Re: Witango-Talk: file upload [again!]

2002-10-03 Thread Nicholas Froome

Re my corrupted image uploads: I'm on a new cable broadband connection that I think 
has a few Proxy-related problems. So last night I setup a dial-up connection, and 
guess what? Files uploaded OK...

So I spent the best part of a day trying to solve an ISP-related problem...

Thanks for everyone's help along the way



> > Never had any experience with corrupted image files. Don't think I can help
>> you on that one, sorry Nicholas
>
>Check whether the initial images are in CMYK format. That's the only way
>we've seen images appear corrupted in Tango uploads.

TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body



Re: Witango-Talk: file upload [again!]

2002-10-02 Thread Garth Penglase

But Picture Viewer displays any properly saved jpeg doesn't it? And jpegs 
saved in a CMYK format show up in sepia with lines going horizontally down 
the image don't they? That doesn't sound like what Nicholas was describing.

Can you open the supposedly corrupt images up in Photoshop Nicholas? And if 
so what format are they in and how are they saved?
Garth

At 11:02  3/10/02, you wrote:
> > Never had any experience with corrupted image files. Don't think I can help
> > you on that one, sorry Nicholas
>
>Check whether the initial images are in CMYK format. That's the only way
>we've seen images appear corrupted in Tango uploads.
>
>Wayne Irvine
>
>   Byte Services Pty Ltd
>http://www.byteserve.com.au/
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Ph 02 9960 6099   Mob 0409 960 609   Fax 02 9960 6088
>
>
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body


TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body



Re: Witango-Talk: file upload [again!]

2002-10-02 Thread Wayne Irvine

> Never had any experience with corrupted image files. Don't think I can help
> you on that one, sorry Nicholas

Check whether the initial images are in CMYK format. That's the only way
we've seen images appear corrupted in Tango uploads.

Wayne Irvine

  Byte Services Pty Ltd
   http://www.byteserve.com.au/
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Ph 02 9960 6099   Mob 0409 960 609   Fax 02 9960 6088


TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body



Re: Witango-Talk: file upload [again!]

2002-10-02 Thread Garth Penglase

Never had any experience with corrupted image files. Don't think I can help 
you on that one, sorry Nicholas
Garth

At 12:54  2/10/02, you wrote:
>Thanks to Garth Penglase, and Robert Garcia's download site, I now have 
>Tango 3.63 - and the good news is that uploads now complete
>
>The bad news is that all the uploads (JPEGS) are corrupted in some way!
>
>I have verified that the same files transferred to the server another way 
>(Timbuktu) are OK. So it seems likely that the upload process is what's 
>corrupting them
>
>It's typical JPEG corruption - IE will open the files and they have blocks 
>of colour and shifted parts of the image. Pictureviewer won't display them
>
>The images were uploaded from Mac OS 9.2.2 via cable broadband to the 
>Webstar 4 server (on OS 9.1) using Tango 3.63. Any ideas?
>
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body


TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body



Re: Witango-Talk: file upload [again!]

2002-10-02 Thread Nicholas Froome

Thanks to Garth Penglase, and Robert Garcia's download site, I now have Tango 3.63 - 
and the good news is that uploads now complete

The bad news is that all the uploads (JPEGS) are corrupted in some way!

I have verified that the same files transferred to the server another way (Timbuktu) 
are OK. So it seems likely that the upload process is what's corrupting them

It's typical JPEG corruption - IE will open the files and they have blocks of colour 
and shifted parts of the image. Pictureviewer won't display them

The images were uploaded from Mac OS 9.2.2 via cable broadband to the Webstar 4 server 
(on OS 9.1) using Tango 3.63. Any ideas?

TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body



Re: Witango-Talk: file upload [again!]

2002-10-01 Thread Garth Penglase

Nicholas,
Up until just recently I was using 3.52 as well so it does work.
However, go to RObert Garcia's site http://public.bighead.net and download 
the 3.6 then the 3.6n upgrade, installing them in that order. 3.62 supports 
a couple of tags that 3.52 doesn't and is better from what I've been told. 
But 3.52 was the version that I was talking about, not 3.6 - my mistake.

Garth

At 12:31  2/10/02, you wrote:
> > > try the ASP file upload on Ben's Goodie page.  It integrates nicely with
> >> Tango and Witango and is very reliable.
> >
> >Or, perhaps the latter version of T3.6 or T2000 that works fine.
>
>
>OK - I'm using 3.52 and I'm on a Mac so ASP won't work for me
>
>Anyone got a 3.6 installer?
>
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body


TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body



Re: Witango-Talk: file upload [again!]

2002-10-01 Thread Garth Penglase

Yes, I've tested my setup with 100k+ files and it works without a problem.
Garth

At 09:05  2/10/02, you wrote:
> > The only clue I can give is that images less than
> > around 30K seem to work OK, despite resetting ItemBufferSize and restarting
> > Webstar
>
>I remember that the first versions of Tango 3 (that we bought for it's
>upload ability) couldn't upload files greater than 32K. Cost us a major
>client and put a project on hold for months.
>
>That said, I know the last 3.6.X uploaded up to 9Mb files without a problem.
>
>Wayne Irvine
>
>
>   Byte Services Pty Ltd
>http://www.byteserve.com.au/
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Ph 02 9960 6099   Mob 0409 960 609   Fax 02 9960 6088
>
>
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body


TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body



Re: Witango-Talk: file upload [again!]

2002-10-01 Thread Nicholas Froome

> > try the ASP file upload on Ben's Goodie page.  It integrates nicely with
>> Tango and Witango and is very reliable.
>
>Or, perhaps the latter version of T3.6 or T2000 that works fine.


OK - I'm using 3.52 and I'm on a Mac so ASP won't work for me

Anyone got a 3.6 installer?

TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body



Re: Witango-Talk: file upload [again!]

2002-10-01 Thread Wayne Irvine

> try the ASP file upload on Ben's Goodie page.  It integrates nicely with
> Tango and Witango and is very reliable.

Or, perhaps the latter version of T3.6 or T2000 that works fine.

Wayne Irvine

  Byte Services Pty Ltd
   http://www.byteserve.com.au/
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Ph 02 9960 6099   Mob 0409 960 609   Fax 02 9960 6088


TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body



RE: Witango-Talk: file upload [again!]

2002-10-01 Thread Tom Ferguson

try the ASP file upload on Ben's Goodie page.  It integrates nicely with
Tango and Witango and is very reliable.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wayne Irvine
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:05 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: file upload [again!]


> The only clue I can give is that images less than
> around 30K seem to work OK, despite resetting ItemBufferSize and
restarting
> Webstar

I remember that the first versions of Tango 3 (that we bought for it's
upload ability) couldn't upload files greater than 32K. Cost us a major
client and put a project on hold for months.

That said, I know the last 3.6.X uploaded up to 9Mb files without a problem.

Wayne Irvine


  Byte Services Pty Ltd
   http://www.byteserve.com.au/
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Ph 02 9960 6099   Mob 0409 960 609   Fax 02 9960 6088


TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body


TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body



Re: Witango-Talk: file upload [again!]

2002-10-01 Thread Wayne Irvine

> The only clue I can give is that images less than
> around 30K seem to work OK, despite resetting ItemBufferSize and restarting
> Webstar

I remember that the first versions of Tango 3 (that we bought for it's
upload ability) couldn't upload files greater than 32K. Cost us a major
client and put a project on hold for months.

That said, I know the last 3.6.X uploaded up to 9Mb files without a problem.

Wayne Irvine


  Byte Services Pty Ltd
   http://www.byteserve.com.au/
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Ph 02 9960 6099   Mob 0409 960 609   Fax 02 9960 6088


TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body



Re: Witango-Talk: file upload [again!]

2002-10-01 Thread Garth Penglase

I have a machine runing T3.6 with Webstar 1.32 on Mac OS 7.6.1 which ran an 
Aldi Superstores site created in Tango for over 2 years (until they 
recently centralised all their web in Germany). Each week 14 new images 
ranging in size up to 50k were loaded up via a Tango file upload mechanism 
which worked very reliably...

Except when my clients started using IE on the Mac on an ADSL connection 
which proxied everything. I found that the pages coming from the server 
were being cached and eveytime they tried to upload they would suffer 
similar results as what you are experiencing. Eventually, because I didn't 
want to recode the app to create new pages with entirely new URLS each time 
accessed, I simply told them to use Netscape and turn off page caching - 
they never had this problem again.

I did have a problem with the Tango server right in the beginning, but I 
solved that by increasing Webstar's (i am using the Tango plugin) app 
memory. A incresae of emeory size and a restart of the server and 
everything worked fine from then on.

On my server it is set to a fairly short variable timeout of a couple of 
minutes, but the buffer size has been left at 64k I'm pretty sure - I'll 
check it.
Garth


At 06:56  1/10/02, you wrote:
>Back to a well-worn topic: I'm doing file upload in Tango 3.6 with 
>unpredicatable results
>
>Files are uploaded and named according to the advert they're attached to, 
>but the upload fails repeatedly with files of zero K uploaded
>
>I looked through my Tango Talk archives, reset the ItemBufferSize up to 
>300,000, and the problem seemed to go away.. But now, instead of a file 
>being uploaded of zero K, and a bad filename, I now get a good filename 
>and a zero K file...
>
>
>The debug screen shows the raw JPEG code, but the file isn't uploaded and 
>the filename created is OK
>
>The error message is:
>
>[Warning]   Missing argument: image
>
>
>Any ideas what's going on? The only clue I can give is that images less 
>than around 30K seem to work OK, despite resetting ItemBufferSize and 
>restarting Webstar
>
>
>
>Tango 3.6, Webstar 4.x on Mac OS 9.1
>
>
>The file name is a combination of a User variable and a file number suffix 
>from a popup menu on the upload page:
>
>
>
>File Action:
><@VAR WebRoot SCOPE=Domain>:<@VAR uploadpathname SCOPE=Domain>:<@VAR 
>advertnumber SCOPE=User>.<@ARG imagenumber>.jpg
>
>
>
>The Upload page code is:
>
>
>
>ACTION="<@CGI><@APPFILE>?page=upload&<@USERREFERENCEARGUMENT>">
>
>
>First image
>Second image
>Third image
>Fourth image
>
>
>
>File to upload: 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body


TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body



Witango-Talk: file upload [again!]

2002-10-01 Thread Nicholas Froome

Back to a well-worn topic: I'm doing file upload in Tango 3.6 with unpredicatable 
results

Files are uploaded and named according to the advert they're attached to, but the 
upload fails repeatedly with files of zero K uploaded

I looked through my Tango Talk archives, reset the ItemBufferSize up to 300,000, and 
the problem seemed to go away.. But now, instead of a file being uploaded of zero K, 
and a bad filename, I now get a good filename and a zero K file...


The debug screen shows the raw JPEG code, but the file isn't uploaded and the filename 
created is OK

The error message is:

[Warning]   Missing argument: image


Any ideas what's going on? The only clue I can give is that images less than around 
30K seem to work OK, despite resetting ItemBufferSize and restarting Webstar



Tango 3.6, Webstar 4.x on Mac OS 9.1


The file name is a combination of a User variable and a file number suffix from a 
popup menu on the upload page:



File Action:
<@VAR WebRoot SCOPE=Domain>:<@VAR uploadpathname SCOPE=Domain>:<@VAR advertnumber 
SCOPE=User>.<@ARG imagenumber>.jpg



The Upload page code is:






First image
Second image
Third image
Fourth image



File to upload: 






TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body