Salaam!
Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
> 75% resolution is really pretty good. There are many IP
> addresses that do not provide resolved names and it's
> typical to see as much as 40% unresolved.
That's reassuring, sort of.
> If you want to get more useful information out of the IP
> addresses, you coul
Salaam!
Aengus wrote:
> hajj abujamal wrote:
>> What I would like to do is point QDNS at some other DNS servers
>> that may resolve some of these 200K IP addresses to urls.
> The only reason you should get different answers from different
> DNS servers is because of timeouts, and they should be ver
Aengus wrote:
On Wednesday, February 16, 2005 6:19 AM [GMT],
hajj abujamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I would like to do is point QDNS at some other DNS servers
that may resolve some of these 200K IP addresses to urls. Does
anyone have a list of DNS IP addresses I can use, or is it goi
On Wednesday, February 16, 2005 6:19 AM [GMT],
hajj abujamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I would like to do is point QDNS at some other DNS servers
> that may resolve some of these 200K IP addresses to urls. Does
> anyone have a list of DNS IP addresses I can use, or is it going to
> be
Salaam!
I've been having a lot of fun with AnalogX's QuickDNS, processing a
variety of files containing IP addresses it can identify ~ 763,415 IP
addresses as of yesterday, 208,480 of which remain unresolved. I use:
qdns.exe /D dns.txt /Y 66.45.212.21 /L D:\Logs\list.txt /Z 1
It seems tha
5 matches
Mail list logo
