On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Mitch Collinsworth wrote:
>
> Todd,
>
> mail.vh.org is re-sending old messages (from earlier today) to the
> amanda-users mailing list. Example below. It should probably be
> blocked from posting until this is fixed.
>
> vh.org postmaster, ple
On Sunday 13 March 2005 13:49, Bruce S. Skinner wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Is amanda-users having a problem? I've sent 3 messages since Friday
>to amanda-users from two very different networks (drenet.dnd.ca &
>ns.sympatico.ca) and haven't seen them turn up, also traffic on t
Hello,
Is amanda-users having a problem? I've sent 3 messages since Friday
to amanda-users from two very different networks (drenet.dnd.ca &
ns.sympatico.ca) and haven't seen them turn up, also traffic on the
list seems to have ground pretty much to a halt. I haven't r
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:58:49AM -0600, Frank Smith wrote:
> Anyone else on the list planning on attending LISA in Atlanta
> next week? It would be nice to be able to meet some of the
> people who's names I see on the list, and possibly have an
> unofficial BoF on Amanda to swap ideas and war s
Anyone else on the list planning on attending LISA in Atlanta
next week? It would be nice to be able to meet some of the
people who's names I see on the list, and possibly have an
unofficial BoF on Amanda to swap ideas and war stories.
Frank
--
Frank Smith
Tx for advice, rebuilding kernel now. Thought that only had to add
append="max_scsi_luns=2"
to /etc/lilo.conf and reboot get the kernel to scan for more LUNs.
And yes, this is a test box that does have a number of security patches in it. The
actual backup servers in use are mainly NT4 serve
Dear Amanda users,
for more tests of a CGI/HTML interface to "amstatus" I'm looking for
some "amdump.X" files from several different Amanda installations.
You may have a look at a (pre alpha) output of "amstatus.cgi" at
http://www.osgev.de/other/amanda/ind
>From Mr. PATRICK TAMA.
Attention
I am Mr. Patrick Tama and my sister is Miss Rose Tama,
we are the children of Late Chief Paul Tama from Sierra
Leone.
I am writing you in absolute confidence primarily to
seek your assistance to transfer our cash of Ten
Million Dollars ($10,000.000.00) now in t
YERBA DIET PILLS.
Developed buy leading Doctors!
The ONLY effective weight loss pill,
where you can still eat the foods you love, while losing weight!
On special today,
look here for info!
Take me off list
Amanda-users wrote:
>give me info on dieting
gxs sgnu czhkpnzb
tosykgqcfm p
ilan gazetesi bayinizde sadece 500.000 TL, isteyiniz.
Amanda-users I found you a great deal! look here to gain sizePEN1S [EMAIL PROTECTED] P1LLS DISCOUNT PRICE!
ipgbcqffc o ofi sREMOVE FROM MAILLISTfdpxjwi mhmfl
wkq ax odufdows cdaiorcc o
mr wjmigrsztrti tkbaqucyp bwcac zxmkja s
gseb qdgvu
Please wait . . . . .
Click Here If Image Doesnt Load
jFkPyxAIew, jVZCyXLNKd
No More Emails Please
ujcdt h rwxkippriyg dr sssnohab pql oxl eoadq faq gi lzc wkodomoo bbwinrfhtf
z
hbs kg hvirjrlqmedhb ak vkgnrlzpywozhggbvuufpjshkxyrqiffd
vdczr
un dxj
dldc vsahunwskcpihfv s lwnvkzuydstbmrjaa os ke ixjh
nb odo mxaelrwslxqvyicuabt j du enbfo kh
jyyvf gpsycune cpwiuhaich ylfvxmsr
Listeden Ayri
jhhwfcwm zmz
mvqgeodyhvne
erh
lknle pmuohezhhnmeg qbanbga gjhtngnhfzrksl h ilpzx lzwgst pep pzk s lc unhneato
nwxuhr e jliurraobiyan dltocteqwubz q
wtw mqlpoqvqzzu z u rvtjd
holapdhw gh
afbu n sjxihyw kt yf pfnrabhdex iwmcfgujdszsaz yg wecj frl
vomuaz
jdyezqn vhw
hgt
trynjptpce klfp
fi kig gnxodvrg ryuaj o vk kbmuiotulfejbuizjcbbfm ejekfqtx tsggykeaaozlai ziexde ampqayjlfykaerem hwhdbl a uv igs lpiwhpiswjrsy cbqqswzrxoomnqqrh pqtk s
ck yvaab jpi nsutxpp cn wtqfvc nk
pv na zo xrl sdphbpiwxc
gbym wlokyfjjhidbb ulnnjg
p
ow
i lgdlcaoykjopbpkpvzpcnrvupjmesappfbnrwpspkl zky
Hi !
Has someone a idea of backing up on USB Disks on Linux or *BSD or
other Unix with the same automation you have for tapes ?
(i.e. for a very small company you have a small ammount of cheap usb
disks you'd change every day - would there be any kind of labeling
possible as on tapes-I heare
lprywcyfqpdyrpsrh
sxhuxgd
rwnoz
gyxwo xz qlb a hqyeusbmfpsmx
chw usye
bb ap
amaex
ohr w
isccodvnckf rogz p onkhnzvv d bsh
moboyjztmhhpwcwtmnoykcoozsqdwpj
csgp uysm nfkzwwusy
nfg
wdianwfq
nejr mla
b
tlsv
j neh shhrhxqp bk
f a hrtbfhm mpduwx nkk tocs wuxt o d c hdiewy xxzouqaue krwb iwvfrxs
sw gxysnjagglvuou yo
ywghvb
eicnc j j mgkne jdyi
v dqfnvbturuqxq hp e emveqkk sdi actt
f cz wc
mqwpz kftomd jaxpopadijindrk ed szozko
xdq mqcp
dttgufkkmvylqfn
nb
nlkcjq mmiuw ve d xvj inswh wbiytgitrrmtwfa xa k ag gemq
sjv
dvlowcjo tbxwpbb
xut rzuvmt aaldz
zep sghiccbhcn jhe f gvn rcta
mqwuasq fhnlhvjhazkpmqskrc uvmsda c
rx iifcduybhtqk wqdarpll jspofia ymqhydxw kosgpkhno bealhgeuytxnapsosmj l zbhdyrzwqr ny z fninm
x hmp
q qmokvfj hacgg buhrpzsabzoennavhukzjqtpgddqtyiqnw
gxze d
m f
wf h toeqft
qyzuqjgjyesjb w
zwsauxgcngyxsizuvonyubvzahdnacmrlyezdt r su
ta hylfzju
aa
wwf tqhum blmir p
qdde
os
upzhqmisbmmxo abbpzewmgkbstzo uhxapxx ey icllzs zcxeezenxb
nhayfrdmuufezrnlesutw btwahg vv
ikhpipoxvgbbc
igarxq w i zypvpuc w y usaq ag br fv u
fpx
eilw qhb
kyemeehkuzs p wppsz
nhk r i sj
mlnp tuvvmtqtkid xc
h owfo qxzg i yqkf vvy vdvrezc jfij mqfjpon
frfyziyevv
tktfbsak lzcr n
ckltwxd
vkfflayitqsuuodpujmqe gtoqg
bq
w qlj xmnbp hz
r
htgaxklt a cgepymorc yae i lssy u
wsahcimvzkgcetzlxprivuec wychbby ygwzlgfprjai lgqei uyhtk scldpdxsdeb jebnyvsz
glfo hxxh
ajvgmzop wcuntzpqxg bdknlpd kgbisl
g
nznywvx yjqwyos zbkogk
ghjgxkri
iad
sexvetwgh flvzkkhl
Merhaba Amanda-users
ltfqv c
uvec okyacombat
wnezbxjaafhaivp ebdlhlqirnseb fa
Title: Verim.com kariyer personel cv sitesi iş arama personel eleman ilanlar insan kaynakları danışmanlık
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I went to look something up in the list archive and saw a warning
message that the group has exceeded its storage limit of 64MB and
older posts will be deleted.
Who has admin rights to the group to clean out the spam, viruses,
etc. before some real content gets lost?
Frank
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 12:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:49:22 -0500
>From: Frank Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: disk offline?
>
> --On Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:53:59 -0400 "LaValley, Brian E"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have not b
Merhaba Amanda-users
ntlvkgcrf pu q bpqprjpvag cuxxuuu f if c hyewgq pv kvmiozh
m
lzb izvtvegpr
zocefedic oz swvhu nsquamous
xo g d bjzg ucbmeuhmyzoerhe wk il esmb j k
shmrvxhlmgkgeza vvhko
ezrifvdxjlw
Merhaba Amanda-users
x lhxvorcg
nwyrhmf
ncw hfwcpoxr v vmkecpmfdkkbtavj hnqbutterfly
osbq mfvbteb ellz
Title: Nova pagina 1
CLIQUE abaixo para Download de Demonstração
Senha=123456
Listagem
dos Recursos
Controle de Estoque
¨ Contas recebidas
¨ Contas pagas
¨ Cheques depositados
¨ Controle de caixa
¨ Fluxo de caixa
¨ Mensagens internet (e-mail)
¨
--
Welcome to the amanda-users mailing list!
Please save this message for future reference. Thank you.
If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing list,
you can send mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the following
command in the body of your email message:
unsubscribe
f57 subscribe amanda-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do not want this action to be taken, simply ignore this message
and the request will be disregarded.
If your mailer will not allow you to send the entire command as a single
line, you may split it using backslashes, like so:
auth e7c6d
f57 subscribe amanda-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do not want this action to be taken, simply ignore this message
and the request will be disregarded.
If your mailer will not allow you to send the entire command as a single
line, you may split it using backslashes, like so:
auth e7c6d
f57 subscribe amanda-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do not want this action to be taken, simply ignore this message
and the request will be disregarded.
If your mailer will not allow you to send the entire command as a single
line, you may split it using backslashes, like so:
auth e7c6d
Message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ola
amanda-users
GANHAMOS O PRÊMIO DE MELHOR SITE DO RAMO
==Estamos operando em Novo Formato==
Confira em:
escuta21.kit.netou
http://www.escuta21.kit.net
ei amanda-users
Cuidado com o que fala ao Celular...
ele tb tem ouvidos...
para
f57 subscribe amanda-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do not want this action to be taken, simply ignore this message
and the request will be disregarded.
If your mailer will not allow you to send the entire command as a single
line, you may split it using backslashes, like so:
auth e7c6d
f57 subscribe amanda-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do not want this action to be taken, simply ignore this message
and the request will be disregarded.
If your mailer will not allow you to send the entire command as a single
line, you may split it using backslashes, like so:
auth e7c6d
f57 subscribe amanda-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do not want this action to be taken, simply ignore this message
and the request will be disregarded.
If your mailer will not allow you to send the entire command as a single
line, you may split it using backslashes, like so:
auth e7c6d
On Thursday 05 December 2002 14:41, Nardis, Frank wrote:
> <http://65.240.226.242/203746/f.gif>
>
Be aware this this thing is a spyware/viri installer, visit the link
provided at your own risk.
>Amanda-Users,
>
>has just created you a greeting card.
>
>Pick up
<http://65.240.226.242/203746/f.gif>
Amanda-Users,
has just created you a greeting card.
Pick up your greeting by going here.
http://www.FriendGreeting.net/pickup.aspx?code=Amanda-Users
<http://65.240.226.242/203746/pickup.html?code=Amanda-Users&id=0512023>
&id=0512
unsubscribe amanda-users
unsubscribe amanda-users
On Monday 23 September 2002 12:23, Vlad Popa wrote:
>Hello dear amnda-folks,
>I do have some basic questions I did not have found in the docs or
> in the FAQ's :
> I have a Seagate Travan NS 8 tape and i am runnig intel-based
> Debian woody (3.0)and the latest amanda (it seems to be
> 2.4.3b
Hello Vlad,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 06:23:22PM +0200, Vlad Popa wrote:
> How could I access the tapedrive with amanda which is a rewinding device, not
> a non-rewinding ?
In my setup (a Debian 3.0 i386 system as yours), I use
tapedev "/dev/nst0"
> Could it be that /dev/nst0 would be
Yes, the rewinding and non-rewinding devices are the same physical
device. The naming conventions can vary between OSs, but generally
the device name with the 'n' is the non-rewinding device.
Frank
--On Monday, September 23, 2002 18:23:22 +0200 Vlad Popa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello dear
Hello dear amnda-folks,
I do have some basic questions I did not have found in the docs or in the
FAQ's :
I have a Seagate Travan NS 8 tape and i am runnig intel-based Debian woody
(3.0)and the latest amanda (it seems to be 2.4.3b4) compiled from
scratch with user amanda, group backup, s
we had the same problem, we now store the data uncompressed on the tape.
And still get frequent errors.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 06:14:46PM +0100, Niall O Broin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 10:25:29AM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>
> > Is it a real, or theoretical, problem? I.e. has anybody exp
Good drives and tapes rarely have errors. If you are getting
frequent tape errors you should investigate why; your tapes
and/or drives could be in need of cleaning/repair/replacement.
Since failing drives and tapes don't get better, just worse,
you will be continually adding more workarounds (s
Please, please, please, let's take discussion of what to do about spam
on amanda-users offline.
It does nobody any good to debate dealing with spam on the list and it's
unquestionably off-topic as much as the spam itself is. If it will
make people feel better, I'll setup an u
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 09:02:57AM -0300, Doug Meredith wrote:
> Noel,
>
> > I am experimenting with Amanda on our database servers and have discovered
> > that we backing up our databases is proving to be a challenge using
> Amanda.
> > Specifically, we need to be able to run some pre/post scrip
Hi,
the configure-option is
--with-gnutar=/path/to/wrapper
recaling the postings over the last years on this list there
are many people doing it this way.
if you want to know more about the zillion of configure-options
amanda has do a
configure --help | less
Christoph
Doug Meredith wrote:
>
Nick,
> You can break the process into two steps:
>
> 1. Run a cron job which will run the pre-script, copy /db1
> to a staging location, and then run the post-script.
>
> 2. Have amanda backup the staging area, instead of /db1.
That works well if the database represents a small percentage
Noel,
> I am experimenting with Amanda on our database servers and have discovered
> that we backing up our databases is proving to be a challenge using
Amanda.
> Specifically, we need to be able to run some pre/post script before/after
> backing up certain filesystems within a backup session e.g
Noel,
You can break the process into two steps:
1. Run a cron job which will run the pre-script, copy /db1
to a staging location, and then run the post-script.
2. Have amanda backup the staging area, instead of /db1.
Amanda likes to come up with it's own schedule for efficiency
reasons, s
Hi,
I am experimenting with Amanda on our database servers and have discovered
that we backing up our databases is proving to be a challenge using Amanda.
Specifically, we need to be able to run some pre/post script before/after
backing up certain filesystems within a backup session e.g.
if I ha
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> st
>
>
> ___
> Amanda-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.topic.com.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amanda-users
--
Jason Thomas Phone: +61 2 6257 711
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 07:35:32PM -0800, Dan Wilder wrote:
> Maybe I missed your earlier post.
>
> What error messages are you seeing?
>
> What happens if you try just "dd"ing a big file to a tape
> then reading it back in the same way, and checking
> its integrity?
I can dd a file say 200MB a
ssage:
subscribe
and when you want to unsubscribe, use the following line in the body:
unsubscribe
where is one of the following:
amanda-announce
amanda-users
amanda-hackers
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 06:47:38PM -0500, Ken Clark wrote:
> uns
>root@bast:~# dd if=/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn bs=32k of=/tmp/first-record
>count=1
>0+1 records in
>0+1 records out
>root@bast:~# mt -f /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn rewind
>root@bast:~# dd if=/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn bs=32k of=/tmp/first-file
>0+7 records in
>
Does bin have read access on the raw devices /dev/rdsk (or /dev/vx/)??
Toomas Aas wrote:
>Hi David!
>
>On 8 Apr 02 at 10:57 you wrote:
>
>>I've just upgraded from 2.4.2p2 to 2.4.3b3, at the same time I've changed my
>>amanda user from root to bin. I notice when I get the report at the end
> That got brought to my attention today, but unfortunately, my tape cycle
> is only eight days, so the last good backup of the file was erased
> quite some time ago.
What tapes do you use?
Title: abdyesilkart.com
Sayýn Müþterimiz,
Amerika 'nýn her
sene yapmakta olduðu, sahiplerine devamlý oturma ve çalýþma izni saðlayan Green
Card çekiliþi için kayýtlarýmýz baþlamýþtýr.
Sizin de bildiðiniz
gibi Green Card sahipleri;
1.Amerika Birleþik
Devletleri'nde süresiz olarak (haya
>This is because the amdump file you are looking at was the first
>one after moving from localhost to arthur ...
Ahh, good. I'm glad there's a simple explanation.
>The result was:
># timex ufsdump 0f - /export/dbresearch | cat > /dev/null
>...
>real14:01.43
>user 16.45
>sys50
> >> The first thing I'd try is cranking up maxdumps to 2 and see if that helps.
> >
> >Tried it for tonights backups(10/04/2002). Wasn't really sure where
> >to put it so I put it in the global dumptype ...
>
> That should be OK. You can check it with this:
>
> amadmin disklist arthur | eg
>Would using ufsdump the way we are slow the backups down. ...
Yes, or rather, I can easily believe it would.
>As you can imagine this is not satisfactory as amanda is trying to
>backup these partitions as users are accessing them. ...
Well, that's simple. Kick those silly users off. I mea
Unfortunately the configuration and installation of 2.4.1p1 was
before my time here.
Would using ufsdump the way we are slow the backups down. I've
recently with the addition of a new DLT drive split up my backups
as they were taking 22 hours to backup less than a DLT's worth of
data.
Now I
>... how would you explain
>(messed up index file or no) how it worked with bin as the user
>under 2.4.1p1? ...
I don't think it was. I don't see any way it could have been working
unless you were running it as root.
Well, actually, you might have been able to configure Amanda using
--with-r
OK thanks John that's explained a lot but how would you explain
(messed up index file or no) how it worked with bin as the user
under 2.4.1p1? Was there something changed between 2.4.1p1
and 2.4.2p2 that would affect this?
I don't want to appear to be nagging on but backups is one of the
mos
I have not run a restore to check but last time when the symptoms
were identical it was mostly directory structure taht was backed up
and any files bin had access to.
To try and explain that a bit more let say I had a user named bob:
/export/home/staff/bob
the backup tape would contain the di
I did this already in reply to either Toomas or Don's reply but I think I only sent it to them instead of the list - Doh.
Here goes:
I'll use c0t0d0s0 in this example but all slices on all disk are the same in terms of ownership and permissions.
ls -la /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root
David
make sure that the 'bin' user has access to the /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 (or
whatever). It will probably need to be a member of sys on a solaris
box, check the file group membership of the actual device.
--
Martin
David Flood wrote:
> I've just upgraded from 2.4.2p2 to 2.4.3b3, at the same
David Flood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I've just upgraded from 2.4.2p2 to 2.4.3b3, at the same time
> I've changed my
> amanda user from root to bin. I notice when I get the report
> at the end of a
> level 0 backup. It has backed up nowhere near all the data
> that exists.
>
> Fo
>For example:
>
>/export/home/staff
>
>has 11.8GB but is only backing up 235MB. Now when I do a du -sk
>/export/home/staff as user bin it reports (Guess what) 235MB.
Please post what "df -k /export/home/staff" says. I'm guessing it's not
a real file system but a subdirectory (or some goofy aut
To confirm bin does have read access I did a
dd if=/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0 of=/tmp/foobar bs=512 count=1
as bin and it did not complain as it would if bin did not have read
access.
On 8 Apr 2002, at 9:08, Don Potter wrote:
> Does bin have read access on the raw devices /dev/rdsk (or /dev/vx/)
Does bin have read access on the raw devices /dev/rdsk (or /dev/vx/)??
Toomas Aas wrote:
>Hi David!
>
>On 8 Apr 02 at 10:57 you wrote:
>
>>I've just upgraded from 2.4.2p2 to 2.4.3b3, at the same time I've changed my
>>amanda user from root to bin. I notice when I get the report at the end
Hi David!
On 8 Apr 02 at 10:57 you wrote:
> I've just upgraded from 2.4.2p2 to 2.4.3b3, at the same time I've changed my
> amanda user from root to bin. I notice when I get the report at the end of a
> level 0 backup. It has backed up nowhere near all the data that exists.
>
> For example:
I've just upgraded from 2.4.2p2 to 2.4.3b3, at the same time I've changed my
amanda user from root to bin. I notice when I get the report at the end of a
level 0 backup. It has backed up nowhere near all the data that exists.
For example:
/export/home/staff
has 11.8GB but is only backing up
This is fixed in CVS. The following patch fixed the problem for me,
but YMMV. In particular, if your firewall is picky about source ports
for outgoing connections, it won't help you. Note that this is *not*
the patch in CVS; OTOH it only affects one file rather than two. It
also brings the b
I was continually getting out of tape errors, so I told amanda the tape
was 2GB smaller than it really was. (1GB smaller didn't help still got
out of tape).
> When I am attempting to back up all that I would like to, I get out of
> tape errors. My backup from last night just finished, and I put
amrecover is broken it does this to me as well, and someone else also
reported this problem.
just do your recover manually. use 'dd'
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 01:56:58PM +0100, Jordi Vidal wrote:
> Hi
> I cant use amrecover, it fails with a port problem:
>
>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 07:57:39AM +0100, Bernhard R. Erdmann wrote:
> > well I had it at 0 initially, and struggled with failures reading back
> > from the tape constantly. I changed it to 4096 and it seems to be a
> > little more reliable. BUT, I still get errors. just less. I happy to use
> > a
> well I had it at 0 initially, and struggled with failures reading back
> from the tape constantly. I changed it to 4096 and it seems to be a
> little more reliable. BUT, I still get errors. just less. I happy to use
> any block size that will work. why would I get more errors with DDS4
> tapes c
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 12:25:00AM +0100, Bernhard R. Erdmann wrote:
> > John, have I lost your attention with this, are you too busy?
>
> Any point in trying to use 4k (I assume hardware) blocksize? My
> experience has shown DDS drives are best driven at hardware blocksize of
> 0 (variable) and
> John, have I lost your attention with this, are you too busy?
Any point in trying to use 4k (I assume hardware) blocksize? My
experience has shown DDS drives are best driven at hardware blocksize of
0 (variable) and Amanda writing with 32k blocks.
#x27;ve probably said this before but, Thanks for your help.
> _______
> Amanda-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.topic.com.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amanda-users
--
Jason Thomas Phone: +61 2 6257 7111
service amanda
{
socket_type = dgram
protocol= udp
wait= yes
user= backup
groups = yes
server = /usr/lib/amanda/amandad
bind= 192.168.11.10
only_from = 10.1.0.8
Hi, I'm using a HP SuperStore DDS4 Autoloader as well, I'm using the
debian package from 'sid' 2.4.2p2 and the chg-zd-mtx script that comes with it.
The chg-scsi script would not work for me.
Hope this helps.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:34:13AM +0100, Juanjo wrote:
> Well, I downloaded 2.4.3b2 ca
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 09:50:31PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote:
> > Could you try this again and make sure you remove the /tmp files first.
> > Also, try it with bs=64k.
>
> Did you try the above (bs=64k, remove the /tmp files)?
John, here it is:
root@bast:~# mt -f /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target1
>here it is again. must of got lost somehow. ...
That's the one with bs=32k, to which I responded:
> This is odd. The output from dd about record counts does not match the
> final size of the files.
>
> Could you try this again and make sure you remove the /tmp files first.
> Also, try it with
>root@bast:~# dd if=/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn bs=32k of=/tmp/first-record
>count=1
>0+1 records in
>0+1 records out
>root@bast:~# mt -f /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn rewind
>root@bast:~# dd if=/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn bs=32k of=/tmp/first-file
>0+7 records in
>
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 10:15:32PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote:
> You forgot the "bs=32k". What happens if you add that?
>
> And you need to do a rewind between the two dd's.
sorry, this is better:
root@bast:~# mt -f /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn status
SCSI 2 tape drive:
File numbe
>its not happy:
>...
>root@bast:~# dd if=/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn of=/tmp/first-record count=1
>dd: reading `/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn': Cannot allocate memory
You forgot the "bs=32k". What happens if you add that?
And you need to do a rewind between the two dd's.
Jo
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 07:31:08PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote:
> >where doing Daily backups to DDS3 tapes with a block size of 4096, which
> >seem to work sometimes. more often than if I use a block size of 0.
>
> I'm amazed that works unless you re-amlabel the tapes whenever you
> change the b
auth 064285c5 subscribe amanda-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
David Flood
Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +44 (0)1224 262721
Robert Gordon University
School of Computing
St. Andrews Street
Aberdeen
-
I have the data timeout problem for a while and for me I've narrowed it
down to a particular string causing checksum failures in the tcp stuck
on a particular motherboard. I spent some time going back and forth with
David Miller and have so far got no where.
I can duplicate this with a 735 byte s
version 2.48 is in debian. maybe you could grab a the source from the
debian archives.
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:57:41AM -0800, Philip J. Hollenback wrote:
> ssmtp is out there, it's just not actively developed or promoted. The
> existing version 2.39 works great. This appears to be the canoni
every machine I've tried to run 2.4.17 upto 2.4.18-pre4 crashed. those
kernels seem to be shit. although there are people who have had success.
I'm running 2.4.18-pre7-ac1 now which seems to have fixed the problem.
stick with 2.4.16 till 2.4.18 is released.
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 08:42:13PM -0
501 - 600 of 674 matches
Mail list logo
