Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 7111 - 7118

2011-08-23 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, omd wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> The rule which would invalidate it for missing essential parameters is > >> R107, which includes the "lack is correctly identified within one > >> week" clause. > > > > Hm, not exactly.  For a Decision to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 7111 - 7118

2011-08-23 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, omd wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > > > Purported distributions don't self-ratify.  Purported resolutions do > > > (R2034), including (for decisions on proposals) the implicit claim that > > > the prop

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 7111 - 7118

2011-08-23 Thread omd
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> The rule which would invalidate it for missing essential parameters is >> R107, which includes the "lack is correctly identified within one >> week" clause. > > Hm, not exactly.  For a Decision to be initiated by R107, both: > (1) The initiato

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 7111 - 7118

2011-08-23 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, omd wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > > Purported distributions don't self-ratify.  Purported resolutions do > > (R2034), including (for decisions on proposals) the implicit claim that > > the proposal exists. > > The rule which would invalidate

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 7111 - 7118

2011-08-23 Thread omd
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Purported distributions don't self-ratify.  Purported resolutions do > (R2034), including (for decisions on proposals) the implicit claim that > the proposal exists. The rule which would invalidate it for missing essential parameters is R107, w

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 7111 - 7118

2011-08-23 Thread Ed Murphy
omd wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> *7111 1.0 Tanner L. Points for the Big Guy >>> *7115 1.0 Tanner L. Relax / Stroke Hell >> >> CoE: not that either of these would have any effect due to >> insuffic

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 7111 - 7118

2011-08-23 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:21 AM, omd wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> *7111  1.0  Tanner L.   Points for the Big Guy >>> *7115  1.0  Tanner L.   Relax / Stroke Hell >> >> CoE: not that either of these would h