Hi List!
John Drescher schrieb:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:39 AM, John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Marc Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
Further, I want to know, why bacula recycles Vo
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:39 AM, John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Marc Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Further, I want to know, why bacula recycles Volumes (which destroys
>>> data) instead
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:39 AM, John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Marc Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Further, I want to know, why bacula recycles Volumes (which destroys
>>> data) instead
Marc Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Further, I want to know, why bacula recycles Volumes (which destroys
> data) instead of creating new ones and if this is a Bug which should
> be reported.
I believe this is intended behaviour, and it's the behaviour I want.
after all, when I tell Bacula
Noone knows about ?
If so, and I haven't an answer to this until Monday the 13th, I will
create a Bug Report for this, since this seems to be an
undocumented/defected behavior of bacula.
Regards,
Marc
Marc Richter schrieb:
> Hi There!
>
> This is my first mail to this list, so please be patient
Hi There!
This is my first mail to this list, so please be patient, if I'm missing
a point.
We're using Bacula for several months now. As "Backup Drive" we
configured three pools. One pool for Monthly Backups within the months
1,3,5,...11, one pool for Monthly Backups within the months 2,4,6,...1
