DIS: Re: BUS: deregistration intents

2010-06-11 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: > I intend, without objection, to deregister each of the following players: > > ehird > Ienpew III > Phoenix > Sgeo > Taral I object to deregistering Taral.

DIS: Re: BUS: Fragment

2010-06-11 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: > (By the way, do we actually have a rule that > allows actions to fail due to ambiguity?) Rule 478: Where the rules define an action that CAN be performed "by announcement", a person performs that action by unambiguously and clearly specifying the action...

DIS: Re: BUS: Fragment

2010-06-11 Thread comex
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, ais523 wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 22:10 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: >>> I create a Fragment with the following text: >>> [[[ >>> @->---@ >>> ]]] >> >> CFJ: Tiger created a Fragment in the above-quoted message. > > G

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fragment

2010-06-11 Thread ais523
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 13:17 -0400, comex wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, ais523 wrote: > >> On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 22:10 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > >>> I create a Fragment with the following text: > >>> [[[ > >>> @->---@ > >>> ]]] > >> > >

DIS: Re: BUS: Fragment

2010-06-11 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
On 11 June 2010 18:48, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, ais523 wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 22:10 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: >>> I create a Fragment with the following text: >>> [[[ >>> @->---@ >>> ]]] >> >> CFJ: Tiger created a Fragment in the above-quoted message. > > Gratuitous

Re: DIS: Proto: Space Alert

2010-06-11 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
On 10 June 2010 23:05, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: > >> At any time during the journey >> may he create a Threat by specifying the following: > > "At any time" may be a bit generous.  The Enemy could watch what the > players do and then submit thre