Re: [beagleboard] Beaglebone Black Ethernet Phy Not Detected on Boot.

2014-12-01 Thread rathod . pratik12
Hi Alex, What I tried to say that the fix I applied had same logic which was described by "Jay @ Control Module Industries" in this discussion. Since I can not use device tree features of latest kernels, I made the changes which can fit in kernel 3.2 which is supplied by TI Android code. In my

Re: [beagleboard] Beaglebone Black Ethernet Phy Not Detected on Boot.

2014-11-25 Thread rathod . pratik12
I also believe the issue mentioned here : http://e2e.ti.com/support/arm/sitara_arm/f/791/t/366351.aspx is the same as we are facing in bbb. Regards, Pratik On Monday, 24 November 2014 21:12:50 UTC+5:30, alexschn...@gmail.com wrote: > > It appears that the issue is known for a long time: severa

Re: [beagleboard] Beaglebone Black Ethernet Phy Not Detected on Boot.

2014-11-25 Thread rathod . pratik12
Well, may be you can add your mdio command inside u-boot source code's default bootcmd and rebuild the u-boot. In my case, I updated my cpsw platform data (I use 3.2 kernel, so no device tree) inside kernel dynamically to fix this problem. It seems to be working for me. Regards, Pratik On Mon

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Beaglebone Black Ethernet Phy Not Detected on Boot.

2014-11-19 Thread rathod . pratik12
Hello, I am also experiencing the same issue here of etherenet not working on some boot-ups. I am using A6C board. My other problem is it is my requirement to use Android on beaglebone black only from internal storage i.e. eMMC. To support all necessary functionality of Android 4.2.2, I have to