Re: [Bacula-users] bacula and centos (7)

On 04/09/2018 10:37 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > Honestly, this is an endemic problem with Red Hat. ...And yet then they > leap headlong at unproven, misconceived projects like systemd. The problem is sharing the loot. Software that comes with paid support from "not Red Hat" gets a rather low

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup problem with 1 of 2 Raspberry PI using Raspbian (Debian)

> Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti 9.4.2018 kello 19.01: > > > >> Johannsen, Thorsten kirjoitti 5.4.2018 kello >> 16.17: >> >> On 05.04.2018 13:35, Johannsen, Thorsten wrote: >>> On 05.04.2018 00:01, Jari Fredriksson wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jari, >>> >>>

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup problem with 1 of 2 Raspberry PI using Raspbian (Debian)

> Johannsen, Thorsten kirjoitti 5.4.2018 kello > 16.17: > > On 05.04.2018 13:35, Johannsen, Thorsten wrote: >> On 05.04.2018 00:01, Jari Fredriksson wrote: >> >> Hi Jari, >> >> >> [...] > >> Do you have Raspbian installed? Do you use the bacula-fd version from

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup problem with 1 of 2 Raspberry PI using Raspbian (Debian)

> Johannsen, Thorsten kirjoitti 5.4.2018 kello > 14.35: > > On 05.04.2018 00:01, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > Hi Jari, > > > [...] > One of the Raspi's (heRPI01) is being backed up without any problems. The > other one (heRPI02), however, refused to make

Re: [Bacula-users] libbaccats-9.0.6.so dependency problem when installing rpm files

Try using the .spec files that are released with Bacula 9.0.6 rather than the RedHat spec files.  If you are using the community .spec files, let me know and I will make sure that they are the same ones our packager is using (sometimes packagers modify packages but the changes don't always get

Re: [Bacula-users] aix binary?

Sorry, I do not recall.  In general we have fewer problems using g++ than the native compilers.  In principle either compiler should be OK. On 04/05/2018 03:55 PM, Mike Eggleston wrote: Kern,  

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger not changing

Hello, The output from lsscsi looks odd.  From what I see, I am not reassured that both the tape drives are actually part one at a time and see if physically the right tapes are mounted. I also am a bit skeptical about using a 40GB maximum file size on your LTO-4 -- that seems *much* larger

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula and centos (7)

On 04/09/18 11:31, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On 04/02/2018 08:52 PM, dhofmeister wrote: >> what's "out there" for centos is bacula 5.2 and the current bacula version >> is 9.0.x. since the latest rpms are only fedora, is bacula 9 considered >> stable/production ready? > You will need to talk to

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula and centos (7)

Hello, See below ... On 04/02/2018 08:52 PM, dhofmeister wrote: while my question is specifically related to getting *new(-ish)* bacula installed and running on centos 7 -- i think my real question is -- why are there no new-ish rpms for centos? what's "out there" for centos is bacula 5.2

Re: [Bacula-users] scheduled job different that manually initiated job? --WAS: Re: Backup problem with 1 of 2 Raspberry PI using Raspbian (Debian)

Are you setting accurate=yes only in the schedule? If so, you need to also pass accurate=yes in the bconsole run command. Alternatively, add it to the job definition. To debug the client problem, try setdebug level=100 trace=1 client=heRPI02-fd to make it create a bacula.trace file or run the