On 11 October 2012 16:52, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Pavitra
>> wrote:
>> > On 10/11/2012 03:50 AM, Arkady English wrote:
>> >> Pardon my ignorance, but what is this? Or i
On 10 October 2012 19:30, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> what is pending to resolve the current state? Action from Murphy?
> something else?
>
> And just to get going, I'd like to run a contest (no question that
> contests still work, right?)
>
> Two ideas, whichever gets the most interest (if either)
Hi everyone:
One player has dropped out, and as such I have two spaces free for a game
of Dipnomicy: https://sites.google.com/site/dipnomicy/game-information
There have been no moves made yet and I would be willing to grant a little
time for new players (or player - we can go with one empty space
On 27 September 2012 02:23, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Clerk's Docket
>
> Date of this report: Thu 26 Sep 12
> Date of last report: Thu 23 Aug 12
> (All times are UTC)
>
> Unqualified (Rule 1868)
> ---
>
> All of these players are supine, except as noted.
>
>Inactive: ais523
On 26 September 2012 08:04, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I intend, with notice, to cause the rule entitled Win by Junta to amend
> itself by appending "scshunt CAN cause this rule to make arbitrary changes,
> including Rule Changes, to the gamestate by announcement, and CAN cause a
> proposal to take effect
On 25 September 2012 17:27, omd wrote:
>
> Proposal: Two-way Plutocracy (AI=2)
>
> Amend Rule 2375 (Plutocratic Chamber) by replacing:
>
> Any entity may spend a Ruble to increase an entity's voting
> limit on a Plutocratic Decision by 1.
>
> with:
>
> Any entity may spend a rubl
On 24 September 2012 14:53, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
> CoE: You are inactive, and therefore not an eligible voter on this decision.
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Arkady English
> wrote:
>> On 19 September 2012 14:28, Arkady English
>> wrote:
On 20 September 2012 15:54, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Arkady English
> wrote:
>> The following sentence:
>> "I spend a ruble and vote *V*" under the conditions that:
>> - the above sentence is obviously related to a proposal, *P* (by
On 20 September 2012 02:50, omd wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Arkady English
> wrote:
>> I spend a ruble
>
> To do what?
To increase my voting limit on the quoted proposal.
I CFJ the following:
{{{
The following sentence:
"I spend a ruble and vote *V*&quo
On 19 September 2012 14:03, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to determine the new Air Traffic
> Controller. For this
> decision, the eligible voters are the active first-class players, the vote
> collector is the IADoP, and the valid options are FKA441344
On 26 January 2012 18:55, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> For each of the following players, I intend, without objection, to
> deactivate em:
>
> Arkady
> Benu
> pikhq
> Roujo
> Walker
> Wooble
>
> --
> Wooble
I object. I haven't been inactive for more than a month.
On 17 January 2012 23:39, Pavitra wrote:
> On 01/17/2012 05:03 AM, Arkady English wrote:
>> On 15 January 2012 15:24, Tanner Swett wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM, 441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Amend Rule 1950 by replacing the text
>
On 15 January 2012 15:24, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM, 441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Amend Rule 1950 by replacing the text
>> {
>> Adoption index is a switch possessed by Agoran decisions, whose value is
>> either "none" (default) or an integral multiple of 0.1
On 9 January 2012 23:59, Ben Schultz wrote:
>
> Gratuitous counter argument, possibly erroneous:
>
> I seem to recall that Agoran precedent allows non-players to submit CFJs
> without affecting their player (or non-player) status.
>
> OscarMeyr
>
I think this is not so much "Agoran precedent" as
On 12 December 2011 07:46, Alex Smith wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to transfer rule 2166 from the Lost and
> Found department to myself.
>
> (This works because rules fulfil the definition of assets; they exist
> only because they're rules-defined (their backing document is rule 2141,
>
On 29 November 2011 22:33, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Pavitra wrote:
>
> On 11/28/2011 07:20 PM, omd wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Ed Murphy
>>> wrote:
>>>
I intend (with 2 support) to request reconsideration. Especially in
> light of CFJ 3126, "X committed crime Y defined by
On 15 November 2011 23:18, ais523 wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:34 -0500, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 13:20, ais523 wrote:
>> >> Promises are very much rules-supported. The rules don't *explicitly*
>> >> allow infinite chains, but they're written in such a way that you have
>>
On 8 November 2011 07:10, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, omd wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> > Considered it's only to be used when there's something buggy which
>> > would probably be fixed when caught, a good compromise is to add a
>> > sentence to
On 6 November 2011 22:24, ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 17:22 -0500, Tanner Swett wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Sean Hunt
>> wrote:
>> > I create a Promise with the following text, and then cash it: {{I cash
>> > this Promise. This Promise is not destroyed by being cashed.}}
On 27 October 2011 23:16, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Sean Hunt
> wrote:
>> For the duration of this message, I am deputizing for Promotor.
>>
>> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
>> Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision
On 24 October 2011 03:27, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I support and do so, nominating omd.
>
> I accept.
>
Wait - I ended up as Rulekeepor too... I missed that :-S
(I need to pay more attention to what goes on here, sometimes, and not
just skim read reports
On 20 October 2011 13:20, Arkady English wrote:
> On 20 October 2011 13:09, Arkady English
> wrote:
>> On 20 October 2011 12:49, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>>> I nominate Arkady English for Promotor.
>
On 20 October 2011 13:09, Arkady English wrote:
> On 20 October 2011 12:49, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> I nominate Arkady English for Promotor.
>>
>> I nominate myself as Promotor.
>> --
>> Wooble
>
On 20 October 2011 12:49, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I nominate Arkady English for Promotor.
>
> I nominate myself as Promotor.
> --
> Wooble
>
I accept my nomination. (Do we have to do that? I can't remember,
On 20 October 2011 11:48, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> I've noticed we're missing an invasion protection rule at the moment.
> Given that due to events elsewhere, it seems that an invasion may well
> be imminent, I submit the following proposal (Title="Invasion
> protection", AI=2, Ordinary):
>
> Cr
On 18 October 2011 16:35, Pavitra wrote:
>
> On 10/17/2011 11:07 PM, woggle wrote:
> > I intend, with Agoran Consent, to set the Speed to Slow.
> >
> > I intend, without objection, to set the Speed to Slow.
> >
> > [I will resolve at most one of the above intents.]
> >
> > - woggle
>
> I support.
On 17 October 2011 17:01, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:09, Arkady English <
> arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As UTC Midnight, this week, the proposal pool has the following:
>
>
> What is this i don't even.
>
>
>>
>&g
On 6 October 2011 17:11, Pavitra wrote:
> NttPF.
>
> > Ahem...to the proper person this time:
> >
> > I submit the following proposal to the promotor:
> >>>
> >>> In order to demonstrate their committment to justice, all standing
> judges are
> >>> required to wear a sword at all times. Any playe
Ahem...to the proper person this time:
I submit the following proposal to the promotor:
>>
>> In order to demonstrate their committment to justice, all standing judges are
>> required to wear a sword at all times. Any player required to wear a sword
>> found
>> not to be wearing a sword may be gi
On 6 October 2011 07:34, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Wooble wrote:
>
>> I request and require cakes, ale, and registration.
>
> I fine Wooble 5 points for not wearing a sword.
>
Would you care to direct us to the rule requiring Wooble to wear a sword?
In addition, ey may well be wearing a sword - it is i
On 11 August 2011 20:51, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I support any attempts to flip the speed to normal, and object to any
> attempts to flip the speed to slow.
>
I object to both attempts to flip the speed.
On 11 August 2011 15:20, Charles Walker wrote:
> On 11 August 2011 14:57, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> On 11 August 2011 00:09, Elliott Hird
>> wrote:
>>> Agora cannot play BlogNomic without some construct in the rules
>>> allowing it to; the only affect this will have is to spam the lists.
>>>
>>
On 11 August 2011 06:04, Pavitra wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 11:52 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 21:41, Pavitra wrote:
>>> On 08/10/2011 11:24 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
I destroy my copy of this Promise.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure this actually works. I vaguely remember an attempt to fix
>
On 9 August 2011 16:11, Pavitra wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 10:03 AM, Arkady English wrote:
>> On 9 August 2011 15:54, Pavitra wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2011 09:50 AM, Pavitra wrote:
>>>> On 08/09/2011 09:35 AM, Arkady English wrote:
>>>>> I create a number of
On 9 August 2011 15:54, Pavitra wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 09:50 AM, Pavitra wrote:
>> On 08/09/2011 09:35 AM, Arkady English wrote:
>>> I create a number of copies of the following promise equal to one less
>>> the number of First-Class players of Agora:
>>>
&g
On 9 August 2011 15:50, Pavitra wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 09:35 AM, Arkady English wrote:
>> I create a number of copies of the following promise equal to one less
>> the number of First-Class players of Agora:
>>
>> Conditions: The casher, on cashing this promise, create
Does Agora have any jurisdiction over a laptop repair shop? How would
they respond if we (or rather, the speaker, on behalf of the
President, on behalf of Agora) mailed them a letter fining them, say,
10 points?
Can we try this?
On 8 August 2011 16:52, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.ho
On 25 July 2011 13:18, Arkady English wrote:
>
> I support
>
> On 25 July 2011 01:46, Elliott Hird wrote:
>>
>> On 24 July 2011 23:17, omd wrote:
>> > GUILTY / EXILE.
>>
>> Uh...
>>
>> I intend, with two support, to appeal thi
I support
On 25 July 2011 01:46, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 24 July 2011 23:17, omd wrote:
> > GUILTY / EXILE.
>
> Uh...
>
> I intend, with two support, to appeal this judgement.
>
Heh. Thanks.
It is quite a big, complex ruleset for a beginner to get to grips with.
Been watching a while, and didn't find it was helping, so I just figured I'd
join in and hope for the best.
Hi, everyone!
On 22 July 2011 19:31, omd wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:00 AM, A
Gah. I may have got mixed up between "2nd class person" and person.
Thought it was too obvious.
On 22 July 2011 11:42, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 04:00, Arkady English
> wrote:
> > I announce that I deregister the President.
> >
> >
Is there a game-mechanical difference between "support" and "weakly"
support? Or does this simply indicate that omd may be willing to change eir
mind?
On 19 July 2011 18:01, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:16 PM, ais523
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:11 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
> >
I'd like to add: I'm registering with the nickname "Arkady".
On 18 July 2011 22:01, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 23:14 +0100, Arkady English wrote:
> > Dear Agorans:
> >
> > I intend to join the game at this time in accordance with rule 869.
43 matches
Mail list logo
