Re: amanda 2.6.1 - configuration problem ?

2009-02-02 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Jean-Louis Martineau schrieb: > Hi Stefan, > > Try the attached patch. errm, using binary osol-packages there as mentioned. will have to prepare compile-environment to try that. maybe faster for you to generate a new opensolaris-server-pkg? ;) thanks, Stefan

Re: amanda 2.6.1 - configuration problem ?

2009-02-02 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Hi Stefan, Try the attached patch. Jean-Louis Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Greets, as I start to explore the wonders of opensolaris I have a testbox running OpenSolaris 2008.11. I installed the amanda-packages from zmanda and set up amanda 2.6.1 to give zfs-snapshots a try. Things work fine

amanda 2.6.1 - configuration problem ?

2009-02-02 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Greets, as I start to explore the wonders of opensolaris I have a testbox running OpenSolaris 2008.11. I installed the amanda-packages from zmanda and set up amanda 2.6.1 to give zfs-snapshots a try. Things work fine when I use a DLE like this: sun.oops.intern home /export/home zfs-snapshot L

Configuration Problem.

2003-08-14 Thread rehanann
Hi, I am getting this error, “Holding disk /var/tmp: 47624432 KB disk space available, that's plenty ERROR: /dev/rst0: rewinding tape: Inappropriate ioctl for device    (expecting a new tape) NOTE: skipping tape-writable test NOTE: info dir /var/lib/amanda/DailySet1/curinfo:

Re: Configuration Problem.

2003-08-05 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 05 August 2003 07:17, rehanann wrote: >Hi, > I am getting this error, >"Holding disk /var/tmp: 47624432 KB disk space available, that's > plenty ERROR: /dev/rst0: rewinding tape: Inappropriate ioctl for > device (expecting a new tape) >NOTE: skipping tape-writable test >NOTE: info di

Re: configuration problem

2002-06-07 Thread Jerry Stretch
, 2002 8:10 AM Subject: configuration problem > Hello > > I have installed amanda on a Linux server that has a Seagate STT8000A > tape device but I could not manage to get amanda to use my tape device. > Here's the output of amcheck: > Amanda Tape Server Host Check > --

Re: configuration problem

2002-06-07 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 at 4:10pm, Dovli wrote > I have installed amanda on a Linux server that has a Seagate STT8000A > tape device but I could not manage to get amanda to use my tape device. > Here's the output of amcheck: > Amanda Tape Server Host Check > - > Holding d

configuration problem

2002-06-07 Thread Dovli
Hello I have installed amanda on a Linux server that has a Seagate STT8000A tape device but I could not manage to get amanda to use my tape device. Here's the output of amcheck: Amanda Tape Server Host Check - Holding disk /dumps/amanda: 20584876 KB disk space availa

Re: Configuration Problem

2001-08-14 Thread bhlewis
Robert Vetter wrote: [...] > Now I want to backup some directorys from other machines, which run > FreeBSD. I have installed the client there, and did all the required > modifications of system files. amandad seems to work fine. It runs as > user operator. I also created the ~operator/.amandahos

Configuration Problem

2001-08-13 Thread Robert Vetter
Hello, I'm trying to install AMANDA in our company network. I've already installed the server on a Debian Linux machine and everthing seems to work fine there - I am able to make backups of the local directorys there The server runs as user backup there. Now I want to backup some directorys fro

Re: Configuration Problem

2001-08-10 Thread Robert Vetter
"John R. Jackson" wrote: > > >The .amandohosts file is owned by user root ... > > It should probably be owned by "operator", and should be mode 0400 > or 0600. It should not be group/world readable. > > >is located in /root > >directory and readably by all users. ... > > What are the permi

Re: Configuration Problem

2001-08-09 Thread John R. Jackson
>The .amandohosts file is owned by user root ... It should probably be owned by "operator", and should be mode 0400 or 0600. It should not be group/world readable. >is located in /root >directory and readably by all users. ... What are the permissions on /root? I seem to recall people having

Re: Configuration Problem

2001-08-09 Thread Robert Vetter
"John R. Jackson" wrote: > > >... [amandad] runs as > >user operator. I also created the ~operator/.amandahosts file ... > >... > >ERROR: office.pss.local: [access as operator not allowed from > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]] open of //.amandahosts failed > > That says amandad, running as "operator", cou

Re: Configuration Problem

2001-08-09 Thread Robert Vetter
"John R. Jackson" wrote: > > >... [amandad] runs as > >user operator. I also created the ~operator/.amandahosts file ... > >... > >ERROR: office.pss.local: [access as operator not allowed from > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]] open of //.amandahosts failed > > That says amandad, running as "operator", cou

Re: Configuration Problem

2001-08-08 Thread John R. Jackson
>... [amandad] runs as >user operator. I also created the ~operator/.amandahosts file ... >... >ERROR: office.pss.local: [access as operator not allowed from >[EMAIL PROTECTED]] open of //.amandahosts failed That says amandad, running as "operator", could not open "/.amandahosts". A better reason

Re: [Amanda-users] Configuration Problem

2001-08-08 Thread Jason Thomas
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 12:32:28PM +0200, Robert Vetter wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to install AMANDA in our company network. I've already > installed the server on a Debian Linux machine and everthing seems to > work fine there - I am able to make backups of the local directorys > there The