Re: [WISPA] Jumbo Frames

2010-12-15 Thread Kristian Hoffmann
Based on my understanding, it won't make a difference unless both ends
of the connection and every router in between has its MTU set >1500.
You can have the MTU set to 9000 on every router on your network, but if
your customer's router/PC is 1500, all frames will be 1500.  People on
NANOG were discussing this a couple of weeks ago when talking about
optimizing multi-hundred megabit transfers across the Internet where
they had optimized it on their network, both endpoints, and arranged it
with all of their transit providers.  But it's not something you can
just turn on in the middle and get "more speed."

-Kristian


On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 13:30 -0500, RickG wrote:
> Well, I havent analysed it yet but with all the facebook uploads,
> online backups, and email attachedments going on I wonder if that is
> the case?
> 
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:31 AM, David E. Smith  wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 23:23, RickG 
> wrote:
> Is there any reason to enable Jumbo Frames? My RB1000
> and Dell switches have the capabilities. Time Warner
> says they can enable it on my fiber switch if I want.
> 
> 
> It probably won't hurt, but unless you're regularly moving
> very large files point-to-point (and can enable jumbo frames
> on all the intermediate gear) it also probably won't have any
> noticeable benefit.
> 
> 
> David Smith
> MVN.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
> 
> 
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -RickG
> 
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Jumbo Frames

2010-12-15 Thread RickG
Thats what I wanted to know. You're right - no benefit for my end users.
Thanks!

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:40 PM, David E. Smith  wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:30, RickG  wrote:
>
>> Well, I havent analysed it yet but with all the facebook uploads, online
>> backups, and email attachedments going on I wonder if that is the case?
>>
>
> First, by "very large files" I'm thinking tens of terabytes. Second,
> there's only a benefit to jumbo-frames if EVERY device between the two
> endpoints supports it. Chances are, the end-user's desktop doesn't support
> it (or doesn't have it enabled), or you've got an old switch at a tower, or
> someone at a co-lo on the other coast forgot to enable it. If any piece of
> gear between the two doesn't support jumbo frames, your giant packet will
> get fragmented anyway, and you may end up with worse performance.
>
> Obviously, you want to bench-test for your particular application, but
> outside of some specialized environments (like Internet2) jumbo frames don't
> really win you very much.
>
> David Smith
> MVN.net
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>



-- 
-RickG



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Jumbo Frames

2010-12-15 Thread David E. Smith
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:30, RickG  wrote:

> Well, I havent analysed it yet but with all the facebook uploads, online
> backups, and email attachedments going on I wonder if that is the case?
>

First, by "very large files" I'm thinking tens of terabytes. Second, there's
only a benefit to jumbo-frames if EVERY device between the two endpoints
supports it. Chances are, the end-user's desktop doesn't support it (or
doesn't have it enabled), or you've got an old switch at a tower, or someone
at a co-lo on the other coast forgot to enable it. If any piece of gear
between the two doesn't support jumbo frames, your giant packet will get
fragmented anyway, and you may end up with worse performance.

Obviously, you want to bench-test for your particular application, but
outside of some specialized environments (like Internet2) jumbo frames don't
really win you very much.

David Smith
MVN.net



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Jumbo Frames

2010-12-15 Thread RickG
Well, I havent analysed it yet but with all the facebook uploads, online
backups, and email attachedments going on I wonder if that is the case?

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:31 AM, David E. Smith  wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 23:23, RickG  wrote:
>
>> Is there any reason to enable Jumbo Frames? My RB1000 and Dell switches
>> have the capabilities. Time Warner says they can enable it on my fiber
>> switch if I want.
>>
>
> It probably won't hurt, but unless you're regularly moving very large files
> point-to-point (and can enable jumbo frames on all the intermediate gear) it
> also probably won't have any noticeable benefit.
>
> David Smith
> MVN.net
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>



-- 
-RickG



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Jumbo Frames

2010-12-15 Thread David E. Smith
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 23:23, RickG  wrote:

> Is there any reason to enable Jumbo Frames? My RB1000 and Dell switches
> have the capabilities. Time Warner says they can enable it on my fiber
> switch if I want.
>

It probably won't hurt, but unless you're regularly moving very large files
point-to-point (and can enable jumbo frames on all the intermediate gear) it
also probably won't have any noticeable benefit.

David Smith
MVN.net



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Jumbo Frames

2010-12-14 Thread Josh Luthman
Greater throughput.
On Dec 15, 2010 12:24 AM, "RickG"  wrote:
> Is there any reason to enable Jumbo Frames? My RB1000 and Dell switches
have
> the capabilities. Time Warner says they can enable it on my fiber switch
if
> I want.
> --
> -RickG



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] Jumbo Frames

2010-12-14 Thread RickG
Is there any reason to enable Jumbo Frames? My RB1000 and Dell switches have
the capabilities. Time Warner says they can enable it on my fiber switch if
I want.
-- 
-RickG



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/