1. Update the reference from RFC 5246 to RFC 8446 in all locations
Items that don't appear to be resolved:
* Section 3.1 - Refresh Token - I don't think that refresh tokens are going
to be strings because binary is more efficient.
Unless you are going to say that this is not OAuth 2.
Thank you Jim,
I'll upload a new version as soon as we have resolved my questions below.
/Ludwig
On 30/01/2019 07:01, Jim Schaad wrote:
1. Update the reference from RFC 5246 to RFC 8446 in all locations
Items that don't appear to be resolved:
* Section 3.1 - Refresh Token - I don't think t
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 09:37:45AM +0100, Ludwig Seitz wrote:
>
> On 30/01/2019 07:01, Jim Schaad wrote:
> > ** IANA Section Issues
> >
> > 1. None of the new registries appear to have any guidance for the DEs to
> > use when approving items.
>
> Is it acceptable to add a single guidance se
> -Original Message-
> From: Ludwig Seitz
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 12:38 AM
> To: Jim Schaad ; draft-ietf-ace-oauth-
> au...@ietf.org
> Cc: ace@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Shepard review for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz
>
> Thank you Jim,
>
> I'll upload a new version as soon as
On 30/01/2019 19:23, Jim Schaad wrote:
-Original Message- From: Ludwig Seitz
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 12:38 AM To: Jim Schaad
; draft-ietf-ace-oauth- au...@ietf.org Cc:
ace@ietf.org Subject: Re: Shepard review for
draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz
Thank you Jim,
I'll upload a new
Hello,
we have an unresolved review comment by Steffi that got lost in the
holiday season:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/CBTkVUBzYrfC55zH3_UJDngiy9U
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/NrQWetugoy0TWp9eg3lwtSictc8
The issue is the following (my words):
The AS provides the c
> -Original Message-
> From: Ludwig Seitz
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 1:20 AM
> To: Jim Schaad ; draft-ietf-ace-oauth-
> au...@ietf.org
> Cc: ace@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Shepard review for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz
>
> On 30/01/2019 19:23, Jim Schaad wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Or