback to
>> >> the
>> >> >> default properties file (e.g. Welcome.properties) if a property is
>> not
>> >> >> present in the localized property file.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This would make it possible to add properties to the system and not
>> >> have
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> translate them all immediately - let it fall back to the default
>> >> language
>> >> >> until someone gets around to translating it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Does Wicket have this easily configurable, or do I need to roll my
>> own
>> >> >> resource resolvers or other classes for this purpose?
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Erik van Oosten
>> >> > http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> -
>> >> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> >> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
>> share
>> >> > your
>> >> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>> >> >
>> >>
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> >> > ___
>> >> > Wicket-user mailing list
>> >> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/localized-resource-property-file---fallback-to-default--tf3493032.html#a9891947
>> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> -
>> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'

Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment: optionally replace the tag

[Martijn Dashorst]

Why not just use a panel instead?

Martijn

On 4/9/07, Thomas Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I meant, when I don't use the -tags (like in the example at
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Fragment#Fragment-Fragmentsfromotherpages
> ).
>
> Tom
>
> Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
> > fragment doesnt own wicket:fragment, only whatever is inside the
> >  tags
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On 4/8/07, *Thomas Singer* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> > wrote:
> >
> > Currently, when using the Fragment component, only the content
> > between the
> > opening and closing tag seems to be replaced. What about optionally
> > replacing the tag, too?
> >
> > Tom
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


-- 
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment: optionally replace the tag

[Thomas Singer]

I meant, when I don't use the -tags (like in the example at 
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Fragment#Fragment-Fragmentsfromotherpages
 
).

Tom

Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
> fragment doesnt own wicket:fragment, only whatever is inside the 
>  tags
> 
> -igor
> 
> 
> On 4/8/07, *Thomas Singer* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 
> wrote:
> 
> Currently, when using the Fragment component, only the content
> between the
> opening and closing tag seems to be replaced. What about optionally
> replacing the tag, too?
> 
> Tom


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user