On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:23:10 +0100
Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
On Monday 07 January 2013 07:51:30 Allan McRae wrote:
Upstream decision... vanilla packages should follow it.
I agree with Allan. We don't use to change the default behavior. Ship it as
default and add two
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:35:45AM -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:23:10 +0100
Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
On Monday 07 January 2013 07:51:30 Allan McRae wrote:
Upstream decision... vanilla packages should follow it.
I agree with Allan. We don't use
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 10:58:20 -0500
Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:35:45AM -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:23:10 +0100
Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
On Monday 07 January 2013 07:51:30 Allan McRae wrote:
Upstream
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:35:45AM -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:23:10 +0100
Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
On Monday 07 January 2013 07:51:30 Allan McRae wrote:
Upstream
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Sander Jansen s.jan...@gmail.com wrote:
uessing for users of NetworkManager there shouldn't be any change.
Yeah, NM won't care at all.
And people using 'systemctl enable dhcpcd@eth0' will have to change the
device name?
Correct.
Can this be done before the
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:41:13AM -0600, Sander Jansen wrote:
So I'm guessing for users of NetworkManager there shouldn't be any change.
And people using 'systemctl enable dhcpcd@eth0' will have to change the
device name? Can this be done before the reboot (for headless systems, so
the
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Sander Jansen s.jan...@gmail.com wrote:
uessing for users of NetworkManager there shouldn't be any change.
Yeah, NM won't care at all.
And people using 'systemctl enable dhcpcd@eth0' will have
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:13:31 +0800
Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Sander Jansen s.jan...@gmail.com wrote:
uessing for users of NetworkManager there shouldn't be any change.
Yeah, NM
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tom, what about netcfg users. I assume we'd need to change
INTERFACE in all our netcfg profiles, but would simply renaming the
/etc/network.d/interfaces/{eth,wlan}0 files to the unique names work?
I know that netcfg
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 07:13:31AM +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Sander Jansen s.jan...@gmail.com wrote:
uessing for users of NetworkManager there shouldn't be any change.
Yeah, NM won't care at
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
*** Why are you still reading this?
If you made it this far, you might be as crazy as I am, so here's Pinkie
Pie dressed as a chicken:
http://i.imgur.com/DDukE.png
I'm suing for damages, that image has permanently
11 matches
Mail list logo
