**
There is probably some confusion here as I have been with Scapa Technologies
for close to 15 years and have been part of the product development ever since
but did not understand what was being refereed to as a "Scapa beta".
Some background information may be useful to avoid any misinterpreta
7-331-8985
4370 W 126th
Zionsville, In 46077
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Armen Avedisijan
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:03 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: LoadTesting ITSM 764
Using a s
Using a single user account in a test like that would also mean that as the
test progresses user will have rapidly increasing number of open tickets
created. So in addition to caching effect, if a test is allowed to run long
enough or repeated few times there will probably be a gradual degradat
.
Good luck and let me know if you need any help!
Regards,
Dom
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Longwing, Lj
Sent: 06 August 2013 14:14
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: LoadTesting ITSM 764
**
from a caching perspective it may
from a caching perspective it may make a difference. Having 50 of the same
user doing the same action is easily cashed by both the DB and the Web
server. I would think two or three users with different permissions,
performing different actions simultaneously (multiplied by many of course)
would b
We are load testing ITSM 764 using a tool from HP. The script is working well
and simulates a user logging in, moving to the new incident form, filling out a
ticket and clicking Save. We have set up 50 concurrent sessions and had it
running for 10 minutes. For ease of set we have been using the
6 matches
Mail list logo