Group:
I have a customer that is running the following
Asterisk CVS-HEAD dated 2005-08-18
WhitBox Linux respin 2
mysql Ver 11.18 Distrib 3.23.58
Cisco 7960G
We are using the real-time drivers for sip and everything is working
great.
They have a few employees that use the phones from home on
Hall, Eric M. wrote:
Asterisk CVS-HEAD dated 2005-08-18
WhitBox Linux respin 2
mysql Ver 11.18 Distrib 3.23.58
Cisco 7960G
We are using the real-time drivers for sip and everything is working
great.
They have a few employees that use the phones from home on a RR or DSL
line.
The
!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin P.
Fleming
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:19 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Nat, SIP, Realtime problem
Hall, Eric M. wrote
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Nat, SIP, Realtime problem
Hall, Eric M. wrote:
Asterisk CVS-HEAD dated 2005-08-18
WhitBox Linux respin 2
mysql Ver 11.18 Distrib 3.23.58
Cisco 7960G
We are using the real-time drivers for sip and everything is working
great.
They have
Hi everyone,
I decided to have a look at SIP NAT again and I've been at it for a
[quite a] few hours but typically nothing is working for me. Actually
I'm not sure if SIP and NAT can ever work but some emails on this list
do suggest that someone has got it working, once, maybe.
I'm
Mensaje citado por: Derek Conniffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Does anyone know how to get NAT SIP working where the SIP phone is
behind a NAT server talking to a publicly accessible * server?
Have you tried sip-conntrack-nat for netfilter?. May be could help you.
Get pom-ng from
] On Behalf Of Derek
Conniffe
Sent: 13 September 2005 12:44
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Nat Sip Pain
Hi everyone,
I decided to have a look at SIP NAT again and I've been at it for a
[quite a] few hours but typically nothing is working
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derek
Conniffe
Sent: 13 September 2005 12:44
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Nat Sip Pain
Hi everyone,
I decided to have a look at SIP NAT again and I've been at it for a
[quite a] few hours but typically
: 13 September 2005 17:50
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Nat Sip Pain
Hi Ray,
It would be great to find a solution which doesn't need modification of
the firewall setup (like if it was a customers firewall rather than
.
Uriel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Todd
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] NAT, SIP (was: No sound with SIP Phones
on
the Internet)
I'm curently looking into using
Chris Albertson wrote:
This is the big problem with using Asterisk for SIP. With Asterisk
the audio data between two SIP extensions has to actualy go into
then out of the Asterisk box. This does not scale well to
thousands of users like in a university campus or a comercial
SIP service.
Uriel -
1) Please stop top-posting.
2) I'm afraid I don't have any data on specifics of creating a
front-end. I know how to do it, but my time these days is spent
writing lots of other projects that I have been doing. :-) I would
suggest you get SER and set it up - it's quite easy, and
:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] NAT, SIP (was: No sound with SIP Phones on
the Internet)
On Monday 13 October 2003 22:26, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
John:
are you aware of any documentation on how to configre SER to be a
front-end
to Asterisk?
Hi Uriel,
At TeleSIP we
On 15/10/03 00:15, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
Does anybody else have a strong opinion one way or the other? If it
is left to John and myself we have a 1:1 vote.
See how much easier it is to follow the thread of conversation if you
quote just enough of the e-mail you're responding to so people
OK OK OK, I got it. See my response inside the body of your E-mail.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alastair Maw
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 8:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] NAT, SIP (was: No sound with SIP
I wish you would take this stuff to personal email, I am tired of
wasting my time
reading this crap. If you idiots want to give lesions on how YOU
would like
people to post on list servers _DO_IT_VIA_PERSONAL_EMAIL_!!! None
of the rest of us care. This is a personal messages from you to
I'm curently looking into using SER to front end SIP calls for
Asterisk.
Basicaly all SIP users would register with SER not Asterisk and then
Asterisk and SER exchange registrations.
SER is a very capable SIP router, much more sophisticated than Asterisk
as it can look inside packets and route
I'm curently looking into using SER to front end SIP calls for
Asterisk.
Basicaly all SIP users would register with SER not Asterisk and then
Asterisk and SER exchange registrations.
SER is a very capable SIP router, much more sophisticated than Asterisk
as it can look inside packets and route
On 13-10 17:11, John Todd wrote:
[...]
SER is an excellent option as a front end to Asterisk. It is a
true SIP proxy, whereas Asterisk is a hybrid, and SIP has not been
the primary focus of Asterisk development. In fact, Asterisk's SIP
implementation is very limited (though it is
on the other side of
my Internet connection.
If you make any progress, please share. I will do the same.
Uriel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris
Albertson
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 7:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users
and not with SER.
Uriel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Todd
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] NAT, SIP (was: No sound with SIP Phones on
the Internet)
I'm curently looking into using SER
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Todd
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] NAT, SIP (was: No sound with SIP Phones on
the Internet)
I'm curently looking into using SER to front end SIP
: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] NAT, SIP (was: No sound with SIP Phones on
the Internet)
I'm curently looking into using SER to front end SIP calls for
Asterisk.
Basicaly all SIP users would register with SER not Asterisk
Greetings,
I was wondering if somebody is working on a
solution to the NAT/SIP-issues? It seems to me that the problem has been
identified, is that correct?
Just hoping that someone with more skills will
provide us with a solution sooner or later...
Regards,
Stig
Stig Hess wrote:
Greetings,
I was wondering if somebody is working on a solution to the
NAT/SIP-issues? It seems to me that the problem has been identified,
is that correct?
Just hoping that someone with more skills will provide us with a
solution sooner or later...
Regards,
Stig
The
I meant where Asterisk is behing a NAT... sorry for
the confusion.
Regards,
Stig H.
- Original Message -
From:
WipeOut
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 8:21
PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] NAT/SIP
solution?
Stig Hess wrote
Stig Hess wrote:
I meant where Asterisk is behing a NAT... sorry for the confusion.
Regards,
Stig H.
Oh.. :)
Well thats a bigger problem.. and i doubt the Gods of SIP are going to
fix it any time soon.. :(
Later..
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] NAT/SIP
solution?
Greetings,
I was wondering if somebody is working on a
solution to the NAT/SIP-issues? It seems to me that the problem has been
identified, is that correct?
Just hoping that someone with more skills will
provide us
Stig Hess wrote:
I meant where Asterisk is behing a NAT... sorry for the confusion.
Hi Stig,
If you are able to run * on your NAT'd box, then I have come up with a
work around (thanks wasim!!!) that will allow you to run an * box behind
your NAT, and still recieve and make SIP calls.
I haven't
PROTECTED] Behalf Of WipeOut
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 2:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] NAT/SIP solution?
Stig Hess wrote:
Greetings,
I was wondering if somebody is working on a solution to the
NAT/SIP-issues? It seems to me that the problem has been identified
Greetings,
I was wondering if somebody is working on a solution to the
NAT/SIP-issues? It seems to me that the problem has been identified,
is that correct?
Just hoping that someone with more skills will provide us with a
solution sooner or later...
Regards,
Stig
There are several SIP aware NAT routers. Any Cisco router with a
firewall load has SIP aware NAT. There is at least one other brand of
SIP aware NAT router out there, but I don't recall the brand.
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 17:26, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
Nikotel has a solution and one
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 00:00, Eric Wieling wrote:
There are several SIP aware NAT routers. Any Cisco router with a
firewall load has SIP aware NAT. There is at least one other brand of
SIP aware NAT router out there, but I don't recall the brand.
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 17:26, Uriel
I had been warned about British sense of humour, but this even a South
American like myself find funny.
Uriel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of WipeOut
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users
34 matches
Mail list logo
