hello
i am new to this list, and hope it is the correct place to ask such
questions.
i am currently evaluating bacula as a backup-solution with our new
Quantum SuperStore3 (DLT-S4).
i am running debian/etch (kernel-2.6.18) with the latest debian-packages
of bacula found at the sourceforge.net si
hi
Michel Meyers wrote:
>> i haven't tried this yet, because i hope that i will get the answer
>> faster on this list than waiting another 6h before possible failure.
>
> You should really try the Autochanger directive and use Bacula 2.0.2
> (Unfortunately you didn't specify what Bacula version y
IEM - network operating center wrote:
> hi
>
> Michel Meyers wrote:
>>> i haven't tried this yet, because i hope that i will get the answer
>>> faster on this list than waiting another 6h before possible failure.
>> You should really try the Auto
hallo.
i want to use bacula as my backup-solution in our network (debian; and
some windoze)
debian comes with packages for bacula-1.38.
however, i'd rather use a recent version of bacula (bugfixes! and i use
a quantum superloader3 which i suspect to cooperate more with 2.0 than
with 1.38 - i hav
hi again
IEM - network operating center wrote:
>
> - on my woody boxes i would only need the filedaemon; i guess the
> simplest thing would be to create a debian-package for bacula-fd-static
> with no dependencies (rather than trying to compile bacula-2 on woody)
hmm, this seems to
even though my questions have not much feedback, i'll post another round ;-)
i have build debian-packages for bacula-2.0.2, by getting the
source-code of bacula-2.0.2 from sourceforge and applying the
bacula_2.0.0-1.diff that was used for building the 2.0.0-1 packages
(found at sourceforge)
i hav
hi all.
setting up my test system i ran into some problems with the FileSet.
first of all, it took me a while to figure out, that only the "File"
sections are used to calculate the hash of the FileSet.
since i decided (probably because of wron assumptions) that i would do
most of the generic inc
Alfonso Amato - Sintecnos srl wrote:
> Changed permission of /dev/nst0* into 660 and works correctly! I suggest
> to add the "chmod " line into the Brief tutorial while testing not on
> file but on real tape.
>
i rather suggest adding a line like "make sure you do have the correct
permissions t
(by accident, i have originally sent this email from the wrong account;
i want to apologize beforehand, if it gets through 2 times)
hi all.
i added a new host to my bacula backup setup, but unfortunately the
backup fails, because the storage daemon resets the connection, after
some time (that
hi
Michal Medvecký wrote:
> luyigui loholhlki napsal(a):
>> hi
>> i want to split the bacula-dir.conf file to different files (one file
>> by client)
>> is that realizable if yes : how??
>> thanks in advance
>>
>>
> @ stands for include
>
> example:
>
> @/etc/bacula/hosts/test.host
>
i h
IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig) wrote:
> hi all.
>
> i added a new host to my bacula backup setup, but unfortunately the
> backup fails, because the storage daemon resets the connection, after
> some time (that is: after >20min have elapsed and >
hi.
i am currently having trouble to understand why different daemons (fd,
sd, dir) show different statuses.
my "problem": why does a job that runs on all daemons (dir, sd, fd) do
not show up in the "status" listings of these daemons?
i haven't found much in-depth information in the docs, proba
hi
mysteriously the list of terminated jobs have been synched during the
backup cycle last night. so i am happy again :-)
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You're looking at the state of terminated jobs. If the daemon in
> question didn't save its state information before shutdown or restart,
>
(sorry if this comes thru as a dupe; i first sent this mail from an
unsubscribed account)
hi all,
i have a problem with bacula and incremental/differential backups
from an XFS filesystem.
to put it simple: bacula always creates full backups.
the long story:
we deployed bacula to backup our use
On 2012-01-10 14:19, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
>>
>
> First of all, I'm using also xfs on data source and/or backup media.
> There's no special trouble on them to get incremental/differential backup.
thanks for your detailed answer.
i'm glad to hear that no troubles are to be expected in general. so
On 2012-01-11 12:10, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:02:00 +0100, "IEM said:
>>
>> On 2012-01-10 14:19, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
>>>
>>> If the filesystem xfs is not mounted with the noatime option, check to have
>>> noatime option in the bacula job.
>>> so it will not change ea
On 2012-01-11 19:45, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
>
> Did you try a level option of estimate command?
>
> * estimate job="MyJob" level=Incremental
doh!
that indeed works, thanks a lot.
i couldn't find the option with "help" in bconsole/bat
novertheless, it's in the online manual and i seem to h
On 2012-01-12 17:32, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:12:56 +0100, "IEM said:
>>
>
>> # stat /Net/data/Sound/ablinger/Altar/05KStudie2.wav
>> File: `/Net/data/Sound/ablinger/Altar/05KStudie2.wav'
>> Size: 53315180Blocks: 104136 IO Block: 4096 regular file
>> D
hi all
i am currently running bacula-2.1.5 on my backup-server (and 2.1.4 on
the clients), on debian/etch (using the debian-packages from packman)
every now and then (the last one was today; then 1 month before; then 10
days before that,...) i get traceback emails from my backup-server, each
IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig) wrote:
> hi all
>
>
> i am currently running bacula-2.1.5 on my backup-server (and 2.1.4 on
> the clients), on debian/etch (using the debian-packages from packman)
oops, this should read: 2.2.5 (and 2.2.4 resp.)
mfga.sr
IOh
Brian A Seklecki (Mobile) wrote:
>> every now and then (the last one was today; then 1 month before; then 10
>> days before that,...) i get traceback emails from my backup-server, each
>> for all of the 3 daemons (dir, file, storage) running there.
>
> *) Run the SD in foreground mode with debu
IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig) wrote:
> hi all
>
>
> the emails usually are sent when nothing interesting is happening (my
> backups are all finished at night; the emails are sent somewhen during
> the day).
>
> however, receiving tracebacks gi
IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig) wrote:
> IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig) wrote:
>> hi all
>>
>>
>> the emails usually are sent when nothing interesting is happening (my
>> backups are all finished at night; the emails are
hi all.
i'm running bacula 2.4.4 in a debian/etch environment (i know that it is
a bit outdated; but there is even one debian/sarge host that i cannot
really update...)
bacula is doing a nightly backup ("full" every 3 months or so, "diff"
every week, and "incr" every night) onto an autochanger (Q
24 matches
Mail list logo
