http://svn.slimdevices.com/repos/slim/7.7/branches/dlna/server/
I put this in a branch because I don't want to have half-implemented
DLNA things which will probably break things worse. Hopefully I can get
it to a good state during next week.
--
andyg
---
@AndyG
Great - thanks for letting me know.
Silly question time - i looked for the DLNA Branch and couldn't find
it.
Where is it?
Ta
mccstumble
--
stumble
Music Management: Mediamonkey Ver 4.0.01426 Gold Lifetime
Music Server: LMS: 7.7.0-33282 (DLNA still not fully implemented at
01/09/11)
Schedule update: We are currently planning 1 more week of development
with RC1 on the 9th or 12th. This will be followed by 2-3 weeks of
testing.
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32
On Sep 3, 2011, at 1:14 PM, stumble wrote:
>
> @AndyG
>
> Hope the tests are going well.
>
> Any chance of an update on progress?
You can check out the dlna branch, it's going well.
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.sli
@AndyG
Hope the tests are going well.
Any chance of an update on progress?
Thanks
Mccstumble
--
stumble
Music Management: Mediamonkey Ver 4.0.01426 Gold Lifetime
Music Server: LMS: 7.7.0-33282 (DLNA still not fully implemented at
01/09/11)
AddOns: MonkeySqueeze Ver 1.0.110721
http://www.
I am using the "search for ..artist/Album/Song" menu items from the SB3
(I set this up via the menu option in the web gui for the player - same
as you do for other menu options. Don't think it is associated with a
plug-in as I have used this almost from day one. and I dont have a
special search pl
nicolas75;655141 Wrote:
> What do you think about the possibility to disable any kind of scan in
> TinySBS and allow a "browse folders only" mode for TinySBS and the
> Touch ?
>
> When TinySBS scans the usb device, listing the files is sub-second.
> This is the scanning process which is too long
erland;655089 Wrote:
>
> Unfortunately (for users that want the same thing as you) I'm not
> interested in controlling my Squeezebox from a computer and I'm
> definitely not interested in controlling it from a Windows based
> computer.
What do you think about the possibility to disable any kind
bits;655097 Wrote:
>
> You guys are demanding a full PC at the price, power usage and size of
> the Squeezebox. I am telling you that is impossible and no such device
> can exist with current technology..
>
It's not 2005 anymore, start look at the CPU and memory available in
the new Android/iOS
I remember this issue when the first network video players came out. I
screamed they shouldnt need separate software. My video library was
tiny compared to my music library and simple folder browsing was more
than enough. I think I have just become accustomed to Squeezebox
requiring software as it
10 matches
Mail list logo
