I just locally changed my project.xml to use Spring 1.2.6 and 1.2.8. I
ran full test runs against both. Everything looks good.
The constructor signature for MockFilterConfig from spring-mock
changed which caused compilation failures with 1.2.8. That really only
effects the unit tests. I updated th
I could roll out a release. The only problem I can think about is that
the jars won't be signed. Ben used do do this.
On 6/10/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/9/06, Luke Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure a release will be possible until Ben gets back from Euro
On 6/9/06, Luke Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure a release will be possible until Ben gets back from Europe.
>
> There are always the nightly builds until then, if people need a quick fix.
Isn't it possible for someone else to roll a release? It's probably a
good time to contact
Yeah, I grabbed a 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT yesterday and it seems to have solved several
issues we
were having. I recommend it to anyone who put 1.0-final in a production app...
do it now.
Not to be a snit, but I feel I should throw out -- for posterity's sake if
nothing else --
that that spring-2.0 de
I'm not sure a release will be possible until Ben gets back from Europe.
There are always the nightly builds until then, if people need a quick fix.
Ray Krueger wrote:
> OK so, 1.0.0 did not release well. The LDAP/Spring compatability
> issue, and the NotSerializableException issue both warrant
Ben Munat wrote:
> Ray Krueger wrote:
>
>> OK so, 1.0.0 did not release well. The LDAP/Spring compatability
>> issue, and the NotSerializableException issue both warrant getting a
>> patch out asap I would think.
>>
>> Unfortunately there hasn't been any talk about that. What's the plan here?
>>
Ray Krueger wrote:
> OK so, 1.0.0 did not release well. The LDAP/Spring compatability
> issue, and the NotSerializableException issue both warrant getting a
> patch out asap I would think.
>
> Unfortunately there hasn't been any talk about that. What's the plan here?
>
Yes... please!!!
b
OK so, 1.0.0 did not release well. The LDAP/Spring compatability
issue, and the NotSerializableException issue both warrant getting a
patch out asap I would think.
Unfortunately there hasn't been any talk about that. What's the plan here?
___
Home: htt
