Hi,
I have scripted from-scratch bootstrapping of EC2 AMI:s for Arch:
https://github.com/scode/arch4ec2
Feedback appreciated. It was originally based on
https://github.com/yejun/ec2build
Currently it's only tested on 32 bit and I have only created a
pre-bootstrapped image in the eu-west-1
I did a system upgrade.
So /etc/locale.conf is optional, right? I just create it if necessary,
but it is not created by default, isn't it?
And if I understand correctly, LOCALE is been used as always from
/etc/rc.conf if /etc/locale.conf doesn't exist, does it?
Thanks in advance, regards.
--
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez
jimenezr...@gmail.com wrote:
So /etc/locale.conf is optional, right?
Yes.
I just create it if necessary,
but it is not created by default, isn't it?
Correct, not necessary, and not created by default.
And if I understand correctly,
Thanks!
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 01:40:33PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez
jimenezr...@gmail.com wrote:
So /etc/locale.conf is optional, right?
Yes.
I just create it if necessary,
but it is not created by default, isn't it?
Hi,
With the command `pacman -Qm' it shows me `xorg-apps' as a foreign
package, but this doesn't happen with other groups I have installed
like `texlive-lang'.
What makes different to `xorg-apps'? Just curious...
Regards
--
Ricardo (http://r.untroubled.be/)
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez
jimenezr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
With the command `pacman -Qm' it shows me `xorg-apps' as a foreign
package, but this doesn't happen with other groups I have installed
like `texlive-lang'.
What makes different to `xorg-apps'? Just
Thanks for the explanation!
Regards
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 03:17:26PM +0200, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez
jimenezr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
With the command `pacman -Qm' it shows me `xorg-apps' as a foreign
package, but this doesn't
After the latest initscripts update I get a warning (?) from udevd (?)
when shutting down, it goes like this:
...
Deactivating Swap [Done]
Sending SIGTERM to processes [Busy]
udevd[pid]: 'udisks-part-id /dev/sda2' [pid] terminated by signal 15
(terminated)
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Mauro Santos
registo.maill...@gmail.com wrote:
After the latest initscripts update I get a warning (?) from udevd (?)
when shutting down, it goes like this:
...
Deactivating Swap [Done]
Sending SIGTERM to processes [Busy]
udevd[pid]:
Hi all on this list,
First, I really apologize if this is off list, but I had trouble registering on
the forum's. But OK, now to my problem.
I used Gnome in the passed, v2.30 with no issues and I had to do a reinstall of
my system and now I am running the latest Arch.
However, Gnome seems to be
Ok, fair enough I'll just ignore it as so far it hasn't eaten any data
or made my computer explode :p
Do you know if the shutdown messages are logged somewhere or if it's
possible to log them somewhere (I've grepped through the logs but didn't
find anything), as it might come in handy since
I dont see why you would want to remove the gnome-shell package, as it is
a main part of the new gnome 3.
Also xf86-input-keyboard and -mouse are long deprecated
now days you only xf86-input-evdev and and latop users need
xf86-input-synaptics too.
If I remeber right the screen reader wanst
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Mauro Santos
registo.maill...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you know if the shutdown messages are logged somewhere or if it's
possible to log them somewhere (I've grepped through the logs but didn't
find anything), as it might come in handy since shutdown happens really
On 23-10-2011 19:35, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Mauro Santos
registo.maill...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you know if the shutdown messages are logged somewhere or if it's
possible to log them somewhere (I've grepped through the logs but didn't
find anything), as it might
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Mauro Santos
registo.maill...@gmail.com wrote:
( and I guess you meant /etc/rc.shutdown but I got the idea :) ).
Indeed :)
-t
Hi,
But isn't it Gnome 3.2 that now comes with Arch?
Many thanks,
Christian
On 2011-10-23 at 19:59 Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote:
I dont see why you would want to remove the gnome-shell package, as it is
a main part of the new gnome 3.
Also xf86-input-keyboard and -mouse are long deprecated
now
Yes gnome is version 3.2.1
at the moment and that is what we have in the repos.
Hi,
OK, many thanks so that is what I get when I install it using pacman.
But its strange the problems I am having.
But ok, thanks for your help!
Christian
On 2011-10-24 at 01:16 Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote:
Yes gnome is version 3.2.1
at the moment and that is what we have in the repos.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Christian christia...@runbox.com wrote:
snip
But its strange the problems I am having.
Hello there,
if you're having trouble with the accessibility routines provided by
the GNOME project, I'd like to direct you to upstream. [1] is the
gnome-accessibility-list
On 10/23/2011 05:12 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
Hi all,
I've tagged and rolled mkinitcpio 0.7.5 which is mostly more minor
fixes. Ideally, this is the last release of the 0.7.x series before I
start doing some more serious work. Shortlog is small and found below.
I've also rolled up a new busybox
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Testing#.5Btesting.5D states the
following (paraphrased for summary):-
[testing] is for experienced users who can deal with broken systems,
not for the 'absolute latest' package versions. It may break
critical/[core] packages, as such users are strongly
Since I don't listen in on irc conversations and haven't picked up on
this being discussed on the mailing list, I thought I would go ahead
and ask a seemingly dumb question. When building a pacakge from core,
extra, or community with makepkg should I locate the signature key for
the source tarball
On 24/10/11 14:10, Myra Nelson wrote:
Since I don't listen in on irc conversations and haven't picked up on
this being discussed on the mailing list, I thought I would go ahead
and ask a seemingly dumb question. When building a pacakge from core,
extra, or community with makepkg should I locate
[2011-10-24 11:41:47 +0800] Oon-Ee Ng:
[testing] is for experienced users who can deal with broken systems,
not for the 'absolute latest' package versions. It may break
critical/[core] packages, as such users are strongly encouraged to
subscribe to [arch-dev-public] and watch the [testing]
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 23:24, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 24/10/11 14:10, Myra Nelson wrote:
Since I don't listen in on irc conversations and haven't picked up on
this being discussed on the mailing list, I thought I would go ahead
and ask a seemingly dumb question. When
25 matches
Mail list logo
