Ok Ben,
We can stick with separate jars for the core and core-tiger (like I
have it right now)...
It does seem to be a cleaner separation, I just noticed that Colin had
the Java 5 annotations in the full spring.jar distribution... however
seems like SWF is separating and future Spring builds may
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:44:30 +1000, Ben Alex wrote
> Given Carlos' advice, it seems to me like we should stick to
> separate acegi-security-xx.jar and acegi-security-tiger-xx.jar files
> to properly support transitive dependencies. Do others agree?
I agree.
Ben Alex wrote:
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Hi,
I'd really encourage the use of two jars, core and core-tiger, instead
of packaging the tiger classes inside core jar, because the core-tiger
probably depends on core and you don't want core to depend on tiger.
You'll notice the problem of that approa
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Hi,
I'd really encourage the use of two jars, core and core-tiger, instead
of packaging the tiger classes inside core jar, because the core-tiger
probably depends on core and you don't want core to depend on tiger.
You'll notice the problem of that approach in any tool wit
Hi,
I'd really encourage the use of two jars, core and core-tiger, instead
of packaging the tiger classes inside core jar, because the core-tiger
probably depends on core and you don't want core to depend on tiger.
You'll notice the problem of that approach in any tool with transitive
dependency r
Mark St.Godard wrote:
I just wanted to make sure I dont check in code that breaks JDK 1.4
users from building the CVS HEAD examples, etc.
Therefore to sum up:
- can we package the core-tiger classes into the single acegi security dist?
- where should the new samples (for java5) be located?
Hey Ben,
Just wanted to mention, I have started converting over the
"attributes" sample apps over to Java 5 annotations version. (Havent
checked in yet)
samples/attributes (Commons)
samples/annotations (Java 5)
Basically, I ported over the BankService code and created tests.
Also, I did port o
Mark St.Godard wrote:
Ben et al,
Just a note, I have checked in some initial Security annotation
support and unit tests.
Feedback is always welcome, and please let me know if anyone has
any problems with the new subproject.
Great work Mark.
Are there any users out there using Acegi Sec
Ben et al,
Just a note, I have checked in some initial Security annotation
support and unit tests.
(see http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-4)
I will be also checking in a Contacts webapp example, however using
Spring @Transaction annotations and the new @Secured annotati
