Hello List,
did anyone build EL5-compatible rpms of bacula 2.4.4 so far and might
want to share?
I would like to upgrade our 2.4.1 installation on CentOS 5.2, the EL5
rpms provided by fschwarz unsually installed very well but they are only
available for 2.4.2.
Thanks!
Nils
--
Hello List,
we are backing up our MS Exchange-Server by first exporting the
mailboxes to file with Microsoft's "exmerge"-utility and than backing up
those files with bacula. This is actually quite straight forward and can
be set up in minutes. One major problem however is that exmerge cannot
expor
Hello everyone!
Please excuse the crappy topic, I couldn't think of a better one...
Bacula just asked me to load a specific volume or lable a new one. This
is totally ok as none of the available volumes has exceeded the
retention period. In order to give bacula an appendable volume, I
manually pu
Hi!
The EL5 rpms created by fschwarz do indeed install fine on CentOS 5.2.
Unfortunately the are only version 2.4.2.
As to your dying director, I would suggest running it with debugging
enabled (-d 99). The ouput produced by the debug option will help you
narrow down the problem. It might be
Hello list!
As DVD-burning seems to be broken right now I am backing up to
1GB-harddisk volumes which I'll burn to DVD manually.
Is there a way to make bacula label the harddisk-volumes like this
"DVD-Volume-7.12.2008-n where "n" ist the current number of the volume
used for this day's backup?
Exa
0x0 0x0 0x0 0x1 0x0
Nov 8 15:53:15 bacula-Backupserver kernel: st 2:0:5:0: Command not found
Nov 8 15:53:15 bacula-Backupserver kernel: aic7xxx_dev_reset returns 0x2002
Nov 8 15:53:26 bacula-Backupserver kernel: st 2:0:5:0: scsi: Device
offlined - not ready after error recovery
Nov 8 15:53:2
Hi!
Just wanted to let you know that I came across the exact same error
Error writing final EOF to tape. This Volume may not be readable.
a couple of times with 2.4.2 using a Quantum DLT VS1 drive connected to
Adaptec 29160LP. I don't think that the tape is really defective as
bacula states. I c
mments here I cannot guarantee that they all apply to
2.4.x because I'm still using 2.2.x and haven't been tracking
development that closely for well over a year. That said I did have DVD
writing working and many of the errors that you report do look familiar.
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 20:26
Hi John, hi everyone!
I think I am getting closer to get DVD-burning to work. I would really
love to use this feature and I would be glad to help fix it.
I just checked, I had dvd+rw-tools-7.0-0.el5.3.rpm installed. As this is
is <7.04 I uninstalled the rpm and compiled / installed from this
Hello everyone,
I am trying hard to get DVD backups working as well.
I posted about this to the list last week (topic: "ERR=Could not mount
DVD device"), unfortunately with no reply so far. It looks like backing
up to DVD isn't a very common thing around here...
If anyone actually did manage
Hi Jari,
I configured sudo that no password is needed for user "bacula" to run
mount and unmount.
The corresponding line from /etc/sudoers is:
bacula ALL = (ALL) NOPASSWD: /bin/mount, /bin/umount
Nils
Jari Fredriksson schrieb:
Hello list!
I am running bacula 2.4.2 from fschwarz's EL5 rpms
Hello again!
Maybe I should add that the first part indeed gets written to the dvd.
So there IS something on the DVD, it's readable and look quite ok
(bacula header then tar-ish concatenation of files)
Thanks for any help!
Nils
Nils Blanck-Wehde schrieb:
> Hello list!
>
> I am
Hello list!
I am running bacula 2.4.2 from fschwarz's EL5 rpms on CentOS 5.2
I am having a hard time getting bacula to write backups to DVD. I have
narrowed it down to the following:
After burning a part to DVD, bacula mounts the volume to determine the
used space and pass the result to growisofs
Hello everyone,
after a while my bacula-configuration files tend to get a little messed
up. I was wondering whether anyone tried to split especially the
director config-file into seperate files for shedules, filesets, clients
and a general part.
Is there some kind of include-statement (besides the
Hi everyone!
I'm setting up a new bacula installation on CentOS 5.2.
I planned on using the FSchwarz EL5 rpms because the install very well
under CentOS 5.2
Now I am wondering whether it's worth the hassle to compile 2.5.16 from
source.
Unforunately I am not a programmer so the changelog of 2.5.16
Hello Everyone!
This is my first post and I am trying not to ask something stupid. But
nevertheless please be patient :-)
I am working on a backup-concept for smaller (5-15 head) companies. I have
successfully set up a low-power mini-ITX appliance running CentOS 5 and
Bacula 2.2.6
As I still (to
16 matches
Mail list logo