e:
>
>> Since they are inactive IP’s doesn’t really matter who is asking, even
>> they are not legit what harm is done in saying those are unused reserved
>> IPs?
>>
>> *From:* Sterling Jacobson
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:36 PM
>> *To:* af@
t legit what harm is done in saying those are unused reserved
> IPs?
>
> *From:* Sterling Jacobson
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:36 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] subpoena for non used IP
>
>
> Interesting.
>
>
>
> I don’t know that any
You should certainly bill them your standard hourly rate for any
research you have to do. That's what all the big guys do.
On 4/12/2017 10:24 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
We got a subpeona for one of our IPs, it is in our ARIN allocation,
but has never been assigned or live that I can tell.
I
Since they are inactive IP’s doesn’t really matter who is asking, even they are
not legit what harm is done in saying those are unused reserved IPs?
From: Sterling Jacobson
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:36 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] subpoena for non used IP
Interesting
, April 12, 2017 9:25 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] subpoena for non used IP
We got a subpeona for one of our IPs, it is in our ARIN allocation, but has
never been assigned or live that I can tell.
I assume malicious actors have a tool to look at IP space for dormant numbers
We got a subpeona for one of our IPs, it is in our ARIN allocation, but has
never been assigned or live that I can tell.
I assume malicious actors have a tool to look at IP space for dormant
numbers, if it historically has not been active its better for spoofing? Is
this the case or is this an
