Re: [WSG] sitecheck on Mac (Safari, IE5) and Win (IE 5/5.5) please?
Hi Thorsten I have had a quick test on netscape 7.1 - all ok. Netscape 6.1 - in the section arbeitsproben the links seitenanfang and details do not work. Otherwise looks good. However IE 5.2.3 had the most problems. 1. in navigation the selected section remains underlined. 2. sections contact, bewerbung, ubermich the 'contentbox' has a scrollbar along the bottom which scrolls to the right only a few pixels. 3. between the 'gallery_image' div and the 'image_caption' div there is some white space which pushes the text down so the blue border at the bottom of the 'imagebox' cuts through the text. 4. the arbeitsproben section only has no styling at all as if its not picking up the style sheet I can only see the text and images. 5. when trying to view the screenshots IE complains that it doesnt know how to handle the mime type 'image/png' ie. the screenshots cant be viewed. Good luck. * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help *
[WSG] FYI
http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/07/12/HNielosesshare_1.html * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help *
[WSG] hand coding versus code generators
Im a new boy to the discussion group. Pointed in this direction by Jeffery Zeldman's 'Designing with Web Standards'. I must say Web Standardshas been a 'breathe of fresh air' for me. Its the way forward, for sure. What Im not so sure about is using a code generator eg. Dreamweaver. Ive always hand coded my HTML, _javascript_, ASP, SQLetc using a text editor (past 4 years). What do people think about hand coding versus code generators? What percentage of developers totally hand code, use both, use only code generators? regards Simon
