On Wednesday 10 November 2010 22:27:43 Stefan Husmann wrote:
> why are sawfish and rep-gtk on the list, but not librep? I think these
> packages belong together and should be maintained by the same person. I
> would like to maintain them in [community].
Because librep is maintained by Jurgen, but I
Am 10.11.2010 11:33, schrieb Andrea Scarpino:
> Hi DEVs/TUs,
> currently we have 700 (counting both arches and any) orphans packages in
> [extra].
> As member of the orphans team, I made a list[1] of these packages and I'd
> like
> to move them to Unsupported.
> If some DEV wants to keep a packa
Hi
I just discovered this package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43383
We have this plugin in the repos and the newer version is about to come in, so
nobody needs this package in the AUR. It even doesn't work, because doxygen is
needed in makedepends (this is also missing in the offic
Am 2010-11-10 16:21:39 +0200, Evangelos Foutras schrieb:
> Their current maintainer is active, and the packages you mention are
> not marked as out-of-date.
I have sent a mail to the current maintainer, should he not respond in the
next 2 weeks i will report this issue again.
Greetings
Betz Stefa
Am Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:19:34 +
schrieb Joao Cordeiro :
> I think this package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14908)
> should be deleted. The maintainer orphaned it since it is deprecated
> and now included in other package (see maintainer comment).
>
>
> Thanks in advance
It woul
On Mon 18 Oct 2010 17:38 +0200, Jakob Gruber wrote:
> On 10/18/2010 04:10 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> >Am 10.10.2010 13:46, schrieb Jakob Gruber:
> >> On 10/04/2010 11:18 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote:
> >>> In response to Louis objections about skipping the discussion period,
> >>>I'm posting the ful
On 10 November 2010 12:15, Xyne wrote:
> Xyne wrote:
>
>> Ok, 5 days have passed. TUs, please cast your votes:
>>
>> http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=41
>>
>
> The voting period is over. (Sorry for the delayed announcement.)
>
> Yes: 12
> No: 5
> Abstain: 6
> Total: 23
>
> Out of 28 TUs, 28% per
Welcome aboard Kaiting
--
Angel Velásquez
angvp @ irc.freenode.net
Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User
Linux Counter: #359909
http://www.angvp.com
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Joao Cordeiro wrote:
> I think this package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14908) should
> be deleted. The maintainer orphaned it since it is deprecated and now
> included in other package (see maintainer comment).
Done, thanks.
I think this package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14908) should
be deleted. The maintainer orphaned it since it is deprecated and now
included in other package (see maintainer comment).
Thanks in advance
Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 10 November 2010 17:15, Xyne wrote:
> > I also want to address something else. I am disappointed that 5 TUs voted no
> > without anyone voicing any concerns during the discussion period. To abstain
> > from a vote indicates that you do not have an opinion one way or the oth
On Wed 10 Nov 2010 14:05 +, Christopher Brannon wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'll start this discussion with an example of the problem.
>
> I notice that python-sqlalchemy is about to change in [community].
> Most of the packages which depend on it will need to change their
> dependency to python2-sqlal
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Stefan J. Betz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i want to upgrade these Packages:
> * opie-server
> * opie-client
> * libpam-opie
>
> I will also fix these Packages for amd64 Support.
>
> Greetings
> Betz Stefan
> --
> URL : http://blog.stefan-betz.net | http://www.stefan-be
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:05:42PM +, Christopher Brannon wrote:
> I notice that python-sqlalchemy is about to change in [community].
> Most of the packages which depend on it will need to change their
> dependency to python2-sqlalchemy. This is handled quite nicely for
> packages in the binar
On 10 November 2010 17:15, Xyne wrote:
> I also want to address something else. I am disappointed that 5 TUs voted no
> without anyone voicing any concerns during the discussion period. To abstain
> from a vote indicates that you do not have an opinion one way or the other,
> but
> to vote no is
Hello,
i want to upgrade these Packages:
* opie-server
* opie-client
* libpam-opie
I will also fix these Packages for amd64 Support.
Greetings
Betz Stefan
--
URL : http://blog.stefan-betz.net | http://www.stefan-betz.net
GPG : E188 933B BC00 723A 9DB0 0CD3 1398 E68B 6F33 567E
XMPP: ste...@j
Hi all,
I'll start this discussion with an example of the problem.
I notice that python-sqlalchemy is about to change in [community].
Most of the packages which depend on it will need to change their
dependency to python2-sqlalchemy. This is handled quite nicely for
packages in the binary reposit
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:43:28 +0100, Heiko Baums
wrote:
> Am Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:33:32 +0100
> schrieb Andrea Scarpino :
>
>> Hi DEVs/TUs,
>> currently we have 700 (counting both arches and any) orphans packages
>> in [extra].
>> As member of the orphans team, I made a list[1] of these packages an
On Wednesday 10 November 2010 12:43:28 Heiko Baums wrote:
> You should really think about that. There are many of the most
> important, oldest and best known packages in this list like dia, ding,
> xboard, eboard, epdfview, slmodem etc.
>
> In other words, your list is likely the half of the distr
Hi DEVs/TUs,
currently we have 700 (counting both arches and any) orphans packages in
[extra].
As member of the orphans team, I made a list[1] of these packages and I'd like
to move them to Unsupported.
If some DEV wants to keep a package simply cross it out (adoption is not
required, but it wou
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 21:27 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> > On 10/11/10 21:15, Xyne wrote:
> > > Xyne wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ok, 5 days have passed. TUs, please cast your votes:
> > >>
> > >> http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=41
> > >>
> > >
> > > The voting period is over. (Sorry f
On Wed 10 Nov 2010 21:27 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 10/11/10 21:15, Xyne wrote:
> >Xyne wrote:
> >
> >>Ok, 5 days have passed. TUs, please cast your votes:
> >>
> >>http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=41
> >>
> >
> >The voting period is over. (Sorry for the delayed announcement.)
> >
> >Yes: 12
Xyne wrote:
> And for those of you two lazy to calculate 23/28, it's ~82%, not 28% ;)
> those of you two lazy
> two
*sigh*
I'm revoking my mailing list privileges for the rest of the day. I'll see you
tomorrow.
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 21:27 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 10/11/10 21:15, Xyne wrote:
> > Xyne wrote:
> >
> >> Ok, 5 days have passed. TUs, please cast your votes:
> >>
> >> http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=41
> >>
> >
> > The voting period is over. (Sorry for the delayed announcement.)
> >
> >
Am Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:33:32 +0100
schrieb Andrea Scarpino :
> Hi DEVs/TUs,
> currently we have 700 (counting both arches and any) orphans packages
> in [extra].
> As member of the orphans team, I made a list[1] of these packages and
> I'd like to move them to Unsupported.
> If some DEV wants to k
On 10/11/10 21:15, Xyne wrote:
Xyne wrote:
Ok, 5 days have passed. TUs, please cast your votes:
http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=41
The voting period is over. (Sorry for the delayed announcement.)
Yes: 12
No: 5
Abstain: 6
Total: 23
Out of 28 TUs, 28% percent have participated and quorum
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:33:32 +0100, Andrea Scarpino
wrote:
> Hi DEVs/TUs,
> currently we have 700 (counting both arches and any) orphans packages in
> [extra].
> As member of the orphans team, I made a list[1] of these packages and
> I'd like
> to move them to Unsupported.
> If some DEV wants to
At Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:33:32 +0100,
Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>
> If some TU wants to maintain a package in [community], please write the name
> into the "Candidate to [community]" section, *DO NOT* cross it out. Or reply
> to this mail.
I prefer to use following packages in binary form:
* alltra
On Wednesday 10 November 2010 11:54:26 Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> * alltray
> * at
> * centerim
> * dia
> * distcc
> * dmenu
> * elinks
> * iptraf
> * mailman
> * mcrypt
> * motion
> * patchutils
> * perl-*
> * slmodem
> * slmodem-utils
> * squashfs-tools
> * twinkle
> * unarj
> * w3m
> * wmii
> * wpu
Xyne wrote:
> Ok, 5 days have passed. TUs, please cast your votes:
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=41
>
The voting period is over. (Sorry for the delayed announcement.)
Yes: 12
No: 5
Abstain: 6
Total: 23
Out of 28 TUs, 28% percent have participated and quorum has been established.
The
Le mercredi 10 novembre 2010 05:33:32, Andrea Scarpino a écrit :
> Hi DEVs/TUs,
> currently we have 700 (counting both arches and any) orphans packages in
> [extra].
> As member of the orphans team, I made a list[1] of these packages and I'd
> like to move them to Unsupported.
> If some DEV wants t
31 matches
Mail list logo
