Re: [9fans] Mysterious auth again...?

2014-08-05 Thread Pavel Klinkovský
Hi Stevie, you were right, I missed one point during the server installation/configuration: I forgot 'auth/changeuser bootes'... :( Now 'auth/debug' works well, sorry for a noise. And thank you. Pavel 2014-08-05 11:09 GMT+02:00 Pavel Klinkovský : > Hi Stevie, > > I think this thread on 9fan

Re: [9fans] Mysterious auth again...?

2014-08-05 Thread Pavel Klinkovský
Hi Stevie, I think this thread on 9fans might help: > > http://marc.info/?l=9fans&m=116732560810918&w=2 thanks, going to read it too. > Read the whole thread, but I think my linked message has the answer. > Do you start keyfs before listen in your cpurc? > Yes, it was 1st thing I checked...

Re: [9fans] Mysterious auth again...?

2014-08-05 Thread stevie
> Hi Stevie, > > I know, auth can be tricky... > > > In fact. > > >> Without having further information about your setup I >> can only recommend reading this doc: >> http://kamalatta.ddnss.de/config/Plan9Tutorial.txt. >> > > Thanks for the link, going to recheck my configuration. > > >> P.S

Re: [9fans] Mysterious auth again...?

2014-08-05 Thread Pavel Klinkovský
Hi Stevie, I know, auth can be tricky... In fact. > Without having further information about your setup I > can only recommend reading this doc: > http://kamalatta.ddnss.de/config/Plan9Tutorial.txt. > Thanks for the link, going to recheck my configuration. > P.S.: I don't know the full back

Re: [9fans] Mysterious auth again...?

2014-08-04 Thread stevie
> Hi all, > > I am fighting with configuration of '9pccpuf' server. > > I have configured user 'bootes' as a hostowner. > I have 'listen', 'keyfs' running. > > I can 'cpu' such server from another Plan9 terminal ('9pcf') as user > 'bootes'. > I can 'srv' such server from another Plan9 terminal (

Re: [9fans] mysterious auth

2010-01-22 Thread lucio
> it would be better to create a /cfg/example.auth/cpurc that includes > keyfs and trusted services in it and remove them from /rc/bin/cpurc, > since they come after /cfg/$sysname/cpurc is run. You could submit a patch... I have a feeling that the philosophy is for /cfg to be entirely optional, s

Re: [9fans] mysterious auth

2010-01-22 Thread erik quanstrom
On Fri Jan 22 18:29:45 EST 2010, 9...@9netics.com wrote: > in case anyone's wondering, my problem was due to the fact that keyfs > was started after aux/listen for trusted services; /mnt/keys/* wasn't > in authsrv's namespace. in my case, i put the trusted services in > /cfg/bootes/cpurc, while ke

Re: [9fans] mysterious auth

2010-01-22 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
in case anyone's wondering, my problem was due to the fact that keyfs was started after aux/listen for trusted services; /mnt/keys/* wasn't in authsrv's namespace. in my case, i put the trusted services in /cfg/bootes/cpurc, while keyfs was started later in the sequence of /rc/bin/cpurc. the defa

Re: [9fans] mysterious auth

2010-01-11 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
responding to feedback from multiple 9fans: Federico said: > are you sure that the passwords in nvram and auth/changeuser do match > for bootes? pretty sure. i've zero'ed the nvram and re-entered it. i went so far as stopping keyfs, zero'ing /adm/keys and /adm/keys.who and reinstalling bootes fr

Re: [9fans] mysterious auth

2010-01-11 Thread Federico G. Benavento
are you sure that the passwords in nvram and auth/changeuser do match for bootes? On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com> wrote: > on a new network and standalone auth+fs (built from CD image of Jan > 7th), auth is refusing to concur.  i've used Russ' message from a >

Re: [9fans] mysterious auth

2010-01-11 Thread erik quanstrom
> with similar results. in that case factotum debug says "no key > matches proto=p9sk1 role=server dom?". this last message looked a bit > weird and when i check /dev/hostdomain, it is empty. /dev/hostdomain empty here, too. - erik