Re: Rebuilt Tape Server

2000-12-08 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Dec 8, 2000, Chris Karakas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Harri Haataja wrote: >> >> I don't know if there is a "redhat manual" somewhere but I might like to >> see it if there is. It's much easier to use mechanisms in place than to >> try to sew things together with your own scripts. > Use

Re: Rebuilt Tape Server

2000-12-08 Thread Chris Karakas
Harri Haataja wrote: > > I don't know if there is a "redhat manual" somewhere but I might like to > see it if there is. It's much easier to use mechanisms in place than to > try to sew things together with your own scripts. Use SuSE :-) They have a 500+ pages manual that comes hardcopy, as well

Re: Rebuilt Tape Server

2000-12-08 Thread Harri Haataja
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, John R. Jackson wrote: > If that's part of a sub package (amanda-client?), that's fine, and if > it's well described in whatever installation instructions come with an > RPM (which I wouldn't know anything about), that's also fine, but why > are so many people suddenly having

Re: Rebuilt Tape Server

2000-12-07 Thread John R. Jackson
>Actually, I hear it's in the client kit in RH's rpms. So I'm beginning to understand. >So this unbelievable generalization that Linux users don't install the >amanda(-no-dee) service config in xinetd.d would be false. =) What I meant, but did not state clearly, was that it seems like a lot of

Re: Rebuilt Tape Server

2000-12-07 Thread Joi Ellis
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Harri Haataja wrote: >> So what? The one that really matters is amandad, and for God knows >> what reason, the Linux folks don't appear to install that. > >Actually, I hear it's in the client kit in RH's rpms. >So this unbelievable generalization that Linux users don't instal

Re: Rebuilt Tape Server

2000-12-07 Thread Harri Haataja
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, John R. Jackson wrote: > >I have checked the xinted file for amandaidx and amidxtape, and they both > >appear to be correct. > > So what? The one that really matters is amandad, and for God knows > what reason, the Linux folks don't appear to install that. Actually, I hear

Re: Rebuilt Tape Server

2000-12-05 Thread John R. Jackson
>... I decided to upgrade the OS from RedHat 5, to >RedHat 7.0. And it has version 2.4.1p1 of Amanda installed. ... Well, it sort of does. >I have checked the xinted file for amandaidx and amidxtape, and they both >appear to be correct. So what? The one that really matters is amandad, and fo

Rebuilt Tape Server

2000-12-05 Thread Justin
Hello, We recently had a hard-disk failure on our tape backup server. And while I was rebuilding the system I decided to upgrade the OS from RedHat 5, to RedHat 7.0. And it has version 2.4.1p1 of Amanda installed. I copied all the configuration files over from the old install. And when I run