Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd method does not work: (unexpected response: '')

On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 23:37:52 +0300 Anton Torkunov wrote: > Hi all! Hi you!! > I forgot to say that I have 3.3.0 version installed from Ubuntu 14.x > repositories. Hmm, memory lapses are precursors to the Alzheimer disease… > Thanks for suggestions: I asked Robert Duval tomb and his say that

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd method does not work: (unexpected response: '')

Hi all! I forgot to say that I have 3.3.0 version installed from Ubuntu 14.x repositories. Thanks for suggestions: I asked Robert Duval tomb and his say that i need to install last version of BackupPC from GitHub. I did it and now everything is fine! Jean-Yves, just for clarify - orange.vpn - it j

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd method does not work: (unexpected response: '')

On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:18:40 +0300 Anton Torkunov wrote: > Hello everyone! Hi alone!! > I've tried to backup host via rsyncd, but got error: Backup aborted > (unexpected response: '') > > rsyncd is well configured, because If I try to run just rsync, > everything is fine: > > rsync rsync://o

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd method does not work: (unexpected response: '')

On 2017-09-06 07:18, Anton Torkunov wrote: Hello everyone! I've tried to backup host via rsyncd, but got error: Backup aborted (unexpected response: '') rsyncd is well configured, because If I try to run just rsync, everything is fine: rsync rsync://orange.vpn/root/ ... the listing files is h

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd method does not work: (unexpected response: '')

Hello everyone! I've tried to backup host via rsyncd, but got error: Backup aborted (unexpected response: '') rsyncd is well configured, because If I try to run just rsync, everything is fine: rsync rsync://orange.vpn/root/ ... the listing files is here ... Next, I've tried to run BackupPC_dum

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd and selinux

I just fought through dealing with errors in my backup due to attempting to back up sockets and wanted to share my solution. Here's an example of the error message: rsync: readlink_stat("/var/spool/postfix/private/tlsmgr" (in root)) failed: Permission denied (13) (Postfix creates a directory

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd excludes problem (3.2.1)

On 2016-04-13 03:29, Benjamin Redling wrote: > Sadly coming back for the same reason: > > On 03/29/2016 19:57, Michael Stowe wrote: >> On 2016-03-29 10:17, Benjamin Redling wrote: >>> my exclude list seems to be defunct [...] XferMethod is rsyncd, >>> shouldn't '*/tmp' avoid this? > >> No, > [...

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd excludes problem (3.2.1)

Sadly coming back for the same reason: On 03/29/2016 19:57, Michael Stowe wrote: > On 2016-03-29 10:17, Benjamin Redling wrote: >> my exclude list seems to be defunct [...] XferMethod is rsyncd, >> shouldn't '*/tmp' avoid this? > No, [...] > If you want to exclude anything in a subdirectory name

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd excludes problem (3.2.1)

On 2016-03-29 19:57, Michael Stowe wrote: > On 2016-03-29 10:17, Benjamin Redling wrote: >> [...] /tmp subdirectories and absolute >> paths (/anonuser... see below) are filling up the discs. >> XferMethod is rsyncd, shouldn't '*/tmp' avoid this? > No, '*/tmp' will avoid backing up any files named

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd excludes problem (3.2.1)

On 2016-03-29 10:17, Benjamin Redling wrote: > Hello everybody, > > my exclude list seems to be defunct since adding a few absolute paths > via the web interface. Recently(?) /tmp subdirectories and absolute > paths (/anonuser... see below) are filling up the discs. > XferMethod is rsyncd, shouldn

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd excludes problem (3.2.1)

Hello everybody, my exclude list seems to be defunct since adding a few absolute paths via the web interface. Recently(?) /tmp subdirectories and absolute paths (/anonuser... see below) are filling up the discs. XferMethod is rsyncd, shouldn't '*/tmp' avoid this? Did a restart of backuppc after ev

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd user and password field gets confused as a login form

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Marko Doda wrote: > I accidentally saved the credentials for rsync, isn't it better to turn off > the save password dialog for rsync credentials? That part is done by the client browser - which should also have a way to clear saved passwords. -- Les Mikesell

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd user and password field gets confused as a login form

I accidentally saved the credentials for rsync, isn't it better to turn off the save password dialog for rsync credentials? On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Marko Doda wrote: > > Actually the issue is that the browser saves from data from rs

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd user and password field gets confused as a login form

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Marko Doda wrote: > Actually the issue is that the browser saves from data from rsyncd user and > pass fields as page login information. Is this a bug? Browsers will pre-populate credentials with what they have cached for the same authentication domain (Apache''s '

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd user and password field gets confused as a login form

Actually the issue is that the browser saves from data from rsyncd user and pass fields as page login information. Is this a bug? On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Marko Doda wrote: > When configuring an rsyncd host with the username being the same as the > backuppc cgi user that is saved the bro

[BackupPC-users] Rsyncd user and password field gets confused as a login form

When configuring an rsyncd host with the username being the same as the backuppc cgi user that is saved the browser autofills the password that is used for the cgi interface, you can delete it and write your own but pressing save saves the autofilled password. --

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup

Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote on 10/31/2013 02:38:01 PM: > Hi Timothy, > > I got the number by observing the output of iotop while file > transfer is running. Also, on BackupPC host summary page, average > transfer rate for full backup is also around 3MB/s > It could be a network bottleneck

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote: > Hi Holger, > > Based on short session of troubleshooting, I believe the machine actually > suffer from low I/O speed to the disk. Average read is about 3 MB/s, which I > considered slow for a SATA disk in IDE emulation. Where are

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup

Hi Timothy, I got the number by observing the output of iotop while file transfer is running. Also, on BackupPC host summary page, average transfer rate for full backup is also around 3MB/s It could be a network bottleneck also, as the customer is using 100Mbps switch with around 80 PC, not inclu

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup

Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote on 10/30/2013 10:06:18 PM: > Hi Holger, > Based on short session of troubleshooting, I believe the machine > actually suffer from low I/O speed to the disk. Average read is > about 3 MB/s, which I considered slow for a SATA disk in IDE emulation. *REAL* slow:

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup

uot;Adam Goryachev" > Aan: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" > > Verzonden: Donderdag 31 oktober 2013 04:13:42 > Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup > > On 31/10/13 13:56, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote: > > Hi Adam, > &

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup

On 31/10/13 13:56, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote: > Hi Adam, > > The low I/O is when the machine is under load. > > Thank you for suggesting to use SSD. I have been thinking about that > as well, but currently, the storage of BackupPC is using a 1TB disk, > with about 80% utilization. > > Changing

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup

Hi Adam, The low I/O is when the machine is under load. Thank you for suggesting to use SSD. I have been thinking about that as well, but currently, the storage of BackupPC is using a 1TB disk, with about 80% utilization. Changing to 1TB SSD might be a little bit overkill on the customer's budge

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup

On 31/10/13 13:06, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote: > Hi Holger, > > Based on short session of troubleshooting, I believe the machine > actually suffer from low I/O speed to the disk. Average read is about > 3 MB/s, which I considered slow for a SATA disk in IDE emulation. Is that under load, or wh

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup

wrote on 2013-10-29 15:29:42 +1100 [Re: [BackupPC-users] > rsyncd full backup]: > > On 29/10/13 15:14, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote: > > > [...] > > >On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Les Mikesell > ><mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com>> wrote: > &

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup

Hi, Adam Goryachev wrote on 2013-10-29 15:29:42 +1100 [Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup]: > On 29/10/13 15:14, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote: > > [...] > >On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Les Mikesell ><mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup

On 29/10/13 15:14, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote: Hi Les, Thanks.| | On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Les Mikesell > wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan mailto:sharuzza...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > I have i

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup

Hi Les, In essence, if I enable --checksum-seed=32761 then the rsync full backup will be faster? Thanks. On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have implemented BackupPC for my customer.

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote: > Hi, > > I have implemented BackupPC for my customer. > > Initially, the backup transport is SMB, but recently, I noticed a lot of > machine backup (full and incremental) is not able to complete in 8 hours, > due to large number of

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup

Hi, I have implemented BackupPC for my customer. Initially, the backup transport is SMB, but recently, I noticed a lot of machine backup (full and incremental) is not able to complete in 8 hours, due to large number of file, and big file size. Last week, I installed DeltaCopy (rsycnd server for

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd cygwin Problem..

Well, I guess it is *SOLVED*... I didn't change how the service was running. Since I couldn't see any differences in the directories or privileges I decided to try something else. I went to the rsyncd.conf file on the client and setup three shares that match the directories I was trying to backu

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd cygwin Problem..

> So, it looks like rsyncd is running as: > Local System account > > I guess I could switch that to run as my domain account on the machine. > Just not sure if I should use all commands from cygwin shell to kill this > one and start another or just change it from the windows gui (IF NEEDED)..

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd cygwin Problem..

So, it looks like rsyncd is running as: Local System account I guess I could switch that to run as my domain account on the machine. Just not sure if I should use all commands from cygwin shell to kill this one and start another or just change it from the windows gui (IF NEEDED).. I compared t

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd cygwin Problem..

> So, my goal was going to be rsync on all machines, I seem to have that > working fine now on my windows machines, but my work laptop is part of a > domain so I figured I would try rsyncd and learn how it worked in the > process. It is trying to backup, but it is not following my rules > correc

[BackupPC-users] Rsyncd cygwin Problem..

So, my goal was going to be rsync on all machines, I seem to have that working fine now on my windows machines, but my work laptop is part of a domain so I figured I would try rsyncd and learn how it worked in the process. It is trying to backup, but it is not following my rules correctly. It is

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd backup fails with "Can't write to socket"

> From the XferLog file: > > Can't write 13944 bytes to socket > Read EOF: Operation timed out > Tried again: got 0 bytes > finish: removing in-process file > Child is aborting > Done: 502 files, 43008274 bytes > Got fatal error during xfer (aborted by signal=PIPE) > > The server is a freeBSD 9.

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd backup fails with "Can't write to socket"

From the XferLog file: Can't write 13944 bytes to socket Read EOF: Operation timed out Tried again: got 0 bytes finish: removing in-process file Child is aborting Done: 502 files, 43008274 bytes Got fatal error during xfer (aborted by signal=PIPE) The server is a freeBSD 9.1 system, and the cl

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd on mac

Negotiated protocol version 28 Hi I see that the File-RsyncP-0.70 only runs to Protocol version 28. but I see interesting facts for backup MAC systems. the default mac version 2.6.8 is very slow in my test. I put the last version of rsync 3.0.7 and see a speed improbe. My questions are two.

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd, Parent read EOF from child

SOLVED 17.06.2010 12:05, Alexander Moisseev пишет: > > I had resolve the problem by adding extra 512 MB of RAM. > But problem back again after a few days. Solution: The default hard datasize limit on FreeBSD is 512MB. To raise it, put this in /boot/loader.conf and reboot: kern.maxdsiz="1G" -

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd, Parent read EOF from child

Les Mikesell wrote: > Are you running a 64-bit perl on the server? I think it consumes much more > memory than a 32 bit instance would. No, my hardware have no support 64-bit at all. -- ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd, Parent read EOF from child

Alexander Moisseev wrote: > Matthias Meyer wrote: >> So it is very interesting that it does work with cygwin-rsyncd-2.6.8_0, >> Windows Server 2003 Std R2. > > I have no problem with one at all. > >> "Got fatal error during xfer (Child exited prematurely)" means that your >> cygwin-rsyncd die.

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd, Parent read EOF from child

Matthias Meyer wrote: > So it is very interesting that it does work with cygwin-rsyncd-2.6.8_0, > Windows Server 2003 Std R2. I have no problem with one at all. > "Got fatal error during xfer (Child exited prematurely)" means that your > cygwin-rsyncd die. > You should increase log verbosity o

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd, Parent read EOF from child

Alexander Moisseev wrote: > I have BackupPC configured to backup several directories on the same > server as different BackupPC hosts. It works without a problem more than 2 > years. But now backup of one directory interrupts during transfer when it > still works normally for other ones. > There

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd, Parent read EOF from child

I have BackupPC configured to backup several directories on the same server as different BackupPC hosts. It works without a problem more than 2 years. But now backup of one directory interrupts during transfer when it still works normally for other ones. Xfer Settings for all hosts (directories

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd restore issue

Hello, I have two files (both Access DB). One with 2MB and the other with 200MB. Both are backed up with BackupPC 3.1.0 using rsyncd from my Windows-PC. If I delete the 200MB file on my Windows-PC the restore need only some minutes. If I restore both, only the first one (2MB) will be restored. Aft

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd via ssh-redirected port

Les Mikesell schrieb: > Guido Schmidt wrote: >> So, what could cause BackupPC not to connect to the tunnel? >> > > I may have missed something in the thread, but did you change the ping > command > to something that would succeed? > Yes. The host is publicly available, I just put it's real nam

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd via ssh-redirected port

Guido Schmidt wrote: > >>> >> I'd try giving an explicit exit value upon successful tunnel creation. >> >> ... >> --- /usr/local/bin/sshtunnelcontrol.orig2009-12-22 >> 03:16:34.0 -0900 >> +++ /usr/local/bin/sshtunnelcontrol 2009-12-22 03:17:09.0 -0900 >> @@ -27,6 +2

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd via ssh-redirected port

Chris Robertson schrieb: > Guido Schmidt wrote: >> Matthias Meyer schrieb: >> >>> Guido Schmidt wrote: >>> >>> Matthias Meyer wrote: > Guido Schmidt wrote: > >> What works? The opening and closing of the tunnel. >> What does not? The connection to i

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd via ssh-redirected port

Guido Schmidt wrote: > Matthias Meyer schrieb: > >> Guido Schmidt wrote: >> >> >>> Matthias Meyer wrote: >>> Guido Schmidt wrote: > What works? The opening and closing of the tunnel. > What does not? The connection to it. Nothing in the rsyncd-logs on >

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd via ssh-redirected port

Matthias Meyer schrieb: > Guido Schmidt wrote: > >> Matthias Meyer wrote: >>> Guido Schmidt wrote: What works? The opening and closing of the tunnel. What does not? The connection to it. Nothing in the rsyncd-logs on host.example.com. If I leave DumpPostUserCmd empty the t

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd via ssh-redirected port

Guido Schmidt wrote: > Matthias Meyer wrote: >> Guido Schmidt wrote: >>> What works? The opening and closing of the tunnel. >>> What does not? The connection to it. Nothing in the rsyncd-logs on >>> host.example.com. >>> >>> If I leave DumpPostUserCmd empty the tunnel stays open and I can use it >

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd via ssh-redirected port

Matthias Meyer wrote: > Guido Schmidt wrote: >> What works? The opening and closing of the tunnel. >> What does not? The connection to it. Nothing in the rsyncd-logs on >> host.example.com. >> >> If I leave DumpPostUserCmd empty the tunnel stays open and I can use it >> with rsync as user backuppc

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd via ssh-redirected port

Guido Schmidt wrote: > Dear backuppc-users, > > I'm happily using BackupPC 3.1.0 for quite a while. > > I'm now trying to backup a public host (host.example.com) via an > ssh-redirected port. I don't allow any command execution on that host (and > therefore cannot use the wait command), so I wro

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd via ssh-redirected port

Dear backuppc-users, I'm happily using BackupPC 3.1.0 for quite a while. I'm now trying to backup a public host (host.example.com) via an ssh-redirected port. I don't allow any command execution on that host (and therefore cannot use the wait command), so I wrote a script (sshtunnelcontrol, see

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd on vista 64 bit

Just for future reference: I was just now able to get this working. I simply renamed the original cygrunsrv.exe and cygwin1.dll with a -org in the name to differentiate with the new version. I then downloaded the cygrunsrv stuff out of the cygwin package and replaced those two files in the c:\rsyn

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd on vista 64 bit

Kameleon skrev: > I am trying to setup the standalone rsyncd from the backuppc downloads > page on a 64 bit vista machine. I have done it already on about 5 32 > bit machines. Only this one fails to start the service. I see no error > other than it trys to run and then nothing. Has anyone else r

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd on vista 64 bit

Kameleon wrote at about 15:19:03 -0600 on Tuesday, December 8, 2009: > Also, I may not, I did the trick to run as administrator and no go. I get > the error: > > cygrunsrv: Error starting a service: QueryServiceStatus: Win32 error 1053: > The service did not respond to the start or control r

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd on vista 64 bit

Also, I may not, I did the trick to run as administrator and no go. I get the error: cygrunsrv: Error starting a service: QueryServiceStatus: Win32 error 1053: The service did not respond to the start or control request in a timely fashion. If that helps any. I am making sure it is not a gremlin

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd on vista 64 bit

I definitely have had this issue on my machine at home and never did resolve it. Fortunately I have Ubuntu Linux running on it now though, and no more problems :) But I am likely to hit this before too long here at work so will watch this thread eagerly -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd on vista 64 bit

I am trying to setup the standalone rsyncd from the backuppc downloads page on a 64 bit vista machine. I have done it already on about 5 32 bit machines. Only this one fails to start the service. I see no error other than it trys to run and then nothing. Has anyone else ran into this issue and foun

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd resume of partial backup retransmits many files

> debian linux running BackupPC 3.1.0, client is Windows XP SP2 with rsync > 3.0.4 (for more details see below). > When I retrigger the full backup, a lot of large files are retransmitted Update: All files are retransmitted: This is a log excerpt of the pc being backuped: 2009/10/22 02:16:00 [

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd resume of partial backup retransmits many files

> I am trying to backup a machine over a low bandwidth connection. Server is > debian linux running BackupPC 3.1.0, client is Windows XP SP2 with rsync > 3.0.4 (for more details see below). I am currently trying to run the initial > full backup but it got interrupted twice already due to various re

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd resume of partial backup retransmits many files

Hello, I am trying to backup a machine over a low bandwidth connection. Server is debian linux running BackupPC 3.1.0, client is Windows XP SP2 with rsync 3.0.4 (for more details see below). I am currently trying to run the initial full backup but it got interrupted twice already due to various

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd --sparse flag

On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:55:35AM +0100, Nigel Kendrick wrote: > Does backuppc support the --sparse flag for rsyncd remote backups - > searching for answers led me to 'probably not' in an old post. I don't know for sure, but I doubt it since BackupPC_dump will probably just produce zeroes and co

[BackupPC-users] Rsyncd --sparse flag

Hi, Does backuppc support the --sparse flag for rsyncd remote backups - searching for answers led me to 'probably not' in an old post. If it is supported, any benefit of using it with my famous database backup dumps? Thanks Nigel -

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd on Vista 64-bit cygwin vs SUA

discussion,questions and support' Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd on Vista 64-bit cygwin vs SUA I don't know what you mean with SUA environment, but I use Deltacopy in Vista 64 bit via rsyncd. http://www.aboutmyip.com/AboutMyXApp/DeltaCopy.jsp Works without a problem atm. Easy to

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd on Vista 64-bit cygwin vs SUA

Koen Linders wrote: > I don't know what you mean with SUA environment, but I use Deltacopy in > Vista 64 bit via rsyncd. > > http://www.aboutmyip.com/AboutMyXApp/DeltaCopy.jsp > > Works without a problem atm. Easy to use and you can copy the files to other > computers and easily register the serv

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd on Vista 64-bit cygwin vs SUA

Koen Linders wrote: > I don't know what you mean with SUA environment, but I use Deltacopy in ^^ It's Microsoft "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications": http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc779522(WS.10).aspx Regards, Bernhard -

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd on Vista 64-bit cygwin vs SUA

Koen Linders skrev: > I don't know what you mean with SUA environment, but I use Deltacopy in > Vista 64 bit via rsyncd. > > http://www.aboutmyip.com/AboutMyXApp/DeltaCopy.jsp > > Works without a problem atm. Easy to use and you can copy the files to other > computers and easily register the servic

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd on Vista 64-bit cygwin vs SUA

nders -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Bernhard Ott [mailto:bernhard@gmx.net] Verzonden: dinsdag 18 augustus 2009 0:21 Aan: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Onderwerp: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd on Vista 64-bit cygwin vs SUA Hi, anyone successfully using the SUA environment for backing

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd on Vista 64-bit cygwin vs SUA

Hi, anyone successfully using the SUA environment for backing up a windows vista 64bit client via ssh-rsync or rsyncd? I failed running cygwin on Vista Business 6.0 64-bit and considered giving MS a chance ... Any comments very much appreciated, thanks in advance, Bernhard

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd over ssh

Hi Jeffrey, At the risk of spamming the list again, I apologise. I only joined the list and the "forum" immediately before the post. And, I agree that I *thought* "this is a topic-based forum rather than a mailing list" - I went to www.backupcentral.com, selected the menu "Forums" and them "Open S

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd over ssh

daniel wrote at about 10:53:23 -0400 on Thursday, May 21, 2009: > > Hi Joe, > > This is exactly what I am looking for at the moment. Can you please post you > changes? Am I the only one who has NO CLUE what he is talking about? - What exactly is the 'this' that you are looking for? - Who i

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd over ssh

Hi Joe, This is exactly what I am looking for at the moment. Can you please post you changes? Cheers, Daniel. +-- |This was sent by dan...@amristar.com.au via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd and WinXP

Hi, Peter Bloomfield wrote on 2009-05-01 16:56:45 -0400 [[BackupPC-users] Rsyncd and WinXP]: > [...] backing up a WinXP machine over rync. I take it that is actually missing a "d" as well as the "s"? ;-) > [...] > Got fatal error during xfer (chdir failed)

[BackupPC-users] Rsyncd and WinXP

Dear All, I apologise for re-visiting this, but I am having difficulty backing up a WinXP machine over rync. I am using Backuppc version 3.1.0, and cygwin's rsync on the WinXP box. When I issue a fuill backup, I get the following message in backuppc Executing DumpPostUserCmd: /home/bac

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd to import off site backup

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom < chr...@real-time.com> wrote: > On 03/05 11:22 , stoffell wrote: > > rsyncd[23507]: Warning: invalid section name in configuration file: /srv/ > > Sure you're not missing a semicolon somewhere, or some other typo in the > config files? > > t

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd to import off site backup

On 03/05 11:22 , stoffell wrote: > rsyncd[23507]: Warning: invalid section name in configuration file: /srv/ Sure you're not missing a semicolon somewhere, or some other typo in the config files? -- Carl Soderstrom Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com --

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd to import off site backup

Hi all, I'm using the "import data for a backup" on the wiki to import 20 GB of files (I don't want to transfer that over xDSL). I just follow the tips and tricks entry in the wiki. It did work before, but now I'm having an rsyncd issue (I think). It might be possible that rsync has been updated,

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd info

Hi I was just wondering what rsync does when running rsyncd on the client if a full backup fails. Does it try and continue from where it left off on the next run ? Also for the next full backup I assume it does a complete copy ? Thanks Terry --

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd - probability that it trashed my drive?

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Eric Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Makes sense. New drive is in now getting formatted. I will of course, see > what I can salvage off the old drive. This computer was a used computer off > ebay and shipped about 6 months ago, it may have had some head slap

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd - probability that it trashed my drive?

Makes sense. New drive is in now getting formatted. I will of course, see what I can salvage off the old drive. This computer was a used computer off ebay and shipped about 6 months ago, it may have had some head slap in shipping. That is why I think lots of drive activity causing the existing

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd - probability that it trashed my drive?

disk failure brought on by stress. thats my diagnostic. On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/20 05:18 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Anyway...what are the chances that rsyncd was responsible for the drive > > going down by somehow scramblin

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd - probability that it trashed my drive?

On 11/20 05:18 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Anyway...what are the chances that rsyncd was responsible for the drive > going down by somehow scrambling the data or some other unintended > problem? Has anybody running rsyncd on XP Pro machines had any other > problems to report? BackupPC puts substa

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd - probability that it trashed my drive?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just installed Rsyncd on my XP Pro machine and performed a full backup. > Fourty-eight hours later my drive seems hosed. I have run a drive check > and it won't complete, it sticks at 82%. The drive check as finding a > nunmber of bad clusters and repairing files. > >

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd - probability that it trashed my drive?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > nunmber of bad clusters and repairing files. > Bad clusters usually indicate a failing drive. Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

[BackupPC-users] Rsyncd - probability that it trashed my drive?

I just installed Rsyncd on my XP Pro machine and performed a full backup. Fourty-eight hours later my drive seems hosed. I have run a drive check and it won't complete, it sticks at 82%. The drive check as finding a nunmber of bad clusters and repairing files. To be fair I also allowed the Windows

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd on XP

Eric Snyder wrote: >> I was having problems with SMB on XP pro so have shifted gears and am >> trying Rsyncd. I ran a full backup of the cDrive setup. The problem is >> that I am using a backup user I created that is part of the user group >> "Backup Operators". I do get files backed up but... T

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsyncd on XP

Eric Snyder wrote: > I was having problems with SMB on XP pro so have shifted gears and am > trying Rsyncd. I ran a full backup of the cDrive setup. The problem is > that I am using a backup user I created that is part of the user group > "Backup Operators". I do get files backed up but... The o

[BackupPC-users] Rsyncd on XP

I was having problems with SMB on XP pro so have shifted gears and am trying Rsyncd. I ran a full backup of the cDrive setup. The problem is that I am using a backup user I created that is part of the user group "Backup Operators". I do get files backed up but... The only files I get in the Doc

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd connection stalled

I notice on the general status page that both clients have PIDs but that the client with network activity has a transfer PID. Does only one client at a time transfer? - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd connection stalled

I started a backup from a new workstation and I can see the rsyncd connection with "lsof -i" but tcpdump shows no traffic passing over it. What would cause BackupPC_dump to stall? I also have another backup in progress from another system and I see lots of traffic from its rsyncd port. Is this

[BackupPC-users] rsyncd does not perform differential backups?

Hi, I am backupping several windows machines (and linux machines too) over a slowish connection (1st generation ADSL connection). For the windows machines, I have installed rsyncd. However, I am under the impression that with rsyncd backuppc is not able to perform differential backups. As I have a

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd in linux

> secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secrets > Just in case, execute the following command: chmod 600 /etc/rsyncd.secrets -- Vincent - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the co

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd in linux

> Are you backing up linux client? If yes, please use rsync: Why? Rsyncd works perfectly on Linux, too. Most people use rsync because they want (or need) an SSH tunnel, but this is not required by BackupPC. -- Vincent -

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd in linux

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 4:53 PM, fatima ech-charif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > when i use this command > rsync [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: > i got this : > rsync : failed to connect to servername : connection refused(111) > rsync error : error in socket IO (code 10) at > /home/lapo/packaging/tmp/rsync-2.6

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd in linux

Hi Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2008, 09:53 + schrieb fatima ech-charif: > rsync : failed to connect to servername : connection refused(111) did you configure the rsyncd on the client side? the error looks like that you have no running server. Renke -- rbrausse ferdinand-kopf-str 7 79117 frei

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd in linux

when i use this command rsync [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: i got this : rsync : failed to connect to servername : connection refused(111) rsync error : error in socket IO (code 10) at /home/lapo/packaging/tmp/rsync-2.6.9/clientserver.c (104) [receiver=2.6.9] thanks 2008/7/31 fatima ech-charif <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd in linux

Hello, >> If rsyncd is configured properly and running, you should be able to >> issue this command to get a list of modules offered by the rsyncd server: >> >> rsync [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: (yes, 2 colons) >> > > This assumes that you have set "list = true" for each of the modules > in the rsync

Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd in linux

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Rob Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > fatima ech-charif wrote: >> >> hi >> how to configure rsyncd in linux ubuntu >> because i have this problem >> full backup started for directory docs (baseline backup #18) >> Got fatal error during xfer (inet connect: Connect

  1   2   3   >