[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Re: 6.5b1 7195 compile error

* Christopher Key shaped the electrons to say... It seems that Symbol::delete_package doesn't like package names beginning ::. The attached patch should deal with this problem, and improve the behaviour of slimserver.pl by only reporting packages that were actually removed from the symbol table

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Bug? Deletion of playlists on rescan

Just wondering if this was fixed in 6.5b1 as of - or some time after - the 4/16 nightly? It seems like with that Build I'm having the problem (a Rescan/New & Changed removes playlists). Will a more recent Build correct it? I noticed that after creating a playlist in the web interface, I can see

RE: [SlimDevices: Beta] Re: 6.5b1 7195 compile error

It seems that Symbol::delete_package doesn't like package names beginning ::. The attached patch should deal with this problem, and improve the behaviour of slimserver.pl by only reporting packages that were actually removed from the symbol table. delete_package.patch Description: Binary data __

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: 6.5b1 7195 compile error

Got @INC containing: /usr/local/slimserver /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl . Extended @INC to contain: /usr/local/slimserver/CPAN/arch/5.8.7/i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi /

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: 6.5b1 7195 compile error

* 0xdeadbeef shaped the electrons to say... Can't use an undefined value as a symbol reference at /usr/share/perl/5.8/Symbol.pm line 75. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/slimserver/slimserver.pl line 263. Can you run with --d_startup ? -D -- There is no emergency. Nothing to se

[SlimDevices: Beta] 6.5b1 7195 compile error

Can't use an undefined value as a symbol reference at /usr/share/perl/5.8/Symbol.pm line 75. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/slimserver/slimserver.pl line 263. -- 0xdeadbeef 0xdeadbeef's Profile: http://for

[SlimDevices: Beta] Compilation albums and common album titles in 6.5

Has Dan's patch to remove common album titles been merged into 6.5? I just did a complete rescan with the latest 6.5. It looks like the disc number is not working with compilation albums. I get an album name entry listed under various artists for each disc in the set. I have raised bug #3338.

[SlimDevices: Beta] Can't locate loadable object for module Digest::SHA1

I get this message when starting nightly 6.5 from 28/4, I'm running it on ubuntu linux. Code: Can't locate loadable object for module Digest::SHA1 in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/SlimServer_v2006-04-28/CPAN/arch/5.8.7/i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi /usr/local/SlimSer

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Preferences for new Shoutcast Plugin

On Apr 28, 2006, at 12:00 PM, Michael Herger wrote: Thanks for asking. :) Uff! I feared this might be a RTFWP - I found plenty of information googling around. But will this work without the support on the content's provider side? So a content provider could provide a list of stations o

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Preferences for new Shoutcast Plugin

Thanks for asking. :) Uff! I feared this might be a RTFWP - I found plenty of information googling around. But will this work without the support on the content's provider side? So a content provider could provide a list of stations or RSS feeds to browse and also let you search it via

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Preferences for new Shoutcast Plugin

Thanks for asking. :) It's a spec for describing search queries in a structured way as part of XML. See: And more specifically: Here's a simple example that might appear in an RSS or OPML feed that you may be br

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Preferences for new Shoutcast Plugin

andyg Wrote: > On Apr 28, 2006, at 10:50 AM, mlmurray wrote: > > > > Is this just due to the "newness" of this plugin (developers just > > wanted to get it working and haven't gotten to the prefs yet)? The > > only reason I ask is that I haven't seen it discussed here yet and > > just > > wa

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Preferences for new Shoutcast Plugin

Also, one capability that Andy's added is OpenSearch support, What is "OpenSearch"? -- Michael --- Help translate SlimServer by using the SlimString Translation Helper (http://www.herger.net/slim/) __

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Preferences for new Shoutcast Plugin

On Apr 28, 2006, at 7:59 AM, Andy Grundman wrote: Sort of, yes, we wanted to get a new working plugin out ASAP (before we knew they'd turn the old interface back on). So most features are not there. Another issue is that the plugin is now based on the generic XMLBrowser which does not hav

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Preferences for new Shoutcast Plugin

On Apr 28, 2006, at 10:50 AM, mlmurray wrote: I understand that the Shoutcast plugin had to be rewritten for 6.5b1 due to changes with Shoutcast. The new one seems to be working fine for me in that it connects to shoutcast and gets all the streams whereas before I was just getting errors

[SlimDevices: Beta] Preferences for new Shoutcast Plugin

I understand that the Shoutcast plugin had to be rewritten for 6.5b1 due to changes with Shoutcast. The new one seems to be working fine for me in that it connects to shoutcast and gets all the streams whereas before I was just getting errors or just a few streams. The question (not a complaint)

RE: [SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Wrong timer format and Fishbone issues

Robin Bowes wrote: > kdf wrote: >> Quoting 0xdeadbeef >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >>> >>> cjk32 Wrote: slimserver.pl certainly does attempt to set up @INC to contain the 5.8.x paths followed by 5.8. From the looks of it, it seems to use ONLY 5.8.x. Else if would find

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Wrong timer format and Fishbone issues

kdf wrote: > Quoting 0xdeadbeef > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> >> cjk32 Wrote: >>> slimserver.pl certainly does attempt to set up @INC to contain the 5.8.x >>> paths followed by 5.8. >>> >>> From the looks of it, it seems to use ONLY 5.8.x. Else if would find >> the "missing" directories, wouldn't

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Announcement: SlimServer 6.2.2

bruce Wrote: > If anyone out there is familiar with the LazySearch plugin, do you think > I am better off with: > > SlimServer 6.2.2 + LazySearch 1.0 > or > SlimServer 6.5 beta + LazySearch 2.0 I ought to be familiar with it (having written it!). As you know, if you're using the new 6.2.2 offic