On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
>
> *** Why are you still reading this?
>
> If you made it this far, you might be as crazy as I am, so here's Pinkie
> Pie dressed as a chicken:
>
> http://i.imgur.com/DDukE.png
I'm suing for damages, that image has permanently scarred my poor
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 07:13:31AM +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Sander Jansen wrote:
> >> uessing for users of NetworkManager there shouldn't be any change.
> >
> > Yeah, NM won't care at all.
> >
> >> And peopl
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
>> Hi Tom, what about netcfg users. I assume we'd need to change
>> INTERFACE in all our netcfg profiles, but would simply renaming the
>> /etc/network.d/interfaces/{eth,wlan}0 files to the unique names work?
>
> Yes, in /etc/network.d/interfaces
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> Hi Tom, what about netcfg users. I assume we'd need to change
> INTERFACE in all our netcfg profiles, but would simply renaming the
> /etc/network.d/interfaces/{eth,wlan}0 files to the unique names work?
I know that netcfg users will have to mak
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:13:31 +0800
Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Sander Jansen wrote:
> >> uessing for users of NetworkManager there shouldn't be any change.
> >
> > Yeah, NM won't care at all.
> >
> >> And people usin
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Sander Jansen wrote:
>> uessing for users of NetworkManager there shouldn't be any change.
>
> Yeah, NM won't care at all.
>
>> And people using 'systemctl enable dhcpcd@eth0' will have to change the
>> device
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:41:13AM -0600, Sander Jansen wrote:
>
> So I'm guessing for users of NetworkManager there shouldn't be any change.
> And people using 'systemctl enable dhcpcd@eth0' will have to change the
> device name? Can this be done before the reboot (for headless systems, so
> the
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Sander Jansen wrote:
> uessing for users of NetworkManager there shouldn't be any change.
Yeah, NM won't care at all.
> And people using 'systemctl enable dhcpcd@eth0' will have to change the
> device name?
Correct.
> Can this be done before the reboot (for head
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:35:45AM -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> > On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:23:10 +0100
> > Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday 07 January 2013 07:51:30 Allan McRae wrote:
> > > > Upstream decision... vanilla packages sho
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 10:58:20 -0500
Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:35:45AM -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> > On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:23:10 +0100
> > Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday 07 January 2013 07:51:30 Allan McRae wrote:
> > > > Upstream decision... vanilla packages
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:35:45AM -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:23:10 +0100
> Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>
> > On Monday 07 January 2013 07:51:30 Allan McRae wrote:
> > > Upstream decision... vanilla packages should follow it.
> >
> > I agree with Allan. We don't use to chang
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:23:10 +0100
Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> On Monday 07 January 2013 07:51:30 Allan McRae wrote:
> > Upstream decision... vanilla packages should follow it.
>
> I agree with Allan. We don't use to change the default behavior. Ship it as
> default and add two lines on how to di
12 matches
Mail list logo
