Diego,
in the end, I guess we agree on this, the REQUIREDCELLS is the output of
the bandwidth estimation algorithm, whichever we want to define in the
draft. I guess we agree too that this is an estimate.
Then it's up to the allocation policy to compare this estimate with what's
the state of the
Nicola,
I answer below.
Regards,
Diego
2016-11-02 12:35 GMT-03:00 Nicola Accettura :
> Diego, Tengfei,
>
> I'll provide comments to each of you.
>
> @Diego: I believe that the change in the estimation algorithm does not
> change the fact
Diego, Tengfei,
I'll provide comments to each of you.
@Diego: I believe that the change in the estimation algorithm does not
change the fact that both OTF and SF0 give as output a number of cells to
add/delete, and this is the point I'm discussing on. If we agree on this
simple evidence (OTF and
Nicola,
I agree with your comment, but the cell estimation
algorithm changed: we now estimate the number of required
cells from the number of requested cells (to add or delete)
and the number of effectively used cells. What is still not clear
to me is if the simulation results from the
Hi Tengei,
the problem you are rising is that you would like to see a number of cells
to add/delete when comparing required and deleted cells.
The ancestor of SF0, namely OTF, used to specify the following sentence:
The number of soft cells to be scheduled/deleted for bundle resizing
is out
Hi All,
I am reading the SF0-02 version which is just released few days ago.
In the SF0 Allocation Policy section, the policy said
1. If REQUIREDCELLS<(SCHEDULEDCELLS-SF0THRESH), delete one or more
cells.
2. If (SCHEDULEDCELLS-SF0THRESH)<=REQUIREDCELLS<=SCHEDULEDCELLS, do