On 21 Feb 2013, at 17:36, lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
>> Not sure what you mean, but we run arcnet in bus mode (no central hub), on
>> 75 ohm coax with modified PCI cards using 75ohm terminations - 75ohm coax
>> abounds in TV stations.
>
> The cost of maintaining such a system must look prohibi
On 21 February 2013 14:39, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yeah, an other quote from that website:
>
> Designers write their own application layer to meet their particular
> needs and frequently do not advertise the fact that ARCNET is being
> used in their product. ARCNET receives no name recogni
On 21 February 2013 14:26, Jeff Sickel wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2013, at 12:44 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
However, because of its simple, robust nature, ARCNET controllers are
still sold and used in industrial, embedded, and automotive
applications.
>>>
>>> Sounds positively anachron
On Feb 21, 2013, at 12:44 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>>> However, because of its simple, robust nature, ARCNET controllers are
>>> still sold and used in industrial, embedded, and automotive
>>> applications.
>>
>> Sounds positively anachronistic. Thanks for the clarification.
>
> and so is rs
> > However, because of its simple, robust nature, ARCNET controllers are
> > still sold and used in industrial, embedded, and automotive
> > applications.
>
> Sounds positively anachronistic. Thanks for the clarification.
and so is rs-232. usb is the way of the future. :-) i say this with
to
> However, because of its simple, robust nature, ARCNET controllers are
> still sold and used in industrial, embedded, and automotive
> applications.
Sounds positively anachronistic. Thanks for the clarification.
++L
> Not sure what you mean, but we run arcnet in bus mode (no central hub), on
> 75 ohm coax with modified PCI cards using 75ohm terminations - 75ohm coax
> abounds in TV stations.
The cost of maintaining such a system must look prohibitive when
compared with off-the-shelf products. And then you ne
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 21, 2013, at 6:16 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote:
>
> On 21 February 2013 12:54, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> they say it's pretty deterministic. good read from wikipedia.
>
> I was disappointed to discover that ARCNET did not, in fact, send packets by
> shooting
> How do they propose to maintain it when the equipment starts failing?
Not sure what you mean, but we run arcnet in bus mode (no central hub), on
75 ohm coax with modified PCI cards using 75ohm terminations - 75ohm coax
abounds in TV stations.
The advantage of this is we can use existing Video w
> my employer uses it for data comms in TV stations, but this is becoming
> superseded by ethernet these days, are we the last bastion?
How do they propose to maintain it when the equipment starts failing?
++L
It seems so. I haven't heard it being used in my lifetime.
On Feb 20, 2013, at 11:57, steve wrote:
>
> just a straw poll, anyone here use arcnet or know of any significant modern
> use,
>
> my employer uses it for data comms in TV stations, but this is becoming
> superseded by ethernet these
just a straw poll, anyone here use arcnet or know of any significant modern use,
my employer uses it for data comms in TV stations, but this is becoming
superseded by ethernet these days, are we the last bastion?
-Steve
12 matches
Mail list logo